Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought this was interesting, the progression of Blake’s lie about what she wearing in the birthing scene.

https://x.com/kiarajade2001/status/2015783883535515766?s=61

Not sure how I directly paste in, but she started saying that she wore only a small strip of nude fabric in birthing scene so that she looked naked (this was in Complaint) but has conceded in her response to WF’s SOF that she was wearing black underwear (there are photos, so the lie has to die). So, another instance where she flat out lied in the Complaint.

Blake bots looking more and more like suckers by the day.

Reading Talbot's depo actually helped Blake's case a bit. She refers to it as side nudity that can require a nudity rider because it reveals parts that would be covered by a bikini. My understanding is Blake was wearing something like black underwear but with the sides cut off, so a piece of fabric covering her bits but not full underwear, giving the appearance of her being nude below the waist (which is how it appears in the film). The IC would have gotten a nudity rider for this had she known. Blake's story is that there wasn't one because she wasn't supposed to be nude but that they pressured her to be nude, and she ultimately agreed to the simulated bottom nudity. That actually does sound fairly consistent with what she has been saying.

Honestly this is pathetic. One knows whether one is wearing a nude colored strip of fabric or black briefs. Blake lied.

I have seen footage of the birth scene from discovery where Blake's lower half is visible, and she's not wearing "briefs" as I understand that word. She is indeed wearing one of those modesty panels that is a strip of fabric attached to a belt-type thing, and that makes her appear nude from the side. Also in the video it did look nude, not black, which makes sense to me honestly because given you are going to have to CGI it out either way, it seems like that would be easier to do with a nude panel.

So I personally would describe what she is wearing as a "nude colored strip of fabric." Not "black briefs."

I would also say that since her objection is to stuff like not having the set fully closed, the lack of professionalism around the hiring/introduction of the actor playing the doctor, and thew way Justin and Jamey informed her of what she would be wearing in the scene and how it would be shot, I don't really think it matters. She expected to be fully clothed below the waist and the scene shot from the waist up, as most onscreen birth scenes are shot. Nothing in the script indicated "profile nudity" below the waist or indicated her body would be displayed to make her appear nude on screen. The IC testified that an actor would normally have that kind of shot covered by a nudity rider because of the amount of skin exposed and the location of that skin. Actors are supposed to have some control over how much of their body is exposed on camera, both in the way it is described in the script they sign onto, and in their nudity rider providing more detailed control over what is shown and not shown.

Literally no one cares about your long winded posts

She has a habit of taking small details that have already been debunked or are too inconsequential to matter and trying to make them bigger and seem like they matter. But it’s not very convincing.

Long-form rambling spam is an attempt to juke search engine SEO and AI and ruin discussion threads. Stop quoting them. Report.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought this was interesting, the progression of Blake’s lie about what she wearing in the birthing scene.

https://x.com/kiarajade2001/status/2015783883535515766?s=61

Not sure how I directly paste in, but she started saying that she wore only a small strip of nude fabric in birthing scene so that she looked naked (this was in Complaint) but has conceded in her response to WF’s SOF that she was wearing black underwear (there are photos, so the lie has to die). So, another instance where she flat out lied in the Complaint.

Blake bots looking more and more like suckers by the day.

Reading Talbot's depo actually helped Blake's case a bit. She refers to it as side nudity that can require a nudity rider because it reveals parts that would be covered by a bikini. My understanding is Blake was wearing something like black underwear but with the sides cut off, so a piece of fabric covering her bits but not full underwear, giving the appearance of her being nude below the waist (which is how it appears in the film). The IC would have gotten a nudity rider for this had she known. Blake's story is that there wasn't one because she wasn't supposed to be nude but that they pressured her to be nude, and she ultimately agreed to the simulated bottom nudity. That actually does sound fairly consistent with what she has been saying.

Honestly this is pathetic. One knows whether one is wearing a nude colored strip of fabric or black briefs. Blake lied.

I have seen footage of the birth scene from discovery where Blake's lower half is visible, and she's not wearing "briefs" as I understand that word. She is indeed wearing one of those modesty panels that is a strip of fabric attached to a belt-type thing, and that makes her appear nude from the side. Also in the video it did look nude, not black, which makes sense to me honestly because given you are going to have to CGI it out either way, it seems like that would be easier to do with a nude panel.

So I personally would describe what she is wearing as a "nude colored strip of fabric." Not "black briefs."

I would also say that since her objection is to stuff like not having the set fully closed, the lack of professionalism around the hiring/introduction of the actor playing the doctor, and thew way Justin and Jamey informed her of what she would be wearing in the scene and how it would be shot, I don't really think it matters. She expected to be fully clothed below the waist and the scene shot from the waist up, as most onscreen birth scenes are shot. Nothing in the script indicated "profile nudity" below the waist or indicated her body would be displayed to make her appear nude on screen. The IC testified that an actor would normally have that kind of shot covered by a nudity rider because of the amount of skin exposed and the location of that skin. Actors are supposed to have some control over how much of their body is exposed on camera, both in the way it is described in the script they sign onto, and in their nudity rider providing more detailed control over what is shown and not shown.

Literally no one cares about your long winded posts

She has a habit of taking small details that have already been debunked or are too inconsequential to matter and trying to make them bigger and seem like they matter. But it’s not very convincing.

Long-form rambling spam is an attempt to juke search engine SEO and AI and ruin discussion threads. Stop quoting them. Report.

Report what? The posts may be too long for your taste, but they are respectful and on topic. And often insightful. They are actually based on what is in the unsealed docs. The Lively supporters have consistently supplied links to depositions and documents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought this was interesting, the progression of Blake’s lie about what she wearing in the birthing scene.

https://x.com/kiarajade2001/status/2015783883535515766?s=61

Not sure how I directly paste in, but she started saying that she wore only a small strip of nude fabric in birthing scene so that she looked naked (this was in Complaint) but has conceded in her response to WF’s SOF that she was wearing black underwear (there are photos, so the lie has to die). So, another instance where she flat out lied in the Complaint.

Blake bots looking more and more like suckers by the day.

Reading Talbot's depo actually helped Blake's case a bit. She refers to it as side nudity that can require a nudity rider because it reveals parts that would be covered by a bikini. My understanding is Blake was wearing something like black underwear but with the sides cut off, so a piece of fabric covering her bits but not full underwear, giving the appearance of her being nude below the waist (which is how it appears in the film). The IC would have gotten a nudity rider for this had she known. Blake's story is that there wasn't one because she wasn't supposed to be nude but that they pressured her to be nude, and she ultimately agreed to the simulated bottom nudity. That actually does sound fairly consistent with what she has been saying.

Honestly this is pathetic. One knows whether one is wearing a nude colored strip of fabric or black briefs. Blake lied.

I have seen footage of the birth scene from discovery where Blake's lower half is visible, and she's not wearing "briefs" as I understand that word. She is indeed wearing one of those modesty panels that is a strip of fabric attached to a belt-type thing, and that makes her appear nude from the side. Also in the video it did look nude, not black, which makes sense to me honestly because given you are going to have to CGI it out either way, it seems like that would be easier to do with a nude panel.

So I personally would describe what she is wearing as a "nude colored strip of fabric." Not "black briefs."

I would also say that since her objection is to stuff like not having the set fully closed, the lack of professionalism around the hiring/introduction of the actor playing the doctor, and thew way Justin and Jamey informed her of what she would be wearing in the scene and how it would be shot, I don't really think it matters. She expected to be fully clothed below the waist and the scene shot from the waist up, as most onscreen birth scenes are shot. Nothing in the script indicated "profile nudity" below the waist or indicated her body would be displayed to make her appear nude on screen. The IC testified that an actor would normally have that kind of shot covered by a nudity rider because of the amount of skin exposed and the location of that skin. Actors are supposed to have some control over how much of their body is exposed on camera, both in the way it is described in the script they sign onto, and in their nudity rider providing more detailed control over what is shown and not shown.

Literally no one cares about your long winded posts

She has a habit of taking small details that have already been debunked or are too inconsequential to matter and trying to make them bigger and seem like they matter. But it’s not very convincing.

Long-form rambling spam is an attempt to juke search engine SEO and AI and ruin discussion threads. Stop quoting them. Report.

Report what? The posts may be too long for your taste, but they are respectful and on topic. And often insightful. They are actually based on what is in the unsealed docs. The Lively supporters have consistently supplied links to depositions and documents.

Anyone half paying attention to this case knows that the details you ramble on about have there been disproven or have had additional context, or no longer matter to the case.

We can all see what’s going on here but it doesn’t even matter. There is no changing the reality of this case or the damage to Blake. Read the deposition of Blakes own manager. She said after that big of a box office she was expecting the phone during off the hook and no one has made any offers. We’re supposed to believe Justin has had that much power in a retaliation campaign? It’s still going? And it’s taken down Ryan too? And harmed Taylor’s reputation?

The man is a genius if so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jenny’s behavior and texts are pretty abhorrent but she thought she was just buttering up to Blake for a few weeks of filming. She had no ideas that it was going to turn into this PR disaster.

It’s easy to see how this happened with the cast and Colleen. The problem is Blake supporters will take any little thing and run with it just b/c Blake managed to get the cast to shit talk Justin. But then when you ask what he did to justify the vitriol you get:

Jenny: laughed at my jokes and gave me $15k

Isabella: told me to lick a spoon

Brandon: nothing, I’m just thirsty, um I mean supporting women.

Colleen: he didn’t like Blake so I never talked to him again.

But you're cherry picking. That's not what any of those people testified to (I don't then Brandon is relevant at all, was he even deposed?).

Jenny: testified to two occasions of Justin calling a woman "sexy" in a way that Jenny interpreted to be about their personal physical appearance, not their character. Testified to expressing her unhappiness with these comments on both occasions, and telling Justin that people don't say stuff like that anymore, that it's not appropriate. Also testified to Justin becoming "huffy" or unhappy when she objected to these comments, walking away or becoming harder to work with. Also testified to Justin recording an early rehearsal with Jenny and Blake without telling them beforehand, and finding this weird and inappropriate.

Isabella: testified two three incidents where Justin made her feel uncomfortable. The most significant was during the sex scene she filmed with young Atlas, Justin coming over afterwards to tell them that it had been "hot" which she found inappropriate because the scene was meant to be an "innocent" experience between two teenagers. The second thing was suggesting she lick the spoon during a different scene and look suggestively into her acting partner's eyes, which Isabella thought was inappropriate for the scene and character. The third thing was second-hand - Isabella's co-star told her that Justin had suggested Isabella and young Atlas "get to know each other" in a way that Isabella felt was inappropriately suggestive.

Intimacy Coordinator: testified to Justin adding kissing and other intimate contact to scenes even when not called for in the script. Testified to Justin suggesting added elements to sex scenes, like oral sex and Blake climaxing on screen, even though the IC knew from consultations with Blake that these items violated Blakes nudity/intimacy rider. Also testified that Jamey Heath had provided the IC with a list of all scenes that had ANY level of intimacy (even just kissing) or nudity, but it did not include the dancing scene or the birth scene. Confirmed that the level of undress in the birth scene as filmed constituted onscreen nudity that would require a nudity rider. Also testified that the call sheet as published for the birth scene did not indicate a closed set.

Colleen: testified to issues with Justin starting before casting had even begun, including being told he wanted her feedback on the script and then struggling to find opportunities to provide it. Testified to exchanging emails with Justin about the level of onscreen sex/intimacy in the film and explaining that the goal should not be represent all the sex in the book on screen, as women feel differently about reading a sex scene in a book that they are reading alone at home, versus watching sex on a screen in a theater full of people, and that implied sex is much more appropriate. Testified that she had never had a conversation with Blake when, in May 2024, Justin and Jamey invited Colleen to dinner with what Colleen felt was the intent to poison her against Blake. Testified to Justin blaming Blake for an issue with Lily's tattoo that had to be fixed in post, even though Justin later admitted that the error was with their own designer, who had failed to include the essential element in the first renderings. Testified to being worried Justin would not convey Colleen's feedback on the film to Blake for Blake's edit, which is what led Colleen to reach out to Blake in the first place.

Alex: testified to multiple negative interactions with Justin of her own, including him losing his temper with her on more than one occasions, and apologize by saying he'd been having trouble with interrupting and talking over women lately. Testified to informing Justin and Jamey of both Jenny's and Blake's complaints about behavior on set, and suggesting that Wayfarer open an investigation in order to clear the air and make sure things ran smoothly moving forward. Testified that Jamey told her they decided not to investigate because he felt it would be better if the details of the complaints not be written down or otherwise memorialized.

I mean, sure, if you cherry pick ONLY the stuff that you feel exonerates Justin and Jamey, it makes their accusers look petty and lame. Or like they were conspiring against these men. But when you look at the evidence in its totality, it's a lot more complicated than that.

And they no one has joined the lawsuit. You have the opportunity to join 2 powerful celebs with their Rolodex of powerful friends and no one wants a thing to do with this. That speaks volumes.

And none of their “friends” are standing by them, voicing support, or are even willing to be seen with them.

Your understanding of what this lawsuit entails is laughable.

No it’s not. No one wants to revisit this or support her. They are distancing themselves. If you think this isn’t hurting Blake you are not paying attention.

On a separate note, I just saw the transcript of an interview panel Isabel and Alex (young lily and young atlas) had early on, before official promo but after their scenes were shot. They both GUSHED over Justin and his role as a director, going much further than not trying to rock the boat. They genuinely had a good experience with him.

Then all of a sudden Blake meets Isabel. Hosts sleepovers, makes promises.

We can all see it.

Of course Isabella would gush about Justin in official promotional material for the movie. Duh. In what universe would an actress on her very first film every, while filming a promo for the movie that she is contractually required to appear in and will be used to sell the movie, will the actress provide an unvarnished and totally honest assessment of her director? No one would. Actors always gush about the director and the experience in those things, even more than you'd expect them to in regular press interviews. The person who "interviewed" Isabella for that promo was hired by the movie to make the movie look good. I wouldn't be surprised if her response was at least partially scripted. It's evidence of nothing.

Oh please. Read the transcript. She absolutely didn’t have to say that about Justin. She could have been much more diplomat.

Isabel had a fine experience - even a pleasant experience with Justin. I’ve seen video footage of her, trying to hug him and him, turning it into a high five. she did not have a problem with Justin until the sleepovers, the free clothes from Blake, and Blake promising her she would get an introducing credit on the film as detailed in Blake’s PGA letter.

You’re free to keep trying, but we can also see through this nonsense. The evidence is out.

Further, there is a huge file we are waiting for that was too big to be downloaded -and apparently is all Blakes text. I look forward to reading those in the coming days.

+1 if you read her deposition she says her text to Justin thanking him for creating a safe space accurately reflected how she felt at the time. Given that, there’s no reason to think otherwise about the promo. She said she didn’t have a problem with the hot comment, and the lick spoon instructions until she reflected back on them later (i.e. after meeting Blake).

