CNN’s inaugural Road to 270 shows Trump in a position to win the White House

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Liberals think the only 2 things that exist regarding states rights are abortion and slavery. It’s tiresome.

States rights does not justify denial of basic rights.

Abortion is not a human right. It has no basis in natural law, or international treaty law.

“abortion” does not appear in any of the U.N. human rights treaties, not even in the ones that the United States has not ratified.

The U.N.’s human rights experts lack the authority to create new rights.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)—one of the few human rights treaties that the United States has signed and ratified—impedes their efforts. It states: “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.”
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 6, paragraph 1.

The treaty prohibits the death penalty in the case of a pregnant woman, presumably to spare the innocent life of the unborn child.

If you think you have the ability to tell any women like myself or my daughters what reproductive decisions they will make, prepare to be sorely disappointed. This will not be tolerated by most women and the people that care about them, regardless of their home state. This is not your business, never has been and never will be. If you are struggling to understand this, wait until election day and it will become clear to you.

It’s very sad that women kill their own babies. Your daughters are killing their own daughters via abortion. Those are your granddaughters being aborted. Why wouldn’t women rather use birth control? Prevent the pregnancy. Many forms of birth control prevent pregnancy at a rate of 99.9-100%. When a child is aborted because it’s inconvenient, it’s not a reproductive decision. The choice to reproduce has already been made, and the woman is not taking the consequence; the unborn child is. The child loses life. The child didn’t ask to be conceived and had no role in the conception. Your daughter, son, granddaughter, or grandson is killed and you don’t have an ounce of care for their life. They are disposable. Human life should not be disposable. I have no doubt millions and millions of women will come out in force to vote for their “right” to kill their own child because it is more convenient for them to do so than to prevent pregnancy.

People care about pregnant women and their unborn baby. It’s not just the woman that deserves care and compassion, but her unborn baby. Both the mother and child are valuable and deserve to be protected and respected.

No one seems to connect the dots that they are killing their son or daughter when they have an abortion. It’s really very sad. Abortion is the leading cause of death in the world.

In 2023, abortion was the leading cause of death, worldwide.

Like many women, I have had a miscarriage. While it was an incredibly sad experience, it was not a death. And if a miscarriage doesn't count as a death then an abortion doesn't either.

Pregnancy loss is defined differently around the world, but in general a baby who dies before 28 weeks of pregnancy is referred to as a miscarriage, and babies who die at or after 28 weeks are stillbirths.

Are you denying your son or daughter was alive in your uterus, and then died?

I am sorry for your loss. It’s extremely traumatic to lose a child.

Every woman’s life and every child’s life is valuable.

And every decision a woman makes about her own uterus is non of your concern.

It is not just a uterus. A baby is growing.

You spelled clump of cells wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Liberals think the only 2 things that exist regarding states rights are abortion and slavery. It’s tiresome.

States rights does not justify denial of basic rights.

Abortion is not a human right. It has no basis in natural law, or international treaty law.

“abortion” does not appear in any of the U.N. human rights treaties, not even in the ones that the United States has not ratified.

The U.N.’s human rights experts lack the authority to create new rights.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)—one of the few human rights treaties that the United States has signed and ratified—impedes their efforts. It states: “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.”
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 6, paragraph 1.

The treaty prohibits the death penalty in the case of a pregnant woman, presumably to spare the innocent life of the unborn child.

If you think you have the ability to tell any women like myself or my daughters what reproductive decisions they will make, prepare to be sorely disappointed. This will not be tolerated by most women and the people that care about them, regardless of their home state. This is not your business, never has been and never will be. If you are struggling to understand this, wait until election day and it will become clear to you.

It’s very sad that women kill their own babies. Your daughters are killing their own daughters via abortion. Those are your granddaughters being aborted. Why wouldn’t women rather use birth control? Prevent the pregnancy. Many forms of birth control prevent pregnancy at a rate of 99.9-100%. When a child is aborted because it’s inconvenient, it’s not a reproductive decision. The choice to reproduce has already been made, and the woman is not taking the consequence; the unborn child is. The child loses life. The child didn’t ask to be conceived and had no role in the conception. Your daughter, son, granddaughter, or grandson is killed and you don’t have an ounce of care for their life. They are disposable. Human life should not be disposable. I have no doubt millions and millions of women will come out in force to vote for their “right” to kill their own child because it is more convenient for them to do so than to prevent pregnancy.

People care about pregnant women and their unborn baby. It’s not just the woman that deserves care and compassion, but her unborn baby. Both the mother and child are valuable and deserve to be protected and respected.

No one seems to connect the dots that they are killing their son or daughter when they have an abortion. It’s really very sad. Abortion is the leading cause of death in the world.

In 2023, abortion was the leading cause of death, worldwide.

Like many women, I have had a miscarriage. While it was an incredibly sad experience, it was not a death. And if a miscarriage doesn't count as a death then an abortion doesn't either.

Pregnancy loss is defined differently around the world, but in general a baby who dies before 28 weeks of pregnancy is referred to as a miscarriage, and babies who die at or after 28 weeks are stillbirths.

Are you denying your son or daughter was alive in your uterus, and then died?

I am sorry for your loss. It’s extremely traumatic to lose a child.

Every woman’s life and every child’s life is valuable.

And every decision a woman makes about her own uterus is non of your concern.

It is not just a uterus. A baby is growing.

You spelled clump of cells wrong.

Please. You’re a clump of cells, then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Liberals think the only 2 things that exist regarding states rights are abortion and slavery. It’s tiresome.

States rights does not justify denial of basic rights.

Abortion is not a human right. It has no basis in natural law, or international treaty law.

“abortion” does not appear in any of the U.N. human rights treaties, not even in the ones that the United States has not ratified.

