Who is going to be next presidential candidate for democrats?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m very progressive and I will vote for anyone who is the eventual Dem nominee IF they promise to use all levers of power to hold the Trump and members of his regime accountable, and to make serious systemic changes. I’m not sure what I’ll do if they promise to move on. I doubt any Dem will run with that.

The youth in Hungary voted for Magyar fully expecting him to be far to the right of them on policy. They understood the moment. I’m following their lead. Will I wish for someone with progressive policies? Yes. But my deal breaker is swiftly holding the regime to account. Nothing else matters.

If the dem nominee doesn’t promise that, then you won’t vote. Is that what you’re saying? Please consider if a dem candidate who doesn’t promise exactly what you want is better than 4 more years of GOP lunatics. The candidate may intend to hold them to account but may not highlight it when campaigning if it doesn’t play well in swing states. Please reconsider.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m very progressive and I will vote for anyone who is the eventual Dem nominee IF they promise to use all levers of power to hold the Trump and members of his regime accountable, and to make serious systemic changes. I’m not sure what I’ll do if they promise to move on. I doubt any Dem will run with that.

The youth in Hungary voted for Magyar fully expecting him to be far to the right of them on policy. They understood the moment. I’m following their lead. Will I wish for someone with progressive policies? Yes. But my deal breaker is swiftly holding the regime to account. Nothing else matters.

Dems will not do that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m very progressive and I will vote for anyone who is the eventual Dem nominee IF they promise to use all levers of power to hold the Trump and members of his regime accountable, and to make serious systemic changes. I’m not sure what I’ll do if they promise to move on. I doubt any Dem will run with that.

The youth in Hungary voted for Magyar fully expecting him to be far to the right of them on policy. They understood the moment. I’m following their lead. Will I wish for someone with progressive policies? Yes. But my deal breaker is swiftly holding the regime to account. Nothing else matters.

Democrats will certainly win the House and possibly the Senate in November. They can begin impeachment proceedings against Trump’s corruption and crimes then. They will have the power of subpoena and can put it all forward for the senate to provide a verdict.

That’s much better than candidates promising blind retribution against republicans when they become president. Democrats need to win independents in a handful of swing states. That’s it. Progressives in NYC are irrelevant in a general election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would really like to see a woman.

I prayed that I would live long enough to see a woman President Hillary Clinton was the most qualified person to ever run and she must to the least qualified moron to ever run. Kamala Harris also extremely qualified a d list to same moron in who was convicted of 34 felonies plus convicted of a sex crime.

No more women. America is misogynistic to its core.

This isn't totally true.

What seems to be lost on many women who think this way is that Hillary Clinton actually got more votes than Trump. She only lost the election because of the Electoral College system that we have. Hillary "won" the popular vote. As for Kamala, she wasn't a good candidate. She ran in 2016 and won no delegates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would really like to see a woman.

I prayed that I would live long enough to see a woman President Hillary Clinton was the most qualified person to ever run and she must to the least qualified moron to ever run. Kamala Harris also extremely qualified a d list to same moron in who was convicted of 34 felonies plus convicted of a sex crime.

No more women. America is misogynistic to its core.

This isn't totally true.

What seems to be lost on many women who think this way is that Hillary Clinton actually got more votes than Trump. She only lost the election because of the Electoral College system that we have. Hillary "won" the popular vote. As for Kamala, she wasn't a good candidate. She ran in 2016 and won no delegates.

Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would really like to see a woman.

I prayed that I would live long enough to see a woman President Hillary Clinton was the most qualified person to ever run and she must to the least qualified moron to ever run. Kamala Harris also extremely qualified a d list to same moron in who was convicted of 34 felonies plus convicted of a sex crime.

No more women. America is misogynistic to its core.

This isn't totally true.

What seems to be lost on many women who think this way is that Hillary Clinton actually got more votes than Trump. She only lost the election because of the Electoral College system that we have. Hillary "won" the popular vote. As for Kamala, she wasn't a good candidate. She ran in 2016 and won no delegates.

I am not over Hillary's loss to Trump. I don't think I ever will be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would really like to see a woman.

I prayed that I would live long enough to see a woman President Hillary Clinton was the most qualified person to ever run and she must to the least qualified moron to ever run. Kamala Harris also extremely qualified a d list to same moron in who was convicted of 34 felonies plus convicted of a sex crime.

No more women. America is misogynistic to its core.

This isn't totally true.

What seems to be lost on many women who think this way is that Hillary Clinton actually got more votes than Trump. She only lost the election because of the Electoral College system that we have. Hillary "won" the popular vote. As for Kamala, she wasn't a good candidate. She ran in 2016 and won no delegates.

Kamala Harris ran a perfectly fine campaign, and don’t forget that she held Trump to under 50% of the popular vote. But don’t kid yourself, once Biden selected her as VP, she was the heir apparent. If Dems ran anyone else besides Harris in 2024, they would have lost in a historic landslide.

[Anonymous]

Rahm Emanuel is running, as someone who will speak truth to power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will never ever vote for Kamala Harris. Can’t stand her

Who cares. Would she be a good president is the question. And she would.

No. She is a blowhard with no original ideas and no real values other than self promotion. She threw Biden under the bus and wrote a book instead of stepping up and doing anything. I have never heard her say anything but boring platitudes.

Fwiw I voted for her.

I don’t care if she’s boring, I don’t care if she has original ideas. I care that she isn’t the current disaster we have in the White House.

I think Kamala Harris has alienated almost everyone at this point. Some people associate her with Biden and that is a negative for them. And those who like Biden feel like she was disloyal and threw him under the bus.

Besides, don't we know from history that Americans are "one and done" with nominees? Obviously if you are the leader of a cult, you can overcome that but most people can't. I hope Harris moves on.

Of course I will vote for her if she is the nominee. Anyone associated with this anti-American administration, including every single cowardly Senator, will never get a vote for me ever, no matter who the opponent is.

You think? That’s your rightful opinion. Although it’s early to predict 2028, take a look. https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_c0cbe579-b306-4407-a57b-6b590288daa3.html

Polls at this point are totally meaningless.

At this point in 1982, the frontrunner was George Wallace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would really like to see a woman.

I prayed that I would live long enough to see a woman President Hillary Clinton was the most qualified person to ever run and she must to the least qualified moron to ever run. Kamala Harris also extremely qualified a d list to same moron in who was convicted of 34 felonies plus convicted of a sex crime.

No more women. America is misogynistic to its core.

This isn't totally true.

What seems to be lost on many women who think this way is that Hillary Clinton actually got more votes than Trump. She only lost the election because of the Electoral College system that we have. Hillary "won" the popular vote. As for Kamala, she wasn't a good candidate. She ran in 2016 and won no delegates.

Kamala Harris ran a perfectly fine campaign, and don’t forget that she held Trump to under 50% of the popular vote. But don’t kid yourself, once Biden selected her as VP, she was the heir apparent. If Dems ran anyone else besides Harris in 2024, they would have lost in a historic landslide.

Yes, she may have been the heir apparent, but if Biden had dropped out earlier, and the Dems had held primaries to decide on a new presidential candidate, I doubt she would have won. But yes, I can see that as she was the VP, she was their only choice when Biden quit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would really like to see a woman.

I prayed that I would live long enough to see a woman President Hillary Clinton was the most qualified person to ever run and she must to the least qualified moron to ever run. Kamala Harris also extremely qualified a d list to same moron in who was convicted of 34 felonies plus convicted of a sex crime.

No more women. America is misogynistic to its core.

This isn't totally true.

What seems to be lost on many women who think this way is that Hillary Clinton actually got more votes than Trump. She only lost the election because of the Electoral College system that we have. Hillary "won" the popular vote. As for Kamala, she wasn't a good candidate. She ran in 2016 and won no delegates.

