Run Glen Younkin run Glen Younkin

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:republicans have truly become the anti choice party.

They want a choice only when it benefits them.

God forbid your middle school child learns how sex works. Suprise, he's rubbing one out every night in his bedroom anyways. Get over it you prudes.

Thanks for displaying the kind of "intellect" the left represents. Wow.

I grew up going to a Catholic school in Potomac and kids were getting HJs in the back of the rooms at school dances, myself included. Middle school in the 90s in a conservative catholic school. What do you think is happening now? Get over yourself. Your kids are into sex, one way or another.

Kids are actually much less sexually active than they were when we were in high school and middle school in the 90s.

Because they are all watching half naked girls on tik tok/instagram and rubbing one out in their bathroom

These books are nowhere as scandalous as social media.

And are public schools showing sexual TikToks to students? Nope. You are not making the case you think you are. Quite the opposite, in fact.
DP

The point is your kids are seeing these images one way or another. Who cares if it's in a book at school.

Just admit you're a prude. Sex is not taboo for middle school kids nowadays. It's everywhere you look. Heck, PG13 movies have sex in them and middle schoolers are watching those movies. I'm not advocating you watch porn with your kid, but you all need to be realistic. They will find it out one way or another and the other avenues, outside of books at schools, are far worse.

Only weird conservative prudes think sex is taboo. You'll be in for a rude awakening when your kid starts exploring in unhealthy ways.

+1

Most/all will have access to actual porn.

These are stories of personal journeys and experiences that some teens may benefit from hearing.

It's this part that the book banners ignore. Having sex described in a book (yes, even with details per the Forever excerpt earlier, or pictures as in the graphic novels) does not make something wrong, does not automatically make it erotica does not automatically make it not ok for highschool level who are navigating sexual feelings. That is the kneejerk reaction some people are giving, but it's kneejerk, without thought, and also a very slippery slope that leads to people attempting to ban additional books like Shakespeare and more.

Same sh*t, different year, the hysteria folks continue to be like this woman from Field of Dreams, decades later.

We’re not book banners. We’re porn banners. On the contrary it is the left that is into banning books; for example, classics like To Kill A Mockingbird and Tom Sawyer.

OK, great.

These books aren't porn so sit down.

So why do LWNJs want to ban them?
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:republicans have truly become the anti choice party.

They want a choice only when it benefits them.

God forbid your middle school child learns how sex works. Suprise, he's rubbing one out every night in his bedroom anyways. Get over it you prudes.

Thanks for displaying the kind of "intellect" the left represents. Wow.

I grew up going to a Catholic school in Potomac and kids were getting HJs in the back of the rooms at school dances, myself included. Middle school in the 90s in a conservative catholic school. What do you think is happening now? Get over yourself. Your kids are into sex, one way or another.

Kids are actually much less sexually active than they were when we were in high school and middle school in the 90s.

Because they are all watching half naked girls on tik tok/instagram and rubbing one out in their bathroom

These books are nowhere as scandalous as social media.

And are public schools showing sexual TikToks to students? Nope. You are not making the case you think you are. Quite the opposite, in fact.
DP

The point is your kids are seeing these images one way or another. Who cares if it's in a book at school.

Just admit you're a prude. Sex is not taboo for middle school kids nowadays. It's everywhere you look. Heck, PG13 movies have sex in them and middle schoolers are watching those movies. I'm not advocating you watch porn with your kid, but you all need to be realistic. They will find it out one way or another and the other avenues, outside of books at schools, are far worse.

Only weird conservative prudes think sex is taboo. You'll be in for a rude awakening when your kid starts exploring in unhealthy ways.

Wow, are you clueless. I’m hardly a prude - got a good laugh out of that. However, as a PARENT, I recognize that graphic sexual material is not for kids. Of course they’ll find it online regardless, but that doesn’t mean schools need to provide that material to them. It’s beyond bizarre that you think school libraries are the place for porn. As several posters have said, just take your kids to the public library or order them all the graphically sexual material you want from Amazon. School libraries are completely inappropriate places for this trash to be accessible.

You’re most likely not even a parent at all - just the usual troll insisting kids NEED easy access to this garbage. And btw - I’m an independent, but people like you definitely make Democrats look repulsive.

How old are your kids?

Ages 17-24. And yours? Do you even have kids?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:republicans have truly become the anti choice party.

They want a choice only when it benefits them.

