Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe it will mean the end of the British Royal Family. I can only hope. Ridiculous, antiquated colonialist nonsense. All of the Royals should quit.

A voice of sanity! So refreshing, thank you!

God- no! I’m a female PhD scientist, former college athlete, business woman and I absolutely love the pomp and circumstance!! The royal weddings are my fave. The palace and the Beefeaters. I can’t imagine going to London and not seeing the Beefeaters.

F@ck you people! It’s a goddamn tradition They are there for our entertainment.

I am a total Anglophile and agree with you. They are a huge part of the British tourist economy. That’s one if the problems with H and M pulling out.

I for one will not miss Harry and Megan, but I do feel sorry for him.

I feel sorry for Will and Kate too. The brothers were close. Now they're not.

I feel bad for them too. Will brought it on himself though. Did he really think Harry wouldn’t be upset about Wills affairs given their history?

So he can't be on the same continent as him anymore? William didn't bring that on Harry. Harry did that on his own (bought a house in LA months ago).

He could. He stayed a year after their affair broke out into the open.

What I don't think he could stand was his brother using his wife as a target for press to shield it.

Harry has put up a lot over the years. All of his ideas and charity initiatives were delayed so they wouldn't 'outshine' the firstborn. He was allowed to be targeted by the tabloids himself as a drunk and fool while often times William was right next to him in those bars and clubs. But this? Especially after he did so much to welcome Kate and issued statements in her defense?

Unbelievable.

[Anonymous]

Of course she’s phoning in. She can’t risk that the family night reconcile without her.

[Anonymous]

They have reportedly said they will not move to the US until Trump is out of office.

This is a very strong argument for a 2nd term for Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They have reportedly said they will not move to the US until Trump is out of office.

This is a very strong argument for a 2nd term for Trump.

These two. I just can't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They have reportedly said they will not move to the US until Trump is out of office.

This is a very strong argument for a 2nd term for Trump.

Source?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They have reportedly said they will not move to the US until Trump is out of office.

This is a very strong argument for a 2nd term for Trump.

Source?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10724543/meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-want-to-eventually-settle-in-la-but-only-once-trumps-presidency-ends-pals-say/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They have reportedly said they will not move to the US until Trump is out of office.

This is a very strong argument for a 2nd term for Trump.

Ridiculous.

Now they're the kicked-out ridiculous royals.

[Anonymous]

What I've been saying about the Queen and the Royal Family all along.

"Both Diana and Meghan were the real top person in that family chain, from my view the Royal Family really have a problem in dealing with junior members of the family being so popular."

Princess Diana's ex-protection officer tells @KayBurley that Meghan was left 'isolated' in the royal family, similar to Diana.

"The only time the Queen acknowledged publicly the work that Diana did was actually when the Queen delivered that (forced) message soon after her death in 1997."

https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1216645602903195648

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What I've been saying about the Queen and the Royal Family all along.

"Both Diana and Meghan were the real top person in that family chain, from my view the Royal Family really have a problem in dealing with junior members of the family being so popular."

Princess Diana's ex-protection officer tells @KayBurley that Meghan was left 'isolated' in the royal family, similar to Diana.

"The only time the Queen acknowledged publicly the work that Diana did was actually when the Queen delivered that (forced) message soon after her death in 1997."

https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1216645602903195648

Disagree. Right now the Queen is the most loved of the BRF and when she passes, it will be Kate. Meghan is interesting but not the most important royal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MM is a family destroyer.

I pity her.

Harry was beyond dumb in marrying her.

Good for her. That family needs to be destroyed.

[Anonymous]

None of us can be surprised. She is divorced and does not speak to half of her family. She does not exactly scream "gets along well with others".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They have reportedly said they will not move to the US until Trump is out of office.

This is a very strong argument for a 2nd term for Trump.

Source?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10724543/meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-want-to-eventually-settle-in-la-but-only-once-trumps-presidency-ends-pals-say/

Note The Sun never actually cites the source as saying they won’t move to the US while trump is president. They made that part up and you fell for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What I've been saying about the Queen and the Royal Family all along.

"Both Diana and Meghan were the real top person in that family chain, from my view the Royal Family really have a problem in dealing with junior members of the family being so popular."

Princess Diana's ex-protection officer tells @KayBurley that Meghan was left 'isolated' in the royal family, similar to Diana.

"The only time the Queen acknowledged publicly the work that Diana did was actually when the Queen delivered that (forced) message soon after her death in 1997."

https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1216645602903195648

They are married ins. That’s the issue. The blood royals don’t like it when the married ins come in and act like they own the place.

[Anonymous]

Is there a reputable source for all things RF? It seems as if 98% of this is National Enquirer level fiction with all the sources being “unnamed.”
If you read a quote or statement attributed to Wills, for example, or other royal, what are the chances he actually said those words and in a context consistent with the headline jist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is there a reputable source for all things RF? It seems as if 98% of this is National Enquirer level fiction with all the sources being “unnamed.”
If you read a quote or statement attributed to Wills, for example, or other royal, what are the chances he actually said those words and in a context consistent with the headline jist?

Who knows?

This is different though with all of this public and/or official stuff, including the statements from Buckingham Palace and today's big family meeting. This is the sort of stuff that usually happens in private.