Remember when 38-year-old Jerry Seinfeld dated a 17-year-old high schooler?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what?

What a dumb, anti woman thread.

Women get to choose who they want to date.

Is a 17yo a woman?

In a lot of states it’s legal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Safe bet practically nobody under age 35 is privy to this. That's pretty much all of gen Y and Z, which'll make a 2020 exposé go viral in about two seconds.

You really think they would care??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what?

What a dumb, anti woman thread.

Women get to choose who they want to date.

Is a 17yo a woman?

In a lot of states it’s legal.

"California law prohibits anyone over the age of 18 to have sexual intercourse with anyone under the age of 17. In most cases, individuals guilty of this crime are automatically placed on the state's sex offender registry."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what?

What a dumb, anti woman thread.

Women get to choose who they want to date.

Is a 17yo a woman?

In a lot of states it’s legal.

"California law prohibits anyone over the age of 18 to have sexual intercourse with anyone under the age of 17. In most cases, individuals guilty of this crime are automatically placed on the state's sex offender registry."

She wasn't under the age of 17.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What were the ages of Seinfeld and current wife when they married?

He was 45. She was 28.

The way he got with wife is way sketch too--she was married and just back from honeymoon I think? She obviously was into his $/fame too.

[Anonymous]

If I was the girl's father, I would have probably punched the 38-year old in the face. I'm the mom of much younger kids.

Looking at the picture in OP, what strikes me is that she looks looks like the product of a photoshop app that changed his gender and age. Gross. He dated the underage opposite gender version of his own face.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Safe bet practically nobody under age 35 is privy to this. That's pretty much all of gen Y and Z, which'll make a 2020 exposé go viral in about two seconds.

You really think they would care??

Um, yes? Didn’t he also move her out to LA and paid her college tuition at UCLA so he could control her and service him? He groomed a child and then took over her life — at least for a few years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Safe bet practically nobody under age 35 is privy to this. That's pretty much all of gen Y and Z, which'll make a 2020 exposé go viral in about two seconds.

You really think they would care??

Um, yes? Didn’t he also move her out to LA and paid her college tuition at UCLA so he could control her and service him? He groomed a child and then took over her life — at least for a few years.

Exactly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Safe bet practically nobody under age 35 is privy to this. That's pretty much all of gen Y and Z, which'll make a 2020 exposé go viral in about two seconds.

You really think they would care??

Um, yes? Didn’t he also move her out to LA and paid her college tuition at UCLA so he could control her and service him? He groomed a child and then took over her life — at least for a few years.

Sigh. Yes, I understand why someone in general would care about the situation, but the people coming in posting over and over again as if under 35s would care about 66 year old Jerry Seinfeld in general are delusional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what?

What a dumb, anti woman thread.

Women get to choose who they want to date.

Is a 17yo a woman?

It’s not a child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Safe bet practically nobody under age 35 is privy to this. That's pretty much all of gen Y and Z, which'll make a 2020 exposé go viral in about two seconds.

You really think they would care??

Um, yes? Didn’t he also move her out to LA and paid her college tuition at UCLA so he could control her and service him? He groomed a child and then took over her life — at least for a few years.

Sigh. Yes, I understand why someone in general would care about the situation, but the people coming in posting over and over again as if under 35s would care about 66 year old Jerry Seinfeld in general are delusional.

What is wrong with you? I made my own choices by the time I was 17. She gets to run her own damn life, not you social media hags.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what?

What a dumb, anti woman thread.

Women get to choose who they want to date.

Is a 17yo a woman?

It’s not a child.

. It’s an adolescent.

[Anonymous]

There's no spinning this. Legal or not, it's beyond creepy and predatory. He was an A List actor, the power dynamic is off the charts imbalanced. MAYBE if he was 15 years younger -- mid to early 20s -- it would have been weird, but whatever. But he was almost 40 years old and one of the biggest celebrities in the world dating a high school senior!

[Anonymous]

How would the public react if Jake Gyllenhaal (age 39) was dating 16 or 17 year old Millie Bobby Brown?

Jake's career would be over immediately. Forever a coined predator.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There's no spinning this. Legal or not, it's beyond creepy and predatory. He was an A List actor, the power dynamic is off the charts imbalanced. MAYBE if he was 15 years younger -- mid to early 20s -- it would have been weird, but whatever. But he was almost 40 years old and one of the biggest celebrities in the world dating a high school senior!

Definitely. My parents would have never let us date someone in their 20s, let alone older, while I was in high school. During my freshman year in college, a friend dated a 25 y/o and we all thought that was creepy.