Youngkin and TJ

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony is hilarious. TJ reformers were able to get support for anti-education policies by literally promising people a free lunch!

Speaking of ignorance-driven misinformation…

I see no misinformation, you disgusting disinformant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Race is one measure of how effectively TJ is serving the entire community. Along with gender, economic factors, etc.

There is no race quota.

Unfortunately, how to measure the effectiveness isn't dictated by you. We'll see what happens.

The best measurement is what % of middle schools were represented. 100%. Major improvement.

said you? again, we'll see what happens. that's concludes our discussion.

Huh? It’s not my opinion. It’s objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

I'm not sure you understand what "objective" means. It's an objective way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community. It is subjectively the best way to measure it, in your opinion. It's unambiguously the topic of a religious-style dispute, meaning that you'll never be able to convince every reasonably-minded person that it's the best way - and it would be unethical and authoritarian to force everyone to do it your way.

Looking at the middle school representation is objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

It would be subjective to say that TJ’s goal is to serve the whole community.

No, that's just your ignorance showing again. If the goal of an organization is to serve every high-flying trapeze expert in a community, and there are three trapeze experts in the community, then you can serve the whole community while not actually having a representation from every neighborhood in the community. I realize that one person's opinion on a subject isn't always black-and-white, but we can definitively say that you didn't logic this one right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Race is one measure of how effectively TJ is serving the entire community. Along with gender, economic factors, etc.

There is no race quota.

Unfortunately, how to measure the effectiveness isn't dictated by you. We'll see what happens.

The best measurement is what % of middle schools were represented. 100%. Major improvement.

said you? again, we'll see what happens. that's concludes our discussion.

Huh? It’s not my opinion. It’s objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

I'm not sure you understand what "objective" means. It's an objective way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community. It is subjectively the best way to measure it, in your opinion. It's unambiguously the topic of a religious-style dispute, meaning that you'll never be able to convince every reasonably-minded person that it's the best way - and it would be unethical and authoritarian to force everyone to do it your way.

Looking at the middle school representation is objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

It would be subjective to say that TJ’s goal is to serve the whole community.

No, that's just your ignorance showing again. If the goal of an organization is to serve every high-flying trapeze expert in a community, and there are three trapeze experts in the community, then you can serve the whole community while not actually having a representation from every neighborhood in the community. I realize that one person's opinion on a subject isn't always black-and-white, but we can definitively say that you didn't logic this one right.

The school board disagrees. Perhaps you should run in 2023, you sound likable enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony is hilarious. TJ reformers were able to get support for anti-education policies by literally promising people a free lunch!

Speaking of ignorance-driven misinformation…

I see no misinformation, you disgusting disinformant.

Speaking of ignorance…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Race is one measure of how effectively TJ is serving the entire community. Along with gender, economic factors, etc.

There is no race quota.

Unfortunately, how to measure the effectiveness isn't dictated by you. We'll see what happens.

The best measurement is what % of middle schools were represented. 100%. Major improvement.

said you? again, we'll see what happens. that's concludes our discussion.

Huh? It’s not my opinion. It’s objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

I'm not sure you understand what "objective" means. It's an objective way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community. It is subjectively the best way to measure it, in your opinion. It's unambiguously the topic of a religious-style dispute, meaning that you'll never be able to convince every reasonably-minded person that it's the best way - and it would be unethical and authoritarian to force everyone to do it your way.

Looking at the middle school representation is objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

It would be subjective to say that TJ’s goal is to serve the whole community.

No, that's just your ignorance showing again. If the goal of an organization is to serve every high-flying trapeze expert in a community, and there are three trapeze experts in the community, then you can serve the whole community while not actually having a representation from every neighborhood in the community. I realize that one person's opinion on a subject isn't always black-and-white, but we can definitively say that you didn't logic this one right.

The school board disagrees. Perhaps you should run in 2023, you sound likable enough.

Disagrees with a fact. You're really showing yourself off as a bright one today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony is hilarious. TJ reformers were able to get support for anti-education policies by literally promising people a free lunch!

Speaking of ignorance-driven misinformation…

I see no misinformation, you disgusting disinformant.

Speaking of ignorance…

Speaking to a mirror.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Race is one measure of how effectively TJ is serving the entire community. Along with gender, economic factors, etc.

There is no race quota.

Unfortunately, how to measure the effectiveness isn't dictated by you. We'll see what happens.

The best measurement is what % of middle schools were represented. 100%. Major improvement.

said you? again, we'll see what happens. that's concludes our discussion.

Huh? It’s not my opinion. It’s objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

I'm not sure you understand what "objective" means. It's an objective way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community. It is subjectively the best way to measure it, in your opinion. It's unambiguously the topic of a religious-style dispute, meaning that you'll never be able to convince every reasonably-minded person that it's the best way - and it would be unethical and authoritarian to force everyone to do it your way.

Looking at the middle school representation is objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

It would be subjective to say that TJ’s goal is to serve the whole community.