Kamala Harris ran a perfectly fine campaign, and don’t forget that she held Trump to under 50% of the popular vote. But don’t kid yourself, once Biden selected her as VP, she was the heir apparent. If Dems ran anyone else besides Harris in 2024, they would have lost in a historic landslide.

Yes, she may have been the heir apparent, but if Biden had dropped out earlier, and the Dems had held primaries to decide on a new presidential candidate, I doubt she would have won. But yes, I can see that as she was the VP, she was their only choice when Biden quit.

Agree, Harris was the inevitable only choice for nominee considering the position Biden put his party in. Harris did a hell of a job in a no-win situation. The mistake was made when 77 year old was nominated in 2020. The 2020 election victory was lock for Dems. Nominating someone who wouldn't be viable in 4 years was asinine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would really like to see a woman.

I prayed that I would live long enough to see a woman President Hillary Clinton was the most qualified person to ever run and she must to the least qualified moron to ever run. Kamala Harris also extremely qualified a d list to same moron in who was convicted of 34 felonies plus convicted of a sex crime.

No more women. America is misogynistic to its core.

This isn't totally true.

What seems to be lost on many women who think this way is that Hillary Clinton actually got more votes than Trump. She only lost the election because of the Electoral College system that we have. Hillary "won" the popular vote. As for Kamala, she wasn't a good candidate. She ran in 2016 and won no delegates.

This is sucH bullshat. Twenty-seven people ran in the Democratic 2020 primaries. Only two people secured any delegates, Biden and Sanders. Like twenty-five other candidates, Harris dropped out due to funding and endorsed the frontrunner, Joe Biden. People forget that Biden did not receive any delegates when he ran for POTUS in 1988 and 2008. When he ran again and won in 2020, it was only because he had been the VP to a popular POTUS. Karmala had a lot going against her when she ran again in 2024. First, she had the misfortune of entering the race with only sixty days to campaign and tell her story, whereas her opponent had been campaigning for four years. She was the VP of an unpopular POTUS, in which she refused to throw him under the bus and distance herself. She was a female in a man's world where the men of all races considered her nothing more than a sexual object. She was a Black-identified person in a world that, despite her achievements as a two-term elected District Attorney in one of the most populous cities in the country; a two-term elected State Attorney in the country's most populous state; and an elected Senator in the most populous state, she was considered nothing more than DEI because you know Black people cannot possibly be qualified. Enough with she wasn't a good candidate. She was an excellent candidate who received over 73 million votes, more votes than any presidential candidate in US history, except, of course, to the person she eventually lost to. pulled in more votes tha

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would really like to see a woman.

I prayed that I would live long enough to see a woman President Hillary Clinton was the most qualified person to ever run and she must to the least qualified moron to ever run. Kamala Harris also extremely qualified a d list to same moron in who was convicted of 34 felonies plus convicted of a sex crime.

No more women. America is misogynistic to its core.

This isn't totally true.

What seems to be lost on many women who think this way is that Hillary Clinton actually got more votes than Trump. She only lost the election because of the Electoral College system that we have. Hillary "won" the popular vote. As for Kamala, she wasn't a good candidate. She ran in 2016 and won no delegates.

Kamala Harris ran a perfectly fine campaign, and don’t forget that she held Trump to under 50% of the popular vote. But don’t kid yourself, once Biden selected her as VP, she was the heir apparent. If Dems ran anyone else besides Harris in 2024, they would have lost in a historic landslide.

Yes, she may have been the heir apparent, but if Biden had dropped out earlier, and the Dems had held primaries to decide on a new presidential candidate, I doubt she would have won. But yes, I can see that as she was the VP, she was their only choice when Biden quit.

Agree, Harris was the inevitable only choice for nominee considering the position Biden put his party in. Harris did a hell of a job in a no-win situation. The mistake was made when 77 year old was nominated in 2020. The 2020 election victory was lock for Dems. Nominating someone who wouldn't be viable in 4 years was asinine.