The U.N.’s human rights experts lack the authority to create new rights.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)—one of the few human rights treaties that the United States has signed and ratified—impedes their efforts. It states: “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.”
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 6, paragraph 1.

The treaty prohibits the death penalty in the case of a pregnant woman, presumably to spare the innocent life of the unborn child.

If you think you have the ability to tell any women like myself or my daughters what reproductive decisions they will make, prepare to be sorely disappointed. This will not be tolerated by most women and the people that care about them, regardless of their home state. This is not your business, never has been and never will be. If you are struggling to understand this, wait until election day and it will become clear to you.

It’s very sad that women kill their own babies. Your daughters are killing their own daughters via abortion. Those are your granddaughters being aborted. Why wouldn’t women rather use birth control? Prevent the pregnancy. Many forms of birth control prevent pregnancy at a rate of 99.9-100%. When a child is aborted because it’s inconvenient, it’s not a reproductive decision. The choice to reproduce has already been made, and the woman is not taking the consequence; the unborn child is. The child loses life. The child didn’t ask to be conceived and had no role in the conception. Your daughter, son, granddaughter, or grandson is killed and you don’t have an ounce of care for their life. They are disposable. Human life should not be disposable. I have no doubt millions and millions of women will come out in force to vote for their “right” to kill their own child because it is more convenient for them to do so than to prevent pregnancy.

People care about pregnant women and their unborn baby. It’s not just the woman that deserves care and compassion, but her unborn baby. Both the mother and child are valuable and deserve to be protected and respected.

No one seems to connect the dots that they are killing their son or daughter when they have an abortion. It’s really very sad. Abortion is the leading cause of death in the world.

In 2023, abortion was the leading cause of death, worldwide.

Like many women, I have had a miscarriage. While it was an incredibly sad experience, it was not a death. And if a miscarriage doesn't count as a death then an abortion doesn't either.

Pregnancy loss is defined differently around the world, but in general a baby who dies before 28 weeks of pregnancy is referred to as a miscarriage, and babies who die at or after 28 weeks are stillbirths.

Are you denying your son or daughter was alive in your uterus, and then died?

I am sorry for your loss. It’s extremely traumatic to lose a child.

Every woman’s life and every child’s life is valuable.

And every decision a woman makes about her own uterus is non of your concern.

It is not just a uterus. A baby is growing.

You spelled clump of cells wrong.

Please. You’re a clump of cells, then.

So an embryo has the same exact rights as a full grown woman?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Liberals think the only 2 things that exist regarding states rights are abortion and slavery. It’s tiresome.

States rights does not justify denial of basic rights.

Abortion is not a human right. It has no basis in natural law, or international treaty law.

“abortion” does not appear in any of the U.N. human rights treaties, not even in the ones that the United States has not ratified.

The U.N.’s human rights experts lack the authority to create new rights.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)—one of the few human rights treaties that the United States has signed and ratified—impedes their efforts. It states: “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.”
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 6, paragraph 1.

The treaty prohibits the death penalty in the case of a pregnant woman, presumably to spare the innocent life of the unborn child.

If you think you have the ability to tell any women like myself or my daughters what reproductive decisions they will make, prepare to be sorely disappointed. This will not be tolerated by most women and the people that care about them, regardless of their home state. This is not your business, never has been and never will be. If you are struggling to understand this, wait until election day and it will become clear to you.

It’s very sad that women kill their own babies. Your daughters are killing their own daughters via abortion. Those are your granddaughters being aborted. Why wouldn’t women rather use birth control? Prevent the pregnancy. Many forms of birth control prevent pregnancy at a rate of 99.9-100%. When a child is aborted because it’s inconvenient, it’s not a reproductive decision. The choice to reproduce has already been made, and the woman is not taking the consequence; the unborn child is. The child loses life. The child didn’t ask to be conceived and had no role in the conception. Your daughter, son, granddaughter, or grandson is killed and you don’t have an ounce of care for their life. They are disposable. Human life should not be disposable. I have no doubt millions and millions of women will come out in force to vote for their “right” to kill their own child because it is more convenient for them to do so than to prevent pregnancy.

People care about pregnant women and their unborn baby. It’s not just the woman that deserves care and compassion, but her unborn baby. Both the mother and child are valuable and deserve to be protected and respected.

No one seems to connect the dots that they are killing their son or daughter when they have an abortion. It’s really very sad. Abortion is the leading cause of death in the world.

In 2023, abortion was the leading cause of death, worldwide.

Like many women, I have had a miscarriage. While it was an incredibly sad experience, it was not a death. And if a miscarriage doesn't count as a death then an abortion doesn't either.

Pregnancy loss is defined differently around the world, but in general a baby who dies before 28 weeks of pregnancy is referred to as a miscarriage, and babies who die at or after 28 weeks are stillbirths.

Are you denying your son or daughter was alive in your uterus, and then died?

I am sorry for your loss. It’s extremely traumatic to lose a child.

Every woman’s life and every child’s life is valuable.

And every decision a woman makes about her own uterus is non of your concern.

It is not just a uterus. A baby is growing.

You spelled clump of cells wrong.

You are welcome to call your growing baby a clump of cells. My husband and I were so happy each of the two times I was pregnant . Dudring each doctor visit of my pregnancy, the obstetrician referred to our baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Liberals think the only 2 things that exist regarding states rights are abortion and slavery. It’s tiresome.

States rights does not justify denial of basic rights.

Abortion is not a human right. It has no basis in natural law, or international treaty law.

“abortion” does not appear in any of the U.N. human rights treaties, not even in the ones that the United States has not ratified.

