MAGA teen bused in from a Catholic school harasses Indigenous People's marcher. Vile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice how the name of this thread remains the same even in the light of the new evidence? You would assume that the person who opened the thread or admin would re-name it to properly reflect the facts.

Curious how admin will respond....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a Catholic, I understand that the media was overly harsh on these kids and blew things out of proportion, however I'm more disgusted by the reaction of the Catholic Church in KY after hearing they purchased the hats for the kids and are now extolling their behavior. Yet another example of do what I say, not what I do in the church.

That is violation of non-profit restrictions. It should lose their non-profit status.

https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/charities-churches-and-politics

“Currently, the law prohibits political campaign activity by charities and churches by defining a 501(c)(3) organization as one "which does not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.’”

"Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig; es ist nicht einmal falsch!" -Wolfgang Pauli

- Trump is not a candidate. His is now a public official.
- Campaign is over. Trump won. MAGA hats are no longer campaign "activity" they are "memorabilia".

Identical to how when Obama won, DC sold tourists "HOPE" or "Yes We Can" t-shirts,
and every Democratic associated non-profit who traveled to DC bought them for the trip.

However, a good reminder that now that Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren have declared,
ANY nonprofit that purchases their merchandise will have internet-sleuths challenging their 501(c)(3) status.

Liar.

Trump officially filed for re-election with the Federal Election Commission on Jan. 20, 2017, the day of his inauguration.

Oh look, you can buy those hats on his campaign website:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com

https://shop.donaldjtrump.com/collections/headwear

THE KIDS BOUGHT THE HATS FROM STREET VENDORS.

They were there representing their school.

Take away their non-profit status.

"There is an innocence in lying which is the sign of fanatical belief in your cause." Friedrich Nietzsche.

“Catholic kids representing their church/school at a MFL event should not wear a political candidate’s gear. Unless they are corrupt & amoral.” -DCUM Anonymous

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice how the name of this thread remains the same even in the light of the new evidence? You would assume that the person who opened the thread or admin would re-name it to properly reflect the facts.

Curious how admin will respond....

I brought that up earlier also.....that the thread title is false. Yet, it remains.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Are you living in DC? You know I’m DC kids are worse, right?

I'm leaving because in the first week one teacher had his arm dislocated by a student while another suffered a broken hand. They threatened to rape a female teacher after work. One of my students was arrested in my classroom for fighting another student for "looking at him." That same day, another student was beaten unconscious in the classroom next door. The students intentionally threw laptops from the laptop cart to the ground, shattering them, because they "didn't feel like reading." All of these students are still enrolled. At most they received a two or three day suspension and returned with new shoes, new hairdos, and a new lore among their peers.
They sit in the classes on their phones, they gamble, they throw chairs and flip over tables in what our administration writes off as "attention seeking behavior" and all throughout this someone comes in to informally observe us and tell us how shitty of a job we're doing. They don't suspend or expel, because the goal is to reduce suspension numbers this year. I call parents everyday and, while a FEW apologize and say that they'll try to speak with their kids, the majority say something along the lines of "that's your problem," "I've washed my hands of my child," or "don't call me again."

I substituted once and the several kids were smoking crack in the back as soon as the PowerPoint started. Others have ear buds in. Some sleep. It’s awful

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/weblog/2015/09/29/dcps-teacher

Curious, does it seem that the DC school kids are held to a LOWER standard of conduct?

Anonymous wrote:
arm dislocated by a student while another suffered a broken hand.
threatened to rape a female teacher after work.
arrested in my classroom for fighting another student
beaten unconscious in the classroom next door.
students intentionally threw laptops from the laptop cart to the ground, shattering them
-
smoking crack in the back as soon as the PowerPoint started.

Seems like the visiting Catholic school kids are held to a HIGHER standard of conduct?

Anonymous wrote:
Mocking an Indian chant,
tomohawk,
act like fools tearing off their shirt,
cat calling girls...

