How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Cory Booker is VICIOUS! Go CORY!

ACB rolled her eyes at the Roe v. Wade comment. THERE'S THE MEME!

Let's see it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just noticed that she describes her biological children by noting their academic strengths and interests, while her adopted children apparently have none.

Jesse and I are parents to seven wonderful children. Emma is a sophomore in college who just might follow her parents into a career in the law. Vivian came to us from Haiti. When she arrived, she was so weak that we were told she might never walk or talk normally. She now deadlifts as much as the male athletes at our gym, and I assure you that she has no trouble talking. Tess is 16, and while she shares her parents’ love for the liberal arts, she also has a math gene that seems to have skipped her parents’ generation. John Peter joined us shortly after the devastating earthquake in Haiti, and Jesse, who brought him home, still describes the shock on JP’s face when he got off the plane in wintertime Chicago. Once that shock wore off, JP assumed the happy-go-lucky attitude that is still his signature trait. Liam is smart, strong, and kind, and to our delight, he still loves watching movies with Mom and Dad. Ten-year-old Juliet is already pursuing her goal of becoming an author by writing multiple essays and short stories, including one she recently submitted for publication. And our youngest—Benjamin, who has Down Syndrome—is the unanimous favorite of the family.

I am conservative from Indiana, and was raised in the same Catholic Diocese, where she has been in the 15 years. The Haitian born children are from Haiti, why? 1.) Evangelical pressure. You can't be a good wealthy Evangelical, if you don't adopt. Kids are a sign of wealth in private school land. The more kids on full-pay tuition is a sign of wealth. 2.) Avoidance of drugs. Vivian's issue are easily solved with simple medical interventions, but drugs in the systems cause a lifetime of trouble for adoptive parents. Jesse was a Fed. Prosecutor handling drug charges. If Jesse and Amy adopted kids with drugs in their systems, Amy's career would be over in a heartbeat.

Sorry, but that sounds crazy. If a couple adopts a baby born to a drug addict with drugs in his or her system their careers are over?

Most people would award the adoptive parents a lot of generosity of spirit points.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way she uses her children of color for political purposes is disgusting. I hope she has saved up for therapy...

I was nauseated to see her Black child sitting up front there with her this morning!! I wonder how that child felt about it? Did that child have any choice?

Later, I noticed, her kids were gone. Bored, no doubt, probably falling asleep, squirming. Not a good look for the SCOTUS pick who is supposed to be such a wonderful example of motherhood.

Wow. If this is all you've got..... judging her ability of being a mother on something you know nothing about.
This is quite the post.

It sounds like a Trumper pretending to be liberal. Skulduggery in ways large and small is all they have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hate how she describes her son with Down syndrome.

That's the worst. Say no more about her. She is vile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She is repulsive.

This sort of hypocrisy should not be rewarded with a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court.

If she lies enough (spoiler: she will) and Biden wins, she can be impeached.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way she uses her children of color for political purposes is disgusting. I hope she has saved up for therapy...

I was nauseated to see her Black child sitting up front there with her this morning!! I wonder how that child felt about it? Did that child have any choice?

Later, I noticed, her kids were gone. Bored, no doubt, probably falling asleep, squirming. Not a good look for the SCOTUS pick who is supposed to be such a wonderful example of motherhood.

Wow. If this is all you've got..... judging her ability of being a mother on something you know nothing about.
This is quite the post.

Using your Black child for show is sick, particularly in support of a clearly racist POTUS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way she uses her children of color for political purposes is disgusting. I hope she has saved up for therapy...

I was nauseated to see her Black child sitting up front there with her this morning!! I wonder how that child felt about it? Did that child have any choice?

Later, I noticed, her kids were gone. Bored, no doubt, probably falling asleep, squirming. Not a good look for the SCOTUS pick who is supposed to be such a wonderful example of motherhood.

Wow. If this is all you've got..... judging her ability of being a mother on something you know nothing about.
This is quite the post.

It sounds like a Trumper pretending to be liberal. Skulduggery in ways large and small is all they have.

