Forum Index
»
Tweens and Teens
I think we need to lower the drinking age back to the age of 18 or 19 and say that HS drinking is not o.k. Ever. You watch out for my kid, I'll watch out for your kid. |
I don't think that the legal drinking age has anything to do it. And we say that now that HS drinking isn't ok, ever. The issues are the decision to drink and the consequences. I don't think, until now, the Whitman kids thought anything like this could happen. |
| As those kids probably know as it's on the MD driver's test, the first thing alcohol affects is your judgment. So we're blaming the boy's drunk friends for exercising poor judgment when they decided to let him walk off? |
| They were all drinking and drunk. They are all responsible for making the decision to go out and drink that night without a plan for dealing with the potential consequences or a even a thought that any one of them could die. The alcohol didn't get into them forcibly. They made a choice. That choice had consequences. Now they will need help dealing with the consequences. It's a tragedy and someone's son and brother died. Yes. They are all to blame. |
|
They went into the woods to drink. Underage kids have been doing that sort of thing for a long, long time. They go into the woods to hide because they know they'll get into trouble if their parents catch them.
This time a terrible tragedy occurred. Honestly, I don't think that most sober adults would have anticipated that happening. It was a freak accident. |
|
More detail from the father.
https://wtop.com/maryland/2017/12/bethesda-father-who-pulled-his-sons-body-from-a-ravine-recalls-his-last-night/ Seeems like a lot of holes in this story. The father says he believes his son purchased a bottle of vodka at a store on River Road - this is not possible since you can only buy liquor at the County stores in MoCo. |
| So sad. So many things happened the right way, but it had a tragic ending. The party house parents broke it up when the discovered the alcohol. The boy didn't take a car that night. The parents were alert and took action when the boy didn't come home on time. Not sure what more could have happened, but I'm not sure why police would not have issued a citation to the boy when they talked to him. Sadly, that probably would have saved his life. |
| The part that does not add up is him declining an Uber ride with friends to presumably walk home from the 7-11, which is a 45 minute walk on a freezing cold Saturday night. |
Wait...you think cops will be held responsible for this? In a country where cops shoot unarmed teenagers with no consequences? |
I'm confused. Now his friends are saying that they left him in the 7-11 parking lot and took an Uber home which the boy declined? From there he presumably walked alone to the woods near the swimming club, fell in the little pond and drowned face up? |
That is the story his father is telling. |
| Tons of 'blame' to go around, people. |
I agree with this actually. I think the fact that the drinking age is 21 (or the age most kids don't reach until junior/senior year of college) means it is seen as pretty much a joke and not taken seriously by most. Sure there are some kids who won't drink in college, but for those who make that choice it has NOTHING to do with the law. Everyone knows kids party in college, starting with the first weekend of freshman year - the schools know, parents know, kids know...it's not even a question, and the legality never really comes into the discussion. Trying to stop freshmen / sophomores / juniors from drinking at college is such a ridiculous premise that no one even tries; it's going to happen. Nobody takes the drinking age of 21 seriously, it's just preposterous. It should be pushed back to a realistic age (18.) and more aggressively enforced. Changes would not happen instantly, but I think we'd see a good trend over several decades. You hear people who grew up in the 50s/60s all the time say how it just wasn't a big mystified deal back then |
Agree. |
Also, he drowned but only blood and alcohol came up during CPR? |