God forbid your middle school child learns how sex works. Suprise, he's rubbing one out every night in his bedroom anyways. Get over it you prudes.

Thanks for displaying the kind of "intellect" the left represents. Wow.

I grew up going to a Catholic school in Potomac and kids were getting HJs in the back of the rooms at school dances, myself included. Middle school in the 90s in a conservative catholic school. What do you think is happening now? Get over yourself. Your kids are into sex, one way or another.

Kids are actually much less sexually active than they were when we were in high school and middle school in the 90s.

Because they are all watching half naked girls on tik tok/instagram and rubbing one out in their bathroom

These books are nowhere as scandalous as social media.

And are public schools showing sexual TikToks to students? Nope. You are not making the case you think you are. Quite the opposite, in fact.
DP

The point is your kids are seeing these images one way or another. Who cares if it's in a book at school.

Just admit you're a prude. Sex is not taboo for middle school kids nowadays. It's everywhere you look. Heck, PG13 movies have sex in them and middle schoolers are watching those movies. I'm not advocating you watch porn with your kid, but you all need to be realistic. They will find it out one way or another and the other avenues, outside of books at schools, are far worse.

Only weird conservative prudes think sex is taboo. You'll be in for a rude awakening when your kid starts exploring in unhealthy ways.

+1

Most/all will have access to actual porn.

These are stories of personal journeys and experiences that some teens may benefit from hearing.

It's this part that the book banners ignore. Having sex described in a book (yes, even with details per the Forever excerpt earlier, or pictures as in the graphic novels) does not make something wrong, does not automatically make it erotica does not automatically make it not ok for highschool level who are navigating sexual feelings. That is the kneejerk reaction some people are giving, but it's kneejerk, without thought, and also a very slippery slope that leads to people attempting to ban additional books like Shakespeare and more.

Same sh*t, different year, the hysteria folks continue to be like this woman from Field of Dreams, decades later.

We’re not book banners. We’re porn banners. On the contrary it is the left that is into banning books; for example, classics like To Kill A Mockingbird and Tom Sawyer.

OK, great.

These books aren't porn so sit down.

So why do LWNJs want to ban them?
DP

The only people who want to ban the LGBTQ books are the MAGA nutters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:republicans have truly become the anti choice party.

They want a choice only when it benefits them.

God forbid your middle school child learns how sex works. Suprise, he's rubbing one out every night in his bedroom anyways. Get over it you prudes.

Thanks for displaying the kind of "intellect" the left represents. Wow.

I grew up going to a Catholic school in Potomac and kids were getting HJs in the back of the rooms at school dances, myself included. Middle school in the 90s in a conservative catholic school. What do you think is happening now? Get over yourself. Your kids are into sex, one way or another.

Kids are actually much less sexually active than they were when we were in high school and middle school in the 90s.

Because they are all watching half naked girls on tik tok/instagram and rubbing one out in their bathroom

These books are nowhere as scandalous as social media.

And are public schools showing sexual TikToks to students? Nope. You are not making the case you think you are. Quite the opposite, in fact.
DP

The point is your kids are seeing these images one way or another. Who cares if it's in a book at school.

Just admit you're a prude. Sex is not taboo for middle school kids nowadays. It's everywhere you look. Heck, PG13 movies have sex in them and middle schoolers are watching those movies. I'm not advocating you watch porn with your kid, but you all need to be realistic. They will find it out one way or another and the other avenues, outside of books at schools, are far worse.

Only weird conservative prudes think sex is taboo. You'll be in for a rude awakening when your kid starts exploring in unhealthy ways.

Wow, are you clueless. I’m hardly a prude - got a good laugh out of that. However, as a PARENT, I recognize that graphic sexual material is not for kids. Of course they’ll find it online regardless, but that doesn’t mean schools need to provide that material to them. It’s beyond bizarre that you think school libraries are the place for porn. As several posters have said, just take your kids to the public library or order them all the graphically sexual material you want from Amazon. School libraries are completely inappropriate places for this trash to be accessible.

You’re most likely not even a parent at all - just the usual troll insisting kids NEED easy access to this garbage. And btw - I’m an independent, but people like you definitely make Democrats look repulsive.

How old are your kids?

Ages 17-24. And yours? Do you even have kids?

Yes, of course. It's a mommy website. 11-16

How did your kids learn about blowjobs, dildos, masturbation, etc?

Did they have cell phones?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:republicans have truly become the anti choice party.

They want a choice only when it benefits them.

God forbid your middle school child learns how sex works. Suprise, he's rubbing one out every night in his bedroom anyways. Get over it you prudes.

Thanks for displaying the kind of "intellect" the left represents. Wow.

I grew up going to a Catholic school in Potomac and kids were getting HJs in the back of the rooms at school dances, myself included. Middle school in the 90s in a conservative catholic school. What do you think is happening now? Get over yourself. Your kids are into sex, one way or another.

Kids are actually much less sexually active than they were when we were in high school and middle school in the 90s.

Because they are all watching half naked girls on tik tok/instagram and rubbing one out in their bathroom

These books are nowhere as scandalous as social media.

And are public schools showing sexual TikToks to students? Nope. You are not making the case you think you are. Quite the opposite, in fact.
DP

The point is your kids are seeing these images one way or another. Who cares if it's in a book at school.

Just admit you're a prude. Sex is not taboo for middle school kids nowadays. It's everywhere you look. Heck, PG13 movies have sex in them and middle schoolers are watching those movies. I'm not advocating you watch porn with your kid, but you all need to be realistic. They will find it out one way or another and the other avenues, outside of books at schools, are far worse.

Only weird conservative prudes think sex is taboo. You'll be in for a rude awakening when your kid starts exploring in unhealthy ways.

Wow, are you clueless. I’m hardly a prude - got a good laugh out of that. However, as a PARENT, I recognize that graphic sexual material is not for kids. Of course they’ll find it online regardless, but that doesn’t mean schools need to provide that material to them. It’s beyond bizarre that you think school libraries are the place for porn. As several posters have said, just take your kids to the public library or order them all the graphically sexual material you want from Amazon. School libraries are completely inappropriate places for this trash to be accessible.

You’re most likely not even a parent at all - just the usual troll insisting kids NEED easy access to this garbage. And btw - I’m an independent, but people like you definitely make Democrats look repulsive.

LOL ok

I never said kids NEED access to it. I truly don't understand why people care so much. Be a good parent and teach your kids about bodies.

Go wash the crusty socks under your kid's bed and forbid them from having sex until marriage. Let's see how that works out.

So you think because we don't want porn in our kids' school libraries, that somehow equates to not teaching our kids about their bodies and sex? Or forbidding them to have sex until marriage? How old are you, 12? You sound dumber than most middle school students.

jfk you guys are mind blowingly simple. Books do not equal porn.

If you’re middle school is pulling up Porn Hub then that’s one thing.

Go live on a homestead if you’re scared Johnny and Sally will see an image of a penis when they are 13.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:republicans have truly become the anti choice party.

They want a choice only when it benefits them.

God forbid your middle school child learns how sex works. Suprise, he's rubbing one out every night in his bedroom anyways. Get over it you prudes.

Thanks for displaying the kind of "intellect" the left represents. Wow.

I grew up going to a Catholic school in Potomac and kids were getting HJs in the back of the rooms at school dances, myself included. Middle school in the 90s in a conservative catholic school. What do you think is happening now? Get over yourself. Your kids are into sex, one way or another.

Kids are actually much less sexually active than they were when we were in high school and middle school in the 90s.

Because they are all watching half naked girls on tik tok/instagram and rubbing one out in their bathroom

These books are nowhere as scandalous as social media.

And are public schools showing sexual TikToks to students? Nope. You are not making the case you think you are. Quite the opposite, in fact.
DP

The point is your kids are seeing these images one way or another. Who cares if it's in a book at school.

Just admit you're a prude. Sex is not taboo for middle school kids nowadays. It's everywhere you look. Heck, PG13 movies have sex in them and middle schoolers are watching those movies. I'm not advocating you watch porn with your kid, but you all need to be realistic. They will find it out one way or another and the other avenues, outside of books at schools, are far worse.

Only weird conservative prudes think sex is taboo. You'll be in for a rude awakening when your kid starts exploring in unhealthy ways.

+1

Most/all will have access to actual porn.

These are stories of personal journeys and experiences that some teens may benefit from hearing.

It's this part that the book banners ignore. Having sex described in a book (yes, even with details per the Forever excerpt earlier, or pictures as in the graphic novels) does not make something wrong, does not automatically make it erotica does not automatically make it not ok for highschool level who are navigating sexual feelings. That is the kneejerk reaction some people are giving, but it's kneejerk, without thought, and also a very slippery slope that leads to people attempting to ban additional books like Shakespeare and more.