Nice try. Nope.
The liberals on this thread are truly disgusting. Calling an accomplished woman and mother of 7 vile, vicious, repulsive, and worse (some have been deleted) is just another Monday on DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way she uses her children of color for political purposes is disgusting. I hope she has saved up for therapy...

I was nauseated to see her Black child sitting up front there with her this morning!! I wonder how that child felt about it? Did that child have any choice?

Later, I noticed, her kids were gone. Bored, no doubt, probably falling asleep, squirming. Not a good look for the SCOTUS pick who is supposed to be such a wonderful example of motherhood.

Wow. If this is all you've got..... judging her ability of being a mother on something you know nothing about.
This is quite the post.

Using your Black child for show is sick, particularly in support of a clearly racist POTUS.

OMG. Well, if you thought this was bad, you must have been enraged at all the pictures the democrats displayed for show. Right?

[Anonymous]

Did anyone ask her why she didn’t wear a mask at the Rose Garden event? Or why her kids and husband did not? And how that comports with her alleged pro-life beliefs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way she uses her children of color for political purposes is disgusting. I hope she has saved up for therapy...

I was nauseated to see her Black child sitting up front there with her this morning!! I wonder how that child felt about it? Did that child have any choice?

Later, I noticed, her kids were gone. Bored, no doubt, probably falling asleep, squirming. Not a good look for the SCOTUS pick who is supposed to be such a wonderful example of motherhood.

Wow. If this is all you've got..... judging her ability of being a mother on something you know nothing about.
This is quite the post.

It sounds like a Trumper pretending to be liberal. Skulduggery in ways large and small is all they have.

Nice try. Nope.
The liberals on this thread are truly disgusting. Calling an accomplished woman and mother of 7 vile, vicious, repulsive, and worse (some have been deleted) is just another Monday on DCUM.

She is a mother and has been successful professionally thanks to trailblazers like RBG and a smaller field of qualified candidates within the GOP. That does not make her morally superior or moral at all. She voted to exclude children of unmarried parents from a school. How is that pro-children or pro-life? Plenty of other examples of discrimination against women and children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way she uses her children of color for political purposes is disgusting. I hope she has saved up for therapy...

I was nauseated to see her Black child sitting up front there with her this morning!! I wonder how that child felt about it? Did that child have any choice?

Later, I noticed, her kids were gone. Bored, no doubt, probably falling asleep, squirming. Not a good look for the SCOTUS pick who is supposed to be such a wonderful example of motherhood.

Wow. If this is all you've got..... judging her ability of being a mother on something you know nothing about.
This is quite the post.

You ignore her testimony where her white kids achievements are noted and her kids of color are noted for being adopted.

Sort of a tell, no?

So creepy! Free children of Amy Covid Barrett! Maybe the Marthas will spirit them to Canada.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way she uses her children of color for political purposes is disgusting. I hope she has saved up for therapy...

I was nauseated to see her Black child sitting up front there with her this morning!! I wonder how that child felt about it? Did that child have any choice?

Later, I noticed, her kids were gone. Bored, no doubt, probably falling asleep, squirming. Not a good look for the SCOTUS pick who is supposed to be such a wonderful example of motherhood.

Wow. If this is all you've got..... judging her ability of being a mother on something you know nothing about.
This is quite the post.

It sounds like a Trumper pretending to be liberal. Skulduggery in ways large and small is all they have.

Nice try. Nope.
The liberals on this thread are truly disgusting. Calling an accomplished woman and mother of 7 vile, vicious, repulsive, and worse (some have been deleted) is just another Monday on DCUM.

No. We just took lessons from Trump.

Checks notes...has anyone called her a “monster” yet?

How about a “dog”?

Anyone?

And has anyone kissed her behind a curtain while their wife is upstairs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just noticed that she describes her biological children by noting their academic strengths and interests, while her adopted children apparently have none.

