Met Gala fashion, anyone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kidman has finally lost the age battle with her face. No complaints, she had a great run.

She's lost nothing, she looks great.

+1

I agree.
She looks amazing and stunning for a woman with four kids, two divorces behind her and pushing the big 6-0!

Face is creepy. If you can't see it, you are part of the alien cult. Come back to us. Remember what it looks like to be a human...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Janelle Monae, also got the assignment!

Love her, she is everything! Breathtakingly gorgeous!

I have always thought that Janae is one of the most beautiful celebrities around.

She ALWAYS slays on the red carpet - I think her beauty and style are so on point.

Kim K. looked fabulous as well, she also always slays at the Met every single year.

Bad Bunny gets the trophy for most original imo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Maybe it's an attempt to reference the Madam X portrait, but it's not well done.

As a woman of a particular age > she has aged wonderfully imo.

Has she though??

Because also as a woman of a particular age, I think aging well means aging. Not staving off aging via surgical interventions (and not insignificantly so). If someone were to say she seems to be using her considerable resources to surgically defy aging, she has a great team, etc. - sure OK.

She’s certainly not alone in that of course. But it would be nice if people continue to remember what actual aging does look like. Not aging poorly, but just aging like a normal human doing what they reasonably can.

In Nicole’s defense - IF she did have cosmetic surgery and that is the only reason that she looks so good at her age…..well then why don’t ALL celebs who are the same age look just as good as she does??

I mean, for instance look at Madonna.
I am sure that she has more money in the bank yet at sixty she didn’t even look an iota as good as Nicole does.

If plastic surgery, fillers, Botox, etc. is all that is needed to look fabulous then why don’t all celebs look as good??

I mean, Mama June had a ton of cosmetic surgery plus new teeth but she has never been even close to stunning.

One must be pretty in the beginning to look good.

Plastic surgery enhances ->> not creates beauty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Maybe it's an attempt to reference the Madam X portrait, but it's not well done.

As a woman of a particular age > she has aged wonderfully imo.

Has she though??

Because also as a woman of a particular age, I think aging well means aging. Not staving off aging via surgical interventions (and not insignificantly so). If someone were to say she seems to be using her considerable resources to surgically defy aging, she has a great team, etc. - sure OK.

She’s certainly not alone in that of course. But it would be nice if people continue to remember what actual aging does look like. Not aging poorly, but just aging like a normal human doing what they reasonably can.

In Nicole’s defense - IF she did have cosmetic surgery and that is the only reason that she looks so good at her age…..well then why don’t ALL celebs who are the same age look just as good as she does??

I mean, for instance look at Madonna.
I am sure that she has more money in the bank yet at sixty she didn’t even look an iota as good as Nicole does.

If plastic surgery, fillers, Botox, etc. is all that is needed to look fabulous then why don’t all celebs look as good??

I mean, Mama June had a ton of cosmetic surgery plus new teeth but she has never been even close to stunning.

One must be pretty in the beginning to look good.

Plastic surgery enhances ->> not creates beauty.

Enhances? Uh, often not.

Nicole was always an exceptional beauty if you ask me, but now she's looking off. They always end up going to far and cross some threshold that just causes me to have an knee-jerk reaction to the creepiness of it. It is sad to me that so many of you think the creepy face is now beautiful. It's perverse, really.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Maybe it's an attempt to reference the Madam X portrait, but it's not well done.

As a woman of a particular age > she has aged wonderfully imo.

Has she though??

Because also as a woman of a particular age, I think aging well means aging. Not staving off aging via surgical interventions (and not insignificantly so). If someone were to say she seems to be using her considerable resources to surgically defy aging, she has a great team, etc. - sure OK.

She’s certainly not alone in that of course. But it would be nice if people continue to remember what actual aging does look like. Not aging poorly, but just aging like a normal human doing what they reasonably can.

In Nicole’s defense - IF she did have cosmetic surgery and that is the only reason that she looks so good at her age…..well then why don’t ALL celebs who are the same age look just as good as she does??