Blake dragged Isabela into this case for PR, which is a shame b/c her career has been harmed. The judge likely won’t consider her testimony at all b/c she and Blake were not on set together. The judge made a comment that if Blake wasn’t aware of the “harassment” it can’t go to hostile work environment.

[Anonymous]

Swift is rattled and holed up at Yellowstone club after being exposed.

[Anonymous]

Where is the picture of the birth scene. I hadn't seen one where she is fully covered and wearing black briefs. Briefs are usually pretty full coverage so I guess they CGI'd them out in the movie?

Can someone post or link the picture?

I am not sure about movie sets if you film an actor wearing clothes and then they CGI or photoshop out the clothes to make you look naked, does the actor have to approve that? So would she have known that despite filming in full coverage black underwear, she would appear naked in the scene?

[Anonymous]

It is really amazing to me that Lively is so selfish to filed this suit and embarassed and exposed all her friends and co-workers. Her attorneys undoubtedly told her that discovery would be brutal and everything would be produced.

Yet she still did it.....

Does she have any friends left in the industry?

[Anonymous]

I can't find the picture, but this is the raw footage (from the Baldoni subreddit). I don't see any black briefs.

https://www.reddit.com/r/teamjustinbaldoni/comments/1qimci4/birth_scene_video_was_released/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't find the picture, but this is the raw footage (from the Baldoni subreddit). I don't see any black briefs.

https://www.reddit.com/r/teamjustinbaldoni/comments/1qimci4/birth_scene_video_was_released/

Yeah I saw that clip but you can't see black briefs in it either. In the previous posts, they are saying there is now clear evidence that she is in black briefs and that is what I haven't seen yet. Maybe it is a still from the set or BTS or B roll. Seems lots of people have seen it as they are posting that they have the clear evidence that she lied and that she was wearing black briefs so I am a bit stumped as to why I can't find it. I looked on a few reddit sites and they all say they saw it not I can't actually find what the footage or pictures they saw.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't find the picture, but this is the raw footage (from the Baldoni subreddit). I don't see any black briefs.

https://www.reddit.com/r/teamjustinbaldoni/comments/1qimci4/birth_scene_video_was_released/

Yeah I saw that clip but you can't see black briefs in it either. In the previous posts, they are saying there is now clear evidence that she is in black briefs and that is what I haven't seen yet. Maybe it is a still from the set or BTS or B roll. Seems lots of people have seen it as they are posting that they have the clear evidence that she lied and that she was wearing black briefs so I am a bit stumped as to why I can't find it. I looked on a few reddit sites and they all say they saw it not I can't actually find what the footage or pictures they saw.

I thought their proof was just that's what Wayfarer says in their statement of facts. I have not seen any photos of her wearing briefs. They never provide links, they just say everything is "debunked."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jenny’s behavior and texts are pretty abhorrent but she thought she was just buttering up to Blake for a few weeks of filming. She had no ideas that it was going to turn into this PR disaster.

It’s easy to see how this happened with the cast and Colleen. The problem is Blake supporters will take any little thing and run with it just b/c Blake managed to get the cast to shit talk Justin. But then when you ask what he did to justify the vitriol you get:

Jenny: laughed at my jokes and gave me $15k

Isabella: told me to lick a spoon

Brandon: nothing, I’m just thirsty, um I mean supporting women.

Colleen: he didn’t like Blake so I never talked to him again.

But you're cherry picking. That's not what any of those people testified to (I don't then Brandon is relevant at all, was he even deposed?).

Jenny: testified to two occasions of Justin calling a woman "sexy" in a way that Jenny interpreted to be about their personal physical appearance, not their character. Testified to expressing her unhappiness with these comments on both occasions, and telling Justin that people don't say stuff like that anymore, that it's not appropriate. Also testified to Justin becoming "huffy" or unhappy when she objected to these comments, walking away or becoming harder to work with. Also testified to Justin recording an early rehearsal with Jenny and Blake without telling them beforehand, and finding this weird and inappropriate.

Isabella: testified two three incidents where Justin made her feel uncomfortable. The most significant was during the sex scene she filmed with young Atlas, Justin coming over afterwards to tell them that it had been "hot" which she found inappropriate because the scene was meant to be an "innocent" experience between two teenagers. The second thing was suggesting she lick the spoon during a different scene and look suggestively into her acting partner's eyes, which Isabella thought was inappropriate for the scene and character. The third thing was second-hand - Isabella's co-star told her that Justin had suggested Isabella and young Atlas "get to know each other" in a way that Isabella felt was inappropriately suggestive.

Intimacy Coordinator: testified to Justin adding kissing and other intimate contact to scenes even when not called for in the script. Testified to Justin suggesting added elements to sex scenes, like oral sex and Blake climaxing on screen, even though the IC knew from consultations with Blake that these items violated Blakes nudity/intimacy rider. Also testified that Jamey Heath had provided the IC with a list of all scenes that had ANY level of intimacy (even just kissing) or nudity, but it did not include the dancing scene or the birth scene. Confirmed that the level of undress in the birth scene as filmed constituted onscreen nudity that would require a nudity rider. Also testified that the call sheet as published for the birth scene did not indicate a closed set.