The U.N.’s human rights experts lack the authority to create new rights.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)—one of the few human rights treaties that the United States has signed and ratified—impedes their efforts. It states: “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.”
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 6, paragraph 1.

The treaty prohibits the death penalty in the case of a pregnant woman, presumably to spare the innocent life of the unborn child.

If you think you have the ability to tell any women like myself or my daughters what reproductive decisions they will make, prepare to be sorely disappointed. This will not be tolerated by most women and the people that care about them, regardless of their home state. This is not your business, never has been and never will be. If you are struggling to understand this, wait until election day and it will become clear to you.

It’s very sad that women kill their own babies. Your daughters are killing their own daughters via abortion. Those are your granddaughters being aborted. Why wouldn’t women rather use birth control? Prevent the pregnancy. Many forms of birth control prevent pregnancy at a rate of 99.9-100%. When a child is aborted because it’s inconvenient, it’s not a reproductive decision. The choice to reproduce has already been made, and the woman is not taking the consequence; the unborn child is. The child loses life. The child didn’t ask to be conceived and had no role in the conception. Your daughter, son, granddaughter, or grandson is killed and you don’t have an ounce of care for their life. They are disposable. Human life should not be disposable. I have no doubt millions and millions of women will come out in force to vote for their “right” to kill their own child because it is more convenient for them to do so than to prevent pregnancy.

People care about pregnant women and their unborn baby. It’s not just the woman that deserves care and compassion, but her unborn baby. Both the mother and child are valuable and deserve to be protected and respected.

No one seems to connect the dots that they are killing their son or daughter when they have an abortion. It’s really very sad. Abortion is the leading cause of death in the world.

In 2023, abortion was the leading cause of death, worldwide.

Like many women, I have had a miscarriage. While it was an incredibly sad experience, it was not a death. And if a miscarriage doesn't count as a death then an abortion doesn't either.

Pregnancy loss is defined differently around the world, but in general a baby who dies before 28 weeks of pregnancy is referred to as a miscarriage, and babies who die at or after 28 weeks are stillbirths.

Are you denying your son or daughter was alive in your uterus, and then died?

I am sorry for your loss. It’s extremely traumatic to lose a child.

Every woman’s life and every child’s life is valuable.

And every decision a woman makes about her own uterus is non of your concern.

It is not just a uterus. A baby is growing.

You spelled clump of cells wrong.

You are welcome to call your growing baby a clump of cells. My husband and I were so happy each of the two times I was pregnant . Dudring each doctor visit of my pregnancy, the obstetrician referred to our baby.

Good for you. For other people, a fetus is a fetus until viability. Either way, someone else's body is not your concern. Move along.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Liberals think the only 2 things that exist regarding states rights are abortion and slavery. It’s tiresome.

States rights does not justify denial of basic rights.

Abortion is not a human right. It has no basis in natural law, or international treaty law.

“abortion” does not appear in any of the U.N. human rights treaties, not even in the ones that the United States has not ratified.

The U.N.’s human rights experts lack the authority to create new rights.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)—one of the few human rights treaties that the United States has signed and ratified—impedes their efforts. It states: “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.”
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 6, paragraph 1.

The treaty prohibits the death penalty in the case of a pregnant woman, presumably to spare the innocent life of the unborn child.

If you think you have the ability to tell any women like myself or my daughters what reproductive decisions they will make, prepare to be sorely disappointed. This will not be tolerated by most women and the people that care about them, regardless of their home state. This is not your business, never has been and never will be. If you are struggling to understand this, wait until election day and it will become clear to you.

It’s very sad that women kill their own babies. Your daughters are killing their own daughters via abortion. Those are your granddaughters being aborted. Why wouldn’t women rather use birth control? Prevent the pregnancy. Many forms of birth control prevent pregnancy at a rate of 99.9-100%. When a child is aborted because it’s inconvenient, it’s not a reproductive decision. The choice to reproduce has already been made, and the woman is not taking the consequence; the unborn child is. The child loses life. The child didn’t ask to be conceived and had no role in the conception. Your daughter, son, granddaughter, or grandson is killed and you don’t have an ounce of care for their life. They are disposable. Human life should not be disposable. I have no doubt millions and millions of women will come out in force to vote for their “right” to kill their own child because it is more convenient for them to do so than to prevent pregnancy.

People care about pregnant women and their unborn baby. It’s not just the woman that deserves care and compassion, but her unborn baby. Both the mother and child are valuable and deserve to be protected and respected.

No one seems to connect the dots that they are killing their son or daughter when they have an abortion. It’s really very sad. Abortion is the leading cause of death in the world.

In 2023, abortion was the leading cause of death, worldwide.

Like many women, I have had a miscarriage. While it was an incredibly sad experience, it was not a death. And if a miscarriage doesn't count as a death then an abortion doesn't either.

Pregnancy loss is defined differently around the world, but in general a baby who dies before 28 weeks of pregnancy is referred to as a miscarriage, and babies who die at or after 28 weeks are stillbirths.

Are you denying your son or daughter was alive in your uterus, and then died?

I am sorry for your loss. It’s extremely traumatic to lose a child.

Every woman’s life and every child’s life is valuable.

And every decision a woman makes about her own uterus is non of your concern.

It is not just a uterus. A baby is growing.

You spelled clump of cells wrong.

You are welcome to call your growing baby a clump of cells. My husband and I were so happy each of the two times I was pregnant . Dudring each doctor visit of my pregnancy, the obstetrician referred to our baby.