No, that's just your ignorance showing again. If the goal of an organization is to serve every high-flying trapeze expert in a community, and there are three trapeze experts in the community, then you can serve the whole community while not actually having a representation from every neighborhood in the community. I realize that one person's opinion on a subject isn't always black-and-white, but we can definitively say that you didn't logic this one right.

The school board disagrees. Perhaps you should run in 2023, you sound likable enough.

Disagrees with a fact. You're really showing yourself off as a bright one today.

Assuming an opinion is fact, points for confidence

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Race is one measure of how effectively TJ is serving the entire community. Along with gender, economic factors, etc.

There is no race quota.

Unfortunately, how to measure the effectiveness isn't dictated by you. We'll see what happens.

The best measurement is what % of middle schools were represented. 100%. Major improvement.

said you? again, we'll see what happens. that's concludes our discussion.

Huh? It’s not my opinion. It’s objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

I'm not sure you understand what "objective" means. It's an objective way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community. It is subjectively the best way to measure it, in your opinion. It's unambiguously the topic of a religious-style dispute, meaning that you'll never be able to convince every reasonably-minded person that it's the best way - and it would be unethical and authoritarian to force everyone to do it your way.

Looking at the middle school representation is objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

It would be subjective to say that TJ’s goal is to serve the whole community.

No, that's just your ignorance showing again. If the goal of an organization is to serve every high-flying trapeze expert in a community, and there are three trapeze experts in the community, then you can serve the whole community while not actually having a representation from every neighborhood in the community. I realize that one person's opinion on a subject isn't always black-and-white, but we can definitively say that you didn't logic this one right.

You’re debating the goal, not the actual measure. Like I said, that’s subjective.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Race is one measure of how effectively TJ is serving the entire community. Along with gender, economic factors, etc.

There is no race quota.

Unfortunately, how to measure the effectiveness isn't dictated by you. We'll see what happens.

The best measurement is what % of middle schools were represented. 100%. Major improvement.

said you? again, we'll see what happens. that's concludes our discussion.

Huh? It’s not my opinion. It’s objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

I'm not sure you understand what "objective" means. It's an objective way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community. It is subjectively the best way to measure it, in your opinion. It's unambiguously the topic of a religious-style dispute, meaning that you'll never be able to convince every reasonably-minded person that it's the best way - and it would be unethical and authoritarian to force everyone to do it your way.

Looking at the middle school representation is objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

It would be subjective to say that TJ’s goal is to serve the whole community.

No, that's just your ignorance showing again. If the goal of an organization is to serve every high-flying trapeze expert in a community, and there are three trapeze experts in the community, then you can serve the whole community while not actually having a representation from every neighborhood in the community. I realize that one person's opinion on a subject isn't always black-and-white, but we can definitively say that you didn't logic this one right.

The school board disagrees. Perhaps you should run in 2023, you sound likable enough.

Now we can see what the agenda is really about. Making education about what certain (not-very-likeable) people consider "llkable," rather than about who knows what they're talking about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony is hilarious. TJ reformers were able to get support for anti-education policies by literally promising people a free lunch!

Speaking of ignorance-driven misinformation…

I see no misinformation, you disgusting disinformant.

Speaking of ignorance…

Speaking to a mirror.

LOL. You sound like a 4 year old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Race is one measure of how effectively TJ is serving the entire community. Along with gender, economic factors, etc.

There is no race quota.

Unfortunately, how to measure the effectiveness isn't dictated by you. We'll see what happens.

The best measurement is what % of middle schools were represented. 100%. Major improvement.

said you? again, we'll see what happens. that's concludes our discussion.

Huh? It’s not my opinion. It’s objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

I'm not sure you understand what "objective" means. It's an objective way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community. It is subjectively the best way to measure it, in your opinion. It's unambiguously the topic of a religious-style dispute, meaning that you'll never be able to convince every reasonably-minded person that it's the best way - and it would be unethical and authoritarian to force everyone to do it your way.

Looking at the middle school representation is objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

It would be subjective to say that TJ’s goal is to serve the whole community.

No, that's just your ignorance showing again. If the goal of an organization is to serve every high-flying trapeze expert in a community, and there are three trapeze experts in the community, then you can serve the whole community while not actually having a representation from every neighborhood in the community. I realize that one person's opinion on a subject isn't always black-and-white, but we can definitively say that you didn't logic this one right.

The school board disagrees. Perhaps you should run in 2023, you sound likable enough.

Disagrees with a fact. You're really showing yourself off as a bright one today.

Assuming an opinion is fact, points for confidence

Look, I'm not assuming anything, and you can't just change the meaning of "objective" and "fact" because you want things to be done a certain way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony is hilarious. TJ reformers were able to get support for anti-education policies by literally promising people a free lunch!

Speaking of ignorance-driven misinformation…

I see no misinformation, you disgusting disinformant.

Speaking of ignorance…

Speaking to a mirror.

