Missionaries should be banned

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:On the contrary, I see mission work as having accomplished a lot good.
Missionaries have translated the bible to indigenous languages, therefore being the first to provide them with a written language.
The new faith doesn't require sacrifices of food to a god, burning of widows, sets people free from a fear of the witches and superstitions.
Has no concept of caste, the idea that your misfortune is earned because you lived a bad life previously.

There is a lot in the traditional beliefs that people need to let go off so that they can adjust to the current century and catch up with the modern world.



Wow. Such an entitled narcissist.

Is this really how you rationalize missionaries forcing themselves on vulnerable people?

You are confusing proselytizing, the traditional door to door activity in the US with what is actual mission work in a third world country.
Like the former Mormon missionary.
Mormon church is only interested in converting people who are wealthy enough to tithe
Religion is mostly business.
An outreach is kind of like inviting new people to your place of worship to keep the business going

Actual mission work in a 3rd world country is wildly different
Anonymous
Our church sends mostly medical missionaries of doctors and RN's.

They always have lines of people to treat. Some have walked for two days for treatment.

They perform a lot of surgeries and also do a lot of womens' reproductive care.

For many people around the world this is the only medical care they have access to.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Our church sends mostly medical missionaries of doctors and RN's.

They always have lines of people to treat. Some have walked for two days for treatment.

They perform a lot of surgeries and also do a lot of womens' reproductive care.

For many people around the world this is the only medical care they have access to.


Which religion?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:On the contrary, I see mission work as having accomplished a lot good.
Missionaries have translated the bible to indigenous languages, therefore being the first to provide them with a written language.
The new faith doesn't require sacrifices of food to a god, burning of widows, sets people free from a fear of the witches and superstitions.
Has no concept of caste, the idea that your misfortune is earned because you lived a bad life previously.

There is a lot in the traditional beliefs that people need to let go off so that they can adjust to the current century and catch up with the modern world.



Wow. Such an entitled narcissist.

Is this really how you rationalize missionaries forcing themselves on vulnerable people?

You are confusing proselytizing, the traditional door to door activity in the US with what is actual mission work in a third world country.
Like the former Mormon missionary.
Mormon church is only interested in converting people who are wealthy enough to tithe
Religion is mostly business.
An outreach is kind of like inviting new people to your place of worship to keep the business going

Actual mission work in a 3rd world country is wildly different


The disgusting part is thinking that your beliefs and ways are inherently better than traditional beliefs and ways. Forcing yourself on them is somehow ok because they are poor.

So vile.
Anonymous
I think the OP is talking about those who come to her part of the world to "convert us." I don't thinks she's talking about the ones who just duig wells, provide medical services and, you know, spread the love. So to stay on topic the responses should be about those missionaries who try to spread the word, tell the people how to obtain eternal salvation and so forth.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote: I am from South East Asia and was born into one of the eastern religions. It absolutely enrages me to see western Christians come to third-world countries to convert us, trying to destroy our local practices, languages because they think they know better than us. The absolute disdain they have towards us brown people is disgusting. I think they should just be banned by all governments. Want to do humanitarian work - enroll with non-religious AID organizations. Keep your bible and your prejudice to yourself.


Read the above. Those apologists who say we just dig wells and provide medical services are not the topic of OP's objection. Those comments are non-responsive. I agree with OP. Keep your bible to yourself. It's highly disrespectful to pretend you know the real truth and that people in these countries do not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I think the OP is talking about those who come to her part of the world to "convert us." I don't thinks she's talking about the ones who just duig wells, provide medical services and, you know, spread the love. So to stay on topic the responses should be about those missionaries who try to spread the word, tell the people how to obtain eternal salvation and so forth.


Does “spreading the love” mean encouraging indigenous people to “let go” of traditional beliefs?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think the OP is talking about those who come to her part of the world to "convert us." I don't thinks she's talking about the ones who just duig wells, provide medical services and, you know, spread the love. So to stay on topic the responses should be about those missionaries who try to spread the word, tell the people how to obtain eternal salvation and so forth.


Does “spreading the love” mean encouraging indigenous people to “let go” of traditional beliefs?



you should ask the person who said that. I don't think anyone really believes that's all missionaries do.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think the OP is talking about those who come to her part of the world to "convert us." I don't thinks she's talking about the ones who just duig wells, provide medical services and, you know, spread the love. So to stay on topic the responses should be about those missionaries who try to spread the word, tell the people how to obtain eternal salvation and so forth.


Does “spreading the love” mean encouraging indigenous people to “let go” of traditional beliefs?



you should ask the person who said that. I don't think anyone really believes that's all missionaries do.


Is that ok for any missionaries to do?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think the OP is talking about those who come to her part of the world to "convert us." I don't thinks she's talking about the ones who just duig wells, provide medical services and, you know, spread the love. So to stay on topic the responses should be about those missionaries who try to spread the word, tell the people how to obtain eternal salvation and so forth.


Does “spreading the love” mean encouraging indigenous people to “let go” of traditional beliefs?



you should ask the person who said that. I don't think anyone really believes that's all missionaries do.


Is that ok for any missionaries to do?


It depends on what you believe I guess. The missionaries in Hawaii got the females to cover up their toplessness because the Bible (from the midd-east) deemed it immoral. Is that ok with you?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think the OP is talking about those who come to her part of the world to "convert us." I don't thinks she's talking about the ones who just duig wells, provide medical services and, you know, spread the love. So to stay on topic the responses should be about those missionaries who try to spread the word, tell the people how to obtain eternal salvation and so forth.


