Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:A couple reasons why I think Depp believers aren't posting as often:

- we get called disgusting names on this forum even if we are
dv victims/survivors sharing our point of view

- we're too busy watching both sides of court, not cherry
picking

Exactly the opposite mon cherie, exactly the opposite. You are defending appalling behavior by a man cause he is a man, and you are tearing down a woman for not being perfect like Betty Crocker. Your standards for her are not the same as for him.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What is the deal with her imitating his outfits? She is a certified psychopath.



Most people wear suits to court, what should she wear in your esteemed opinion?


Her choice of clothing and hair style struck me as quite histrionic myself. She dresses up like she is acting scenes from different time periods - ages of innocence, with adorable little girl braids, little house on prairie style with a shirt buttoned up to the top. An innocent little gale she is. And the 1940s look, same thing.

In reality, she is a drug using millennial.

I mean do you even hear yourself? Just her clothing are offensive to you? Why? He is also dressed like a pimp, but that doesn't offend you?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A couple reasons why I think Depp believers aren't posting as often:

- we get called disgusting names on this forum even if we are
dv victims/survivors sharing our point of view

- we're too busy watching both sides of court, not cherry
picking

Exactly the opposite mon cherie, exactly the opposite. You are defending appalling behavior by a man cause he is a man, and you are tearing down a woman for not being perfect like Betty Crocker. Your standards for her are not the same as for him.



This, yes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Kate Moss looked like a million bucks! Amber Heard was squirming and looking very upset before her testimony.


Kate is all class and a genuine beauty, Amber is the homecoming queen in some trailer trash town. The latter rarely shake who they truly are. It's genetic.


Are you really that naive
Anonymous
Who contacted TMZ for real? Amber or her friends?

Why doesn’t Amber have more videos of him in rage or stupor? Or more or better documentation of his tearing stuff apart ? And honestly how much more would a jury need?

What’s with the weird Amber hairdo today? Is she trying to copy dr curry

Why isn’t dr curry board certified

Why is there such a huge bias towards johnny depp in the comments section of the trial feed on youtube? Not 1% seem pro-Amber even a smidge. It is terrifythat they will ignore every fault of Johnny , regardless of whether Amber has done wrong. What % are bots?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not really the topic, but wow did Kate Moss look amazing. Have always thought her face was mesmerizing and she hasn’t changed.


Yeah I think she looked lovely and came across as really very sweet. I was surprised how high and girly her voice was - but that's probably partly distortion from being processed thru zoom then on tv / YouTube etc.


Are you actually serious??? She’s had a F-ing face lift!!! And a buffet of other procedures. She is probably also putting on a higher voice
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not really the topic, but wow did Kate Moss look amazing. Have always thought her face was mesmerizing and she hasn’t changed.


Yeah I think she looked lovely and came across as really very sweet. I was surprised how high and girly her voice was - but that's probably partly distortion from being processed thru zoom then on tv / YouTube etc.


Are you actually serious??? She’s had a F-ing face lift!!! And a buffet of other procedures. She is probably also putting on a higher voice


Excuse me- let me edit: Alleged face lift and buffet of other procedures
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not really the topic, but wow did Kate Moss look amazing. Have always thought her face was mesmerizing and she hasn’t changed.


Yeah I think she looked lovely and came across as really very sweet. I was surprised how high and girly her voice was - but that's probably partly distortion from being processed thru zoom then on tv / YouTube etc.


Are you actually serious??? She’s had a F-ing face lift!!! And a buffet of other procedures. She is probably also putting on a higher voice


Do you have your blood pressure meds to hand? You might want to take them. This is not that important.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:6 hrs left on the clock for Depp’s team and they put Heard back on the stand? There’s NO way her team advised that so she must have insisted on it. Her delusion is real!


She's batshit crazy. I hope the jury see's that. As a survivor of domestic abuse it's horrible she's trying to claim it.

Doesn’t actually matter if she’s crazy. I don’t think they proved the op-Ed caused a decline in his career. That’s what is on trial.

No it's not. The words in the Op Ed are what is referred to in the law as "defamatory per se." He only has to prove the elements of defamation, not damages. Damages are presumed if the jury finds that Depp proved the elements of defamation. Therefore, he doesn't have to prove that the Op Ed caused a decline in his career.


This is not true, in the US you have to prove material harm came from the defamation, and the standard is VERY high for a public figure
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And now she confesses to writing the oped in front of the jury? Wowza.


Yep, she was talking about how abusive he was but got away with it because of his celebrity status, then she said that's why she wrote the Op ed, so if that Op ed wasn't about Johnny, who was it about then?


