Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You people (men obviously) defending Kavanaugh are gross.

Are you admin? No. I'm a woman asking questions here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kelly Ayotte to be the new nominee. He wants to go off list after this debacle with the Fed Society and she impressed him greatly when she was Gorsuch's sherpa, despite opposing him in 2016.

She's 50, opposes abortion in most cases, a woman, and a former senator who Collins and Murkowski will go for in a second.

I hear she sexually assaulted a bunch of men 25 years ago. Next!

I really dont understand how you square this position with Gorsuch, an appointment people were straight up enraged by

They are accusing a man of participating in gang rape multiple times and saying "it doesn't have to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt" That is so reprehensible, it's almost incomprehensible to imagine it not enraging every man, every mother of a male child in America.

It absolutely enrages this Democratic woman and I’m done with the party. Expect no loyalty from me. I’ll vote for the most moderate candidate from either party. Romney over Sanders, for example, for sure.

Pretty sure most of American would vote Romney over Sanders. Thankfully, I don't think that's going to be an option.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is Julie Swetnick actually alleging?

That Brett was part of a gang rape ring when he was in high school. She doesn't say for sure that he raped anyone, or her, but that she saw him standing in line for his turn. The members of this rape ring made punch that people knew had been spiked with drugs and/or grain alcohol. She says she attended 10 of these parties while she was a college student. I think the one where she was finally raped was her last, but I'm not sure of that.

WTF?!?!? As an adult, she witnessed multiple rapes of children and said nothing to anyone????? What????

Please say that again!

Yes. She and every other non-lineup partyogoer.

What would she have said? To whom?

Seriously? She was an adult bizarrely admittedly deciding to repeatedly attend gang rape parties. What?

She's practically an accomplice, by her description. A 19-20 year old woman sees 15/16/17 year old girls drinking drugged punch and doesn't bother to say, "Girls, you see those men, waiting in line with their pants unzipped over there? They're not waiting for the bathroom. If I were you, I'd be careful."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how FBI heard nothing of BK being part of a prolific child rape ring throughout HS and college.

Yup. And he was subjected to six different FBI investigations.

Exactly.

Actually I'm thinking now that the FBI heard he was on occasion a mean out of control drunk from several sources and maybe the Trump administration has known this all along but thought they could hide it. Just speculation on my part, though. But it seems to be such a pattern with him that it seems logical that the FBI must have heard this and passed it on.

Yep THIS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hearing is going to be cancelled/postponed tonight, and he’ll be withdrawn. It’s over.

I hear the next applicant tried to rape a woman in Alexandria!

I know you’re attempting a bit on what you see as men being punished for being men, but given Donald’s track record, it’s entirely probably he’ll nominate another sex offender. Like with like, right?

"Another sex offender?" You've already determined that Kavanaugh is a sex offender?

The behavior on display by liberals this past week turns my stomach.

Great. The behavior on display by conservatives this week has turned my stomach, too.

At least be honest. A woman could have a rape kit with Brett’s DNA, injuries and video of the assault from last week and you’d still not believe her. Yes, false allegations happen. But not three (or four or five - I haven’t read the new ones yet so I don’t know if they’ve actually been reported or are internet rumor) for one guy from different times and places and severity. You’ve just been a sack of rape excusing, victim blaming monsters. And this while Brett has been lying.

So interesting that these allegations are JUST NOW coming out. Very, very interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is Julie Swetnick actually alleging?

That Brett was part of a gang rape ring when he was in high school. She doesn't say for sure that he raped anyone, or her, but that she saw him standing in line for his turn. The members of this rape ring made punch that people knew had been spiked with drugs and/or grain alcohol. She says she attended 10 of these parties while she was a college student. I think the one where she was finally raped was her last, but I'm not sure of that.

So, she is what, 3 years older than he? In college. She is returning from college, as a legal adult, and attending parties where she is witnessing gang rapes of minors.... children, legally. And, instead of doing something about it, like reporting it, she returns to these parties where crimes are being committed 9 more times. And, has decided it is now time to report it.
But, instead of going to the police, she goes to the press through an attorney.

Sure. Makes sense to me. /s

Said the loser that's never been to a party that didn't involve a goodie bag at the end.

Give me a break. Lesson for the losers in the room: You don't "report" what happens at a kegger (or in this case, a grain alcohol and quaaluder). You will be destroyed and they will be named to the homecoming court.

Who cares? Were you all such pathetic followers in high school? I’d report and not care who was prom king.

You would have had to have even known about the party, and I'm pretty sure you didn't, narc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Richard Goldstein, former Hillary advisor on TV with Tucker: "You don't have to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt because it's not a criminal proceeding"

Wow, that's pretty damn telling. That's a flat-out admission that the intention is to simply bring Kavanaugh down with unfounded accusations.

Not it isn't. It is admitting that this is not a criminal proceeding and "beyond reasonable doubt" doesn't apply.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is Julie Swetnick actually alleging?

That Brett was part of a gang rape ring when he was in high school. She doesn't say for sure that he raped anyone, or her, but that she saw him standing in line for his turn. The members of this rape ring made punch that people knew had been spiked with drugs and/or grain alcohol. She says she attended 10 of these parties while she was a college student. I think the one where she was finally raped was her last, but I'm not sure of that.

So, she is what, 3 years older than he? In college. She is returning from college, as a legal adult, and attending parties where she is witnessing gang rapes of minors.... children, legally. And, instead of doing something about it, like reporting it, she returns to these parties where crimes are being committed 9 more times. And, has decided it is now time to report it.
But, instead of going to the police, she goes to the press through an attorney.

Sure. Makes sense to me. /s

Said the loser that's never been to a party that didn't involve a goodie bag at the end.

Give me a break. Lesson for the losers in the room: You don't "report" what happens at a kegger (or in this case, a grain alcohol and quaaluder). You will be destroyed and they will be named to the homecoming court.

Oh, please. It is beyond credulity to think that not one person at any of these 10 parties did not report or tell anyone about the crap that was going on. This wasn’t a Kegger - this was gang rape of minors. And, this woman making the accusations was an f’ing adult.
I cannot believe people are actually falling for this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is Julie Swetnick actually alleging?

That Brett was part of a gang rape ring when he was in high school. She doesn't say for sure that he raped anyone, or her, but that she saw him standing in line for his turn. The members of this rape ring made punch that people knew had been spiked with drugs and/or grain alcohol. She says she attended 10 of these parties while she was a college student. I think the one where she was finally raped was her last, but I'm not sure of that.

WTF?!?!? As an adult, she witnessed multiple rapes of children and said nothing to anyone????? What????

Please say that again!

Yes. She and every other non-lineup partyogoer.

What would she have said? To whom?

Seriously? She was an adult bizarrely admittedly deciding to repeatedly attend gang rape parties. What?

She's practically an accomplice, by her description. A 19-20 year old woman sees 15/16/17 year old girls drinking drugged punch and doesn't bother to say, "Girls, you see those men, waiting in line with their pants unzipped over there? They're not waiting for the bathroom. If I were you, I'd be careful."

Why am I confident YOUR "19-20 year old woman" child is not capable of paying her own cell phone bill without your assistance?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

She's accusing him of being a willing participant or at least enthusiastic observer of a pattern of behavior that demeaned, disrespected and endangered women. Something that may not be criminal but should be disqualifying for. SJC

One could argue that a man could grow out of such youthful behavior and become a good, upstanding member of society. But not if he is lying about what he did back then. That is what is telling here. We don't know for sure what happened when he was young but we know for sure that he lied about the kind of person he was in that Fox interview. He is not trustworthy.

He is unfit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kelly Ayotte to be the new nominee. He wants to go off list after this debacle with the Fed Society and she impressed him greatly when she was Gorsuch's sherpa, despite opposing him in 2016.

She's 50, opposes abortion in most cases, a woman, and a former senator who Collins and Murkowski will go for in a second.

I hear she sexually assaulted a bunch of men 25 years ago. Next!

I really dont understand how you square this position with Gorsuch, an appointment people were straight up enraged by

They are accusing a man of participating in gang rape multiple times and saying "it doesn't have to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt" That is so reprehensible, it's almost incomprehensible to imagine it not enraging every man, every mother of a male child in America.

It absolutely enrages this Democratic woman and I’m done with the party. Expect no loyalty from me. I’ll vote for the most moderate candidate from either party. Romney over Sanders, for example, for sure.

I'm the PP. Glad to hear it. Thank you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Richard Goldstein, former Hillary advisor on TV with Tucker: "You don't have to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt because it's not a criminal proceeding"

Wow, that's pretty damn telling. That's a flat-out admission that the intention is to simply bring Kavanaugh down with unfounded accusations.

Not it isn't. It is admitting that this is not a criminal proceeding and "beyond reasonable doubt" doesn't apply.

How about just meeting minimal standards like corroborating evidence that's not hearsay?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She's accusing him of being a willing participant or at least enthusiastic observer of a pattern of behavior that demeaned, disrespected and endangered women. Something that may not be criminal but should be disqualifying for. SJC

One could argue that a man could grow out of such youthful behavior and become a good, upstanding member of society. But not if he is lying about what he did back then. That is what is telling here. We don't know for sure what happened when he was young but we know for sure that he lied about the kind of person he was in that Fox interview. He is not trustworthy.

He is unfit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Richard Goldstein, former Hillary advisor on TV with Tucker: "You don't have to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt because it's not a criminal proceeding"

Wow, that's pretty damn telling. That's a flat-out admission that the intention is to simply bring Kavanaugh down with unfounded accusations.

Not it isn't. It is admitting that this is not a criminal proceeding and "beyond reasonable doubt" doesn't apply.

The Dems are already going in with their minds made up. Not one of them on the committee would vote for him anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now we know why there's a 4th accuser:

https://100percentfedup.com/breaking-kavanaugh-accuser-made-previous-sexual-harassment-claim-represented-by-debra-katzs-law-firm/

Good lawyering.