Who is going to be next presidential candidate for democrats?

[Anonymous]

Beshear/Warnock is my dream ticket

[Anonymous]

Oh good. This thread again... ;

[Anonymous]

Thread title could really be retitled "Which Democrat is going to be President in 2029?" I'm not sure which Republican would want to use up a campaign cycle to lose given how that tends to sideline you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Josh Shapiro. AIPAC money controls the establishment democrats. He will lose

This, Democratic establishment wants an Israel first candidate and he'll be the perfect fit.

I really don't think that's true. After what happened in 2024, with that issue, the establishment hopes that particular issue never rears its head again. As a matter of fact, they will try to run away from it, or at the very least, not embrace it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hopefully a moderate who priorities righting the economy and international relations over gender pronouns.

Sigh. I guess that Kamala Harris "they/them" ad worked.

Both sides are/were too intent on changing culture rather than improving things that matter to the general US population. I don’t want to talk about Jesus and I don’t want to tiptoe around he/she/they/we/us/it/yo. Anyone who stops focusing on gender nonconformity and avoids getting into stupid shit with the Pope of all people will be a massive win for the whole country. No one seems to know how to keep the focus on the important stuff and get the job done so they focus on changing US culture and shoving weird stuff into the spotlight.

Well, you got half of your post right, since Trump can't stop talking about Jesus. But, you're a fool. You're not tiptoeing. Be real. That nonsense is why were here with a ruined economy today. If you had any discernment, that would be obvious to you.

DP. It is nonsense, isn’t it?
The gender stuff is massively unpopular, and for good reason. If you can agree it is nonsense, then why not keep it out of the picture?

[Anonymous]

The way things are going, it will probably be Gavin Newsom.

[Anonymous]

Right now, Gavin Newsom and Mark Kelly seem like the leading candidates. I think Andy Beasher will do well once the campaigns really get going and more people get to know him. I think people will really want an antidote to the Trump sleaze and circus, so Beshear may stand out.

But politics can change in minute. Too early to say who's got what it takes. So far there is no Obama type candidate that everyone is rallying around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Beshear/Warnock is my dream ticket

Yes, that could be pretty good.

[Anonymous]

Mark Kelly - let's ride this artemis enthusiasm to an astronaut president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Josh Shapiro. AIPAC money controls the establishment democrats. He will lose

This, Democratic establishment wants an Israel first candidate and he'll be the perfect fit.

No. No one who condones Netanyahu will succeed. The republicans may love the Israel under Bibi, but dems know it’s become terrible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Beshear/Warnock is my dream ticket

Listen to Beshear at 40:30 for about a minute. This is all he has to do all campaign cycle. I think the country is going to be shocked to hear from somebody that sounds Presidential again, particularly since we still have 2+ years of having to suffer Trump's anger, stupidity, and dementia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hopefully a moderate who priorities righting the economy and international relations over gender pronouns.

Sigh. I guess that Kamala Harris "they/them" ad worked.

Both sides are/were too intent on changing culture rather than improving things that matter to the general US population. I don’t want to talk about Jesus and I don’t want to tiptoe around he/she/they/we/us/it/yo. Anyone who stops focusing on gender nonconformity and avoids getting into stupid shit with the Pope of all people will be a massive win for the whole country. No one seems to know how to keep the focus on the important stuff and get the job done so they focus on changing US culture and shoving weird stuff into the spotlight.

Maybe you were not paying attention, but Harris's campaign focused on things like stopping post0covid price gouging, getting costs down particularly healthcare, making more fair the tax code, and investing in the American people and not billionaires.

She did not campaign on pronouns or gender non-conformity, though when asked, advocated for the civil rights of ALL Americans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Beshear/Warnock is my dream ticket

Boring white male, religious black Democrat

Both from the South, both are fairly moderate. Both could appeal to key Democratic constituents and Independents

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The way things are going, it will probably be Gavin Newsom.

This 🏆

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hopefully a moderate who priorities righting the economy and international relations over gender pronouns.

Sigh. I guess that Kamala Harris "they/them" ad worked.

Both sides are/were too intent on changing culture rather than improving things that matter to the general US population. I don’t want to talk about Jesus and I don’t want to tiptoe around he/she/they/we/us/it/yo. Anyone who stops focusing on gender nonconformity and avoids getting into stupid shit with the Pope of all people will be a massive win for the whole country. No one seems to know how to keep the focus on the important stuff and get the job done so they focus on changing US culture and shoving weird stuff into the spotlight.

Maybe you were not paying attention, but Harris's campaign focused on things like stopping post0covid price gouging, getting costs down particularly healthcare, making more fair the tax code, and investing in the American people and not billionaires.

She did not campaign on pronouns or gender non-conformity, though when asked, advocated for the civil rights of ALL Americans.

.

And yet, there is no reason to believe she would have done differently than Biden to sign off on redefining the meaning of biological sex to mean gender.
If someone can’t get something so simple right, how can they be trusted?