Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary

[Anonymous]

No dna evidence wants to be opened up the judge.

Lacis autopsy sealed..

No real time of death established by the state. They waver between the evening of December 23rd and morning of December 24th and claim proving the time of death doesn’t matter because Scott did it..

This was the best case the state can prove: a flexible time of death, a sealed autopsy record of Laci, sealed fishing boat re-enactments, and hair on pliers as their only forensic evidence. He was sentenced to death with a case like this where the state didn’t even provide a real timeline of death. They did not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

And they still haven’t found the rest of her knowing that it should be in the Bay. It’s not some easily searchable neighborhood retention pond. They had “leads” you seem to think they never withhold information from the public in these cases. They also didn’t tell Laci’s parents they were aware of Amber as soon as they knew because they were using her to try to get information from Scott. Meanwhile the family was still supporting Scott. But it was an active investigation.

They ignored all leads that Laci was kidnapped and thought all the Laci spottings callers called in with were all bunk.

After Amber showed up, they were convinced it was a homicide case even without a body. They should’ve spent more time vetting the calls from locals because there weren’t that many 5’1, heavily pregnant women around. Modesto has a small town feel with close knit neighborhoods and the surrrounding area was rural.

On May 1, 2002, 24 year old Evelyn Fernandez, expecting a baby boy, disappeared at eight months pregnant and her torso and legs were also found in the SF Bay in July 2002. Her murder is still unsolved.

They weren’t wrong, there was a homicide and they waited until the body turned up to arrest Scott. That’s when Scott tried to hightail it to Mexico with weapons, cash, dyed hair, and speeding. Guilty as sin.

It’s no wonder our Justice system is so screwed up. It’s all in the hands of cops and juries of our peers who don’t care about anything besides their own biases about who killed someone. There is zero impartiality in the legal system. It’s a 21st century Salem witch trial

Poor Scott Peterson. He did the crime, now he can do the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the A&E doc, one of the things that pissed off the detectives is Scott giving one of the cops a coaster for his cup of water. He thought that was suspicious for a man who just lost his wife to do.

It’s ridiculous the stuff they came up with. They just didn’t like Scott. The entire family originally thought she was alive and maybe went into labor and was at a local hospital. Even Sharon Rocha, Lacis mom, criticized the cops and the reporters who implied foul play. The family thought Laci went into labor prematurely.

Its called wishful thinking

Murderers are unlikable. The spouse is the most dangerous person to a pregnant woman. Not stranger danger. Scott put a target on himself.

It’s also dangerous if a woman confronts strange men committing a crime.

The spouse is the most dangerous when there is a history of previous DV. There was no history of DV with the Petersons. Laci loved Scott and would hate that everyone thought he killed her thanks to some loose tramp like Amber who didn’t even know who her kids father even was. That was the woman Scott wanted to leave Laci for? I don’t think so. Nancy Grace and the state had it all wrong.

The partner is the most dangerous person, period. Not just in DV cases.

Cars are a leading cause of death. So is alcohol.

Are we going to all stop driving cars or stop drinking alcohol?

What does statistics have to do with an actual crime? Start with the crime and the crime scene and the clues not assumptions and general statistics. The cops handled the investigation backwards, starting with the suspect first, and clues second. Instead of evidence collecting first and suspect last.

Laci and Connors bodies were not found until mid April. They went missing on Christmas Eve and that marina and SF Bay was searched so extensively including with radar and scuba divers. Nothing was found until the search ended. A passerby is who alerted cops to Laci and Connors remains. They didn’t find it themselves.

How was Scott able to hide human remains in such a shallow body of water on his first attempt? They searched the water day and night for Lacis remains and nobody found anything until the SF Bay search is suspended in March

Laci’s body was found in the bay right where it was suspected to be. Because it wasn’t found earlier than April doesn’t mean it wasn’t there all along. The body was consistent with a body that was submerged in water for many months. The bay has swift currents, it’s dark, muddy, etc. This isn’t that hard to figure out.

A couple million dollars was spent on the SF Bay search with scuba divers and radars and they couldn’t find Laci. They all knew from the Evelyn Fernandez case that the bay was the likely place the body would be but they couldn’t find it despite desperately searching for it to finally arrest Scott.

The search was getting too expensive so they had to finally stop searching the SF Bay. They searched it over 30 times and couldn’t find anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

And they still haven’t found the rest of her knowing that it should be in the Bay. It’s not some easily searchable neighborhood retention pond. They had “leads” you seem to think they never withhold information from the public in these cases. They also didn’t tell Laci’s parents they were aware of Amber as soon as they knew because they were using her to try to get information from Scott. Meanwhile the family was still supporting Scott. But it was an active investigation.