Same sh*t, different year, the hysteria folks continue to be like this woman from Field of Dreams, decades later.

We’re not book banners. We’re porn banners. On the contrary it is the left that is into banning books; for example, classics like To Kill A Mockingbird and Tom Sawyer.

OK, great.

These books aren't porn so sit down.

So why do LWNJs want to ban them?
DP

The only people who want to ban the LGBTQ books are the MAGA nutters.

You seem unable to follow this conversation. I've bolded the relevant information for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:republicans have truly become the anti choice party.

They want a choice only when it benefits them.

God forbid your middle school child learns how sex works. Suprise, he's rubbing one out every night in his bedroom anyways. Get over it you prudes.

Thanks for displaying the kind of "intellect" the left represents. Wow.

I grew up going to a Catholic school in Potomac and kids were getting HJs in the back of the rooms at school dances, myself included. Middle school in the 90s in a conservative catholic school. What do you think is happening now? Get over yourself. Your kids are into sex, one way or another.

Kids are actually much less sexually active than they were when we were in high school and middle school in the 90s.

Because they are all watching half naked girls on tik tok/instagram and rubbing one out in their bathroom

These books are nowhere as scandalous as social media.

And are public schools showing sexual TikToks to students? Nope. You are not making the case you think you are. Quite the opposite, in fact.
DP

The point is your kids are seeing these images one way or another. Who cares if it's in a book at school.

Just admit you're a prude. Sex is not taboo for middle school kids nowadays. It's everywhere you look. Heck, PG13 movies have sex in them and middle schoolers are watching those movies. I'm not advocating you watch porn with your kid, but you all need to be realistic. They will find it out one way or another and the other avenues, outside of books at schools, are far worse.

Only weird conservative prudes think sex is taboo. You'll be in for a rude awakening when your kid starts exploring in unhealthy ways.

Wow, are you clueless. I’m hardly a prude - got a good laugh out of that. However, as a PARENT, I recognize that graphic sexual material is not for kids. Of course they’ll find it online regardless, but that doesn’t mean schools need to provide that material to them. It’s beyond bizarre that you think school libraries are the place for porn. As several posters have said, just take your kids to the public library or order them all the graphically sexual material you want from Amazon. School libraries are completely inappropriate places for this trash to be accessible.

You’re most likely not even a parent at all - just the usual troll insisting kids NEED easy access to this garbage. And btw - I’m an independent, but people like you definitely make Democrats look repulsive.

How old are your kids?

Ages 17-24. And yours? Do you even have kids?

Yes, of course. It's a mommy website. 11-16

How did your kids learn about blowjobs, dildos, masturbation, etc?

Did they have cell phones?

Good grief, you're thick. THE POINT is that school libraries are not appropriate places for this crap. We get that you can't get enough of it and want to make sure your kids get their hands on it as soon as possible, but there is no reason for explicit books to be in the SCHOOL LIBRARY. Get it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:republicans have truly become the anti choice party.

They want a choice only when it benefits them.

God forbid your middle school child learns how sex works. Suprise, he's rubbing one out every night in his bedroom anyways. Get over it you prudes.

Thanks for displaying the kind of "intellect" the left represents. Wow.

I grew up going to a Catholic school in Potomac and kids were getting HJs in the back of the rooms at school dances, myself included. Middle school in the 90s in a conservative catholic school. What do you think is happening now? Get over yourself. Your kids are into sex, one way or another.

Kids are actually much less sexually active than they were when we were in high school and middle school in the 90s.

Because they are all watching half naked girls on tik tok/instagram and rubbing one out in their bathroom

These books are nowhere as scandalous as social media.

And are public schools showing sexual TikToks to students? Nope. You are not making the case you think you are. Quite the opposite, in fact.
DP

The point is your kids are seeing these images one way or another. Who cares if it's in a book at school.

Just admit you're a prude. Sex is not taboo for middle school kids nowadays. It's everywhere you look. Heck, PG13 movies have sex in them and middle schoolers are watching those movies. I'm not advocating you watch porn with your kid, but you all need to be realistic. They will find it out one way or another and the other avenues, outside of books at schools, are far worse.

Only weird conservative prudes think sex is taboo. You'll be in for a rude awakening when your kid starts exploring in unhealthy ways.

