With Love, Meghan on Netflix

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have always loved the whole idea of a royal family and the parades and castles and fun stuff but.This thing with Charles is so strange that maybe it is time for UK to give up monarchy. If a father cannot directly speak with his son for fear of upsetting monarchy then maybe it is a sign that this monarchy thing is unhealthy and not good for UK?

Dad is not speaking to son because he’s upset with son’s behavior. A tale as old as time.

Charles’ mind is poisoned by Camilla is my guess. She seems like the ultimate evil step mother.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have always loved the whole idea of a royal family and the parades and castles and fun stuff but.This thing with Charles is so strange that maybe it is time for UK to give up monarchy. If a father cannot directly speak with his son for fear of upsetting monarchy then maybe it is a sign that this monarchy thing is unhealthy and not good for UK?

Anti-monarchists with any excuse to bring this up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guess Meghan think if they live montecito and make millions she has hit the top and it’s incredible. She still does not get that royal family is another world and league entirely. It’s so far apart that it’s not even a competition but yet they are still losing as they hold their we’re #1 banners.

If Meghan is happy with her life, which she chose, and it's not a competition, I don't understand why you care? She didn't want to live the royal life in London, so she doesn't, and she seems happy with the life she lives instead.

Is this really just all about anger over her calling herself Duchess? She is a Duchess, unless they take it away. Who cares? There have always been random titles people floating around Hollywood and high society. It's a whatever.

Agree. These people would be just as insulted, if not more, if she didn’t use a title. They’d claim she is denying it/wasting it.
Some people will criticize her for anything, in any which direction.

People are annoyed that they left the British Royal family and complained bitterly about how the family is racist and unsupportive, and yet still use their titles. No one would complain more or saying that that they “were wasting it.” Ever hear of the saying, “it’s the economy, stupid?” This is “it’s the hypocrisy, stupid.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor woman is trying to hold it all together. That recent interview about him being a fox, loving her so so much so much and slaying the dragon to save the princess and what not was sad. They've so much to be thankful about but wanting it all can be their downfall. Hope they realize it before its too late. Forget the the Windsors and the Markles and being the American royalty and just be a boring normal family.

Why do we think she talks like this? Mental illness?

No that's just being human. She wants him and others to keep believing and supporting their love story to preserve their public image and their marriage.

As far as title of a duchess, she is one so she has every right to use it. However, it's hypocritical to call herself one considering her stance on racism and colonialism AND being an American.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have always loved the whole idea of a royal family and the parades and castles and fun stuff but.This thing with Charles is so strange that maybe it is time for UK to give up monarchy. If a father cannot directly speak with his son for fear of upsetting monarchy then maybe it is a sign that this monarchy thing is unhealthy and not good for UK?

Dad is not speaking to son because he’s upset with son’s behavior. A tale as old as time.

Charles’ mind is poisoned by Camilla is my guess. She seems like the ultimate evil step mother.

Oh please. Not everything is the woman's fault

[Anonymous]

and because she made a point to denounce and leave that world

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she keep posing pictures of the backs of her kids? She really, really wants us to want to see them. Nobody cares what the backsides of her kids look like and close to nobody cares what they look like from the front.

Constantly posting photos of them from the back is just crazy. She wants to protect their privacy? That’s great- we don’t need to see them at all. Most of us would be happy of H&M just disappeared.

It’s incredibly common in my circle and among influencers. If you don’t want see the kids, feel free to unfollow her on social media.

I am not a follower and she is everywhere

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have always loved the whole idea of a royal family and the parades and castles and fun stuff but.This thing with Charles is so strange that maybe it is time for UK to give up monarchy. If a father cannot directly speak with his son for fear of upsetting monarchy then maybe it is a sign that this monarchy thing is unhealthy and not good for UK?

Dad is not speaking to son because he’s upset with son’s behavior. A tale as old as time.

My guess is that Charles sees it as he pulled out all the bells and whistles to celebrate Harry and Meghan's wedding, only to have them repeatedly spit in his face.

At a certain point, parents label such a kid as ungrateful and focus on the child who shows some love for all the energy expended on the child.Now that Will has a wife and three kids, there are plenty of happy times, and the ungratefulness is not needed. There are only so many hours in the day, and drama gets really tiresome as you age.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have always loved the whole idea of a royal family and the parades and castles and fun stuff but.This thing with Charles is so strange that maybe it is time for UK to give up monarchy. If a father cannot directly speak with his son for fear of upsetting monarchy then maybe it is a sign that this monarchy thing is unhealthy and not good for UK?

Dad is not speaking to son because he’s upset with son’s behavior. A tale as old as time.