This is entirely the point, yes? You're free to view it as a baby and others are not, while dependent on the mother (host) for survival. Which is why people should not be making decisions for how to deal with the baby/cell clump. You make yours and others will make theirs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s very sad that women kill their own babies. Your daughters are killing their own daughters via abortion. Those are your granddaughters being aborted. Why wouldn’t women rather use birth control? Prevent the pregnancy. Many forms of birth control prevent pregnancy at a rate of 99.9-100%. When a child is aborted because it’s inconvenient, it’s not a reproductive decision. The choice to reproduce has already been made, and the woman is not taking the consequence; the unborn child is. The child loses life. The child didn’t ask to be conceived and had no role in the conception. Your daughter, son, granddaughter, or grandson is killed and you don’t have an ounce of care for their life. They are disposable. Human life should not be disposable. I have no doubt millions and millions of women will come out in force to vote for their “right” to kill their own child because it is more convenient for them to do so than to prevent pregnancy.

People care about pregnant women and their unborn baby. It’s not just the woman that deserves care and compassion, but her unborn baby. Both the mother and child are valuable and deserve to be protected and respected.

No one seems to connect the dots that they are killing their son or daughter when they have an abortion. It’s really very sad. Abortion is the leading cause of death in the world.

In 2023, abortion was the leading cause of death, worldwide.

IMG-7801


This post is fantastic!
Please please please push this message into the fall. The American people need to hear what you stand for. It will help make their decision so much easier.

Yes; please do. Your life is precious and valuable. So are the lives of your children. Every pregnant woman should be cared for and receive help and love from every segment of society and both mother and baby cherished.

[…]

Talk is cheap. You’re a forced birther who votes for the party that denies anything that would improve lives.

Not at all. Mothers, children, babies, families, etc, deserve the highest level of financial support and government assistance. I want our government to support every single mother and baby with everything possible. Women, their babies and children, should not want for anything in a country as wealthy as ours. The support should include secondary education, medical care, food assistance, housing assistance, everything possible. Nothing is more worthy of our tax dollars than supporting families.

And you vote for…

I often am unable to vote. I will not vote for the sake of voting. I vote for people who believe that human life is precious, not disposable, and support women and families and babies. I think every day about the babies who never get a chance to live because their mothers are alone, scared, unsupported, unable to support themselves much less support their unborn child. The mother needs to be supported and loved, cared for and protected. Her daughter or son deserves to be protected. Her daughter or son deserves a chance to choose their own path in life and be the unique and special human being that they are destined to be. I think of the artists, the inventors, the doctors, the writers, the engineers, you name it, that have been killed by their own mothers because their mothers were unable to care for them and society has made it very easy to kill a child. Those babies were capable of incredible things! We will never know what they could have achieved and created. We don’t even pause to consider that the child is our daughter. The child is our son. They are part of us and we them. I experienced an unwanted pregnancy and had no support, no money, no help. I thought my way out was abortion, I made the appointment, I unexpectedly came into enough money to pay for the abortion. I felt “saved “ from the horrible problem that had suddenly been foisted upon me. (I actually was having sex and gave no thought to using birth control.) I couldn’t go through with it. Something made me consider the fact that the baby inside me was my son or daughter. I struggled throughout the pregnancy financially and emotionally, but the night my son was born (I gave birth alone, no one was there in the delivery room with me) I fell in love with him the very second I heard his cry. The nurse who cleaned him and handed him to me said he smiled at her, she said she had never had a baby smile at her while she was cleaning them before. I thought in my head, he’s happy to be in the world, he’s happy to be alive and meet us all.

I vote for women and their babies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Liberals think the only 2 things that exist regarding states rights are abortion and slavery. It’s tiresome.

States rights does not justify denial of basic rights.

Abortion is not a human right. It has no basis in natural law, or international treaty law.

“abortion” does not appear in any of the U.N. human rights treaties, not even in the ones that the United States has not ratified.

The U.N.’s human rights experts lack the authority to create new rights.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)—one of the few human rights treaties that the United States has signed and ratified—impedes their efforts. It states: “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.”
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 6, paragraph 1.

The treaty prohibits the death penalty in the case of a pregnant woman, presumably to spare the innocent life of the unborn child.

If you think you have the ability to tell any women like myself or my daughters what reproductive decisions they will make, prepare to be sorely disappointed. This will not be tolerated by most women and the people that care about them, regardless of their home state. This is not your business, never has been and never will be. If you are struggling to understand this, wait until election day and it will become clear to you.

It’s very sad that women kill their own babies. Your daughters are killing their own daughters via abortion. Those are your granddaughters being aborted. Why wouldn’t women rather use birth control? Prevent the pregnancy. Many forms of birth control prevent pregnancy at a rate of 99.9-100%. When a child is aborted because it’s inconvenient, it’s not a reproductive decision. The choice to reproduce has already been made, and the woman is not taking the consequence; the unborn child is. The child loses life. The child didn’t ask to be conceived and had no role in the conception. Your daughter, son, granddaughter, or grandson is killed and you don’t have an ounce of care for their life. They are disposable. Human life should not be disposable. I have no doubt millions and millions of women will come out in force to vote for their “right” to kill their own child because it is more convenient for them to do so than to prevent pregnancy.

People care about pregnant women and their unborn baby. It’s not just the woman that deserves care and compassion, but her unborn baby. Both the mother and child are valuable and deserve to be protected and respected.

No one seems to connect the dots that they are killing their son or daughter when they have an abortion. It’s really very sad. Abortion is the leading cause of death in the world.

In 2023, abortion was the leading cause of death, worldwide.

Like many women, I have had a miscarriage. While it was an incredibly sad experience, it was not a death. And if a miscarriage doesn't count as a death then an abortion doesn't either.

Pregnancy loss is defined differently around the world, but in general a baby who dies before 28 weeks of pregnancy is referred to as a miscarriage, and babies who die at or after 28 weeks are stillbirths.

Are you denying your son or daughter was alive in your uterus, and then died?