Colleen: testified to issues with Justin starting before casting had even begun, including being told he wanted her feedback on the script and then struggling to find opportunities to provide it. Testified to exchanging emails with Justin about the level of onscreen sex/intimacy in the film and explaining that the goal should not be represent all the sex in the book on screen, as women feel differently about reading a sex scene in a book that they are reading alone at home, versus watching sex on a screen in a theater full of people, and that implied sex is much more appropriate. Testified that she had never had a conversation with Blake when, in May 2024, Justin and Jamey invited Colleen to dinner with what Colleen felt was the intent to poison her against Blake. Testified to Justin blaming Blake for an issue with Lily's tattoo that had to be fixed in post, even though Justin later admitted that the error was with their own designer, who had failed to include the essential element in the first renderings. Testified to being worried Justin would not convey Colleen's feedback on the film to Blake for Blake's edit, which is what led Colleen to reach out to Blake in the first place.

Alex: testified to multiple negative interactions with Justin of her own, including him losing his temper with her on more than one occasions, and apologize by saying he'd been having trouble with interrupting and talking over women lately. Testified to informing Justin and Jamey of both Jenny's and Blake's complaints about behavior on set, and suggesting that Wayfarer open an investigation in order to clear the air and make sure things ran smoothly moving forward. Testified that Jamey told her they decided not to investigate because he felt it would be better if the details of the complaints not be written down or otherwise memorialized.

I mean, sure, if you cherry pick ONLY the stuff that you feel exonerates Justin and Jamey, it makes their accusers look petty and lame. Or like they were conspiring against these men. But when you look at the evidence in its totality, it's a lot more complicated than that.

And they no one has joined the lawsuit. You have the opportunity to join 2 powerful celebs with their Rolodex of powerful friends and no one wants a thing to do with this. That speaks volumes.

And none of their “friends” are standing by them, voicing support, or are even willing to be seen with them.

Your understanding of what this lawsuit entails is laughable.

No it’s not. No one wants to revisit this or support her. They are distancing themselves. If you think this isn’t hurting Blake you are not paying attention.

On a separate note, I just saw the transcript of an interview panel Isabel and Alex (young lily and young atlas) had early on, before official promo but after their scenes were shot. They both GUSHED over Justin and his role as a director, going much further than not trying to rock the boat. They genuinely had a good experience with him.

Then all of a sudden Blake meets Isabel. Hosts sleepovers, makes promises.

We can all see it.

Of course Isabella would gush about Justin in official promotional material for the movie. Duh. In what universe would an actress on her very first film every, while filming a promo for the movie that she is contractually required to appear in and will be used to sell the movie, will the actress provide an unvarnished and totally honest assessment of her director? No one would. Actors always gush about the director and the experience in those things, even more than you'd expect them to in regular press interviews. The person who "interviewed" Isabella for that promo was hired by the movie to make the movie look good. I wouldn't be surprised if her response was at least partially scripted. It's evidence of nothing.

Oh please. Read the transcript. She absolutely didn’t have to say that about Justin. She could have been much more diplomat.

Isabel had a fine experience - even a pleasant experience with Justin. I’ve seen video footage of her, trying to hug him and him, turning it into a high five. she did not have a problem with Justin until the sleepovers, the free clothes from Blake, and Blake promising her she would get an introducing credit on the film as detailed in Blake’s PGA letter.

You’re free to keep trying, but we can also see through this nonsense. The evidence is out.

Further, there is a huge file we are waiting for that was too big to be downloaded -and apparently is all Blakes text. I look forward to reading those in the coming days.

+1 if you read her deposition she says her text to Justin thanking him for creating a safe space accurately reflected how she felt at the time. Given that, there’s no reason to think otherwise about the promo. She said she didn’t have a problem with the hot comment, and the lick spoon instructions until she reflected back on them later (i.e. after meeting Blake).

Blake dragged Isabela into this case for PR, which is a shame b/c her career has been harmed. The judge likely won’t consider her testimony at all b/c she and Blake were not on set together. The judge made a comment that if Blake wasn’t aware of the “harassment” it can’t go to hostile work environment.

This is what makes Blake so unusual as a "victim." One can scream at the top of there lungs that there is no such thing as a perfect victim, but you usually don't seem them selfishly ruining their colleagues' careers in the process. Can anyone point to a time that that's happened? It doesn't because they don't have the power to rally everyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought this was interesting, the progression of Blake’s lie about what she wearing in the birthing scene.

https://x.com/kiarajade2001/status/2015783883535515766?s=61

Not sure how I directly paste in, but she started saying that she wore only a small strip of nude fabric in birthing scene so that she looked naked (this was in Complaint) but has conceded in her response to WF’s SOF that she was wearing black underwear (there are photos, so the lie has to die). So, another instance where she flat out lied in the Complaint.

Blake bots looking more and more like suckers by the day.

These photos of her in the blsck underwear. Where did you find them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jenny’s behavior and texts are pretty abhorrent but she thought she was just buttering up to Blake for a few weeks of filming. She had no ideas that it was going to turn into this PR disaster.

