Loudoun Struggles in ECNL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody was bashing Loudoun 06 team. However, the team is not in ECNL so it does not count toward Loudoun's overall ECNL performance. I don't think I agree with the poster who argues that VDA is just as bad as Loudoun. VDA has three solid ECNL teams in U13 through U15 age groups so VDA's future looks bright. Loudoun does not have a single team in top five in any age group in ECNL. Loudoun's best case scenario is that the players on its 06 team stay with the club and Loudoun would use that team to market its program. However, their 05 team is not a high level team so it seems Loudoun's 06 team is the lone bright spot.

Exactly was is the birth year of VDA's U13 ECNL team?

*what is

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nobody was bashing Loudoun 06 team. However, the team is not in ECNL so it does not count toward Loudoun's overall ECNL performance. I don't think I agree with the poster who argues that VDA is just as bad as Loudoun. VDA has three solid ECNL teams in U13 through U15 age groups so VDA's future looks bright. Loudoun does not have a single team in top five in any age group in ECNL. Loudoun's best case scenario is that the players on its 06 team stay with the club and Loudoun would use that team to market its program. However, their 05 team is not a high level team so it seems Loudoun's 06 team is the lone bright spot.

Those players will leave

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nobody was bashing Loudoun 06 team. However, the team is not in ECNL so it does not count toward Loudoun's overall ECNL performance. I don't think I agree with the poster who argues that VDA is just as bad as Loudoun. VDA has three solid ECNL teams in U13 through U15 age groups so VDA's future looks bright. Loudoun does not have a single team in top five in any age group in ECNL. Loudoun's best case scenario is that the players on its 06 team stay with the club and Loudoun would use that team to market its program. However, their 05 team is not a high level team so it seems Loudoun's 06 team is the lone bright spot.

Wait until next year with the 07s. The future is probably brighter for Loudoun than any other local club. They are an ECNL club on the rise. Everyone knows that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:U13-14 age groups are completely irrelevant in the ECNL. These are developmental age groups.

Interesting .. . . . after multiple posts touting Loudoun's 06 pre-ECNL team (U12s), all of a sudden U13-14 ECNL teams become irrelevant to overall ECNL performance because they are developmental age groups.

2006's are U13's, 2007's are U12. Unless Loudoun is playing entire teams up an age group...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody was bashing Loudoun 06 team. However, the team is not in ECNL so it does not count toward Loudoun's overall ECNL performance. I don't think I agree with the poster who argues that VDA is just as bad as Loudoun. VDA has three solid ECNL teams in U13 through U15 age groups so VDA's future looks bright. Loudoun does not have a single team in top five in any age group in ECNL. Loudoun's best case scenario is that the players on its 06 team stay with the club and Loudoun would use that team to market its program. However, their 05 team is not a high level team so it seems Loudoun's 06 team is the lone bright spot.

Those players will leave

To where and why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody was bashing Loudoun 06 team. However, the team is not in ECNL so it does not count toward Loudoun's overall ECNL performance. I don't think I agree with the poster who argues that VDA is just as bad as Loudoun. VDA has three solid ECNL teams in U13 through U15 age groups so VDA's future looks bright. Loudoun does not have a single team in top five in any age group in ECNL. Loudoun's best case scenario is that the players on its 06 team stay with the club and Loudoun would use that team to market its program. However, their 05 team is not a high level team so it seems Loudoun's 06 team is the lone bright spot.

Those players will leave

To where and why?

FCV-Mclean-BRYC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody was bashing Loudoun 06 team. However, the team is not in ECNL so it does not count toward Loudoun's overall ECNL performance. I don't think I agree with the poster who argues that VDA is just as bad as Loudoun. VDA has three solid ECNL teams in U13 through U15 age groups so VDA's future looks bright. Loudoun does not have a single team in top five in any age group in ECNL. Loudoun's best case scenario is that the players on its 06 team stay with the club and Loudoun would use that team to market its program. However, their 05 team is not a high level team so it seems Loudoun's 06 team is the lone bright spot.

Those players will leave

To where and why?

FCV-Mclean-BRYC

Ok, but now why?

[Anonymous]

I'm an ECNL Loudoun parent and I'm 100% okay with their records at this point. It's their first year beyond CCL for girls. Last year they lost all of their top players to DAs. I don't think that they have anything to worry about going forward.

Now FCV DA...that's a different story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody was bashing Loudoun 06 team. However, the team is not in ECNL so it does not count toward Loudoun's overall ECNL performance. I don't think I agree with the poster who argues that VDA is just as bad as Loudoun. VDA has three solid ECNL teams in U13 through U15 age groups so VDA's future looks bright. Loudoun does not have a single team in top five in any age group in ECNL. Loudoun's best case scenario is that the players on its 06 team stay with the club and Loudoun would use that team to market its program. However, their 05 team is not a high level team so it seems Loudoun's 06 team is the lone bright spot.

Wait until next year with the 07s. The future is probably brighter for Loudoun than any other local club. They are an ECNL club on the rise. Everyone knows that.