Wow, are you clueless. I’m hardly a prude - got a good laugh out of that. However, as a PARENT, I recognize that graphic sexual material is not for kids. Of course they’ll find it online regardless, but that doesn’t mean schools need to provide that material to them. It’s beyond bizarre that you think school libraries are the place for porn. As several posters have said, just take your kids to the public library or order them all the graphically sexual material you want from Amazon. School libraries are completely inappropriate places for this trash to be accessible.

You’re most likely not even a parent at all - just the usual troll insisting kids NEED easy access to this garbage. And btw - I’m an independent, but people like you definitely make Democrats look repulsive.

LOL ok

I never said kids NEED access to it. I truly don't understand why people care so much. Be a good parent and teach your kids about bodies.

Go wash the crusty socks under your kid's bed and forbid them from having sex until marriage. Let's see how that works out.

So you think because we don't want porn in our kids' school libraries, that somehow equates to not teaching our kids about their bodies and sex? Or forbidding them to have sex until marriage? How old are you, 12? You sound dumber than most middle school students.

jfk you guys are mind blowingly simple. Books do not equal porn.

If you’re middle school is pulling up Porn Hub then that’s one thing.

Go live on a homestead if you’re scared Johnny and Sally will see an image of a penis when they are 13.

No doubt you are simply a middle school troll, your posts are so ridiculous. And it's JFC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:republicans have truly become the anti choice party.

They want a choice only when it benefits them.

God forbid your middle school child learns how sex works. Suprise, he's rubbing one out every night in his bedroom anyways. Get over it you prudes.

Thanks for displaying the kind of "intellect" the left represents. Wow.

I grew up going to a Catholic school in Potomac and kids were getting HJs in the back of the rooms at school dances, myself included. Middle school in the 90s in a conservative catholic school. What do you think is happening now? Get over yourself. Your kids are into sex, one way or another.

Kids are actually much less sexually active than they were when we were in high school and middle school in the 90s.

Because they are all watching half naked girls on tik tok/instagram and rubbing one out in their bathroom

These books are nowhere as scandalous as social media.

And are public schools showing sexual TikToks to students? Nope. You are not making the case you think you are. Quite the opposite, in fact.
DP

The point is your kids are seeing these images one way or another. Who cares if it's in a book at school.

Just admit you're a prude. Sex is not taboo for middle school kids nowadays. It's everywhere you look. Heck, PG13 movies have sex in them and middle schoolers are watching those movies. I'm not advocating you watch porn with your kid, but you all need to be realistic. They will find it out one way or another and the other avenues, outside of books at schools, are far worse.

Only weird conservative prudes think sex is taboo. You'll be in for a rude awakening when your kid starts exploring in unhealthy ways.

Wow, are you clueless. I’m hardly a prude - got a good laugh out of that. However, as a PARENT, I recognize that graphic sexual material is not for kids. Of course they’ll find it online regardless, but that doesn’t mean schools need to provide that material to them. It’s beyond bizarre that you think school libraries are the place for porn. As several posters have said, just take your kids to the public library or order them all the graphically sexual material you want from Amazon. School libraries are completely inappropriate places for this trash to be accessible.

You’re most likely not even a parent at all - just the usual troll insisting kids NEED easy access to this garbage. And btw - I’m an independent, but people like you definitely make Democrats look repulsive.

How old are your kids?

Ages 17-24. And yours? Do you even have kids?

Yes, of course. It's a mommy website. 11-16

How did your kids learn about blowjobs, dildos, masturbation, etc?

Did they have cell phones?

Good grief, you're thick. THE POINT is that school libraries are not appropriate places for this crap. We get that you can't get enough of it and want to make sure your kids get their hands on it as soon as possible, but there is no reason for explicit books to be in the SCHOOL LIBRARY. Get it?

School libraries do not have this "crap," they have books. They are libraries. That's what libraries do: have books. If you don't want your child to read a given book, tell your child they're not allowed to read that book. Or tell your child they're not allowed to enter the library, or not allowed to read any books, or whatever you want. That's your prerogative as the parent of your child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

We’re not book banners. We’re porn banners. On the contrary it is the left that is into banning books; for example, classics like To Kill A Mockingbird and Tom Sawyer.

Nope, you're book banners. Even taking your word for it that the books are porn - your goal is to ban books.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:republicans have truly become the anti choice party.

They want a choice only when it benefits them.

God forbid your middle school child learns how sex works. Suprise, he's rubbing one out every night in his bedroom anyways. Get over it you prudes.