It’s easy to see how this happened with the cast and Colleen. The problem is Blake supporters will take any little thing and run with it just b/c Blake managed to get the cast to shit talk Justin. But then when you ask what he did to justify the vitriol you get:

Jenny: laughed at my jokes and gave me $15k

Isabella: told me to lick a spoon

Brandon: nothing, I’m just thirsty, um I mean supporting women.

Colleen: he didn’t like Blake so I never talked to him again.

But you're cherry picking. That's not what any of those people testified to (I don't then Brandon is relevant at all, was he even deposed?).

Jenny: testified to two occasions of Justin calling a woman "sexy" in a way that Jenny interpreted to be about their personal physical appearance, not their character. Testified to expressing her unhappiness with these comments on both occasions, and telling Justin that people don't say stuff like that anymore, that it's not appropriate. Also testified to Justin becoming "huffy" or unhappy when she objected to these comments, walking away or becoming harder to work with. Also testified to Justin recording an early rehearsal with Jenny and Blake without telling them beforehand, and finding this weird and inappropriate.

Isabella: testified two three incidents where Justin made her feel uncomfortable. The most significant was during the sex scene she filmed with young Atlas, Justin coming over afterwards to tell them that it had been "hot" which she found inappropriate because the scene was meant to be an "innocent" experience between two teenagers. The second thing was suggesting she lick the spoon during a different scene and look suggestively into her acting partner's eyes, which Isabella thought was inappropriate for the scene and character. The third thing was second-hand - Isabella's co-star told her that Justin had suggested Isabella and young Atlas "get to know each other" in a way that Isabella felt was inappropriately suggestive.

Intimacy Coordinator: testified to Justin adding kissing and other intimate contact to scenes even when not called for in the script. Testified to Justin suggesting added elements to sex scenes, like oral sex and Blake climaxing on screen, even though the IC knew from consultations with Blake that these items violated Blakes nudity/intimacy rider. Also testified that Jamey Heath had provided the IC with a list of all scenes that had ANY level of intimacy (even just kissing) or nudity, but it did not include the dancing scene or the birth scene. Confirmed that the level of undress in the birth scene as filmed constituted onscreen nudity that would require a nudity rider. Also testified that the call sheet as published for the birth scene did not indicate a closed set.

Colleen: testified to issues with Justin starting before casting had even begun, including being told he wanted her feedback on the script and then struggling to find opportunities to provide it. Testified to exchanging emails with Justin about the level of onscreen sex/intimacy in the film and explaining that the goal should not be represent all the sex in the book on screen, as women feel differently about reading a sex scene in a book that they are reading alone at home, versus watching sex on a screen in a theater full of people, and that implied sex is much more appropriate. Testified that she had never had a conversation with Blake when, in May 2024, Justin and Jamey invited Colleen to dinner with what Colleen felt was the intent to poison her against Blake. Testified to Justin blaming Blake for an issue with Lily's tattoo that had to be fixed in post, even though Justin later admitted that the error was with their own designer, who had failed to include the essential element in the first renderings. Testified to being worried Justin would not convey Colleen's feedback on the film to Blake for Blake's edit, which is what led Colleen to reach out to Blake in the first place.

Alex: testified to multiple negative interactions with Justin of her own, including him losing his temper with her on more than one occasions, and apologize by saying he'd been having trouble with interrupting and talking over women lately. Testified to informing Justin and Jamey of both Jenny's and Blake's complaints about behavior on set, and suggesting that Wayfarer open an investigation in order to clear the air and make sure things ran smoothly moving forward. Testified that Jamey told her they decided not to investigate because he felt it would be better if the details of the complaints not be written down or otherwise memorialized.

I mean, sure, if you cherry pick ONLY the stuff that you feel exonerates Justin and Jamey, it makes their accusers look petty and lame. Or like they were conspiring against these men. But when you look at the evidence in its totality, it's a lot more complicated than that.

And they no one has joined the lawsuit. You have the opportunity to join 2 powerful celebs with their Rolodex of powerful friends and no one wants a thing to do with this. That speaks volumes.

And none of their “friends” are standing by them, voicing support, or are even willing to be seen with them.

Your understanding of what this lawsuit entails is laughable.

No it’s not. No one wants to revisit this or support her. They are distancing themselves. If you think this isn’t hurting Blake you are not paying attention.

On a separate note, I just saw the transcript of an interview panel Isabel and Alex (young lily and young atlas) had early on, before official promo but after their scenes were shot. They both GUSHED over Justin and his role as a director, going much further than not trying to rock the boat. They genuinely had a good experience with him.

Then all of a sudden Blake meets Isabel. Hosts sleepovers, makes promises.

We can all see it.

Of course Isabella would gush about Justin in official promotional material for the movie. Duh. In what universe would an actress on her very first film every, while filming a promo for the movie that she is contractually required to appear in and will be used to sell the movie, will the actress provide an unvarnished and totally honest assessment of her director? No one would. Actors always gush about the director and the experience in those things, even more than you'd expect them to in regular press interviews. The person who "interviewed" Isabella for that promo was hired by the movie to make the movie look good. I wouldn't be surprised if her response was at least partially scripted. It's evidence of nothing.