I mean, for instance look at Madonna.
I am sure that she has more money in the bank yet at sixty she didn’t even look an iota as good as Nicole does.

If plastic surgery, fillers, Botox, etc. is all that is needed to look fabulous then why don’t all celebs look as good??

I mean, Mama June had a ton of cosmetic surgery plus new teeth but she has never been even close to stunning.

One must be pretty in the beginning to look good.

Plastic surgery enhances ->> not creates beauty.

Enhances? Uh, often not.

Nicole was always an exceptional beauty if you ask me, but now she's looking off. They always end up going to far and cross some threshold that just causes me to have an knee-jerk reaction to the creepiness of it. It is sad to me that so many of you think the creepy face is now beautiful. It's perverse, really.

DP. Are you still nattering on about "creepy faces"?

[Anonymous]

I would much rather see naturally aging faces. For now that includes Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore.

[Anonymous]

I remember watching Kidman in some TV show (that one she did with Hugh Grant a while back) and thinking her face looked odd because her skin was very taught and there was no wrinkles or sagging EXCEPT around her eyes. So her face looked 32 everywhere except her eyes, which looked 55.

Since then, I think she has evened that out a little -- she's doing more to her eyes and less to her face. But I still think I see some of the results of excess filler, where the face starts to take on a kind of muppet appearance.

Look, no one has ever successfully managed to use interventions to erase aging. You either look older, or you look like you've messed with your face too much, or both. I think sometimes people buy some time in their 50s with a combo of an actual face lift plus very judicious Botox and filler. But at some point you have to accept you are going to look your age. Some actresses, like Helen Mirren, just seek to look very good for their age, but embrace the age. Mirren has likely had one or two lower face lifts for her jaw line and definitely uses Botox, but I think that might be it. She never tried to look 30 when she was 20 years older, and that's key. So she is still beautiful, but looks her age. I think that's the approach with the most longevity. I see Gwyneth going that route, which makes sense because that's what Blythe Danner did too.

Time stops for no one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Maybe it's an attempt to reference the Madam X portrait, but it's not well done.

As a woman of a particular age > she has aged wonderfully imo.

Has she though??

Because also as a woman of a particular age, I think aging well means aging. Not staving off aging via surgical interventions (and not insignificantly so). If someone were to say she seems to be using her considerable resources to surgically defy aging, she has a great team, etc. - sure OK.

She’s certainly not alone in that of course. But it would be nice if people continue to remember what actual aging does look like. Not aging poorly, but just aging like a normal human doing what they reasonably can.

In Nicole’s defense - IF she did have cosmetic surgery and that is the only reason that she looks so good at her age…..well then why don’t ALL celebs who are the same age look just as good as she does??

I mean, for instance look at Madonna.
I am sure that she has more money in the bank yet at sixty she didn’t even look an iota as good as Nicole does.

If plastic surgery, fillers, Botox, etc. is all that is needed to look fabulous then why don’t all celebs look as good??

I mean, Mama June had a ton of cosmetic surgery plus new teeth but she has never been even close to stunning.

One must be pretty in the beginning to look good.

Plastic surgery enhances ->> not creates beauty.

PP being quited here questioning if she has aged well here - I responded to the person who said “she” has aged well and that was all referring to Lauren. If you expand the quotes you will see none of these comments were about Nicole.

[Anonymous]

The baywatch lady looked really really good for a gracefully aging blonde. She was always pretty though. She just needs a little bit of longer bangs and she’d look phenomenal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My favorite looks of the night: Gracie Abrams absolutely stunning Klimt-inspired gown

Plastic surgery addicted nepo baby who looks like a teen boy. Like, why are these people even invited? The Gala has no class or aura anymore.

You seem to not like the waif look. I can almost guarantee you that this person has not had plastic surgery. Maybe they're on weight loss drugs, however. The two looks you dissed are my two favorites.