Thanks for displaying the kind of "intellect" the left represents. Wow.

I grew up going to a Catholic school in Potomac and kids were getting HJs in the back of the rooms at school dances, myself included. Middle school in the 90s in a conservative catholic school. What do you think is happening now? Get over yourself. Your kids are into sex, one way or another.

Kids are actually much less sexually active than they were when we were in high school and middle school in the 90s.

Because they are all watching half naked girls on tik tok/instagram and rubbing one out in their bathroom

These books are nowhere as scandalous as social media.

And are public schools showing sexual TikToks to students? Nope. You are not making the case you think you are. Quite the opposite, in fact.
DP

The point is your kids are seeing these images one way or another. Who cares if it's in a book at school.

Just admit you're a prude. Sex is not taboo for middle school kids nowadays. It's everywhere you look. Heck, PG13 movies have sex in them and middle schoolers are watching those movies. I'm not advocating you watch porn with your kid, but you all need to be realistic. They will find it out one way or another and the other avenues, outside of books at schools, are far worse.

Only weird conservative prudes think sex is taboo. You'll be in for a rude awakening when your kid starts exploring in unhealthy ways.

Wow, are you clueless. I’m hardly a prude - got a good laugh out of that. However, as a PARENT, I recognize that graphic sexual material is not for kids. Of course they’ll find it online regardless, but that doesn’t mean schools need to provide that material to them. It’s beyond bizarre that you think school libraries are the place for porn. As several posters have said, just take your kids to the public library or order them all the graphically sexual material you want from Amazon. School libraries are completely inappropriate places for this trash to be accessible.

You’re most likely not even a parent at all - just the usual troll insisting kids NEED easy access to this garbage. And btw - I’m an independent, but people like you definitely make Democrats look repulsive.

LOL ok

I never said kids NEED access to it. I truly don't understand why people care so much. Be a good parent and teach your kids about bodies.

Go wash the crusty socks under your kid's bed and forbid them from having sex until marriage. Let's see how that works out.

So you think because we don't want porn in our kids' school libraries, that somehow equates to not teaching our kids about their bodies and sex? Or forbidding them to have sex until marriage? How old are you, 12? You sound dumber than most middle school students.

jfk you guys are mind blowingly simple. Books do not equal porn.

If you’re middle school is pulling up Porn Hub then that’s one thing.

Go live on a homestead if you’re scared Johnny and Sally will see an image of a penis when they are 13.

The books we are referring to DO equal porn. That’s what you’re missing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:republicans have truly become the anti choice party.

They want a choice only when it benefits them.

God forbid your middle school child learns how sex works. Suprise, he's rubbing one out every night in his bedroom anyways. Get over it you prudes.

Thanks for displaying the kind of "intellect" the left represents. Wow.

I grew up going to a Catholic school in Potomac and kids were getting HJs in the back of the rooms at school dances, myself included. Middle school in the 90s in a conservative catholic school. What do you think is happening now? Get over yourself. Your kids are into sex, one way or another.

Kids are actually much less sexually active than they were when we were in high school and middle school in the 90s.

Because they are all watching half naked girls on tik tok/instagram and rubbing one out in their bathroom

These books are nowhere as scandalous as social media.

And are public schools showing sexual TikToks to students? Nope. You are not making the case you think you are. Quite the opposite, in fact.
DP

The point is your kids are seeing these images one way or another. Who cares if it's in a book at school.

Just admit you're a prude. Sex is not taboo for middle school kids nowadays. It's everywhere you look. Heck, PG13 movies have sex in them and middle schoolers are watching those movies. I'm not advocating you watch porn with your kid, but you all need to be realistic. They will find it out one way or another and the other avenues, outside of books at schools, are far worse.

Only weird conservative prudes think sex is taboo. You'll be in for a rude awakening when your kid starts exploring in unhealthy ways.

Wow, are you clueless. I’m hardly a prude - got a good laugh out of that. However, as a PARENT, I recognize that graphic sexual material is not for kids. Of course they’ll find it online regardless, but that doesn’t mean schools need to provide that material to them. It’s beyond bizarre that you think school libraries are the place for porn. As several posters have said, just take your kids to the public library or order them all the graphically sexual material you want from Amazon. School libraries are completely inappropriate places for this trash to be accessible.

You’re most likely not even a parent at all - just the usual troll insisting kids NEED easy access to this garbage. And btw - I’m an independent, but people like you definitely make Democrats look repulsive.

