Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Apparently they are blackmailing Harry’s 93year old grandmother. Despicable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The “kicked out” royals. ROTFLMAO.
Young people hardly know who Diana was btw.

Right? And they certainly don't remember her history. If she hadn't died when she did, she would not be remembered the way she is. She was on the fast track to being seen as a floozy shacking up with random rich guys floating around on their yachts in the Med looking for the next Mr Right. People were watching the downward spiral. And she was younger than Meghan is now when she died.

I don't think that's accurate at all. In that last year or so, Diana was really coming into her own, and it was exciting to see. Public opinion was pretty polarized in favor of Diana and against Charles (and Camilla) at that point.

The fling with Dody didn't really do much for her.

It was a tiny blip that most people hadn't given much thought about until she suddenly died. If she hadn't died with him, I'm not sure how much people would have been all that aware of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who knew a small blog overly populated by women, in a large metro urban area could generate so many misogynistic views. Blame the woman and make excuses for the man. The woman is a sorceress who bewitched a 36 year-old worldly man to do something he did t want to do. Etc., etc

It’s a blog used primarily by white women. For many reasons it’s difficult for this demographic to relate to Meghan. Plus, acknowledging the racism she faces is very uncomfortable for them which explains all the posts claiming it doesn’t happen or dismissing any all examples as “not really racist.” Those picture and posts comparing Meghan and Archie to animals were just jokes! They don’t really count. It’s not like those reporters work for a reputable publication like the BBC or anything... Oh, wait...

For the record, some of us vocal and prolific MM defenders are middle-aged white women. I'm pretty sure the vitriolic MM haters are almost exclusively white, though.

You're a paranoid bigot.

Given that they overlap so clearly with Trumpsters and Brexiteers, I doubt it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Apparently they are blackmailing Harry’s 93year old grandmother. Despicable.

Well, Harry's 93-year-old grandmother is the Queen who let her courtiers cockblock him after she agreed to see him.

Oh, and stood by while her press crucified his wife. But she's ALWAYS ready-and-willing to assist and protect a pedophile.

[Anonymous]

I came here to see what y’all are talking about for 176 pages. Wow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe it will mean the end of the British Royal Family. I can only hope. Ridiculous, antiquated colonialist nonsense. All of the Royals should quit.

Err. . Why?

Some of you need a dose of reality. The BRF is not going to collapse over Meghan. She is not popular in Britain anymore to start with.

All these weird dreaming of an American princess? Well, wow. America needs a princess? And that the American press will be nicer to an entitled woman swanning around like a princess? Wow.

Meghan will be a divorced middle aged minor celebrity within a decade and thats the only outcome of all this.

Well, we went from 2 years to 3 years to 7 years to...10 years on the divorce.

Good to know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who knew a small blog overly populated by women, in a large metro urban area could generate so many misogynistic views. Blame the woman and make excuses for the man. The woman is a sorceress who bewitched a 36 year-old worldly man to do something he did t want to do. Etc., etc

It’s a blog used primarily by white women. For many reasons it’s difficult for this demographic to relate to Meghan. Plus, acknowledging the racism she faces is very uncomfortable for them which explains all the posts claiming it doesn’t happen or dismissing any all examples as “not really racist.” Those picture and posts comparing Meghan and Archie to animals were just jokes! They don’t really count. It’s not like those reporters work for a reputable publication like the BBC or anything... Oh, wait...

For the record, some of us vocal and prolific MM defenders are middle-aged white women. I'm pretty sure the vitriolic MM haters are almost exclusively white, though.

You're a paranoid bigot.

+1. She has shown she is an evil snake. She's gorgeous, smart as a freaking tack, manipulative and evil. Her mixed heritage is the least of it. What? We aren't allowed to call it like it is just because she's half black? Give me a break! She is far more privileged than you and I will EVER be. She is a nasty narc and I almost want to do a slow clap. I am impressed she might pull off her plan perfectly. This is more entertaining than any movie. Seriously, you have to admire her chutzpah. Agree with the Bezos poster, he is due for an upgrade! She's going to rule the world. She's a modern day Helen of Troy! And she is totally up for criticism..that's the life of a public figure...a life she chose and dreamed and schemed for long before Harry.

Riiiiight. I guess I'm the crazy one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Apparently they are blackmailing Harry’s 93year old grandmother. Despicable.

Source?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently they are blackmailing Harry’s 93year old grandmother. Despicable.

Source?

