Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Agree. This is a he said she said between two Washington raised elites. Most men who never gave a wit about Kavanaugh now think he is a cool dude they want to drink with. Chrissy is that smarmy teacher who pissed you off in class. Big win.

That’s the misogynist’s take.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I grew up five miles from Georgetown prep in the same era, in the 1980’s. I was at parties where there was beer. As girls, some of us were trying to lose our virginity, and what is funny, is very few were successful - with other high school students. The girls who did were seeing boys who were already in college. The high school boys were very immature. I graduated a virgin, it was my impression that actually very few in that scene were actually having sex, both boys and girls.

I know two boys from a prep feeder school who started having sex in 7th grade. By HS, the alpha males/jocks at prep were definitely having sex...or at the very least trying to.

Signed,

LOTA

From the 1980’s? Because in the 80’s it was not the norm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I grew up five miles from Georgetown prep in the same era, in the 1980’s. I was at parties where there was beer. As girls, some of us were trying to lose our virginity, and what is funny, is very few were successful - with other high school students. The girls who did were seeing boys who were already in college. The high school boys were very immature. I graduated a virgin, it was my impression that actually very few in that scene were actually having sex, both boys and girls.

Maybe you and your friends were just not very attractive.

Have you seen Ford??? Every guy dream

So, you were even uglier than her I guess?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I grew up five miles from Georgetown prep in the same era, in the 1980’s. I was at parties where there was beer. As girls, some of us were trying to lose our virginity, and what is funny, is very few were successful - with other high school students. The girls who did were seeing boys who were already in college. The high school boys were very immature. I graduated a virgin, it was my impression that actually very few in that scene were actually having sex, both boys and girls.

Maybe you and your friends were just not very attractive.

Seriously? This is how you respond in a thread that involves discussion of issues of sexism and misogyny?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I grew up five miles from Georgetown prep in the same era, in the 1980’s. I was at parties where there was beer. As girls, some of us were trying to lose our virginity, and what is funny, is very few were successful - with other high school students. The girls who did were seeing boys who were already in college. The high school boys were very immature. I graduated a virgin, it was my impression that actually very few in that scene were actually having sex, both boys and girls.

Maybe you and your friends were just not very attractive.

Seriously? This is how you respond in a thread that involves discussion of issues of sexism and misogyny?

It speaks to some pp’s mindset, doesn’t it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I grew up five miles from Georgetown prep in the same era, in the 1980’s. I was at parties where there was beer. As girls, some of us were trying to lose our virginity, and what is funny, is very few were successful - with other high school students. The girls who did were seeing boys who were already in college. The high school boys were very immature. I graduated a virgin, it was my impression that actually very few in that scene were actually having sex, both boys and girls.

Maybe you and your friends were just not very attractive.

Seriously? This is how you respond in a thread that involves discussion of issues of sexism and misogyny?

Well, pp is implying that rape would be impossible because she was unable to get laid, so I’m just offering an alternative explanation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh? Do you know how long 10 days is?

Me: Do you know how long a lifetime appointment is?

Perfect!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I grew up five miles from Georgetown prep in the same era, in the 1980’s. I was at parties where there was beer. As girls, some of us were trying to lose our virginity, and what is funny, is very few were successful - with other high school students. The girls who did were seeing boys who were already in college. The high school boys were very immature. I graduated a virgin, it was my impression that actually very few in that scene were actually having sex, both boys and girls.

Maybe you and your friends were just not very attractive.

Seriously? This is how you respond in a thread that involves discussion of issues of sexism and misogyny?

Not the PP and think those comments are beyond immature and out of line. I also think the word "misogyny" has been used WAY too much on this thread to be meaningful. And I'm a woman.

[Anonymous]

I want puss-Brett to cry some more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why in the world is he asking questions back to the Senators? Unprofessional.

Because these senators are asking him holier-than-thou questions about drinking when they are all likely guilty of the exact behavior they accuse him of.

Couple differences between a SCOTUS nominee and Senator.
Senators are elected for a 6 year period of time. SCOTUS is a lifetime appointment.

Seems like one’s lifetime conduct is more relevant to their government job than others.

Get real. You think someone's high school drinking habits should dictate whether they're on SCOTUS? Get a life.

The drinking goes to the allegations about his sexual assaults. It's relevant because the women who accused him said alcohol was involved in all of them.

Sexual assault is a crime. Drinking is not, but sexual assault while drinking is, even when you are in high school.

They can't substantiate the sexual assault claims in any way, so this is all they have left.

They have a very credible witness to sexual assault. The JC refused to call the other accusers, so we have not heard from them.

This "hearing" is a sham. What a farce. The GOP is controlling it, and it's ludicrous. I feel so sorry for Christine Ford. God help her.

Kav deserves to lose his current job for all his lying. Boofing is anal sex. The devils triangle is a threesome. Kav lied about that under oath. What else is he lying about?

[Anonymous]

Lady member, asking about reports of his drinking, "do you have a drinking problem judge?"
Kav: Do YOU?

[Anonymous]

Why doesn't the lady prosecutor ask him questions? He is very pugnaciouus! Bully. I could see him strongarming a girl into a room when drunk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree. This is a he said she said between two Washington raised elites. Most men who never gave a wit about Kavanaugh now think he is a cool dude they want to drink with. Chrissy is that smarmy teacher who pissed you off in class. Big win.

That’s the misogynist’s take.

+1 My facebook feed is full of people calling Ford a true hero, and Kavanaugh a belligerent creepy drunk.

[Anonymous]

Today I have never been so embarrassed to be a Democrat. While I do think Dr Ford is the victim of a sexual assault I do not believe it was at the hands of Judge Kavanaugh.

But wha the democrats are doing today is downright demonic. Really disgusting sham.

[Anonymous]

Blumenthal lecturing Kavanaugh about the truth is rich.