Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the A&E doc, one of the things that pissed off the detectives is Scott giving one of the cops a coaster for his cup of water. He thought that was suspicious for a man who just lost his wife to do.

It’s ridiculous the stuff they came up with. They just didn’t like Scott. The entire family originally thought she was alive and maybe went into labor and was at a local hospital. Even Sharon Rocha, Lacis mom, criticized the cops and the reporters who implied foul play. The family thought Laci went into labor prematurely.

Its called wishful thinking

Murderers are unlikable. The spouse is the most dangerous person to a pregnant woman. Not stranger danger. Scott put a target on himself.

It’s also dangerous if a woman confronts strange men committing a crime.

The spouse is the most dangerous when there is a history of previous DV. There was no history of DV with the Petersons. Laci loved Scott and would hate that everyone thought he killed her thanks to some loose tramp like Amber who didn’t even know who her kids father even was. That was the woman Scott wanted to leave Laci for? I don’t think so. Nancy Grace and the state had it all wrong.

The partner is the most dangerous person, period. Not just in DV cases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

And they still haven’t found the rest of her knowing that it should be in the Bay. It’s not some easily searchable neighborhood retention pond. They had “leads” you seem to think they never withhold information from the public in these cases. They also didn’t tell Laci’s parents they were aware of Amber as soon as they knew because they were using her to try to get information from Scott. Meanwhile the family was still supporting Scott. But it was an active investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the A&E doc, one of the things that pissed off the detectives is Scott giving one of the cops a coaster for his cup of water. He thought that was suspicious for a man who just lost his wife to do.

It’s ridiculous the stuff they came up with. They just didn’t like Scott. The entire family originally thought she was alive and maybe went into labor and was at a local hospital. Even Sharon Rocha, Lacis mom, criticized the cops and the reporters who implied foul play. The family thought Laci went into labor prematurely.

Its called wishful thinking

Murderers are unlikable. The spouse is the most dangerous person to a pregnant woman. Not stranger danger. Scott put a target on himself.

It’s also dangerous if a woman confronts strange men committing a crime.

The spouse is the most dangerous when there is a history of previous DV. There was no history of DV with the Petersons. Laci loved Scott and would hate that everyone thought he killed her thanks to some loose tramp like Amber who didn’t even know who her kids father even was. That was the woman Scott wanted to leave Laci for? I don’t think so. Nancy Grace and the state had it all wrong.

The partner is the most dangerous person, period. Not just in DV cases.

Cars are a leading cause of death. So is alcohol.

Are we going to all stop driving cars or stop drinking alcohol?

What does statistics have to do with an actual crime? Start with the crime and the crime scene and the clues not assumptions and general statistics. The cops handled the investigation backwards, starting with the suspect first, and clues second. Instead of evidence collecting first and suspect last.

Laci and Connors bodies were not found until mid April. They went missing on Christmas Eve and that marina and SF Bay was searched so extensively including with radar and scuba divers. Nothing was found until the search ended. A passerby is who alerted cops to Laci and Connors remains. They didn’t find it themselves.

How was Scott able to hide human remains in such a shallow body of water on his first attempt? They searched the water day and night for Lacis remains and nobody found anything until the SF Bay search is suspended in March

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

And they still haven’t found the rest of her knowing that it should be in the Bay. It’s not some easily searchable neighborhood retention pond. They had “leads” you seem to think they never withhold information from the public in these cases. They also didn’t tell Laci’s parents they were aware of Amber as soon as they knew because they were using her to try to get information from Scott. Meanwhile the family was still supporting Scott. But it was an active investigation.

You might want to post this on Modesto Urban Moms. I don't think anyone on this site is in the jury pool that you are trying to convince.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the A&E doc, one of the things that pissed off the detectives is Scott giving one of the cops a coaster for his cup of water. He thought that was suspicious for a man who just lost his wife to do.

It’s ridiculous the stuff they came up with. They just didn’t like Scott. The entire family originally thought she was alive and maybe went into labor and was at a local hospital. Even Sharon Rocha, Lacis mom, criticized the cops and the reporters who implied foul play. The family thought Laci went into labor prematurely.

