
Loon, I didn't say anything except, wow it's annoying there are 10 year olds in my kid's third grade class, get a grip people. Your kid doesn't need to be a star in elemetary school, just send them in a reasonable amount of time. One year redshirt, fine, Two, sorry not reasonable. It's bananas and sorry you don't agree. |
Learners permit in 7th grade and License in 8th! Will be great for car pool. |
Loon? The people crying about birthdays in a 3rd grade classroom are unhinged. Go pick on someone your own size, baddie. |
You're taking this really personally. No one is crying. I said it's out of control. And those kids are not thriving, they don't fit in and are social outcasts. |
Your kid doesn’t need to go to a private elementary school. Just send them to the public school and stop annoying me by making different parenting choices than I do. |
But yours, apparently, does? |
If only there was a solution! |
Social outcasts? You get more disgusting with every post. Keep going. |
Since most public schools do an age cut off around September 1st, the number of kids attending K at age 4 is very small (and even people who complain about excessive redshirting don't complain about redshirting a kid who would be 4 during the "normal" cut off). In NY (which is the only place with a midyear cut off that results in a lot of 4 year olds being eligible for K) it's common for people to redshirt those kids and no one complains about it. The only redshirting people complain about is when people start redshirting kids who would be well over 5 when starting K but they hold them back anyway. Yes, in some privates that's common place, but the school generally encourages it and everyone has a chance to do it -- they like having an older class of K students and often they will strongly encourage redshirting summer or late spring birthdays. Some schools even offer a transitional year for young K students before taking the regular K class, so you still wind up with a fairly age-homogenous class. But in public that's not the case, and when some parents start deciding their April or May birthday kid needs another year, it can leave other parents stuck with the consequences of those actions without warning. No one is going to get mad that a parent redshirted so their kid could start K at 5, but when you see kids starting K at 6 and a half, it becomes an issue. Please yell at me now and tell me I'm a "crazy anti-redshirter" for agreeing this specific issue is a problem. |
No, they don't and aren't which I why I just sent them on time. |
Sorry that offends you on an anonymous message board. They are kids that do not get included in things with their peers. I think something it goes the other way too and parents do not like to hear that because it doesn't confirm what they are hoping the outcome is, that their child is a leader in the grade and has some social advantages. |
So you mentioned that only kids with major developmental issues get redshirted. And also these kids are outcasts. Hmmm. Sounds like such a great inclusive environment. |
Hahaha yes all these private schools with many years of admissions experience are having kids redshirt and yet not do well, because that definitely makes a lot of sense. God I love the DCUM anti-redshirters. OP is a live one for sure. |
Tell us more! Please please please. |
You do you and send your 7 year old to kinder if you see nothing wrong with it. I will do me and roll my eyes and call it annoying. Why stop at 7? Wait until 9. There's nothing wrong with it. |