Hate to tell you, but if your kid actually paid attention in class, he could have done fine on the qualification tests. Maybe if the admissions folks didn't ask such BS questions on the essay tests and not actually cared about robotics camp the value of traditional prep would go down. The use of geographic quotas is just another sign suggesting that FCPS views it's job as redistributing political favors rather than teaching kids. |
I love how we've somehow managed to reduce people like Vern Williams to crackpot conspiracy theorists. |
+1000000 The post I agree with is so spot on! All those people that are not with the program are so not with the program. |
It really should be. Because guess what they are going to be doing until 1 am every morning once they get there? Think hard. It will come to you. |
I guess that’s why she hates rote memorization, because she can only wrote it. |
So be it. Presumably the kid is up for a challenge. I get that it was easier to get your kids into TJ in years past. Now there is even more competition for seats. |
No. Now there is no competition in the real sense of the word for seats, because all you need to do is fill out an application and have a pulse and a sob story. I’m sorry “experience factors”. There may be a smaller likelihood of getting a seat. But since admission is not longer merit based, it just another HS with a long commute and getting a seat means nothing. I’m glad my last kid graduates from FCPS this year. There’s a lot of pride that comes with working hard and struggling some to achieve a goal. My TJ grads diploma means something to him. Being handed something because your MS is crappy? It makes the TJ diploma from 2025 forward worthless. |
If there is a crappy middle school, it is a reflection on the school district, not the student. And it's incumbent on them to fix it. |
YES! It's just a random coincidence that 30% of those admitted spent a few hours a day at Curie for a year and the other 60% went to other prep centers to ensure they got in. ![]() |
The schools are more or less the same. The difference is how much the parents in these areas invest in outside enrichemnt. |
Well said! |
Sorry logic isn't your forte. Did the Curie experience improve the test scores (which doesn't indicate the material wasn't taught in MS) or teach them to BS the essay to say robotics camp demonstrates my lifelong commitment to STEM? Also, both of my TJ kids did not prep so perhaps your 60% figure is simply pulled from your ass. |
Worthless to whom? What will change? The teachers? The labs? Motivated kids who love science and learning? What these kids achieve once they get there matters, not if one more or less kid who competed in a STEM science competition in 7th grade gets in. Your disdain for kids who are applying to work hard in high school is disturbing. There is a lot of pride in working hard to achieve a goal and more kids deserve that opportunity. Lots of kids who didn't get in your childs year could have thrived too....don't kid yourself, your child isn't the most special 450 in Fairfax County, they just got in under the old system. All you parents calling the class of 2025 weak are just reflecting your own issues. |
did they peak in high school? It's a high school diploma. It should mean less than a BA/BS which should mean less than any subsequent degree which should all mean less than the life they live after graduation |
there is a large gap between Whitman and Cooper |