Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry

[Anonymous]

read the WAPO summary of the phone call, not enough there to impeach. - lib

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi just admitted to not seeing the transcript, yet continued to condemn the president based on a transcript she has not read.

She is looking more and more idiotic with each statement.

The Democrats are desperate because they are fearful that not one of their candidates cannot beat Trump.

But every major news outlet has read the transcript, which is short, and I have read it, and I can tell you - it's over.

It's just a summary of a transcript, yes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi just admitted to not seeing the transcript, yet continued to condemn the president based on a transcript she has not read.

She is looking more and more idiotic with each statement.

The Democrats are desperate because they are fearful that not one of their candidates cannot beat Trump.

But every major news outlet has read the transcript, which is short, and I have read it, and I can tell you - it's over.

Yeah. It's over for the Democrats. There will be no impeachment vote - mark my words.
Nancy won't allow her members to vote on impeachment when there is nothing there.

We're not marking your words because you're nothing but a bot.

There you go again. Can't debate with facts, so you resort to name calling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:read the WAPO summary of the phone call, not enough there to impeach. - lib

Thank you. Let’s settle this at the ballot box. Conservative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe Chris Cuomo and dumb don lemon can fantasize that the transcript is a “fughese” using Fredo’s Patois.

This will be true wittiest comment of the week

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi just admitted to not seeing the transcript, yet continued to condemn the president based on a transcript she has not read.

She is looking more and more idiotic with each statement.

The Democrats are desperate because they are fearful that not one of their candidates cannot beat Trump.

But every major news outlet has read the transcript, which is short, and I have read it, and I can tell you - it's over.

It's just a summary of a transcript, yes?

No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:read the WAPO summary of the phone call, not enough there to impeach. - lib

It's a critical piece of information, where the President asks another country's leader to investigate a political opponent. The other part of the puzzle is Trump's order to withhold aid before the call.
Put the two together and you have an impeachable offense.

[Anonymous]

Headlines are all saying the transcript shows Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate his political rival right after aid was brought up.

[Anonymous]

And why won’t they release the entire whistleblower complaint to congress? That is fishy right there.

[Anonymous]

The transcript is 5 pages! It took 2 minutes to read!!!

Read it you fools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi just admitted to not seeing the transcript, yet continued to condemn the president based on a transcript she has not read.

She is looking more and more idiotic with each statement.

The Democrats are desperate because they are fearful that not one of their candidates cannot beat Trump.

But every major news outlet has read the transcript, which is short, and I have read it, and I can tell you - it's over.

Hahahaha!!!! Liberals suffer again from derangement!!!

I support my president!!!!

You and your ilk are trolls blitzing this thread trying desperately to create an alternative narrative. It is obvious and pathetic.

Lmao! Are you going to call me a Russian bot?!?


Trump!!!! All hail the Chief!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:read the WAPO summary of the phone call, not enough there to impeach. - lib

It's a critical piece of information, where the President asks another country's leader to investigate a political opponent. The other part of the puzzle is Trump's order to withhold aid before the call.
Put the two together and you have an impeachable offense.

Nope.

And, what the president did in relation to an investigation is NO DIFFERENT than what several Senators did - in a letter.
Are we going after them too?

[Anonymous]

As bad as the transcript looks for Trump and his friends, the complaint must look much worse. And the IC IG concurs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And why won’t they release the entire whistleblower complaint to congress? That is fishy right there.

It will be released.
The reason it was held back......IC Whistleblower complaints are supposed to be limited to complaints within the IC. This wasn't limited to within the IC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi just admitted to not seeing the transcript, yet continued to condemn the president based on a transcript she has not read.

She is looking more and more idiotic with each statement.

The Democrats are desperate because they are fearful that not one of their candidates cannot beat Trump.

But every major news outlet has read the transcript, which is short, and I have read it, and I can tell you - it's over.

It's just a summary of a transcript, yes?

It's the official document written by the professionals assigned to record official conversations. So there may be a word substituted for another, or something marked "inaudible" if the line was bad or the accent too heavy (not on this one), but usually they're very accurate.