I am sorry for your loss. It’s extremely traumatic to lose a child.

Every woman’s life and every child’s life is valuable.

And every decision a woman makes about her own uterus is non of your concern.

It is not just a uterus. A baby is growing.

You spelled clump of cells wrong.

You are welcome to call your growing baby a clump of cells. My husband and I were so happy each of the two times I was pregnant . Dudring each doctor visit of my pregnancy, the obstetrician referred to our baby.

This is entirely the point, yes? You're free to view it as a baby and others are not, while dependent on the mother (host) for survival. Which is why people should not be making decisions for how to deal with the baby/cell clump. You make yours and others will make theirs.

A pregnant woman is a mother, not a host. Your words try to distance you from reality, because admitting the truth is too uncomfortable and painful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Liberals think the only 2 things that exist regarding states rights are abortion and slavery. It’s tiresome.

States rights does not justify denial of basic rights.

Abortion is not a human right. It has no basis in natural law, or international treaty law.

“abortion” does not appear in any of the U.N. human rights treaties, not even in the ones that the United States has not ratified.

The U.N.’s human rights experts lack the authority to create new rights.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)—one of the few human rights treaties that the United States has signed and ratified—impedes their efforts. It states: “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.”
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 6, paragraph 1.

The treaty prohibits the death penalty in the case of a pregnant woman, presumably to spare the innocent life of the unborn child.

If you think you have the ability to tell any women like myself or my daughters what reproductive decisions they will make, prepare to be sorely disappointed. This will not be tolerated by most women and the people that care about them, regardless of their home state. This is not your business, never has been and never will be. If you are struggling to understand this, wait until election day and it will become clear to you.

It’s very sad that women kill their own babies. Your daughters are killing their own daughters via abortion. Those are your granddaughters being aborted. Why wouldn’t women rather use birth control? Prevent the pregnancy. Many forms of birth control prevent pregnancy at a rate of 99.9-100%. When a child is aborted because it’s inconvenient, it’s not a reproductive decision. The choice to reproduce has already been made, and the woman is not taking the consequence; the unborn child is. The child loses life. The child didn’t ask to be conceived and had no role in the conception. Your daughter, son, granddaughter, or grandson is killed and you don’t have an ounce of care for their life. They are disposable. Human life should not be disposable. I have no doubt millions and millions of women will come out in force to vote for their “right” to kill their own child because it is more convenient for them to do so than to prevent pregnancy.

People care about pregnant women and their unborn baby. It’s not just the woman that deserves care and compassion, but her unborn baby. Both the mother and child are valuable and deserve to be protected and respected.

No one seems to connect the dots that they are killing their son or daughter when they have an abortion. It’s really very sad. Abortion is the leading cause of death in the world.

In 2023, abortion was the leading cause of death, worldwide.

Like many women, I have had a miscarriage. While it was an incredibly sad experience, it was not a death. And if a miscarriage doesn't count as a death then an abortion doesn't either.

Pregnancy loss is defined differently around the world, but in general a baby who dies before 28 weeks of pregnancy is referred to as a miscarriage, and babies who die at or after 28 weeks are stillbirths.

Are you denying your son or daughter was alive in your uterus, and then died?

I am sorry for your loss. It’s extremely traumatic to lose a child.

Every woman’s life and every child’s life is valuable.

And every decision a woman makes about her own uterus is non of your concern.

It is not just a uterus. A baby is growing.

You spelled clump of cells wrong.

You are welcome to call your growing baby a clump of cells. My husband and I were so happy each of the two times I was pregnant . Dudring each doctor visit of my pregnancy, the obstetrician referred to our baby.

Good for you. For other people, a fetus is a fetus until viability. Either way, someone else's body is not your concern. Move along.

The mother keeps her body; her son or daughter loses their body and life. I want both mother and child to keep their bodies and lives and live in a world that loves and protects them both.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Michigan is not even a purple state anymore, it should be as blue as Nevada - that makes me question the rest of what CNN is trying to sell.

Yes, there are some mad arab voters, but they won't be voting for the guy who wants to deport them.

Michigan has the most Arabic/Muslim population in the country- much more than the usual margin of victory.

Michigan has more than ten million people and less than 250,000 of them are Muslims. Biden won Michigan by three points, Democrats hold every single statewide office and won them all by more than eight points, Democrats flipped the state house and the state senate, and the Michigan GOP is broke and trying to sell their headquarters which is open to the elements because they didn’t pay the electric bill so the locks don’t work. But CNN thinks it’s a tossup.

It is only a toss up because of the weakness in the Dem presidential candidate. Replace Biden with a real candidate and Michigan, along with the other swing states, transition to states where the Dem candidate is heavily favored. The only thing Biden has going for him is his likely opponent being the worst candidate in American history.

Ok, I’ll play. Name your “real” candidate. Not just a hypothetical. What “real” candidate can match Trumps name recognition or Biden’s accomplishments?

Either give us a name or sit down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Liberals think the only 2 things that exist regarding states rights are abortion and slavery. It’s tiresome.

States rights does not justify denial of basic rights.

Abortion is not a human right. It has no basis in natural law, or international treaty law.

“abortion” does not appear in any of the U.N. human rights treaties, not even in the ones that the United States has not ratified.

The U.N.’s human rights experts lack the authority to create new rights.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)—one of the few human rights treaties that the United States has signed and ratified—impedes their efforts. It states: “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.”
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 6, paragraph 1.

The treaty prohibits the death penalty in the case of a pregnant woman, presumably to spare the innocent life of the unborn child.