LOL. You sound like a 4 year old.

You're one to talk. You're literally arguing against fact while pretending you're right. Some hubris.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Race is one measure of how effectively TJ is serving the entire community. Along with gender, economic factors, etc.

There is no race quota.

Unfortunately, how to measure the effectiveness isn't dictated by you. We'll see what happens.

The best measurement is what % of middle schools were represented. 100%. Major improvement.

said you? again, we'll see what happens. that's concludes our discussion.

Huh? It’s not my opinion. It’s objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

I'm not sure you understand what "objective" means. It's an objective way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community. It is subjectively the best way to measure it, in your opinion. It's unambiguously the topic of a religious-style dispute, meaning that you'll never be able to convince every reasonably-minded person that it's the best way - and it would be unethical and authoritarian to force everyone to do it your way.

Looking at the middle school representation is objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

It would be subjective to say that TJ’s goal is to serve the whole community.

No, that's just your ignorance showing again. If the goal of an organization is to serve every high-flying trapeze expert in a community, and there are three trapeze experts in the community, then you can serve the whole community while not actually having a representation from every neighborhood in the community. I realize that one person's opinion on a subject isn't always black-and-white, but we can definitively say that you didn't logic this one right.

You’re debating the goal, not the actual measure. Like I said, that’s subjective.

Can you not read, or are you just dumb? The measure is objective. The claim that the measure is the best measure of whether something serves the whole community is not objective. This claim is fact. You can't just say it's not because you want things to go your way. This has all been explained to you already.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Race is one measure of how effectively TJ is serving the entire community. Along with gender, economic factors, etc.

There is no race quota.

Unfortunately, how to measure the effectiveness isn't dictated by you. We'll see what happens.

The best measurement is what % of middle schools were represented. 100%. Major improvement.

said you? again, we'll see what happens. that's concludes our discussion.

Huh? It’s not my opinion. It’s objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

I'm not sure you understand what "objective" means. It's an objective way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community. It is subjectively the best way to measure it, in your opinion. It's unambiguously the topic of a religious-style dispute, meaning that you'll never be able to convince every reasonably-minded person that it's the best way - and it would be unethical and authoritarian to force everyone to do it your way.

Looking at the middle school representation is objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

It would be subjective to say that TJ’s goal is to serve the whole community.

No, that's just your ignorance showing again. If the goal of an organization is to serve every high-flying trapeze expert in a community, and there are three trapeze experts in the community, then you can serve the whole community while not actually having a representation from every neighborhood in the community. I realize that one person's opinion on a subject isn't always black-and-white, but we can definitively say that you didn't logic this one right.

You’re debating the goal, not the actual measure. Like I said, that’s subjective.

Can you not read, or are you just dumb? The measure is objective. The claim that the measure is the best measure of whether something serves the whole community is not objective. This claim is fact. You can't just say it's not because you want things to go your way. This has all been explained to you already.

Sorry you’re struggling here. Measuring the % of the community served is a great was to measure the extent of the community served. Turns out it’s 100%.

But maybe you don’t think TJ should be serving the whole community. Maybe you think some kids are more…entitled?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Race is one measure of how effectively TJ is serving the entire community. Along with gender, economic factors, etc.

There is no race quota.

Unfortunately, how to measure the effectiveness isn't dictated by you. We'll see what happens.

The best measurement is what % of middle schools were represented. 100%. Major improvement.

said you? again, we'll see what happens. that's concludes our discussion.

Huh? It’s not my opinion. It’s objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

I'm not sure you understand what "objective" means. It's an objective way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community. It is subjectively the best way to measure it, in your opinion. It's unambiguously the topic of a religious-style dispute, meaning that you'll never be able to convince every reasonably-minded person that it's the best way - and it would be unethical and authoritarian to force everyone to do it your way.

Looking at the middle school representation is objectively the best way to measure if TJ is serving the whole community.

It would be subjective to say that TJ’s goal is to serve the whole community.

No, that's just your ignorance showing again. If the goal of an organization is to serve every high-flying trapeze expert in a community, and there are three trapeze experts in the community, then you can serve the whole community while not actually having a representation from every neighborhood in the community. I realize that one person's opinion on a subject isn't always black-and-white, but we can definitively say that you didn't logic this one right.

You’re debating the goal, not the actual measure. Like I said, that’s subjective.

Can you not read, or are you just dumb? The measure is objective. The claim that the measure is the best measure of whether something serves the whole community is not objective. This claim is fact. You can't just say it's not because you want things to go your way. This has all been explained to you already.

Sorry you’re struggling here. Measuring the % of the community served is a great was to measure the extent of the community served. Turns out it’s 100%.

But maybe you don’t think TJ should be serving the whole community. Maybe you think some kids are more…entitled?

DP. You are embarrassing yourself. You wrote "It’s objectively the best way ..." You used an adverb "objectively" to modify "best". You are entitled to your opinion. But your opinion is just that, your opinion.