Does “spreading the love” mean encouraging indigenous people to “let go” of traditional beliefs?



you should ask the person who said that. I don't think anyone really believes that's all missionaries do.


Is that ok for any missionaries to do?


It depends on what you believe I guess. The missionaries in Hawaii got the females to cover up their toplessness because the Bible (from the midd-east) deemed it immoral. Is that ok with you?


The missionaries shouldn’t have been there in the first place.

They certainly shouldn’t have have forced any changes to local traditions & customs & religion.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think the OP is talking about those who come to her part of the world to "convert us." I don't thinks she's talking about the ones who just duig wells, provide medical services and, you know, spread the love. So to stay on topic the responses should be about those missionaries who try to spread the word, tell the people how to obtain eternal salvation and so forth.


Does “spreading the love” mean encouraging indigenous people to “let go” of traditional beliefs?



you should ask the person who said that. I don't think anyone really believes that's all missionaries do.


Is that ok for any missionaries to do?


It depends on what you believe I guess. The missionaries in Hawaii got the females to cover up their toplessness because the Bible (from the midd-east) deemed it immoral. Is that ok with you?


The missionaries shouldn’t have been there in the first place.
They certainly shouldn’t have have forced any changes to local traditions & customs & religion.

At the same time, some local traditions would have prevented them from catching up to the modern times.
They needed to learn to read and write, do away with the custom of walking topless and the taboo of men and women eating together.
A new century was on their doorstep and they needed the skills to navigate it in order to survive as a people
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think the OP is talking about those who come to her part of the world to "convert us." I don't thinks she's talking about the ones who just duig wells, provide medical services and, you know, spread the love. So to stay on topic the responses should be about those missionaries who try to spread the word, tell the people how to obtain eternal salvation and so forth.


Does “spreading the love” mean encouraging indigenous people to “let go” of traditional beliefs?



you should ask the person who said that. I don't think anyone really believes that's all missionaries do.


Is that ok for any missionaries to do?


It depends on what you believe I guess. The missionaries in Hawaii got the females to cover up their toplessness because the Bible (from the midd-east) deemed it immoral. Is that ok with you?


The missionaries shouldn’t have been there in the first place.
They certainly shouldn’t have have forced any changes to local traditions & customs & religion.

At the same time, some local traditions would have prevented them from catching up to the modern times.
They needed to learn to read and write, do away with the custom of walking topless and the taboo of men and women eating together.
A new century was on their doorstep and they needed the skills to navigate it in order to survive as a people


Are you being facetious? (i think you are ). Why not just leave them alone? It was none of the missionaries' business how they lived (which was a paradise btw). This is exactly the kind of meddlesome behavior that OP and many others here are objecting to.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think the OP is talking about those who come to her part of the world to "convert us." I don't thinks she's talking about the ones who just duig wells, provide medical services and, you know, spread the love. So to stay on topic the responses should be about those missionaries who try to spread the word, tell the people how to obtain eternal salvation and so forth.


Does “spreading the love” mean encouraging indigenous people to “let go” of traditional beliefs?



you should ask the person who said that. I don't think anyone really believes that's all missionaries do.


Is that ok for any missionaries to do?


It depends on what you believe I guess. The missionaries in Hawaii got the females to cover up their toplessness because the Bible (from the midd-east) deemed it immoral. Is that ok with you?


The missionaries shouldn’t have been there in the first place.
They certainly shouldn’t have have forced any changes to local traditions & customs & religion.

At the same time, some local traditions would have prevented them from catching up to the modern times.
They needed to learn to read and write, do away with the custom of walking topless and the taboo of men and women eating together.
A new century was on their doorstep and they needed the skills to navigate it in order to survive as a people


Right. So entitled narcissists. With a serious case of white savior syndrome.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think the OP is talking about those who come to her part of the world to "convert us." I don't thinks she's talking about the ones who just duig wells, provide medical services and, you know, spread the love. So to stay on topic the responses should be about those missionaries who try to spread the word, tell the people how to obtain eternal salvation and so forth.


Does “spreading the love” mean encouraging indigenous people to “let go” of traditional beliefs?



you should ask the person who said that. I don't think anyone really believes that's all missionaries do.


Is that ok for any missionaries to do?


It depends on what you believe I guess. The missionaries in Hawaii got the females to cover up their toplessness because the Bible (from the midd-east) deemed it immoral. Is that ok with you?


The missionaries shouldn’t have been there in the first place.
They certainly shouldn’t have have forced any changes to local traditions & customs & religion.

At the same time, some local traditions would have prevented them from catching up to the modern times.
They needed to learn to read and write, do away with the custom of walking topless and the taboo of men and women eating together.
A new century was on their doorstep and they needed the skills to navigate it in order to survive as a people


“Local traditions” in the Hawaiian culture included the abandonment/exposure of infants deemed “defective.” Also the maintenance of a caste system that included a slave caste others considered disgusting. Incestuous marriages among the elite, death penalty inflicted at whim by the ruling class, and human sacrifice were also traditional practices.

In other parts of the world, “traditional practices” to this day include “honor killings,” forcible concubinage, involuntary servitude, and the murder of homosexuals, among other things.

The notion that “traditional practices” represent some sort of divine Eden that must never be interfered with is juvenile and ill-informed at best.
post reply Forum Index » Religion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: