Met Gala fashion, anyone?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
PP. Per link name, it is a Vestal Virgin. Which explains the veil. Totally pagan. |
Anonymous
She'll never pass as a virgin! |
Anonymous
OMG yes. Please show me if you figure it out. |
Anonymous
It really is pathetic |
Anonymous
Kendall looks more natural than some of her sisters but she had a lot of work done too: https://www.reddit.com/r/PlasticSurgery/comments/1kww10p/i_had_to_share_this_kendall_jenner_before_and/ |
Anonymous
The only natural beauties among the Kardashian sisters are Kim and Kourtney (who still both use extensive botox, filler, and heavy contouring to change the look of their faces). Kendall and Kylie had more work done than Kim, who actually doesn't look that different than when she was a teen, and many of the differences are due her super stylized makeup. Kendall had to have work done in order to become a model because runway and editorial models have to be able to look beautiful even without makeup, or in different styles. She can't just walk around with 8 pounds of contour on at all times. Even Khloe's more recent transformation has been less dramatic than Kendall's glow up to launch her modeling career. |
Anonymous
Face looks great. That hair though 😩 |
Anonymous
This looks familiar like something I’ve seen a middle eastern royal wearing |
Anonymous
Why does she have 6 fingers |
Anonymous
I think the whole thing is meant to be commentary on AI. |
Anonymous
She sponsored the event but ok |
Anonymous
Kim, the Rock and Chase were the best dressed to me |
Anonymous
It’s a disguise. If you saw her in anything else she’s unrecognizable which is the point |
Anonymous
Kylie’s dress/costume (because this is really just a big costume party) is amazing IMO. “ Kylie Jenner’s appearance at the 2026 Met Gala was less a red-carpet moment than a study in living sculpture. Wearing a custom Schiaparelli creation, she embodied the house’s longstanding fascination with surrealism, anatomy, and the transformation of the female form into art. The gown’s sculpted bodice appeared almost carved rather than sewn, evoking the cool permanence of classical marble while retaining the fluid sensuality of couture. The design immediately called to mind the Venus de Milo, the ancient Greek statue celebrated for its beauty, poise, and enigmatic incompleteness. Like the Venus, Jenner’s silhouette balanced softness with monumentality. The corseted structure mimicked the contours of a classical torso, creating the illusion that the dress had been molded directly onto the body, as though lifted from stone and brought to life. Schiaparelli’s craftsmanship transformed fabric into something architectural — an effect that blurred the line between fashion and museum artifact. What made the look especially compelling was its tension between antiquity and modernity. The Venus de Milo represents an enduring ideal of beauty from the ancient world, while Jenner, as one of the defining celebrity figures of the digital era, represents contemporary image culture at its most amplified. By merging these references, Schiaparelli created a visual dialogue across centuries: the timelessness of classical art meeting the immediacy of modern celebrity. The result was one of the most memorable interpretations of the evening — not simply because it was glamorous, but because it carried intellectual and artistic weight. Schiaparelli did not merely dress Kylie Jenner; the house turned her into a contemporary marble goddess, walking the Met steps as though she had stepped out of antiquity itself.” |
Anonymous
Oh come on. She sponsored the event because she gets something out of that too. It's not like they just donated the money without strings. |