Its called wishful thinking

Murderers are unlikable. The spouse is the most dangerous person to a pregnant woman. Not stranger danger. Scott put a target on himself.

It’s also dangerous if a woman confronts strange men committing a crime.

The spouse is the most dangerous when there is a history of previous DV. There was no history of DV with the Petersons. Laci loved Scott and would hate that everyone thought he killed her thanks to some loose tramp like Amber who didn’t even know who her kids father even was. That was the woman Scott wanted to leave Laci for? I don’t think so. Nancy Grace and the state had it all wrong.

The partner is the most dangerous person, period. Not just in DV cases.

Cars are a leading cause of death. So is alcohol.

Are we going to all stop driving cars or stop drinking alcohol?

What does statistics have to do with an actual crime? Start with the crime and the crime scene and the clues not assumptions and general statistics. The cops handled the investigation backwards, starting with the suspect first, and clues second. Instead of evidence collecting first and suspect last.

Laci and Connors bodies were not found until mid April. They went missing on Christmas Eve and that marina and SF Bay was searched so extensively including with radar and scuba divers. Nothing was found until the search ended. A passerby is who alerted cops to Laci and Connors remains. They didn’t find it themselves.

How was Scott able to hide human remains in such a shallow body of water on his first attempt? They searched the water day and night for Lacis remains and nobody found anything until the SF Bay search is suspended in March

Laci’s body was found in the bay right where it was suspected to be. Because it wasn’t found earlier than April doesn’t mean it wasn’t there all along. The body was consistent with a body that was submerged in water for many months. The bay has swift currents, it’s dark, muddy, etc. This isn’t that hard to figure out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

And they still haven’t found the rest of her knowing that it should be in the Bay. It’s not some easily searchable neighborhood retention pond. They had “leads” you seem to think they never withhold information from the public in these cases. They also didn’t tell Laci’s parents they were aware of Amber as soon as they knew because they were using her to try to get information from Scott. Meanwhile the family was still supporting Scott. But it was an active investigation.

You might want to post this on Modesto Urban Moms. I don't think anyone on this site is in the jury pool that you are trying to convince.

What jury pool? This case is done and dusted except for one or two conspiracy theorists keeping it going.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

Why would there be sightings of Laci if she was kidnapped and they had the intention of killing her. She wouldn't just be walking around in public with her kidnappers. Also, how do petty theft druggies go from burglary to kidnapping to the extent they keep her alive for months, allow her to give birth and then kill her and the baby. This is such a stupid theory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

And they still haven’t found the rest of her knowing that it should be in the Bay. It’s not some easily searchable neighborhood retention pond. They had “leads” you seem to think they never withhold information from the public in these cases. They also didn’t tell Laci’s parents they were aware of Amber as soon as they knew because they were using her to try to get information from Scott. Meanwhile the family was still supporting Scott. But it was an active investigation.

You might want to post this on Modesto Urban Moms. I don't think anyone on this site is in the jury pool that you are trying to convince.

What jury pool? This case is done and dusted except for one or two conspiracy theorists keeping it going.

The jury pool if Scott gets a new trial, which is the apparent goal of the poster who believes Scott did not do it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

And they still haven’t found the rest of her knowing that it should be in the Bay. It’s not some easily searchable neighborhood retention pond. They had “leads” you seem to think they never withhold information from the public in these cases. They also didn’t tell Laci’s parents they were aware of Amber as soon as they knew because they were using her to try to get information from Scott. Meanwhile the family was still supporting Scott. But it was an active investigation.

They ignored all leads that Laci was kidnapped and thought all the Laci spottings callers called in with were all bunk.

After Amber showed up, they were convinced it was a homicide case even without a body. They should’ve spent more time vetting the calls from locals because there weren’t that many 5’1, heavily pregnant women around. Modesto has a small town feel with close knit neighborhoods and the surrrounding area was rural.