They ignored all leads that Laci was kidnapped and thought all the Laci spottings callers called in with were all bunk.

After Amber showed up, they were convinced it was a homicide case even without a body. They should’ve spent more time vetting the calls from locals because there weren’t that many 5’1, heavily pregnant women around. Modesto has a small town feel with close knit neighborhoods and the surrrounding area was rural.

On May 1, 2002, 24 year old Evelyn Fernandez, expecting a baby boy, disappeared at eight months pregnant and her torso and legs were also found in the SF Bay in July 2002. Her murder is still unsolved.

They weren’t wrong, there was a homicide and they waited until the body turned up to arrest Scott. That’s when Scott tried to hightail it to Mexico with weapons, cash, dyed hair, and speeding. Guilty as sin.

It’s no wonder our Justice system is so screwed up. It’s all in the hands of cops and juries of our peers who don’t care about anything besides their own biases about who killed someone. There is zero impartiality in the legal system. It’s a 21st century Salem witch trial

Poor Scott Peterson. He did the crime, now he can do the time.

I hope he’s exonerated and sues California

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

And they still haven’t found the rest of her knowing that it should be in the Bay. It’s not some easily searchable neighborhood retention pond. They had “leads” you seem to think they never withhold information from the public in these cases. They also didn’t tell Laci’s parents they were aware of Amber as soon as they knew because they were using her to try to get information from Scott. Meanwhile the family was still supporting Scott. But it was an active investigation.

They ignored all leads that Laci was kidnapped and thought all the Laci spottings callers called in with were all bunk.

After Amber showed up, they were convinced it was a homicide case even without a body. They should’ve spent more time vetting the calls from locals because there weren’t that many 5’1, heavily pregnant women around. Modesto has a small town feel with close knit neighborhoods and the surrrounding area was rural.

On May 1, 2002, 24 year old Evelyn Fernandez, expecting a baby boy, disappeared at eight months pregnant and her torso and legs were also found in the SF Bay in July 2002. Her murder is still unsolved.

They weren’t wrong, there was a homicide and they waited until the body turned up to arrest Scott. That’s when Scott tried to hightail it to Mexico with weapons, cash, dyed hair, and speeding. Guilty as sin.

It’s no wonder our Justice system is so screwed up. It’s all in the hands of cops and juries of our peers who don’t care about anything besides their own biases about who killed someone. There is zero impartiality in the legal system. It’s a 21st century Salem witch trial

Poor Scott Peterson. He did the crime, now he can do the time.

I hope he’s exonerated and sues California

He won’t be, but dare to dream! Do you write him love letters in jail? Do you hope he will get in touch if he ever gets out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No dna evidence wants to be opened up the judge.

Lacis autopsy sealed..

No real time of death established by the state. They waver between the evening of December 23rd and morning of December 24th and claim proving the time of death doesn’t matter because Scott did it..

This was the best case the state can prove: a flexible time of death, a sealed autopsy record of Laci, sealed fishing boat re-enactments, and hair on pliers as their only forensic evidence. He was sentenced to death with a case like this where the state didn’t even provide a real timeline of death. They did not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

He is guilty, Janey.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

And they still haven’t found the rest of her knowing that it should be in the Bay. It’s not some easily searchable neighborhood retention pond. They had “leads” you seem to think they never withhold information from the public in these cases. They also didn’t tell Laci’s parents they were aware of Amber as soon as they knew because they were using her to try to get information from Scott. Meanwhile the family was still supporting Scott. But it was an active investigation.

You might want to post this on Modesto Urban Moms. I don't think anyone on this site is in the jury pool that you are trying to convince.

What jury pool? This case is done and dusted except for one or two conspiracy theorists keeping it going.

The jury pool if Scott gets a new trial, which is the apparent goal of the poster who believes Scott did not do it.

Yes, but that’s not me. You replied to me above saying I was trying to convince a nonexistent jury pool, when I’m sure Scott did it.

Sorry!

[Anonymous]

Scott was offered tons of money for confession interviews and refused

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No dna evidence wants to be opened up the judge.

Lacis autopsy sealed..

No real time of death established by the state. They waver between the evening of December 23rd and morning of December 24th and claim proving the time of death doesn’t matter because Scott did it..

This was the best case the state can prove: a flexible time of death, a sealed autopsy record of Laci, sealed fishing boat re-enactments, and hair on pliers as their only forensic evidence. He was sentenced to death with a case like this where the state didn’t even provide a real timeline of death. They did not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

He is guilty, Janey.