If you think you have the ability to tell any women like myself or my daughters what reproductive decisions they will make, prepare to be sorely disappointed. This will not be tolerated by most women and the people that care about them, regardless of their home state. This is not your business, never has been and never will be. If you are struggling to understand this, wait until election day and it will become clear to you.

It’s very sad that women kill their own babies. Your daughters are killing their own daughters via abortion. Those are your granddaughters being aborted. Why wouldn’t women rather use birth control? Prevent the pregnancy. Many forms of birth control prevent pregnancy at a rate of 99.9-100%. When a child is aborted because it’s inconvenient, it’s not a reproductive decision. The choice to reproduce has already been made, and the woman is not taking the consequence; the unborn child is. The child loses life. The child didn’t ask to be conceived and had no role in the conception. Your daughter, son, granddaughter, or grandson is killed and you don’t have an ounce of care for their life. They are disposable. Human life should not be disposable. I have no doubt millions and millions of women will come out in force to vote for their “right” to kill their own child because it is more convenient for them to do so than to prevent pregnancy.

People care about pregnant women and their unborn baby. It’s not just the woman that deserves care and compassion, but her unborn baby. Both the mother and child are valuable and deserve to be protected and respected.

No one seems to connect the dots that they are killing their son or daughter when they have an abortion. It’s really very sad. Abortion is the leading cause of death in the world.

In 2023, abortion was the leading cause of death, worldwide.

Like many women, I have had a miscarriage. While it was an incredibly sad experience, it was not a death. And if a miscarriage doesn't count as a death then an abortion doesn't either.

Pregnancy loss is defined differently around the world, but in general a baby who dies before 28 weeks of pregnancy is referred to as a miscarriage, and babies who die at or after 28 weeks are stillbirths.

Are you denying your son or daughter was alive in your uterus, and then died?

I am sorry for your loss. It’s extremely traumatic to lose a child.

Every woman’s life and every child’s life is valuable.

And every decision a woman makes about her own uterus is non of your concern.

It is not just a uterus. A baby is growing.

You spelled clump of cells wrong.

You are welcome to call your growing baby a clump of cells. My husband and I were so happy each of the two times I was pregnant . Dudring each doctor visit of my pregnancy, the obstetrician referred to our baby.

This is entirely the point, yes? You're free to view it as a baby and others are not, while dependent on the mother (host) for survival. Which is why people should not be making decisions for how to deal with the baby/cell clump. You make yours and others will make theirs.

Newborn babies are usually dependent on the mother for survival as well. By your rationale child abandonment, or worse, should be totally okay, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s very sad that women kill their own babies. Your daughters are killing their own daughters via abortion. Those are your granddaughters being aborted. Why wouldn’t women rather use birth control? Prevent the pregnancy. Many forms of birth control prevent pregnancy at a rate of 99.9-100%. When a child is aborted because it’s inconvenient, it’s not a reproductive decision. The choice to reproduce has already been made, and the woman is not taking the consequence; the unborn child is. The child loses life. The child didn’t ask to be conceived and had no role in the conception. Your daughter, son, granddaughter, or grandson is killed and you don’t have an ounce of care for their life. They are disposable. Human life should not be disposable. I have no doubt millions and millions of women will come out in force to vote for their “right” to kill their own child because it is more convenient for them to do so than to prevent pregnancy.

People care about pregnant women and their unborn baby. It’s not just the woman that deserves care and compassion, but her unborn baby. Both the mother and child are valuable and deserve to be protected and respected.

No one seems to connect the dots that they are killing their son or daughter when they have an abortion. It’s really very sad. Abortion is the leading cause of death in the world.

In 2023, abortion was the leading cause of death, worldwide.

IMG-7801


This post is fantastic!
Please please please push this message into the fall. The American people need to hear what you stand for. It will help make their decision so much easier.

Yes; please do. Your life is precious and valuable. So are the lives of your children. Every pregnant woman should be cared for and receive help and love from every segment of society and both mother and baby cherished.

[…]

Talk is cheap. You’re a forced birther who votes for the party that denies anything that would improve lives.

Not at all. Mothers, children, babies, families, etc, deserve the highest level of financial support and government assistance. I want our government to support every single mother and baby with everything possible. Women, their babies and children, should not want for anything in a country as wealthy as ours. The support should include secondary education, medical care, food assistance, housing assistance, everything possible. Nothing is more worthy of our tax dollars than supporting families.

And you vote for…

I often am unable to vote. I […]

So when you are able to get yourself sorted to vote, which party do you vote for?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Liberals think the only 2 things that exist regarding states rights are abortion and slavery. It’s tiresome.

States rights does not justify denial of basic rights.

Abortion is not a human right. It has no basis in natural law, or international treaty law.

“abortion” does not appear in any of the U.N. human rights treaties, not even in the ones that the United States has not ratified.

The U.N.’s human rights experts lack the authority to create new rights.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)—one of the few human rights treaties that the United States has signed and ratified—impedes their efforts. It states: “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.”
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 6, paragraph 1.

The treaty prohibits the death penalty in the case of a pregnant woman, presumably to spare the innocent life of the unborn child.

If you think you have the ability to tell any women like myself or my daughters what reproductive decisions they will make, prepare to be sorely disappointed. This will not be tolerated by most women and the people that care about them, regardless of their home state. This is not your business, never has been and never will be. If you are struggling to understand this, wait until election day and it will become clear to you.

It’s very sad that women kill their own babies. Your daughters are killing their own daughters via abortion. Those are your granddaughters being aborted. Why wouldn’t women rather use birth control? Prevent the pregnancy. Many forms of birth control prevent pregnancy at a rate of 99.9-100%. When a child is aborted because it’s inconvenient, it’s not a reproductive decision. The choice to reproduce has already been made, and the woman is not taking the consequence; the unborn child is. The child loses life. The child didn’t ask to be conceived and had no role in the conception. Your daughter, son, granddaughter, or grandson is killed and you don’t have an ounce of care for their life. They are disposable. Human life should not be disposable. I have no doubt millions and millions of women will come out in force to vote for their “right” to kill their own child because it is more convenient for them to do so than to prevent pregnancy.