Yes. Kamala Harris did fine under the circumstances. We had an 82 year old deeply unpopular president running for reelection who fell apart in a debate with Donald Trump. It's difficult to be the incoherent imbecile compared to Trump, but the Biden team managed it. Great job, Biden campaign. Harris stepped into the breach and did as well as she could. But nothing was going to save her from the disaster of Biden.

That whole nightmare is a reminder of why we need competitive primaries to get the right candidate that can win. The DNC and Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries and the big donors need to disappear for a good long while. Let it play out and let a good candidate emerge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m very progressive and I will vote for anyone who is the eventual Dem nominee IF they promise to use all levers of power to hold the Trump and members of his regime accountable, and to make serious systemic changes. I’m not sure what I’ll do if they promise to move on. I doubt any Dem will run with that.

The youth in Hungary voted for Magyar fully expecting him to be far to the right of them on policy. They understood the moment. I’m following their lead. Will I wish for someone with progressive policies? Yes. But my deal breaker is swiftly holding the regime to account. Nothing else matters.

Democrats will certainly win the House and possibly the Senate in November. They can begin impeachment proceedings against Trump’s corruption and crimes then. They will have the power of subpoena and can put it all forward for the senate to provide a verdict.

That’s much better than candidates promising blind retribution against republicans when they become president. Democrats need to win independents in a handful of swing states. That’s it. Progressives in NYC are irrelevant in a general election.

PP here. I’d be thrilled to see Dems do start impeachment and the subpoena cannon as soon as they win in the Fall. I disagree that holding a corrupt politician won’t play in swing states. If the Dem nominee can’t talk about accountability I have no interest in voting for them. I live in DC so my vote has no weight.

I’m very active and work with young people who run for office in state and local races. I prefer to put my energy in a new generation how aren’t afraid to use their power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would really like to see a woman.

I prayed that I would live long enough to see a woman President Hillary Clinton was the most qualified person to ever run and she must to the least qualified moron to ever run. Kamala Harris also extremely qualified a d list to same moron in who was convicted of 34 felonies plus convicted of a sex crime.

No more women. America is misogynistic to its core.

This isn't totally true.

What seems to be lost on many women who think this way is that Hillary Clinton actually got more votes than Trump. She only lost the election because of the Electoral College system that we have. Hillary "won" the popular vote. As for Kamala, she wasn't a good candidate. She ran in 2016 and won no delegates.

This is sucH bullshat. Twenty-seven people ran in the Democratic 2020 primaries. Only two people secured any delegates, Biden and Sanders. Like twenty-five other candidates, Harris dropped out due to funding and endorsed the frontrunner, Joe Biden. People forget that Biden did not receive any delegates when he ran for POTUS in 1988 and 2008. When he ran again and won in 2020, it was only because he had been the VP to a popular POTUS. Karmala had a lot going against her when she ran again in 2024. First, she had the misfortune of entering the race with only sixty days to campaign and tell her story, whereas her opponent had been campaigning for four years. She was the VP of an unpopular POTUS, in which she refused to throw him under the bus and distance herself. She was a female in a man's world where the men of all races considered her nothing more than a sexual object. She was a Black-identified person in a world that, despite her achievements as a two-term elected District Attorney in one of the most populous cities in the country; a two-term elected State Attorney in the country's most populous state; and an elected Senator in the most populous state, she was considered nothing more than DEI because you know Black people cannot possibly be qualified. Enough with she wasn't a good candidate. She was an excellent candidate who received over 73 million votes, more votes than any presidential candidate in US history, except, of course, to the person she eventually lost to. pulled in more votes tha

Only one of the many candidates in 2020 had the "right" people in their corner. It came down to two after Warren realized she was wasting her time running against the establishment. One of the remaining two is a progressive populist speaking truth to politics with an ambition to close the wealth divide and the other is a 50 year politician with well established relationships with the billionaire mega-donors who control our political system. Who do you think wins? Biden, and here we are. Reduce the influence of money in politics or else expect more of the same.