MAGA teen bused in from a Catholic school harasses Indigenous People's marcher. Vile.

[Anonymous]

Why were the kids laughing and dancing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The chaperones were not the problem. You are still trying to deflect.

They were responsible for the boys and let them enter and remain in that situation. They should have steered clear of BHIs. They should have shut down DB behavior.

[Anonymous]

The liberal and media response to this event and the Kavanaugh hearings will not be forgotten.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The liberal and media response to this event and the Kavanaugh hearings will not be forgotten.

Write it down on your little list. Keep it safe!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The liberal and media response to this event and the Kavanaugh hearings will not be forgotten.

The behavior of the Covington kids and Kavanaugh will never be forgotten.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The liberal and media response to this event and the Kavanaugh hearings will not be forgotten.

The behavior of the Covington kids and Kavanaugh will never be forgotten.

Again, no one has been able to articulate *what* these kids did that was so horrible!!

He STOOD there. In the same spot he'd been standing in, since before the NA man came up to him.

And that's bad because........? Why?

Is a person under some universal obligation to move when someone walks up to them and starts beating a drum in their face?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope the kids’ lawyers sue the crap out of people

I sure hope you are expressing the same sentiment with respect to the horrible treatment the Parkland kids got from right wing gun nuts.

Also, why are those saying Covington kids behaved well ignoring the tomahawk chops, war whoops and shirt shedding? Can you really not see how disrespectful and entitled those kids were. Separate from the bad actions of black Israelites and, less clearly, the native Americans? Truly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Where were the chaperones?
Busy working out excuses for their kids and calling PR firms.
Poor judgment and negligent.

You've made a mistake by repeating your post.
It's like the "can I get change, two 20's for a 10?" scam, it only works if your not paying attention.

So, I'm calling BS on this. You failed at gaslighting the kids, now you're trying to gaslight the chaperones.

I'll grant that this is a very well crafted and polite lie; it's short, punchy, succinct, and pushes all the buttons for the moderate to far left.
But when I read what you just wrote, it falls apart, because it's well played, but false.


A) Initial attempts to pin the blame on the kids worked, but only because the video was edited AND nobody knew that Nathan Phillips was a professional protester and serial victim-of-white-oppression. The initial gaslighting the kids by editing the video to support Nathan's tearful TV interview that THEY SWARMED HIM, WORKED.
But, once Phillips version of the event was shown to be a lie, the desired narrative began to crumble.


B) Now that gaslighting the kids has failed, you're trying to gaslight the chaperones.
You ask a question, give an answer, then make a conclusion.
1) where are the chaperones, 2) they were busy planning ahead for publicity, 3) they, therefore, failed to act on behalf of the children

C) I think it's cowardly to now claim, without any evidence, and knowing that it's false, imply that the chaperones are the ones
who wanted this to escalate in order to get publicity. I think you and everyone reading this knows that blaming the chaperones as the people seeking publicity while this happened is a bald-faced lie.

That being said, it's a reasonably good strategy
To summarize, you're claiming the chaperones, weren't doing their job because they were coordinating excuses and looking for publicity.
You conclude that the chaperones used the kids to advance their agenda and any harm to the kids from liberal doxxing and death-threats,
is, therefore, the fault of the Catholic chaperones who failed to anticipate that Nathan Phillips would use the kids for his own publicity.

Sorry, although you initially succeeded in gaslighting the kids because Nathan Phillips lied about the facts on national TV; you're not going to succeed in gaslighting the chaperones by claiming that THEY were at fault and THEY were the ones scheming to make this a media circus.

The priest and chaperones were there to protect the kids and make sure the kids had a wonderful day.
The BHI and Nathan Phillips were there to ruin someone else's day.
Your attempt to portray the ONLY people who cared about the kids as PR vultures is repulsive.

You are full of shit. I didn’t gaslight the kids. I’ve always thought they behaved poorly but the adults were to blame.

Where did I say anything about chaperones scheming for publicity or implied they are PR vultures? You are just making up random shit now to support some delusional point of yours. Lying nutjob.

Go take your meds.

DP.

"Busy working out excuses for their kids and calling PR firms."

You have been called out.

Sarcasm. Obviously they weren’t calling PR firms AT the march.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A great read by Andrew Sullivan...

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/01/andrew-sullivan-the-abyss-of-hate-versus-hate.html

From the article:

To put it bluntly: They were 16-year-olds subjected to verbal racist assault by grown men; and then the kids were accused of being bigots. It just beggars belief that the same liberals who fret about “micro-aggressions” for 20-somethings were able to see 16-year-olds absorbing the worst racist garbage from religious bigots … and then express the desire to punch the kids in the face.

