Not that PP. James Boulware immediately springs to mind. Does he count? |
|
I started a flag thread here:
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/479602.page Hook for the Political Forum, Clarence Thomas joined the SC liberals in a case involving the Confederate flag. |
You are making your point very well. You are obtuse by choice. |
I think conflating mass murders and serial killers is a category error. Dahmer was obviously loopy; people who kill abortion providers are rational given their premises. I think this gets at the crazy vs. evil distinction, which in real life is, of course, to some extent muddled in all cases. |
| There's a photo of the suspect in an orange jumpsuit that was apparently taken in April at a detention center. Does anyone know why he was there? Did he commit other crimes in the past? I'm not seeing anything about whether he has a criminal record. |
This is interesting to me. If his father didn't know, then I have no issue with him giving his adult son a firearm. However this kid seems to be kind of a peculiar loner (so far) so I would hope his father would notice something was off about his son. I do think this is a hate crime (and horrible inexcusable tragedy) but not terrorism. If the dots can be connected between Dylann's motives and what knowledge his father had about his son, then yes I agree his father should be charged with accessory. |
I completely get that, but I, as an individual, am not and would not use "thug" or "animal" to describe a black perpetrator if he shot up a church full of white people. I would say that person is mentally ill. So when I say that the perpetrator is mentally ill, regardless of his race, I am not "excusing" anything and I certainly don't believe I am a hypocrite. I believe race relations in this country are terrible. I believe black lives matter. I believe the way we recognize and treat mental illness in this country needs to be examined. I believe this man should in no way have had access to a firearm. I believe this was an evil act, I believe the perp was a racist terrorist, AND I believe he was mentally ill. Why can't we as individuals have a conversation about all those factors, which all are clearly at play, without someone calling me a hypocrite because some other white people that I don't agree with would have called him a thug if the races were switched in this scenario? |
Apparently arrested for trespassing in that instance. I also understand he had a couple of drug-related arrests. |
I agree with this. I have a very hard time handing mental illness as an excuse to mass murders. Do you need to have some crazy in you to do that, sure. Should that be an excuse for your crime, in my opinion, no. Serial Killers, different story. Should be locked up forever, but no doubt that they have a compulsion and they cannot be anything but a predator. |
I heard he was questioned in response to a retail business complaint that he was asking a bunch of crazy questions - closing time, closing procedures, and other stuff. He said his parents were saying he had to get a job, but he was found with drugs. |
| Well in any case I'm eagerly awaiting my other $5 cause I KNOW this dude ain't gonna be called out as a thug or a criminal (despite being recently arrested on drug charges) and there's a 99.999999% probability that the meat of the discussion around this dude will be his psyche - not his race. |
Damn you Jeff, lol. |
It’s in the mail.
We get it - you have an overwhelming need to say “I told you so.” |
This is just political posturing. "Thug" is a term generally associated with street crime and/or gangsters, and this incident was far worse than that. Osama bin Laden was not a "thug" either. Nor were the (black) beltway snipers, and I seem to recall a lot of discussion about their "psyche's" as well. |