People care about pregnant women and their unborn baby. It’s not just the woman that deserves care and compassion, but her unborn baby. Both the mother and child are valuable and deserve to be protected and respected.

No one seems to connect the dots that they are killing their son or daughter when they have an abortion. It’s really very sad. Abortion is the leading cause of death in the world.

In 2023, abortion was the leading cause of death, worldwide.

Like many women, I have had a miscarriage. While it was an incredibly sad experience, it was not a death. And if a miscarriage doesn't count as a death then an abortion doesn't either.

Pregnancy loss is defined differently around the world, but in general a baby who dies before 28 weeks of pregnancy is referred to as a miscarriage, and babies who die at or after 28 weeks are stillbirths.

Are you denying your son or daughter was alive in your uterus, and then died?

I am sorry for your loss. It’s extremely traumatic to lose a child.

Every woman’s life and every child’s life is valuable.

And every decision a woman makes about her own uterus is non of your concern.

It is not just a uterus. A baby is growing.

You spelled clump of cells wrong.

You are welcome to call your growing baby a clump of cells. My husband and I were so happy each of the two times I was pregnant . Dudring each doctor visit of my pregnancy, the obstetrician referred to our baby.

This is entirely the point, yes? You're free to view it as a baby and others are not, while dependent on the mother (host) for survival. Which is why people should not be making decisions for how to deal with the baby/cell clump. You make yours and others will make theirs.

Newborn babies are usually dependent on the mother for survival as well. By your rationale child abandonment, or worse, should be totally okay, right?

Babies are not dependent on the particular person who gave birth to them once they are born. That’s how adoption is a thing. Or you know, fathers taking care of their babies. I can’t believe you actually need this explained to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Liberals think the only 2 things that exist regarding states rights are abortion and slavery. It’s tiresome.

States rights does not justify denial of basic rights.

Abortion is not a human right. It has no basis in natural law, or international treaty law.

“abortion” does not appear in any of the U.N. human rights treaties, not even in the ones that the United States has not ratified.

The U.N.’s human rights experts lack the authority to create new rights.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)—one of the few human rights treaties that the United States has signed and ratified—impedes their efforts. It states: “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.”
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 6, paragraph 1.

The treaty prohibits the death penalty in the case of a pregnant woman, presumably to spare the innocent life of the unborn child.

If you think you have the ability to tell any women like myself or my daughters what reproductive decisions they will make, prepare to be sorely disappointed. This will not be tolerated by most women and the people that care about them, regardless of their home state. This is not your business, never has been and never will be. If you are struggling to understand this, wait until election day and it will become clear to you.

It’s very sad that women kill their own babies. Your daughters are killing their own daughters via abortion. Those are your granddaughters being aborted. Why wouldn’t women rather use birth control? Prevent the pregnancy. Many forms of birth control prevent pregnancy at a rate of 99.9-100%. When a child is aborted because it’s inconvenient, it’s not a reproductive decision. The choice to reproduce has already been made, and the woman is not taking the consequence; the unborn child is. The child loses life. The child didn’t ask to be conceived and had no role in the conception. Your daughter, son, granddaughter, or grandson is killed and you don’t have an ounce of care for their life. They are disposable. Human life should not be disposable. I have no doubt millions and millions of women will come out in force to vote for their “right” to kill their own child because it is more convenient for them to do so than to prevent pregnancy.

People care about pregnant women and their unborn baby. It’s not just the woman that deserves care and compassion, but her unborn baby. Both the mother and child are valuable and deserve to be protected and respected.

No one seems to connect the dots that they are killing their son or daughter when they have an abortion. It’s really very sad. Abortion is the leading cause of death in the world.

In 2023, abortion was the leading cause of death, worldwide.

Like many women, I have had a miscarriage. While it was an incredibly sad experience, it was not a death. And if a miscarriage doesn't count as a death then an abortion doesn't either.

Pregnancy loss is defined differently around the world, but in general a baby who dies before 28 weeks of pregnancy is referred to as a miscarriage, and babies who die at or after 28 weeks are stillbirths.

Are you denying your son or daughter was alive in your uterus, and then died?

I am sorry for your loss. It’s extremely traumatic to lose a child.

Every woman’s life and every child’s life is valuable.

And every decision a woman makes about her own uterus is non of your concern.

It is not just a uterus. A baby is growing.

You spelled clump of cells wrong.

You are welcome to call your growing baby a clump of cells. My husband and I were so happy each of the two times I was pregnant . Dudring each doctor visit of my pregnancy, the obstetrician referred to our baby.

This is entirely the point, yes? You're free to view it as a baby and others are not, while dependent on the mother (host) for survival. Which is why people should not be making decisions for how to deal with the baby/cell clump. You make yours and others will make theirs.

Newborn babies are usually dependent on the mother for survival as well. By your rationale child abandonment, or worse, should be totally okay, right?

Babies are not dependent on the particular person who gave birth to them once they are born. That’s how adoption is a thing. Or you know, fathers taking care of their babies. I can’t believe you actually need this explained to you.