THIS.

With this, I honestly don’t think another word can be said that adds anything. It is done.

Except he watched the wrong the video.

https://vimeo.com/312411257

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A great read by Andrew Sullivan...

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/01/andrew-sullivan-the-abyss-of-hate-versus-hate.html

From the article:

To put it bluntly: They were 16-year-olds subjected to verbal racist assault by grown men; and then the kids were accused of being bigots. It just beggars belief that the same liberals who fret about “micro-aggressions” for 20-somethings were able to see 16-year-olds absorbing the worst racist garbage from religious bigots … and then express the desire to punch the kids in the face.

THIS.

With this, I honestly don’t think another word can be said that adds anything. It is done.

Except he watched the wrong the video.

https://vimeo.com/312411257

This video is even more evidence that Nathan Phillips is lying about his story.
He said in his Today Show interview that he was looking beyond the boy to the Lincoln Memorial where he wanted to go. That is such BS. He was looking straight at Sandmann. Trying to intimidate him.
He said he was heading to the Lincoln Memorial and that the boy was in his way. Once the group moved, did he head to the Lincoln Memorial? Nope. Because, he was never headed there to begin with.
And, then, the "We won grandpa" line seals his lie.
Such a fraud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The liberal and media response to this event and the Kavanaugh hearings will not be forgotten.

The behavior of the Covington kids and Kavanaugh will never be forgotten.

Again, no one has been able to articulate *what* these kids did that was so horrible!!

He STOOD there. In the same spot he'd been standing in, since before the NA man came up to him.

And that's bad because........? Why?

Is a person under some universal obligation to move when someone walks up to them and starts beating a drum in their face?

fundamentally, they came to DC to try to interfere with my right to control my body. and then acted like dumb jocks on the steps of the lincoln memorial, performed not only a disrespectful haka but also the tomahawk chop, THEN defended blackface. Covington Catholic = scum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A great read by Andrew Sullivan...

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/01/andrew-sullivan-the-abyss-of-hate-versus-hate.html

From the article:

To put it bluntly: They were 16-year-olds subjected to verbal racist assault by grown men; and then the kids were accused of being bigots. It just beggars belief that the same liberals who fret about “micro-aggressions” for 20-somethings were able to see 16-year-olds absorbing the worst racist garbage from religious bigots … and then express the desire to punch the kids in the face.

THIS.

With this, I honestly don’t think another word can be said that adds anything. It is done.

Except he watched the wrong the video.

https://vimeo.com/312411257

Negligent chaperone admits she was negligent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The liberal and media response to this event and the Kavanaugh hearings will not be forgotten.

The behavior of the Covington kids and Kavanaugh will never be forgotten.

Again, no one has been able to articulate *what* these kids did that was so horrible!!

He STOOD there. In the same spot he'd been standing in, since before the NA man came up to him.

And that's bad because........? Why?

Is a person under some universal obligation to move when someone walks up to them and starts beating a drum in their face?

fundamentally, they came to DC to try to interfere with my right to control my body. and then acted like dumb jocks on the steps of the lincoln memorial, performed not only a disrespectful haka but also the tomahawk chop, THEN defended blackface. Covington Catholic = scum.

You want to interfere with my rights, too, but I don't call you names.

You should try to be more tolerant of other opinions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

...
Where did I say anything about chaperones scheming for publicity or implied they are PR vultures?
...

DP.

"Busy working out excuses for their kids and calling PR firms."

You have been called out.

Sarcasm. Obviously they weren’t calling PR firms AT the march.

Correct, this is about what happened AFTER the march, while they were waiting for a bus.

Again, the post if very well crafted, short and succinct, and close-enough to correct to mislead effectively.
Nice try to divert and gaslight about the timeing and subtly switch the subject, but still a deceptive straw man argument.


"A man who tells lies, merely hides the truth. But a man who tells half-lies has forgotten what the truth is"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The liberal and media response to this event and the Kavanaugh hearings will not be forgotten.

The behavior of the Covington kids and Kavanaugh will never be forgotten.

Again, no one has been able to articulate *what* these kids did that was so horrible!!

He STOOD there. In the same spot he'd been standing in, since before the NA man came up to him.

And that's bad because........? Why?

Is a person under some universal obligation to move when someone walks up to them and starts beating a drum in their face?

fundamentally, they came to DC to try to interfere with my right to control my body. and then acted like dumb jocks on the steps of the lincoln memorial, performed not only a disrespectful haka but also the tomahawk chop, THEN defended blackface. Covington Catholic = scum.

See. That is what this is about. Had they been wearing pussy hats the next day, they would be hailed as heroes.
Wrong day, wrong hat - in your opinion.