Their delusions!

[Anonymous]

You people are certifiable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t the main issue that the rightwing-billionaire run British press is attacking Markle nonstop?

The Murdoch Sun and the Rothermere Daily Mail are poisoning British minds against her.

More evidence you can’t have a functioning civil society if you allow rightwing billionaires to buy and fund media and use that media to spread hate and division (ultimately in order to get votes for tax cuts).

This is true. Murdoch dominates Australian news as well, including making it impossible to deal with climate change or empower the national government to fight bushfires. Those millions of burning acres are being tackled by almost exclusively volunteer, state (not federal) firefighters. It's absolutely insane. The oil and gas industries have a stranglehold on Australian politics thanks to Murdoch's news orgs.

Put plug for Succession here

I don't have HBO, darn it, so I can't. Have heard it's great, though.

[Anonymous]

So not reading through all this but I just wanted to post my prediction for how this all plays out now before they announce it. I think they are basically going to get everything they want. The only things I could see them maybe not getting are retaining frogmore and the HRH title.

Here’s why: if you know anything about Prince Charles upbringing his father was very harsh with him. I don’t think he could ever truly drop the hammer on either of his sons. He controls the Duchy of cornwall which is where most of the support for Harry and his family comes from and I think his plan to “streamline the monarchy” was basically meant to cut out his siblings and their children, not his boys. Similarly, he’s not going to potentially put Harry and his family at risk. People keep saying well Diana didn’t get this blah blah blah but a lot of your mothers in laws wouldn’t pay a dime towards your security...i also think that since Philip has retired Charles has stepped into the family enforcer type role that Phillip previously had (evidenced by him forcing the Queen to sideline Andrew).

I personally think they might retain use of Frogmore either for free or for a cheap fee. And I think they will likely retain the titles but I feel slightly less confident about that.

I just don’t see them leaving Harry with “nothing” (other than his $40 million) because presumably they will 1) want to create the appearance that they are all unified 2) Harry spilling 35 years of their secrets to support himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So not reading through all this but I just wanted to post my prediction for how this all plays out now before they announce it. I think they are basically going to get everything they want. The only things I could see them maybe not getting are retaining frogmore and the HRH title.

Here’s why: if you know anything about Prince Charles upbringing his father was very harsh with him. I don’t think he could ever truly drop the hammer on either of his sons. He controls the Duchy of cornwall which is where most of the support for Harry and his family comes from and I think his plan to “streamline the monarchy” was basically meant to cut out his siblings and their children, not his boys. Similarly, he’s not going to potentially put Harry and his family at risk. People keep saying well Diana didn’t get this blah blah blah but a lot of your mothers in laws wouldn’t pay a dime towards your security...i also think that since Philip has retired Charles has stepped into the family enforcer type role that Phillip previously had (evidenced by him forcing the Queen to sideline Andrew).

I personally think they might retain use of Frogmore either for free or for a cheap fee. And I think they will likely retain the titles but I feel slightly less confident about that.

I just don’t see them leaving Harry with “nothing” (other than his $40 million) because presumably they will 1) want to create the appearance that they are all unified 2) Harry spilling 35 years of their secrets to support himself.

Frogmore isn't even that expensive. It came out in tonight's documentary that its market rental value is 5,000 pounds. So they could swing it even if they had to pay for it.

Which is precisely why I think the Sussexes were shafted. Andrew's paying 10,000 pounds a month just for Beatrice's St. James Palace apartment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently they are blackmailing Harry’s 93year old grandmother. Despicable.

Well, Harry's 93-year-old grandmother is the Queen who let her courtiers cockblock him after she agreed to see him.

Oh, and stood by while her press crucified his wife. But she's ALWAYS ready-and-willing to assist and protect a pedophile.

Mamas ALWAYS coddle their boys. Look at yourselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently they are blackmailing Harry’s 93year old grandmother. Despicable.

Well, Harry's 93-year-old grandmother is the Queen who let her courtiers cockblock him after she agreed to see him.

Oh, and stood by while her press crucified his wife. But she's ALWAYS ready-and-willing to assist and protect a pedophile.

Mamas ALWAYS coddle their boys. Look at yourselves.

I'm sorry I'm not protecting a son if he's a - rapist, pedophile, abuser, or murderer.

He can go to jail.

The only reason Andrew wasn't in handcuffs in NYC and only had his trade ambassadorship stripped is precisely because the Queen is protecting him.