Oh, yes, let's address the REAL problem here...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The chaperones were not the problem. You are still trying to deflect.

They were responsible for the boys and let them enter and remain in that situation. They should have steered clear of BHIs. They should have shut down DB behavior.

What, exactly, did these boys do that has offended your delicate sensibilities? No one has been able to get beyond, "But he *SMIRKED*!!"
-They were standing in a group, waiting for their ride, removed from the bigoted bhi (what an insult to true Hebrew Israelites, btw), watching from a distance as the a-hole bhi (not deserving of capitalization) spewed their hatred.
-Phillips decided for some unknown reason - need for attention? drama? - to insert himself into the middle of their group, fixated on the one boy.
-The boy quietly stood his ground and did nothing more than maintain eye contact with Phillips (and smile! the nerve!) as Phillips banged his drum right in his face, in the boy's personal space.

I can definitely see why you're so outraged.
-DP

Mocking an Indian chant, tomohawk, act like fools tearing off their shirt, cat calling girls, defending black face,

When did they cat call any girls? Show me the video where CovCath students did that.

[Anonymous]

I think they were still being assholes. Period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a Catholic, I understand that the media was overly harsh on these kids and blew things out of proportion, however I'm more disgusted by the reaction of the Catholic Church in KY after hearing they purchased the hats for the kids and are now extolling their behavior. Yet another example of do what I say, not what I do in the church.

That is violation of non-profit restrictions. It should lose their non-profit status.

https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/charities-churches-and-politics

“Currently, the law prohibits political campaign activity by charities and churches by defining a 501(c)(3) organization as one "which does not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.’”

"Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig; es ist nicht einmal falsch!" -Wolfgang Pauli

- Trump is not a candidate. His is now a public official.
- Campaign is over. Trump won. MAGA hats are no longer campaign "activity" they are "memorabilia".

Identical to how when Obama won, DC sold tourists "HOPE" or "Yes We Can" t-shirts,
and every Democratic associated non-profit who traveled to DC bought them for the trip.

However, a good reminder that now that Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren have declared,
ANY nonprofit that purchases their merchandise will have internet-sleuths challenging their 501(c)(3) status.

Liar.

Trump officially filed for re-election with the Federal Election Commission on Jan. 20, 2017, the day of his inauguration.

Oh look, you can buy those hats on his campaign website:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com

https://shop.donaldjtrump.com/collections/headwear

THE KIDS BOUGHT THE HATS FROM STREET VENDORS.

They were there representing their school.

Take away their non-profit status.

You mean... "Take away their freedom of speech."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a Catholic, I understand that the media was overly harsh on these kids and blew things out of proportion, however I'm more disgusted by the reaction of the Catholic Church in KY after hearing they purchased the hats for the kids and are now extolling their behavior. Yet another example of do what I say, not what I do in the church.

That is violation of non-profit restrictions. It should lose their non-profit status.

https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/charities-churches-and-politics

“Currently, the law prohibits political campaign activity by charities and churches by defining a 501(c)(3) organization as one "which does not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.’”

"Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig; es ist nicht einmal falsch!" -Wolfgang Pauli

- Trump is not a candidate. His is now a public official.
- Campaign is over. Trump won. MAGA hats are no longer campaign "activity" they are "memorabilia".

Identical to how when Obama won, DC sold tourists "HOPE" or "Yes We Can" t-shirts,
and every Democratic associated non-profit who traveled to DC bought them for the trip.

However, a good reminder that now that Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren have declared,
ANY nonprofit that purchases their merchandise will have internet-sleuths challenging their 501(c)(3) status.

Liar.

Trump officially filed for re-election with the Federal Election Commission on Jan. 20, 2017, the day of his inauguration.

Oh look, you can buy those hats on his campaign website:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com

https://shop.donaldjtrump.com/collections/headwear

THE KIDS BOUGHT THE HATS FROM STREET VENDORS.

They were there representing their school.

Take away their non-profit status.