Not Janey and not a Scott fan. He’s a cheater and a liar, but that doesn’t necessarily equal murder

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

And they still haven’t found the rest of her knowing that it should be in the Bay. It’s not some easily searchable neighborhood retention pond. They had “leads” you seem to think they never withhold information from the public in these cases. They also didn’t tell Laci’s parents they were aware of Amber as soon as they knew because they were using her to try to get information from Scott. Meanwhile the family was still supporting Scott. But it was an active investigation.

They ignored all leads that Laci was kidnapped and thought all the Laci spottings callers called in with were all bunk.

After Amber showed up, they were convinced it was a homicide case even without a body. They should’ve spent more time vetting the calls from locals because there weren’t that many 5’1, heavily pregnant women around. Modesto has a small town feel with close knit neighborhoods and the surrrounding area was rural.

On May 1, 2002, 24 year old Evelyn Fernandez, expecting a baby boy, disappeared at eight months pregnant and her torso and legs were also found in the SF Bay in July 2002. Her murder is still unsolved.

They weren’t wrong, there was a homicide and they waited until the body turned up to arrest Scott. That’s when Scott tried to hightail it to Mexico with weapons, cash, dyed hair, and speeding. Guilty as sin.

+1. No one has any explanation for this, or selling Laci's car, or using the nursery for storage. Or making jokes during the initial search for them - his supposedly beloved wife and baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
The spouse is the most dangerous when there is a history of previous DV. There was no history of DV with the Petersons. Laci loved Scott and would hate that everyone thought he killed her thanks to some loose tramp like Amber who didn’t even know who her kids father even was. That was the woman Scott wanted to leave Laci for? I don’t think so. Nancy Grace and the state had it all wrong.

The partner is the most dangerous person, period. Not just in DV cases.

Cars are a leading cause of death. So is alcohol.

Are we going to all stop driving cars or stop drinking alcohol?


You are comparing apples to oranges and your stupidity is starting to really piss me off. Google is your friend.

"The CDC analyzed the murders of women in 18 states from 2003 to 2014, finding a total of 10,018 deaths. Of those, 55 percent were intimate partner violence-related, meaning they occurred at the hands of a former or current partner or the partner’s family or friends. In 93 percent of those cases, the culprit was a current or former romantic partner. The report also bucks the strangers-in-dark-alleys narrative common to televised crime dramas: Strangers perpetrated just 16 percent of all female homicides, fewer than acquaintances and just slightly more than parents.
About a third of the time, the couple had argued right before the homicide took place, and about 12 percent of the deaths were associated with jealousy. The majority of the victims were under the age of 40, and 15 percent were pregnant."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The spouse is the most dangerous when there is a history of previous DV. There was no history of DV with the Petersons. Laci loved Scott and would hate that everyone thought he killed her thanks to some loose tramp like Amber who didn’t even know who her kids father even was. That was the woman Scott wanted to leave Laci for? I don’t think so. Nancy Grace and the state had it all wrong.

The partner is the most dangerous person, period. Not just in DV cases.

Cars are a leading cause of death. So is alcohol.

Are we going to all stop driving cars or stop drinking alcohol?


You are comparing apples to oranges and your stupidity is starting to really piss me off. Google is your friend.

"The CDC analyzed the murders of women in 18 states from 2003 to 2014, finding a total of 10,018 deaths. Of those, 55 percent were intimate partner violence-related, meaning they occurred at the hands of a former or current partner or the partner’s family or friends. In 93 percent of those cases, the culprit was a current or former romantic partner. The report also bucks the strangers-in-dark-alleys narrative common to televised crime dramas: Strangers perpetrated just 16 percent of all female homicides, fewer than acquaintances and just slightly more than parents.
About a third of the time, the couple had argued right before the homicide took place, and about 12 percent of the deaths were associated with jealousy. The majority of the victims were under the age of 40, and 15 percent were pregnant."

Statistics also show prosecutors have a a larger fail rate with homicide cases than other cases. The majority (over 60%) of court exonerations are homicide cases.

Does this mean Scott is innocent?

This is how foolish using statistics is. Forensic DNA evidence tells us everything. Motive means nothing. Anybody can build a motive in court about killing. Opportunity is also dubious. Why would he use Christmas Eve, the worst possible day ever, to kill Laci? Family was expecting her and she was preparing for her family as guests the next day (mopping the kitchen floor, baking, grocery shopping).