She has a Michael Jackson nose and the hollowed structure of her face has the same appearance of trendy surgical "work". Just a coincidence, I'm sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My favorite looks of the night: Gracie Abrams absolutely stunning Klimt-inspired gown

Plastic surgery addicted nepo baby who looks like a teen boy. Like, why are these people even invited? The Gala has no class or aura anymore.

Ok, weirdo. You sound pleasant. Gracie Abrams is gorgeous, as is her gown.

She looks like an anorexic tween boy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My favorite looks of the night: Gracie Abrams absolutely stunning Klimt-inspired gown

Plastic surgery addicted nepo baby who looks like a teen boy. Like, why are these people even invited? The Gala has no class or aura anymore.

You seem to not like the waif look. I can almost guarantee you that this person has not had plastic surgery. Maybe they're on weight loss drugs, however. The two looks you dissed are my two favorites.

+1
Gracie Abrams is just a very slender person, something that really annoys trolls.

I don't even know this young gal but we can all Google Image what she looked like in 2018-2020. She was naturally not chubby but certainly fuller figured, had a larger nose, a round face, and no cheekbones. Now in 2026 at age 26 she looks like a waif, sunken face, a button nose and high cheekbones. No work though. Sure, sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Maybe it's an attempt to reference the Madam X portrait, but it's not well done.

As a woman of a particular age > she has aged wonderfully imo.

Has she though??

Because also as a woman of a particular age, I think aging well means aging. Not staving off aging via surgical interventions (and not insignificantly so). If someone were to say she seems to be using her considerable resources to surgically defy aging, she has a great team, etc. - sure OK.

She’s certainly not alone in that of course. But it would be nice if people continue to remember what actual aging does look like. Not aging poorly, but just aging like a normal human doing what they reasonably can.

In Nicole’s defense - IF she did have cosmetic surgery and that is the only reason that she looks so good at her age…..well then why don’t ALL celebs who are the same age look just as good as she does??

I mean, for instance look at Madonna.
I am sure that she has more money in the bank yet at sixty she didn’t even look an iota as good as Nicole does.

If plastic surgery, fillers, Botox, etc. is all that is needed to look fabulous then why don’t all celebs look as good??

I mean, Mama June had a ton of cosmetic surgery plus new teeth but she has never been even close to stunning.

One must be pretty in the beginning to look good.

Plastic surgery enhances ->> not creates beauty.

Enhances? Uh, often not.

Nicole was always an exceptional beauty if you ask me, but now she's looking off. They always end up going to far and cross some threshold that just causes me to have an knee-jerk reaction to the creepiness of it. It is sad to me that so many of you think the creepy face is now beautiful. It's perverse, really.

DP. Are you still nattering on about "creepy faces"?

Well, they are. If you can't see it, you've gone over to the dark side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My favorite looks of the night: Gracie Abrams absolutely stunning Klimt-inspired gown

Plastic surgery addicted nepo baby who looks like a teen boy. Like, why are these people even invited? The Gala has no class or aura anymore.

You seem to not like the waif look. I can almost guarantee you that this person has not had plastic surgery. Maybe they're on weight loss drugs, however. The two looks you dissed are my two favorites.

+1
Gracie Abrams is just a very slender person, something that really annoys trolls.

I don't even know this young gal but we can all Google Image what she looked like in 2018-2020. She was naturally not chubby but certainly fuller figured, had a larger nose, a round face, and no cheekbones. Now in 2026 at age 26 she looks like a waif, sunken face, a button nose and high cheekbones. No work though. Sure, sure.

There's a picture in here if her in college and she looks a little thinner now but otherwise the same (and she's still very thin in this photo, not "fuller figured"): https://www.voguehk.com/en/article/celebrity/six-things-to-know-about-gracie-abrams/?q=/en/article/celebrity/six-things-to-know-about-gracie-abrams/&

[Anonymous]

Ciara and Russel Wilson. Love the whole look.