Cops in TX tackle & block desperate parents, while they let shooter rampage thru the school

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I second a UN investigation.

American LE are completely out of control.

The same UN that put Iran as head of the women’s rights commission?

[Anonymous]

You know what would solve this problem? Police in schools. OH we have police in schools? Well then, MORE police in schools. Maybe we should just make schools into police stations. That will solve our problems!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know what would solve this problem? Police in schools. OH we have police in schools? Well then, MORE police in schools. Maybe we should just make schools into police stations. That will solve our problems!

No, we need sharpshooters in every school. At every possible entrance.

Duh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yesterday's timelines were all lies.

Prove it!

The cops admitted it!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know what would solve this problem? Police in schools. OH we have police in schools? Well then, MORE police in schools. Maybe we should just make schools into police stations. That will solve our problems!

The school had no resource officer on premise, armed or otherwise.

I guarantee you that if there was a proper perimeter fence, locked doors and and armed resource officer, as well as signs posted saying that adults on premise were armed and ready to engage, the shooting would never have happened. These cowards go for easy targets. Stop making things easier for them WHILE you work on legislation.

[Anonymous]

Cops should have fought the fight they were in and not the one they wanted to have. Time was not on their side, but that doesn’t mean give more time to the shooter. You establish dominance and go in with what you have.

[Anonymous]

How, if in Texas everyone is ok with just buying an assault rifle at a local sporting goods store, do police not have a supply of them to bring to such a situation? Don’t they have those armored vehicles we bought them?
And couldn’t they have just gone to the same sporting goods store and picked up the same gun and rounds of ammunition as they leisurely drove to the school?

I am sure the truth of what happened is even worse than what the police are sharing, though it strains me to imagine how that could be at this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How, if in Texas everyone is ok with just buying an assault rifle at a local sporting goods store, do police not have a supply of them to bring to such a situation? Don’t they have those armored vehicles we bought them?
And couldn’t they have just gone to the same sporting goods store and picked up the same gun and rounds of ammunition as they leisurely drove to the school?

I am sure the truth of what happened is even worse than what the police are sharing, though it strains me to imagine how that could be at this point.

They had the weaponry. The did not have the tactical equipment to protect themselves. They still should have gone in

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know what would solve this problem? Police in schools. OH we have police in schools? Well then, MORE police in schools. Maybe we should just make schools into police stations. That will solve our problems!

The school had no resource officer on premise, armed or otherwise.

I guarantee you that if there was a proper perimeter fence, locked doors and and armed resource officer, as well as signs posted saying that adults on premise were armed and ready to engage, the shooting would never have happened. These cowards go for easy targets. Stop making things easier for them WHILE you work on legislation.

You want to treat the symptoms without getting to the cause. Easy access to weapons of mass destruction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know what would solve this problem? Police in schools. OH we have police in schools? Well then, MORE police in schools. Maybe we should just make schools into police stations. That will solve our problems!

No, we need sharpshooters in every school. At every possible entrance.

Duh.

There was no armed officer inside the school and the doors were unlocked, and children died. No amount of your sarcasm can change that. But if the doors were locked and there was an armed officer inside, chances are that the gunman would not have gotten in at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know what would solve this problem? Police in schools. OH we have police in schools? Well then, MORE police in schools. Maybe we should just make schools into police stations. That will solve our problems!

No, we need sharpshooters in every school. At every possible entrance.

Duh.

There was no armed officer inside the school and the doors were unlocked, and children died. No amount of your sarcasm can change that. But if the doors were locked and there was an armed officer inside, chances are that the gunman would not have gotten in at all.

If an 18yo couldn’t buy an AR-15 he wouldn’t have been there at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know what would solve this problem? Police in schools. OH we have police in schools? Well then, MORE police in schools. Maybe we should just make schools into police stations. That will solve our problems!

No, we need sharpshooters in every school. At every possible entrance.

Duh.

There was no armed officer inside the school and the doors were unlocked, and children died. No amount of your sarcasm can change that. But if the doors were locked and there was an armed officer inside, chances are that the gunman would not have gotten in at all.

If an 18yo couldn’t buy an AR-15 he wouldn’t have been there at all.

Exactly.

Do all these armed guard folks work for the gun industry? Funny how the nra solution involves thousands and thousands of schools districts having to buy more and more weapons. F off nra. We want less of these horrible weapons, not more

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me get this straight. The Uvalde shooter made it by three armed officers. Then cops barricaded the killer in with a room full of children in a tactical stack. The cops sat safely outside as the killer shot each child? Protect and serve WHO?

Have you ever heard of the fog of war?

Doubtful the cops knew exactly what was happening as the situation was unfolding in real time. It's so easy to sit there behind a computer screen with 20/20 hindsight.

Fog of war did not seem to be confusing some of those parents that wanted to get into the building.

Yeah and they could have gotten shot too and added to the chaos. Clearly mobs running into an active shooting situation will make it better. /s

Never stop amazing me with your stupidity DCUM. Never stop.

Yeah actually it would have made a HUGE difference. All that needed to happen was to add chaos into this 18 hr olds rampage. A window shot out, some bullets flying, people running in rushing him. He can’t shoot every single one. Sure some would have died, but it would have diverted attention away from the kids and the classroom. The 18 yr old would have likely panicked, needed to refill ammo, paused a second...really any interference at all could have made a world of a difference in this situation. This monster was given ZERO resistance to stand there, mow down kids, listen to them cry out, then continue to sit there and play music while he waited ...and waited.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Firm information now:

1) No armed resource officer at the school
2) Shooter walked in through an unlocked door.

Those are both massive changes in the earlier narrative. So all the ‘good guy with a gun’ statements can be thrown in the trash, because there was none.

Sadly, by the time the first officer got there, those kids were probably already shot. Why it took 12 minutes to respond to the first call is definitely something I want to know. That’s a LOT of time! That no officer went in, I find disturbing. Police lacked leve 4 ballistic shields (i.e. needed gear) when they got there, which is also disturbing. That gives the shooter an advanced position. The border agent did have a shield.

That’s what they say now. I believe nothing.

You also missed the news that the shooter was shooting OUTSIDE for 12 MINUTES. In that very small town where we’re the police? Especially after they had already been called by the grandma. So maybe they should answer that. Not looking good for them. They let it happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How, if in Texas everyone is ok with just buying an assault rifle at a local sporting goods store, do police not have a supply of them to bring to such a situation? Don’t they have those armored vehicles we bought them?
And couldn’t they have just gone to the same sporting goods store and picked up the same gun and rounds of ammunition as they leisurely drove to the school?

I am sure the truth of what happened is even worse than what the police are sharing, though it strains me to imagine how that could be at this point.

They had the weaponry. The did not have the tactical equipment to protect themselves. They still should have gone in[/quote
So what, they buy ar 15s but not body armor? Is body armor not legal to buy but ar 15s are? Are the republicans in the senate aware of this? How will I stand my ground without my armored suit to protect myself?
And did they not have means to aim from a distance?

I mean if you want ar15s available at every drive through, it does seem like police need to be outfitted to expect that criminals will be using them routinely and arm themselves appropriately. What is next, are they going to stop doing car chases because they only bought bicycles and can’t keep up?