Oh right in your mind this case is the only domestic violence case. IIRC Weinstein, Cosby, et al are in prison with much less evidence than Heard. #metoo


Well she wrote the Oped about her experience. Are you saying that she's accusing Weinstein, Cosby, et al?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A couple reasons why I think Depp believers aren't posting as often:

- we get called disgusting names on this forum even if we are
dv victims/survivors sharing our point of view

- we're too busy watching both sides of court, not cherry
picking

Exactly the opposite mon cherie, exactly the opposite. You are defending appalling behavior by a man cause he is a man, and you are tearing down a woman for not being perfect like Betty Crocker. Your standards for her are not the same as for him.


Not the person you are responding to here, but I personally don’t think that spitting at staff, sh*tting in your spouse’s bed, and lying about donating money to a children’s hospital for her own gain/public image falls within the definition of someone who is simply “not being perfect like Betty Crocker.” Heard has serious issues; she is vulgar and has real anger issues, and her behavior is frightening and bizarre.

I’m also the person who observed that Depp is a mildly brain-damaged drunk, so I’m not critical of Heard in favour of Depp. They are both disgusting people.
Anonymous
I hope both of them lose. Vasquez was more obnoxious than effective today. She would have alienated me had I been on the jury.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A couple reasons why I think Depp believers aren't posting as often:

- we get called disgusting names on this forum even if we are
dv victims/survivors sharing our point of view

- we're too busy watching both sides of court, not cherry
picking

Exactly the opposite mon cherie, exactly the opposite. You are defending appalling behavior by a man cause he is a man, and you are tearing down a woman for not being perfect like Betty Crocker. Your standards for her are not the same as for him.


Not the person you are responding to here, but I personally don’t think that spitting at staff, sh*tting in your spouse’s bed, and lying about donating money to a children’s hospital for her own gain/public image falls within the definition of someone who is simply “not being perfect like Betty Crocker.” Heard has serious issues; she is vulgar and has real anger issues, and her behavior is frightening and bizarre.

I’m also the person who observed that Depp is a mildly brain-damaged drunk, so I’m not critical of Heard in favour of Depp. They are both disgusting people.


+1

The AH die hards are just as creepy as the JD fan girls on the live stream chats.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am not a fan of either JD or AH but have been curious about the case so I am following it on and off. Although I have never been a fan of JD (didn't care for his role as Jack Sparrow for example), I can totally believe than the Op ed affected him career and money wise. I have never heard of AH until Aquaman and I have trouble agreeing with her claim that her career was on the rise and it was on a similar path to that of Jason Momoa ot Gal Gadot, I know she was in Aquaman but I can't honestly remember what she did in the movie. She was forgettable as Mera.

During the court proceedings, I just found JD more believable. With his slurred speech and stuttering and his unwillingness to look at her, he was able to bring out a vulnerable side that is often associated with an abused person. By contrast, AH displayed confidence (sometimes too much) and her tears didn't seem very genuine. She sure didn't give me the vibes of an abused person. Maybe both of them were coached to act the way they did. I just think JD performed better, maybe he was just the better actor.



Right? How delusional is that pp? Snickering, smirking, laughing, what an abuse victim!


I just see it as a defense mechanism against blatant lies. Sometimes, there is nothing you can do but laugh it off. Also, you gotta admit some of the defense testimony was nonsensical like that psychiatrist who based his opinion of JD on his characters in movies. The Pro Amber will not see it and just chalk it up to me being a fangirl

Well you are. You are clearly picking and choosing the evidence that suits your own bias. He is a nasty narcissist, that must is clear with anyone who has half a brain. I hope you are proud of being his flying monkey.


And you're not? You choose to ignore all her lies. Look at her perfect face the day after she was supposedly punched in the face multiple times, so hard that she thought she had a broken nose (where is the medical records? She didnt have any because she didn't seek medical treatment. Yeah right. She documented much less than that). I hope you are proud for perpetuating the lies and as such doing a huge disservice to the real victims of domestic abuse.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What is the deal with her imitating his outfits? She is a certified psychopath.



Most people wear suits to court, what should she wear in your esteemed opinion?


Her choice of clothing and hair style struck me as quite histrionic myself. She dresses up like she is acting scenes from different time periods - ages of innocence, with adorable little girl braids, little house on prairie style with a shirt buttoned up to the top. An innocent little gale she is. And the 1940s look, same thing.

In reality, she is a drug using millennial.



Meanwhile, Johnny Depp is dressed to look like the monopoly man, whereas he is a drug using Boomer.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: