|
Yes, my September birthday DS was 4 when he started K in Virginia. |
No, you silly PP. Never have the DCUM anti-redshirt posters taken the position that redshirting doesn't matter. After all, if it didn't matter, why bother being a DCUM anti-redshirt poster? The party line of the DCUM anti-redshirt posters is that all redshirted kids are dumb AND ALSO advanced (unfairly, of course). I don't understand how this is possible, but there it is. |
And then he turned 5 less than 30 days later. And none of the kids in his class were 6 when they started K, because kids with September birthdays who start kindergarten a year late in Virginia, start when they are 5. |
| My redshirted DD is off to Yale next year - BYE BITCHES!! |
Ha ha, this exactly. Hard to see how the so-called giant idiots are getting any advantage if they are as slow and poorly behaved as the anti-red shifters complain. If anything, they should be making the short geniuses shine. |
It's true that no kindergartners are 4 and 7 at the same time, generally. But there are certainly kindergartners who are 5 and 7 at the same time, in the same class together. |
How is this possible? My DD (redshirted) turned 6 on August 23rd which was the at before (or after) she started kindergarten. There were a few kids who tunrned 6 right after her and some that turned 6 in the spring/early summer. Nobody turned 7 until July. I doubt there are many redshirted kids that were born before June/July. This is in DC private school where cutoff is sept 1st |
Let's take PP's example with the Virginia cutoff of September 30. If you start a year late, and if your birthday is between October 1 and the last day of school in June, then you will turn 7 in kindergarten. But that doesn't mean that the 7-year-olds are actually 2 years older than the 5-year-olds, except maybe for the delayed-entry kid whose birthday is October 1 compared to the on-time kid whose birthday is September 30. |
I get that, but it’s not likely there will be any redshirted kid with a birthday before school ends at the beginning of June |
I feel like July/June/ earlier redshirted kids are the exception. DCUM always treats it like SO many 7 Kindergarteners are out there, but at least in public, I don’t see it. As for late September children, they are just days/months older than most of their classmates. It isreally insignificant for most of the other children, but can make a big difference for the redshirted child. |
In my son's kindergarten class, someone just turned 7 and another one will turn 7 in May. On the younger end, one student turned 5 in late Sept (Sept cutoff). I don't much care. I assume that there were reasons that the two oldest kids were not sent earlier. None of my business and my child is doing great. |
Well they were lacking and then their parents decided to give them an age advantage to make them competitive with kids 20% younger. That's confusing to you? |
I thought that as well, until I had a child born in may. 85% of his "early 4's" preschool went on to a "5's" full day program instead of K. These kids were born April-June with a Sept 1 cutoff. I absolutely get why those who make the decision for their child are defensive. I'm not worried about your decision and I have no doubt that it might help your child. I think that my strong feelings on the subject come from being in an area where this has become de rigueur. At 5% does the practice of redshirting change anything for everyone else? Probably not. But having been in a school where it was 85%, I feel very differently. I hope that makes sense. |
I agree with this. In my DD preschool all kids born after may/June were redshirted. That helped us make the decision to redshirt our late August birthday girl. |