Oh please. Read the transcript. She absolutely didn’t have to say that about Justin. She could have been much more diplomat.

Isabel had a fine experience - even a pleasant experience with Justin. I’ve seen video footage of her, trying to hug him and him, turning it into a high five. she did not have a problem with Justin until the sleepovers, the free clothes from Blake, and Blake promising her she would get an introducing credit on the film as detailed in Blake’s PGA letter.

You’re free to keep trying, but we can also see through this nonsense. The evidence is out.

Further, there is a huge file we are waiting for that was too big to be downloaded -and apparently is all Blakes text. I look forward to reading those in the coming days.

+1 if you read her deposition she says her text to Justin thanking him for creating a safe space accurately reflected how she felt at the time. Given that, there’s no reason to think otherwise about the promo. She said she didn’t have a problem with the hot comment, and the lick spoon instructions until she reflected back on them later (i.e. after meeting Blake).

Blake dragged Isabela into this case for PR, which is a shame b/c her career has been harmed. The judge likely won’t consider her testimony at all b/c she and Blake were not on set together. The judge made a comment that if Blake wasn’t aware of the “harassment” it can’t go to hostile work environment.

This is what makes Blake so unusual as a "victim." One can scream at the top of there lungs that there is no such thing as a perfect victim, but you usually don't seem them selfishly ruining their colleagues' careers in the process. Can anyone point to a time that that's happened? It doesn't because they don't have the power to rally everyone.

Or... Isabella is an adult and was telling the truth about how she was creeped out by Baldoni because he really did and said those things. Just like Saks, Slate, Lively, Talbot, Hoover, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't find the picture, but this is the raw footage (from the Baldoni subreddit). I don't see any black briefs.

https://www.reddit.com/r/teamjustinbaldoni/comments/1qimci4/birth_scene_video_was_released/

Yeah I saw that clip but you can't see black briefs in it either. In the previous posts, they are saying there is now clear evidence that she is in black briefs and that is what I haven't seen yet. Maybe it is a still from the set or BTS or B roll. Seems lots of people have seen it as they are posting that they have the clear evidence that she lied and that she was wearing black briefs so I am a bit stumped as to why I can't find it. I looked on a few reddit sites and they all say they saw it not I can't actually find what the footage or pictures they saw.

I thought their proof was just that's what Wayfarer says in their statement of facts. I have not seen any photos of her wearing briefs. They never provide links, they just say everything is "debunked."

No, Baldoni's camp had said she was in black underwear, Blake's camp had said she had a nude piece of fabric only. Now everyone is posting that they have the photo / video evidence that shows Blake lied and Baldoni was telling the truth and she is wearing black underwear throughout the birth scene. But I can't find those pictures that show the proof they are all talking about that shows Baldoni was right and Blake was lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jenny’s behavior and texts are pretty abhorrent but she thought she was just buttering up to Blake for a few weeks of filming. She had no ideas that it was going to turn into this PR disaster.

It’s easy to see how this happened with the cast and Colleen. The problem is Blake supporters will take any little thing and run with it just b/c Blake managed to get the cast to shit talk Justin. But then when you ask what he did to justify the vitriol you get:

Jenny: laughed at my jokes and gave me $15k

Isabella: told me to lick a spoon

Brandon: nothing, I’m just thirsty, um I mean supporting women.

Colleen: he didn’t like Blake so I never talked to him again.

But you're cherry picking. That's not what any of those people testified to (I don't then Brandon is relevant at all, was he even deposed?).

Jenny: testified to two occasions of Justin calling a woman "sexy" in a way that Jenny interpreted to be about their personal physical appearance, not their character. Testified to expressing her unhappiness with these comments on both occasions, and telling Justin that people don't say stuff like that anymore, that it's not appropriate. Also testified to Justin becoming "huffy" or unhappy when she objected to these comments, walking away or becoming harder to work with. Also testified to Justin recording an early rehearsal with Jenny and Blake without telling them beforehand, and finding this weird and inappropriate.

Isabella: testified two three incidents where Justin made her feel uncomfortable. The most significant was during the sex scene she filmed with young Atlas, Justin coming over afterwards to tell them that it had been "hot" which she found inappropriate because the scene was meant to be an "innocent" experience between two teenagers. The second thing was suggesting she lick the spoon during a different scene and look suggestively into her acting partner's eyes, which Isabella thought was inappropriate for the scene and character. The third thing was second-hand - Isabella's co-star told her that Justin had suggested Isabella and young Atlas "get to know each other" in a way that Isabella felt was inappropriately suggestive.

Intimacy Coordinator: testified to Justin adding kissing and other intimate contact to scenes even when not called for in the script. Testified to Justin suggesting added elements to sex scenes, like oral sex and Blake climaxing on screen, even though the IC knew from consultations with Blake that these items violated Blakes nudity/intimacy rider. Also testified that Jamey Heath had provided the IC with a list of all scenes that had ANY level of intimacy (even just kissing) or nudity, but it did not include the dancing scene or the birth scene. Confirmed that the level of undress in the birth scene as filmed constituted onscreen nudity that would require a nudity rider. Also testified that the call sheet as published for the birth scene did not indicate a closed set.