How old are your kids?

Ages 17-24. And yours? Do you even have kids?

Yes, of course. It's a mommy website. 11-16

How did your kids learn about blowjobs, dildos, masturbation, etc?

Did they have cell phones?

Good grief, you're thick. THE POINT is that school libraries are not appropriate places for this crap. We get that you can't get enough of it and want to make sure your kids get their hands on it as soon as possible, but there is no reason for explicit books to be in the SCHOOL LIBRARY. Get it?

School libraries do not have this "crap," they have books. They are libraries. That's what libraries do: have books. If you don't want your child to read a given book, tell your child they're not allowed to read that book. Or tell your child they're not allowed to enter the library, or not allowed to read any books, or whatever you want. That's your prerogative as the parent of your child.

Ok so they currently shelve crappy, inappropriate-for-the-audience books. Is that better?

[Anonymous]

Hung Cao is running. He will probably be the well funded nominee and probably won’t win, but might get the margin under 5%, depending on who the presidential nominee is. He lost by 5 in a district that was Biden +18

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

We’re not book banners. We’re porn banners. On the contrary it is the left that is into banning books; for example, classics like To Kill A Mockingbird and Tom Sawyer.

Nope, you're book banners. Even taking your word for it that the books are porn - your goal is to ban books.

My goal that I am working tirelessly for is to ban books in school libraries that contain porn. On that point you are completely correct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:republicans have truly become the anti choice party.

They want a choice only when it benefits them.

God forbid your middle school child learns how sex works. Suprise, he's rubbing one out every night in his bedroom anyways. Get over it you prudes.

Thanks for displaying the kind of "intellect" the left represents. Wow.

I grew up going to a Catholic school in Potomac and kids were getting HJs in the back of the rooms at school dances, myself included. Middle school in the 90s in a conservative catholic school. What do you think is happening now? Get over yourself. Your kids are into sex, one way or another.

Kids are actually much less sexually active than they were when we were in high school and middle school in the 90s.

Because they are all watching half naked girls on tik tok/instagram and rubbing one out in their bathroom

These books are nowhere as scandalous as social media.

And are public schools showing sexual TikToks to students? Nope. You are not making the case you think you are. Quite the opposite, in fact.
DP

The point is your kids are seeing these images one way or another. Who cares if it's in a book at school.

Just admit you're a prude. Sex is not taboo for middle school kids nowadays. It's everywhere you look. Heck, PG13 movies have sex in them and middle schoolers are watching those movies. I'm not advocating you watch porn with your kid, but you all need to be realistic. They will find it out one way or another and the other avenues, outside of books at schools, are far worse.

Only weird conservative prudes think sex is taboo. You'll be in for a rude awakening when your kid starts exploring in unhealthy ways.

Wow, are you clueless. I’m hardly a prude - got a good laugh out of that. However, as a PARENT, I recognize that graphic sexual material is not for kids. Of course they’ll find it online regardless, but that doesn’t mean schools need to provide that material to them. It’s beyond bizarre that you think school libraries are the place for porn. As several posters have said, just take your kids to the public library or order them all the graphically sexual material you want from Amazon. School libraries are completely inappropriate places for this trash to be accessible.

You’re most likely not even a parent at all - just the usual troll insisting kids NEED easy access to this garbage. And btw - I’m an independent, but people like you definitely make Democrats look repulsive.

How old are your kids?

Ages 17-24. And yours? Do you even have kids?

Yes, of course. It's a mommy website. 11-16

How did your kids learn about blowjobs, dildos, masturbation, etc?

Did they have cell phones?

Good grief, you're thick. THE POINT is that school libraries are not appropriate places for this crap. We get that you can't get enough of it and want to make sure your kids get their hands on it as soon as possible, but there is no reason for explicit books to be in the SCHOOL LIBRARY. Get it?

School libraries do not have this "crap," they have books. They are libraries. That's what libraries do: have books. If you don't want your child to read a given book, tell your child they're not allowed to read that book. Or tell your child they're not allowed to enter the library, or not allowed to read any books, or whatever you want. That's your prerogative as the parent of your child.

Ok so they currently shelve crappy, inappropriate-for-the-audience books. Is that better?

Well, no. Appropriate for the audience books, as determined by the school librarians. Maybe you can explain why it bothers you so much that children who are not your children might choose to read these books? Are you worried that the children who are not your children might get ideas you disapprove from these books?