Thus begins the conservative "where's Waldo" search through images of the Boston Women's March:
anybody wearing "Elizabeth Warren 2020" shirts hats or buttons?


Let's see Planned Parenthood co-sponsored the march?
Check.
They're an employee or volunteer of Planned Parenthood.
Check
They're wearing something with "Warren 2020"?
Check.

Ok, call Tom Fitton, file that lawsuit to take away Planned Parenthood's 501(c)(3) status.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think they were still being assholes. Period.

And I do, too. All I’ve learned is that nasty asshole Nick Sandmann has lazy parents, who reinforced his bad behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think they were still being assholes. Period.

And I do, too. All I’ve learned is that nasty asshole Nick Sandmann has lazy parents, who reinforced his bad behavior.

Well... if you think Sandmann's behavior was "bad," you must have been simply appalled by the behavior or Nathan Phillips, his fellow Native American friend who yelled at the teens and the Black Hebrew Israelites.

[Anonymous]

Curious that mainstream media largely gives these black supremacists a free pass for their hateful racism towards white people, regardless of national heritage and family history.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think they were still being assholes. Period.

And I do, too. All I’ve learned is that nasty asshole Nick Sandmann has lazy parents, who reinforced his bad behavior.

yep

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a Catholic, I understand that the media was overly harsh on these kids and blew things out of proportion, however I'm more disgusted by the reaction of the Catholic Church in KY after hearing they purchased the hats for the kids and are now extolling their behavior. Yet another example of do what I say, not what I do in the church.

That is violation of non-profit restrictions. It should lose their non-profit status.

https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/charities-churches-and-politics

“Currently, the law prohibits political campaign activity by charities and churches by defining a 501(c)(3) organization as one "which does not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.’”

"Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig; es ist nicht einmal falsch!" -Wolfgang Pauli

- Trump is not a candidate. His is now a public official.
- Campaign is over. Trump won. MAGA hats are no longer campaign "activity" they are "memorabilia".

Identical to how when Obama won, DC sold tourists "HOPE" or "Yes We Can" t-shirts,
and every Democratic associated non-profit who traveled to DC bought them for the trip.

However, a good reminder that now that Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren have declared,
ANY nonprofit that purchases their merchandise will have internet-sleuths challenging their 501(c)(3) status.

Liar.

Trump officially filed for re-election with the Federal Election Commission on Jan. 20, 2017, the day of his inauguration.

Oh look, you can buy those hats on his campaign website:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com

https://shop.donaldjtrump.com/collections/headwear

THE KIDS BOUGHT THE HATS FROM STREET VENDORS.

They were there representing their school.

Take away their non-profit status.

Thus begins the conservative "where's Waldo" search through images of the Boston Women's March:
anybody wearing "Elizabeth Warren 2020" shirts hats or buttons?


Let's see Planned Parenthood co-sponsored the march?
Check.
They're an employee or volunteer of Planned Parenthood.
Check
They're wearing something with "Warren 2020"?
Check.

Ok, call Tom Fitton, file that lawsuit to take away Planned Parenthood's 501(c)(3) status.

Sure. Go ahead. Laws are laws.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think they were still being assholes. Period.

And I do, too. All I’ve learned is that nasty asshole Nick Sandmann has lazy parents, who reinforced his bad behavior.

yep

The whole community seems rotten based on their previous actions as well as those after the incident.

But not surprising since MAGA = trash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I think they were still being assholes. Period.

And I do, too. All I’ve learned is that nasty asshole Nick Sandmann has lazy parents, who reinforced his bad behavior.


Well... if you think Sandmann's behavior was "bad," you must have been simply appalled by the behavior or Nathan Phillips, his fellow Native American friend who yelled at the teens and the Black Hebrew Israelites.

If someone else is being an a**hole, it doesn't give me permission to be one too. The kids don't get off with a free pass. What happened to turn the other cheek?

And sure, the kids are allowed to make a mistake . . . but we're allowed to call them out on the mistake too, no?