Charles’ mind is poisoned by Camilla is my guess. She seems like the ultimate evil step mother.

Oh please. Not everything is the woman's fault

This^. Charles shouldn't have gotten into an arranged marriage by his mum if he loved Camilla and should've been a good father no matter how bad of a wife Diana was or how evil of a step mum Camilla was.

[Anonymous]

Same way, Harry shouldn't have sold his family disputes to American media for quick million$.

[Anonymous]

The dad should be an adult and see his role in this. Son felt the only way to get dad to interact was in the media which is sad. Dad should think hmmm I may not have a lot of time so I should fix things with my son and make sure my kids have a relationship for when I am gone. The security issue is one dad should pay for if government can’t or
won’t. Son’s mom died from lack of security. This is not rocket science. Do you love your kid or not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is paranoid like her mother was.

Actually, Harry’s recent lawsuits vindicated Princess Diana and him. They were not paranoid. The press was in fact illegally spying on them, hacking into their voicemails and other records, attaching geolocation tracking devices to their cars, etc. There was also evidence showing that the palace did in fact leak stories about H and M to help get spotlight off William and Kate or Charles and Camilla.

I agree he is vindicated but did it really help? I know we can now see the details in the security and he lost technically but really everyone knows what went down so he won morally. But again for what? He is completely isolated and he has talked about his depression and I am sure PTSD from his mom dying as how he was treated and also from serving. I think Megan will be fine if they divorce but he will not. He would not want to be away from his kids and without a marriage than why be in US? I really wish Charles acted like a normal father. This blocking calls and having to make appointments to see your family
is bizarre. President Trump/President Biden/President Obama etc all saw their kids and said they always take calls
from their kids. Sorry Charles you should be no different. Who cares if you are arguing. Come on how many of us have dealt with bigger problems than a bratty kid. Charles also needs to step up and fix this while he can. If he passes my guess is William never talks to Harry again and that is really sad.

There is still time. Charles should meet with Harry and William together and they should make a plan. Harry should agree to no more family interviews and Megan needs to buy in. They should live in UK part of the year and actually do family things in UK. They should be given a chance to fix being bratty. This is all unnecessary drama.

This post is clearly written by an American with no understanding of the British Royal family. I’m not saying it is right, the way they operate. But it’s stupid to compare Trump and Obama and their kids to the BRF. President’s wives are not required to stand on the steps of the hospital a day after birth and show off the new heir. The President doesn’t need to release a picture of his wife while she is going through chemo to stop all the rumors about her. President’s kids aren’t required to walk behind their mother’s casket in a parade-like setting through the streets of London. The kids don’t “belong to the American people,” unlike British heirs. They aren’t trotted out on their birthdays and special occasions. They aren’t like us. They have rules and have to put service before spoiled brat children that will leak everything to the press in a temper tantrum and threaten the monarchy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have always loved the whole idea of a royal family and the parades and castles and fun stuff but.This thing with Charles is so strange that maybe it is time for UK to give up monarchy. If a father cannot directly speak with his son for fear of upsetting monarchy then maybe it is a sign that this monarchy thing is unhealthy and not good for UK?

Dad is not speaking to son because he’s upset with son’s behavior. A tale as old as time.

Charles’ mind is poisoned by Camilla is my guess. She seems like the ultimate evil step mother.

I think it's more that no one has time for constant drama. Imagine being them and wondering what tv show Harry and Meghan will be on next. Charles and Camilla don't do Netflix interviews and tv confessional talks. You cannot blame them for not wanting to deal with Harry anymore.

[Anonymous]

He inherited or will inherit multimillions from his grandparents, mother and father and he and his wife made millions with interviews, Netflix, jams and books. They'll always have a source of income selling glimpses of their lives so they always live a comfy life and can buy private security. However, it seems they feel entitled to a much more luxurious life and protocol equal to his brother and SIL, which generates all the rage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have always loved the whole idea of a royal family and the parades and castles and fun stuff but.This thing with Charles is so strange that maybe it is time for UK to give up monarchy. If a father cannot directly speak with his son for fear of upsetting monarchy then maybe it is a sign that this monarchy thing is unhealthy and not good for UK?

Dad is not speaking to son because he’s upset with son’s behavior. A tale as old as time.

I don’t know about that but he should be speaking with his son. Parents do not not talk to their kids. Is he bratty perhaps but what if what he said is true? So you don’t talk to him because he is saying true things that make you look bad? Maybe a better tactic would be becoming the healing person in the family. I cannot imagine not taking my kids calls. No way.

Charles’ mind is poisoned by Camilla is my guess. She seems like the ultimate evil step mother.