Loudoun's 07 team does not look particularly strong with their record of 3 wins, 2 draws, 8 losses. I don't think it will put fear in any of ECNL teams. Perhaps you were referring to 06 team, which is good, but it is the only good team with Loudoun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody was bashing Loudoun 06 team. However, the team is not in ECNL so it does not count toward Loudoun's overall ECNL performance. I don't think I agree with the poster who argues that VDA is just as bad as Loudoun. VDA has three solid ECNL teams in U13 through U15 age groups so VDA's future looks bright. Loudoun does not have a single team in top five in any age group in ECNL. Loudoun's best case scenario is that the players on its 06 team stay with the club and Loudoun would use that team to market its program. However, their 05 team is not a high level team so it seems Loudoun's 06 team is the lone bright spot.

Wait until next year with the 07s. The future is probably brighter for Loudoun than any other local club. They are an ECNL club on the rise. Everyone knows that.

Loudoun's 07 team does not look particularly strong with their record of 3 wins, 2 draws, 8 losses. I don't think it will put fear in any of ECNL teams. Perhaps you were referring to 06 team, which is good, but it is the only good team with Loudoun.

8 losses, where? when? I think you are misreading the standings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody was bashing Loudoun 06 team. However, the team is not in ECNL so it does not count toward Loudoun's overall ECNL performance. I don't think I agree with the poster who argues that VDA is just as bad as Loudoun. VDA has three solid ECNL teams in U13 through U15 age groups so VDA's future looks bright. Loudoun does not have a single team in top five in any age group in ECNL. Loudoun's best case scenario is that the players on its 06 team stay with the club and Loudoun would use that team to market its program. However, their 05 team is not a high level team so it seems Loudoun's 06 team is the lone bright spot.

Wait until next year with the 07s. The future is probably brighter for Loudoun than any other local club. They are an ECNL club on the rise. Everyone knows that.

Loudoun's 07 team does not look particularly strong with their record of 3 wins, 2 draws, 8 losses. I don't think it will put fear in any of ECNL teams. Perhaps you were referring to 06 team, which is good, but it is the only good team with Loudoun.

Try again. Their record is 21-4-4 against some of the top programs on the East Coast in tournaments. In league play they are undefeated. The team is ranked #1 in VA and #10 in Region 1. So - right there is another good Loudoun team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody was bashing Loudoun 06 team. However, the team is not in ECNL so it does not count toward Loudoun's overall ECNL performance. I don't think I agree with the poster who argues that VDA is just as bad as Loudoun. VDA has three solid ECNL teams in U13 through U15 age groups so VDA's future looks bright. Loudoun does not have a single team in top five in any age group in ECNL. Loudoun's best case scenario is that the players on its 06 team stay with the club and Loudoun would use that team to market its program. However, their 05 team is not a high level team so it seems Loudoun's 06 team is the lone bright spot.

Those players will leave

To where and why?

FCV-Mclean-BRYC

Ok, but now why?

Better programs at the recruiting age groups? VDA has no history of putting players in college? Have already been losing top players to those clubs in older age groups

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody was bashing Loudoun 06 team. However, the team is not in ECNL so it does not count toward Loudoun's overall ECNL performance. I don't think I agree with the poster who argues that VDA is just as bad as Loudoun. VDA has three solid ECNL teams in U13 through U15 age groups so VDA's future looks bright. Loudoun does not have a single team in top five in any age group in ECNL. Loudoun's best case scenario is that the players on its 06 team stay with the club and Loudoun would use that team to market its program. However, their 05 team is not a high level team so it seems Loudoun's 06 team is the lone bright spot.

Wait until next year with the 07s. The future is probably brighter for Loudoun than any other local club. They are an ECNL club on the rise. Everyone knows that.

Loudoun's 07 team does not look particularly strong with their record of 3 wins, 2 draws, 8 losses. I don't think it will put fear in any of ECNL teams. Perhaps you were referring to 06 team, which is good, but it is the only good team with Loudoun.

8 losses, where? when? I think you are misreading the standings.

My bad, I looked at the wrong team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody was bashing Loudoun 06 team. However, the team is not in ECNL so it does not count toward Loudoun's overall ECNL performance. I don't think I agree with the poster who argues that VDA is just as bad as Loudoun. VDA has three solid ECNL teams in U13 through U15 age groups so VDA's future looks bright. Loudoun does not have a single team in top five in any age group in ECNL. Loudoun's best case scenario is that the players on its 06 team stay with the club and Loudoun would use that team to market its program. However, their 05 team is not a high level team so it seems Loudoun's 06 team is the lone bright spot.

Those players will leave

To where and why?

FCV-Mclean-BRYC

Ok, but now why?

Better programs at the recruiting age groups? VDA has no history of putting players in college? Have already been losing top players to those clubs in older age groups

The player drives 90% of the work during the recruiting process. Soccer recruiting is not like HS Football. While the club and coach can play a role in the process recruiting success is far more dependent upon the work the player puts in with regards to reaching out to coaches, sending film, attending ID camps etc.

[Anonymous]

Loudon will need a year or two (maybe 3) in order to build teams with their players that they have developed. They are paying the price for the FCV "partnership." VDA at the younger age groups is a good example of what holding onto your players can look like. This is a rarity in the recruiting circus of NOVA youth soccer. McLean will stay in the top 3 but Loudon and VDA will move up in the coming years as they retain their players. VDA's base (PWSI/VSA who are severely underrepresented on this forum) will not be heading to FCV or anywhere else.

No history putting players in college? That's funny. Go check on PWSI/VSA alumni.