90% of Americans are neither forced birthers (someone who doesn't believe abortion should be legal under any circumstance) or baby killers (someone that believes abortion should be legal up until the moment a a baby takes it's first breath). With R vs W being overturned, we are now left with each state determining the abortion laws applicable to their state. There is an important discussion to be had about abortion but no one seems to be interested in having that important discussion. Here goes- I've always thought of myself as pro-choice but based on my little scientific knowledge of the issue, I'm uncertain of how far along in pregnancy abortion should be legal. 25 to 30 weeks is where I feel most comfortable at this point but I could be convinced of anywhere between 20 to 35 weeks. Does my belief that there should be a point in time during a pregnancy term for which abortion is no longer legal make me pro-life or does my belief in 25-30 weeks leave me in the pro-choice camp? I'd love to hear some more productive conversation on this topic that includes numbers of weeks, scientific data, and reasons for exceptions. I'm tired of hearing people ridicule each other with an insinuation of the other person being a forced birther or baby killer. Most of us are neither but I think most of us, like me, aren't 100% sure of exactly where they stand as far as the specifics of abortion laws because we don't choose to talk about it and think about it as much we prefer to throw insults to those on the other "side" of the issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Liberals think the only 2 things that exist regarding states rights are abortion and slavery. It’s tiresome.

States rights does not justify denial of basic rights.

Abortion is not a human right. It has no basis in natural law, or international treaty law.

“abortion” does not appear in any of the U.N. human rights treaties, not even in the ones that the United States has not ratified.

The U.N.’s human rights experts lack the authority to create new rights.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)—one of the few human rights treaties that the United States has signed and ratified—impedes their efforts. It states: “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.”
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 6, paragraph 1.

The treaty prohibits the death penalty in the case of a pregnant woman, presumably to spare the innocent life of the unborn child.

If you think you have the ability to tell any women like myself or my daughters what reproductive decisions they will make, prepare to be sorely disappointed. This will not be tolerated by most women and the people that care about them, regardless of their home state. This is not your business, never has been and never will be. If you are struggling to understand this, wait until election day and it will become clear to you.

It’s very sad that women kill their own babies. Your daughters are killing their own daughters via abortion. Those are your granddaughters being aborted. Why wouldn’t women rather use birth control? Prevent the pregnancy. Many forms of birth control prevent pregnancy at a rate of 99.9-100%. When a child is aborted because it’s inconvenient, it’s not a reproductive decision. The choice to reproduce has already been made, and the woman is not taking the consequence; the unborn child is. The child loses life. The child didn’t ask to be conceived and had no role in the conception. Your daughter, son, granddaughter, or grandson is killed and you don’t have an ounce of care for their life. They are disposable. Human life should not be disposable. I have no doubt millions and millions of women will come out in force to vote for their “right” to kill their own child because it is more convenient for them to do so than to prevent pregnancy.

People care about pregnant women and their unborn baby. It’s not just the woman that deserves care and compassion, but her unborn baby. Both the mother and child are valuable and deserve to be protected and respected.

No one seems to connect the dots that they are killing their son or daughter when they have an abortion. It’s really very sad. Abortion is the leading cause of death in the world.

In 2023, abortion was the leading cause of death, worldwide.

Like many women, I have had a miscarriage. While it was an incredibly sad experience, it was not a death. And if a miscarriage doesn't count as a death then an abortion doesn't either.

Pregnancy loss is defined differently around the world, but in general a baby who dies before 28 weeks of pregnancy is referred to as a miscarriage, and babies who die at or after 28 weeks are stillbirths.

Are you denying your son or daughter was alive in your uterus, and then died?

I am sorry for your loss. It’s extremely traumatic to lose a child.

Every woman’s life and every child’s life is valuable.

And every decision a woman makes about her own uterus is non of your concern.

It is not just a uterus. A baby is growing.

You spelled clump of cells wrong.

You are welcome to call your growing baby a clump of cells. My husband and I were so happy each of the two times I was pregnant . Dudring each doctor visit of my pregnancy, the obstetrician referred to our baby.

This is entirely the point, yes? You're free to view it as a baby and others are not, while dependent on the mother (host) for survival. Which is why people should not be making decisions for how to deal with the baby/cell clump. You make yours and others will make theirs.

Newborn babies are usually dependent on the mother for survival as well. By your rationale child abandonment, or worse, should be totally okay, right?

Babies are not dependent on the particular person who gave birth to them once they are born. That’s how adoption is a thing. Or you know, fathers taking care of their babies. I can’t believe you actually need this explained to you.

90% of Americans are neither forced birthers (someone who doesn't believe abortion should be legal under any circumstance) or baby killers (someone that believes abortion should be legal up until the moment a a baby takes it's first breath). With R vs W being overturned, we are now left with each state determining the abortion laws applicable to their state. There is an important discussion to be had about abortion but no one seems to be interested in having that important discussion. Here goes- I've always thought of myself as pro-choice but based on my little scientific knowledge of the issue, I'm uncertain of how far along in pregnancy abortion should be legal. 25 to 30 weeks is where I feel most comfortable at this point but I could be convinced of anywhere between 20 to 35 weeks. Does my belief that there should be a point in time during a pregnancy term for which abortion is no longer legal make me pro-life or does my belief in 25-30 weeks leave me in the pro-choice camp? I'd love to hear some more productive conversation on this topic that includes numbers of weeks, scientific data, and reasons for exceptions. I'm tired of hearing people ridicule each other with an insinuation of the other person being a forced birther or baby killer. Most of us are neither but I think most of us, like me, aren't 100% sure of exactly where they stand as far as the specifics of abortion laws because we don't choose to talk about it and think about it as much we prefer to throw insults to those on the other "side" of the issue.

I encourage you to go read the stories of women who seek abortions during the late stages of pregnancy. It's incredibly sad - often they've picked out a name, set up the baby's room, etc...only to find out that their baby won't survive outside the womb. Rather than trying to apply some universal standard, why not treat it on a case-by-case basis and leave the decision to each woman and her doctor?