Jesse and I are parents to seven wonderful children. Emma is a sophomore in college who just might follow her parents into a career in the law. Vivian came to us from Haiti. When she arrived, she was so weak that we were told she might never walk or talk normally. She now deadlifts as much as the male athletes at our gym, and I assure you that she has no trouble talking. Tess is 16, and while she shares her parents’ love for the liberal arts, she also has a math gene that seems to have skipped her parents’ generation. John Peter joined us shortly after the devastating earthquake in Haiti, and Jesse, who brought him home, still describes the shock on JP’s face when he got off the plane in wintertime Chicago. Once that shock wore off, JP assumed the happy-go-lucky attitude that is still his signature trait. Liam is smart, strong, and kind, and to our delight, he still loves watching movies with Mom and Dad. Ten-year-old Juliet is already pursuing her goal of becoming an author by writing multiple essays and short stories, including one she recently submitted for publication. And our youngest—Benjamin, who has Down Syndrome—is the unanimous favorite of the family.

I am conservative from Indiana, and was raised in the same Catholic Diocese, where she has been in the 15 years. The Haitian born children are from Haiti, why? 1.) Evangelical pressure. You can't be a good wealthy Evangelical, if you don't adopt. Kids are a sign of wealth in private school land. The more kids on full-pay tuition is a sign of wealth. 2.) Avoidance of drugs. Vivian's issue are easily solved with simple medical interventions, but drugs in the systems cause a lifetime of trouble for adoptive parents. Jesse was a Fed. Prosecutor handling drug charges. If Jesse and Amy adopted kids with drugs in their systems, Amy's career would be over in a heartbeat.

Let’s just hope one of them takes to TikTok like Claudia Conway and tells us what’s really going on at home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way she uses her children of color for political purposes is disgusting. I hope she has saved up for therapy...

I was nauseated to see her Black child sitting up front there with her this morning!! I wonder how that child felt about it? Did that child have any choice?

Later, I noticed, her kids were gone. Bored, no doubt, probably falling asleep, squirming. Not a good look for the SCOTUS pick who is supposed to be such a wonderful example of motherhood.

Wow. If this is all you've got..... judging her ability of being a mother on something you know nothing about.
This is quite the post.

It sounds like a Trumper pretending to be liberal. Skulduggery in ways large and small is all they have.

Nice try. Nope.
The liberals on this thread are truly disgusting. Calling an accomplished woman and mother of 7 vile, vicious, repulsive, and worse (some have been deleted) is just another Monday on DCUM.

She is a mother and has been successful professionally thanks to trailblazers like RBG and a smaller field of qualified candidates within the GOP. That does not make her morally superior or moral at all. She voted to exclude children of unmarried parents from a school. How is that pro-children or pro-life? Plenty of other examples of discrimination against women and children.

+1000. Trumpkins touting the fact that she’s a woman are laughable. She GOT to where she is in life due to women like RGB. If she were the daughter of Scalia (or if she were the beneficiary of legal rulings she supports rather than those of RGB and other women trailblazers and their supporters), she would never have even *gone* to law school, let alone be an appellate court judge. It’s laughable, hypocritical and completely beyond.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/economy/justice-scalias-most-lasting-legacy-could-be-his-children%3f_amp=true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dems are fear mongering again on pre-existing conditions. Yawn...

Where's the written guarantee from the GOP that they'll protect them???

The GOP is suing to get rid of protections for preexisting conditions as well as abolish the ACA, stripping millions of Americans of health insurance.

You may not fear that, but I sure do. I have preexisting conditions. I need health insurance to stay alive.

Yawn as much as you want. I hope a fly lands in your mouth and lays eggs, maggot.

Plus, the Supreme Court issue is the ridiculous notion that it is unconstitutional for Congress to enact a law to regulate health insurance. This I how loony Republicans have become, to claim that Congress is not permitted to regulate commerce.

The issue is not whether Congress can regulate interstate commerce, that is clear. The issue is whether what Congress did in ordering individual people to purchase something is unconstitutional (revisiting the previous issues since Congress changed the penalty for failure to purchase coverage to zero) and if that individual mandate is unconstitutional whether the whole ACA is unconstitutional or if that individual provision is severable. So no, the provision being challenge is not whether Congress can regulate interstate commerce.