Forum Index
»
Religion
How is the fact that the world exists proof of a god? How is "the god gene" not simply "the god of the gaps" like Thor's hammer? I don't agree or even understand that only humans (vs other animals) are capable of such deep evil? . Ever seen a documentary on Hippos? They are vegetarians who want to kill you simply because they hate you! But even if this obtuse and unsupported claim were true, how is that evidence for a god? |
1) if you were walking in the wilderness and came across a well constructed fort, would you say that is evidence there is/was someone around who built it? Any answer other than yes is absurd. 2) not sure what god of the gaps is, but religious longing has not waned with advancement of science. There are lots of hard core scientists from all fields who believe in God. And even if people have abandoned organized religion in our society, they have not abandoned spirituality, which for our purposes, is the same thing. 3) No, i have not seen a documentary on hippos. But I don't need to see one to know that animals do not commit atrocities and evils like humans do. Look at our history and read the news. Animals may kill, and often brutally, but they kill because they need to. We see animals evolve over time into more complex creatures, but we see no evidence of the evolution of evil (meaning, monkeys are not more evil than a lion or a spider or a virus). It is evidence of Christianity because Christianity has an explanation for this phenomenon, whereas atheism does not. I look into the world objectively and look for the worldview that best explains what I see. And theism (specifically Christianity) does that better than atheism. |
Wanted to add that the human longing for God is separate from scientific gaps. Sure, they sometimes intertwine but at their roots, they are not addressing the same questions. Search for God is about answering the why questions, whereas science is about the how questions. The most important questions people ask will always be "why did this happen" "was there a purpose to my suffering" "will death separate me from my loved ones" etc. And those are not scientific questions. It is about people seeking to find meaning in their lives. Which begs the question, why are humans obsessed with finding meaning in their lives? |
This is the long disproved "watchmaker" argument. You know what a fort is and you've seen them made, so if you see a fort you know someone made it. With this world view, which is fully pre-suppositional of a god's existence, name me something that is not designed. What? There is nothing that is not designed? Then you can't claim to see a difference between the two, now, can you. Logical fail. Again, the watchmaker theory disproved by others much smarter than I. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/intelligent-design-watchmaker_b_1730878
If you don't know what "god of the gaps" is, then you are very inexperienced in these kinds of arguments, and I politely suggest you read up on them more before making them. Again, these are long disproved fallacies by those much smarter than I. "God of the gaps" is a theological perspective in which gaps in scientific knowledge are taken to be evidence or proof of God's existence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_of_the_gaps
First, Atheism does not try to explain anything. Atheism is simply the position that there is insufficient evidence to believe in a god or gods. And hippos are entirely and 100% evil by anyone's definition as they will kill you for no reason whatsoever, and not because "they need to". They don't.
Does it matter to you if it is true or not, or just that it "explains it better"? |
You're welcome. Signed, a formerly religious person who has given this sort of question a lot of thought. |
|
Atheism is a personal decision, and just because you don’t think there is enough evidence to believe in God, doesn’t mean other people don’t personally have enough evidence to believe in God.
That’s the thing that gets me: nobody has to believe in God. You don’t think there is a God, bully for you. But your decision doesn’t mean other people can’t believe in God. People here have multiple cows because they think people are “proselytizing,” but them will post multiple times asking for Christians to give evidence and prove God to them . How about live your God free life not thinking about God 24/7/365? If you were really happy and fulfilled and busy in your life, you’d not spend more time debating and thinking about God than many Christian people. |
| Mother Teresa suffered from depression. I'm sure she knew Jesus better than your friend. Tell her to shut up andgo sit down somewhere! |
Personally I disagree that it is a decision. I never decided to not beleive in god just as you never decided not to believe in Bigfoot. You say people personally have enough evidence, I am simply asking them for it. They don't have to respond or provide it. The easiest thing is to ignore it. But I would hope we can have an open discussion and an open mind. I promise you if I see evidence of a god I will instantly begin believing in one. Can you say the same?
That’s the thing that gets me: nobody has to believe in God. You think there is a God, bully for you. But your decision doesn’t mean other people can’t not believe in God.
Please give an example of how you'd like a conversation to go here, between someone who believes and someone who does not. You can script it out if you like. |
If you want believe, fine. Remember, it's faith, not facts or logic. Your pastor will tell you that. And the fact is that not "all humans" have desires for God. Many humans could never believe and many gave up the beliefs they were inculcated with in childhood. |
1) I don't see what watchman argument proves or disapproves. Everything I know is designed because a designer designed it. You argument for disproving it actually proves it imo. I have no trouble imagining the alternative, which is that the world simply doesn't exist. Or that it isn't consistent or coherent. Maybe you lack imagination, but it's really not that hard to imagine. 2) I may not have heard the term god of gaps because I don't focus my life on atheist verbiage but I think I addressed this argument already. Religion/spirituality has not disappeared with advancement of science and logically the two do not address the same set of questions. 3) I'm not sure what your obsession with hippos are, but if you are seriously saying that hippos can rival human evil, then you are not to be taken seriously because you are willing to be intellectually dishonest to support your favored conclusion. If theism explains the world better, that fact itself affects the likelihood of theism being true. That is how we form conclusions in any other area of our lives. We look at the facts, and go with the hypothesis that explains those facts the best. |
How odd -- usually religious people go by faith and don't try to prove anything. Faith is a feeling. Some people have it in abundance. Some not at all. Other have it, then drop it along the way |
Look who's talking! |
Adding that if you are the previous poster who asked for evidence, I've given the evidence that I think support theism that can be universally understood (there are other types of evidence that are not so easily shared because they are based on personal experience, which you would automatically discount anyways but that is a whole other discussion). The single biggest evidence, imo, is human exceptionalism. In our goodness, in our evilness, in our search for meaning, everything that we ordinarily define as "most human" hints at something beyond this world. Evil, the way humans are capable of it, simply doesn't exist elsewhere in the natural world. Human search for transcendence (through music, art, living a moral life, etc) also simply doesn't exist elsewhere nor is it really necessary for anything. For me, all that is evidence that there is a missing key in the mystery that is the human race, pointing to something beyond and outside of this natural world. But again, this is not conclusive evidence nor will there ever be. The smaller reality (this world) cannot prove conclusively the existence of the bigger reality, that is just logic, because we cannot contain that bigger reality, in our world, in our ways of measuring reality, in our own minds. The best evidence we can have are things that don't quite fit well in this reality, that long for things outside of this reality. Honestly I used to think like you. Sometimes religious belief is like those visual puzzles where you only see on possible thing at one point, but then something changes and suddenly you see the second image and you can't believe you never saw it before even though you were staring at the exact same picture. In the same way, you and I can look at the same facts and I can see it as concrete (though not conclusive) evidence of the existence of God and yet you see nothing but wishful thinking. |
See? Your position is everything is designed, therefore you can't tell a watch's origin from a rock's. Your pre-supposition was that there was a designer. How does that prove anything?
Those are the only 2 possibilities? That the earth was designed or doesn't exist? There are no other possibilities, such as natural ones? Don't you see the gigantic flaw here?
Sorry, religion and spirituality (whatever the heck that is) has absolutely decreased with the advancement of science. People no longer believe thunder is caused by Odin's bolts, or that god created earth at the center of the universe. This is really an unsupportable claim you are making.
I'm admittedly kind of having fun with the hippos thing, but if you prefer you can consider the parasites that bore themselves into people's eyes and eat them, which, according to you, was designed by your god. Now that's some seriously evil stuff right there. https://www.cnet.com/science/meet-the-parasite-that-can-burrow-its-way-into-the-human-eye/
As explained before, and ignored by you, atheism does not attempt to explain anything. As asked before, and ignored by you, Does it matter to you if it is true or not, or just that it "explains it better"? |
This is a child’s thought process. |