Colleen: testified to issues with Justin starting before casting had even begun, including being told he wanted her feedback on the script and then struggling to find opportunities to provide it. Testified to exchanging emails with Justin about the level of onscreen sex/intimacy in the film and explaining that the goal should not be represent all the sex in the book on screen, as women feel differently about reading a sex scene in a book that they are reading alone at home, versus watching sex on a screen in a theater full of people, and that implied sex is much more appropriate. Testified that she had never had a conversation with Blake when, in May 2024, Justin and Jamey invited Colleen to dinner with what Colleen felt was the intent to poison her against Blake. Testified to Justin blaming Blake for an issue with Lily's tattoo that had to be fixed in post, even though Justin later admitted that the error was with their own designer, who had failed to include the essential element in the first renderings. Testified to being worried Justin would not convey Colleen's feedback on the film to Blake for Blake's edit, which is what led Colleen to reach out to Blake in the first place.

Alex: testified to multiple negative interactions with Justin of her own, including him losing his temper with her on more than one occasions, and apologize by saying he'd been having trouble with interrupting and talking over women lately. Testified to informing Justin and Jamey of both Jenny's and Blake's complaints about behavior on set, and suggesting that Wayfarer open an investigation in order to clear the air and make sure things ran smoothly moving forward. Testified that Jamey told her they decided not to investigate because he felt it would be better if the details of the complaints not be written down or otherwise memorialized.

I mean, sure, if you cherry pick ONLY the stuff that you feel exonerates Justin and Jamey, it makes their accusers look petty and lame. Or like they were conspiring against these men. But when you look at the evidence in its totality, it's a lot more complicated than that.

And they no one has joined the lawsuit. You have the opportunity to join 2 powerful celebs with their Rolodex of powerful friends and no one wants a thing to do with this. That speaks volumes.

And none of their “friends” are standing by them, voicing support, or are even willing to be seen with them.

Your understanding of what this lawsuit entails is laughable.

No it’s not. No one wants to revisit this or support her. They are distancing themselves. If you think this isn’t hurting Blake you are not paying attention.

On a separate note, I just saw the transcript of an interview panel Isabel and Alex (young lily and young atlas) had early on, before official promo but after their scenes were shot. They both GUSHED over Justin and his role as a director, going much further than not trying to rock the boat. They genuinely had a good experience with him.

Then all of a sudden Blake meets Isabel. Hosts sleepovers, makes promises.

We can all see it.

Of course Isabella would gush about Justin in official promotional material for the movie. Duh. In what universe would an actress on her very first film every, while filming a promo for the movie that she is contractually required to appear in and will be used to sell the movie, will the actress provide an unvarnished and totally honest assessment of her director? No one would. Actors always gush about the director and the experience in those things, even more than you'd expect them to in regular press interviews. The person who "interviewed" Isabella for that promo was hired by the movie to make the movie look good. I wouldn't be surprised if her response was at least partially scripted. It's evidence of nothing.

Oh please. Read the transcript. She absolutely didn’t have to say that about Justin. She could have been much more diplomat.

Isabel had a fine experience - even a pleasant experience with Justin. I’ve seen video footage of her, trying to hug him and him, turning it into a high five. she did not have a problem with Justin until the sleepovers, the free clothes from Blake, and Blake promising her she would get an introducing credit on the film as detailed in Blake’s PGA letter.

You’re free to keep trying, but we can also see through this nonsense. The evidence is out.

Further, there is a huge file we are waiting for that was too big to be downloaded -and apparently is all Blakes text. I look forward to reading those in the coming days.

+1 if you read her deposition she says her text to Justin thanking him for creating a safe space accurately reflected how she felt at the time. Given that, there’s no reason to think otherwise about the promo. She said she didn’t have a problem with the hot comment, and the lick spoon instructions until she reflected back on them later (i.e. after meeting Blake).

Blake dragged Isabela into this case for PR, which is a shame b/c her career has been harmed. The judge likely won’t consider her testimony at all b/c she and Blake were not on set together. The judge made a comment that if Blake wasn’t aware of the “harassment” it can’t go to hostile work environment.

This is what makes Blake so unusual as a "victim." One can scream at the top of there lungs that there is no such thing as a perfect victim, but you usually don't seem them selfishly ruining their colleagues' careers in the process. Can anyone point to a time that that's happened? It doesn't because they don't have the power to rally everyone.

Or... Isabella is an adult and was telling the truth about how she was creeped out by Baldoni because he really did and said those things. Just like Saks, Slate, Lively, Talbot, Hoover, etc.

She said she was comfortable and felt safe with Justin before Blake entered the pictured. But let's say your version of events is true, even if though they're clearly not. If I were Blake, I'd be like, "You have no idea how the public is going to react against any allegations. I'm powerful, so I'm willing to take the brunt of the drama, and I'm willing to take him down through the NYTimes." But if I were a genuinely caring person who cared about my colleague's safety, I would not tell her to engage in petty stuff like unfollowing him or try to giggle with her in interviews about how he talked about her mole or something. So stupid.