On May 1, 2002, 24 year old Evelyn Fernandez, expecting a baby boy, disappeared at eight months pregnant and her torso and legs were also found in the SF Bay in July 2002. Her murder is still unsolved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

And they still haven’t found the rest of her knowing that it should be in the Bay. It’s not some easily searchable neighborhood retention pond. They had “leads” you seem to think they never withhold information from the public in these cases. They also didn’t tell Laci’s parents they were aware of Amber as soon as they knew because they were using her to try to get information from Scott. Meanwhile the family was still supporting Scott. But it was an active investigation.

You might want to post this on Modesto Urban Moms. I don't think anyone on this site is in the jury pool that you are trying to convince.

What jury pool? This case is done and dusted except for one or two conspiracy theorists keeping it going.

The jury pool if Scott gets a new trial, which is the apparent goal of the poster who believes Scott did not do it.

Yes, but that’s not me. You replied to me above saying I was trying to convince a nonexistent jury pool, when I’m sure Scott did it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

And they still haven’t found the rest of her knowing that it should be in the Bay. It’s not some easily searchable neighborhood retention pond. They had “leads” you seem to think they never withhold information from the public in these cases. They also didn’t tell Laci’s parents they were aware of Amber as soon as they knew because they were using her to try to get information from Scott. Meanwhile the family was still supporting Scott. But it was an active investigation.

They ignored all leads that Laci was kidnapped and thought all the Laci spottings callers called in with were all bunk.

After Amber showed up, they were convinced it was a homicide case even without a body. They should’ve spent more time vetting the calls from locals because there weren’t that many 5’1, heavily pregnant women around. Modesto has a small town feel with close knit neighborhoods and the surrrounding area was rural.

On May 1, 2002, 24 year old Evelyn Fernandez, expecting a baby boy, disappeared at eight months pregnant and her torso and legs were also found in the SF Bay in July 2002. Her murder is still unsolved.

They weren’t wrong, there was a homicide and they waited until the body turned up to arrest Scott. That’s when Scott tried to hightail it to Mexico with weapons, cash, dyed hair, and speeding. Guilty as sin.

[Anonymous]

During Scott Peterson’s trial, the judge sealed Laci’s autopsy files.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

Zzzz....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are actually tons of bodily markers that could’ve showed Laci gave birth but they were ignored. We don’t know if she ever nurses Connor or if Connor ever drank milk.

Those are clues but the cops didn’t think about it.

Women should lead investigations. Men aren’t great investigators of anything

He killed her when she was pregnant. She never had the opportunity to give birth or nurse her baby. Your account if what could have occurred is like fan fiction.

The cops couldn’t find Laci in that body of water they searched hundreds of times from December-March. The police department finally gave up on thinking Scott placed her in water when fishing and at some point, thought maybe he buried her in his backyard or in his warehouse with fertilizer.

The cops kept saying they had “no leads” on where Laci’s body was while their phone line was ringing off the hook with tips (some true, many untrue) of Laci sightings in late December-early January. They did have leads. They just didn’t want to follow any leads that implied Laci was still alive

And they still haven’t found the rest of her knowing that it should be in the Bay. It’s not some easily searchable neighborhood retention pond. They had “leads” you seem to think they never withhold information from the public in these cases. They also didn’t tell Laci’s parents they were aware of Amber as soon as they knew because they were using her to try to get information from Scott. Meanwhile the family was still supporting Scott. But it was an active investigation.

They ignored all leads that Laci was kidnapped and thought all the Laci spottings callers called in with were all bunk.

After Amber showed up, they were convinced it was a homicide case even without a body. They should’ve spent more time vetting the calls from locals because there weren’t that many 5’1, heavily pregnant women around. Modesto has a small town feel with close knit neighborhoods and the surrrounding area was rural.

On May 1, 2002, 24 year old Evelyn Fernandez, expecting a baby boy, disappeared at eight months pregnant and her torso and legs were also found in the SF Bay in July 2002. Her murder is still unsolved.

They weren’t wrong, there was a homicide and they waited until the body turned up to arrest Scott. That’s when Scott tried to hightail it to Mexico with weapons, cash, dyed hair, and speeding. Guilty as sin.

It’s no wonder our Justice system is so screwed up. It’s all in the hands of cops and juries of our peers who don’t care about anything besides their own biases about who killed someone. There is zero impartiality in the legal system. It’s a 21st century Salem witch trial