He already had plenty of opportunities to sleep with Amber and keep it that way. There is also the fact that Scott was working on the morning of December 24th for a few hours. Where did he leave Laci’s body? Their home had no garage so how did he lift the body to the trunk in broad daylight? A neighbor saw him
Putting umbrellas in his truck that same morning so this wasn’t some deserted neighborhood. Everyone was home because it was Xmas Eve. Surely, Mackenzie, the golden retriever, would not have been allowed to roam the streets and draw attention to a crime scene at the house. The dog had a muddy collar and leash when the neighbor discovered it which means Laci probably was on a walk with the dog.

Many basic facts were overlooked by cops

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

And they still haven’t found the rest of her knowing that it should be in the Bay. It’s not some easily searchable neighborhood retention pond. They had “leads” you seem to think they never withhold information from the public in these cases. They also didn’t tell Laci’s parents they were aware of Amber as soon as they knew because they were using her to try to get information from Scott. Meanwhile the family was still supporting Scott. But it was an active investigation.

They ignored all leads that Laci was kidnapped and thought all the Laci spottings callers called in with were all bunk.

After Amber showed up, they were convinced it was a homicide case even without a body. They should’ve spent more time vetting the calls from locals because there weren’t that many 5’1, heavily pregnant women around. Modesto has a small town feel with close knit neighborhoods and the surrrounding area was rural.

On May 1, 2002, 24 year old Evelyn Fernandez, expecting a baby boy, disappeared at eight months pregnant and her torso and legs were also found in the SF Bay in July 2002. Her murder is still unsolved.

They weren’t wrong, there was a homicide and they waited until the body turned up to arrest Scott. That’s when Scott tried to hightail it to Mexico with weapons, cash, dyed hair, and speeding. Guilty as sin.

+1. No one has any explanation for this, or selling Laci's car, or using the nursery for storage. Or making jokes during the initial search for them - his supposedly beloved wife and baby.

At the time, Scott didn’t know he was supposed to be grieving. He was keeping hope alive that Laci was alive but had a medical emergency.

Just because he didn’t sit in a corner and wail and cry next to police, it doesn’t mean he didn’t miss his wife and want her home.

Before the cops were called, he searched the store and neighborhood and called all the local hospitals. I don’t get why the cops and others are so angry because Scott didn’t provide the proper grief porn.

Some men are stoic and never cry

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

And they still haven’t found the rest of her knowing that it should be in the Bay. It’s not some easily searchable neighborhood retention pond. They had “leads” you seem to think they never withhold information from the public in these cases. They also didn’t tell Laci’s parents they were aware of Amber as soon as they knew because they were using her to try to get information from Scott. Meanwhile the family was still supporting Scott. But it was an active investigation.

They ignored all leads that Laci was kidnapped and thought all the Laci spottings callers called in with were all bunk.

After Amber showed up, they were convinced it was a homicide case even without a body. They should’ve spent more time vetting the calls from locals because there weren’t that many 5’1, heavily pregnant women around. Modesto has a small town feel with close knit neighborhoods and the surrrounding area was rural.

On May 1, 2002, 24 year old Evelyn Fernandez, expecting a baby boy, disappeared at eight months pregnant and her torso and legs were also found in the SF Bay in July 2002. Her murder is still unsolved.

They weren’t wrong, there was a homicide and they waited until the body turned up to arrest Scott. That’s when Scott tried to hightail it to Mexico with weapons, cash, dyed hair, and speeding. Guilty as sin.

+1. No one has any explanation for this, or selling Laci's car, or using the nursery for storage. Or making jokes during the initial search for them - his supposedly beloved wife and baby.

At the time, Scott didn’t know he was supposed to be grieving. He was keeping hope alive that Laci was alive but had a medical emergency.

Just because he didn’t sit in a corner and wail and cry next to police, it doesn’t mean he didn’t miss his wife and want her home.

Before the cops were called, he searched the store and neighborhood and called all the local hospitals. I don’t get why the cops and others are so angry because Scott didn’t provide the proper grief porn.

Some men are stoic and never cry

No. His baby was missing too. Normal parents are beside themselves with grief. Nothing about Scotts reaction was normal. He wasn’t grieving because he knew where they were all along.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No dna evidence wants to be opened up the judge.

Lacis autopsy sealed..

No real time of death established by the state. They waver between the evening of December 23rd and morning of December 24th and claim proving the time of death doesn’t matter because Scott did it..

This was the best case the state can prove: a flexible time of death, a sealed autopsy record of Laci, sealed fishing boat re-enactments, and hair on pliers as their only forensic evidence. He was sentenced to death with a case like this where the state didn’t even provide a real timeline of death. They did not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Actually they did. That is legally what they did. The jurors who heard the whole admissible case convicted him of murder. They all believed that they proved guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.