DHS Creating "Disinformation Governance Board"

[Anonymous]

More proof of Govt using fascist tactics to push a narrative.

[Anonymous]

This is so f-ed up, censoring only one party is outrageous, cant wait to vote these criminals out

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is so f-ed up, censoring only one party is outrageous, cant wait to vote these criminals out

It will require more than just voting. Many government departments need to be purged of the people who believe this type of censorship is appropriate. And, leaders of the different departments - like DHS - need to be held to account for the employees who do this.

[Anonymous]

Censoring Russia disinformation and lies is bad because?????

[Anonymous]

Disinformation is really causing problems. It’s unclear to me why folks would defend misinformation? I mean it’s one thing if it only affects the consumer of misinformation but J6 proved it can have huge implications for society and nothing good comes from it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is so f-ed up, censoring only one party is outrageous, cant wait to vote these criminals out

It will require more than just voting. Many government departments need to be purged of the people who believe this type of censorship is appropriate. And, leaders of the different departments - like DHS - need to be held to account for the employees who do this.

Wow, you’re frightening. Don’t you have an Oath Keepers chat board to go to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Disinformation is really causing problems. It’s unclear to me why folks would defend misinformation? I mean it’s one thing if it only affects the consumer of misinformation but J6 proved it can have huge implications for society and nothing good comes from it.

Simple.

Disinformation is subjective.

If I posted in 2020 that Covid was from a lab in Wuhan, it would be censored. In fact anyone who posted that was ridiculed and rebuked by the MSM as spreading lies.


However, 3 years later, the current theory accepted by the government, public, media, Fauci that is was from the lab indeed.

So yo I have to be careful what you censor as false info as it actually may be correct.

[Anonymous]

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2023/03/02/covid-lab-leak-china-not-conspiracy-theory/11364905002/

Evolution of the theory.

No way govt should be censoring anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Disinformation is really causing problems. It’s unclear to me why folks would defend misinformation? I mean it’s one thing if it only affects the consumer of misinformation but J6 proved it can have huge implications for society and nothing good comes from it.

because “disinformation” and “misinformation” are generally protected by the 1st amendment, and in the eyes of the beholder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is so f-ed up, censoring only one party is outrageous, cant wait to vote these criminals out

It will require more than just voting. Many government departments need to be purged of the people who believe this type of censorship is appropriate. And, leaders of the different departments - like DHS - need to be held to account for the employees who do this.

Wow, you’re frightening. Don’t you have an Oath Keepers chat board to go to?

No. I'm being honest. Any government worker who seeks to censor ideas or opinions that don't meet with their approval should not be government workers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Disinformation is really causing problems. It’s unclear to me why folks would defend misinformation? I mean it’s one thing if it only affects the consumer of misinformation but J6 proved it can have huge implications for society and nothing good comes from it.

because “disinformation” and “misinformation” are generally protected by the 1st amendment, and in the eyes of the beholder.

But it’s radicalizing white male racists, which put the average Americans at risk. The constitution seems to only protect your speech and gun rights but no one else’s right to live in peace… that common good of tranquility and liberty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Disinformation is really causing problems. It’s unclear to me why folks would defend misinformation? I mean it’s one thing if it only affects the consumer of misinformation but J6 proved it can have huge implications for society and nothing good comes from it.

Simple.

Disinformation is subjective.

If I posted in 2020 that Covid was from a lab in Wuhan, it would be censored. In fact anyone who posted that was ridiculed and rebuked by the MSM as spreading lies.


However, 3 years later, the current theory accepted by the government, public, media, Fauci that is was from the lab indeed.

So yo I have to be careful what you censor as false info as it actually may be correct.

Except what they wanted to censor was more directly attributable to actual foreign psyops.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Disinformation is really causing problems. It’s unclear to me why folks would defend misinformation? I mean it’s one thing if it only affects the consumer of misinformation but J6 proved it can have huge implications for society and nothing good comes from it.

Simple.

Disinformation is subjective.

If I posted in 2020 that Covid was from a lab in Wuhan, it would be censored. In fact anyone who posted that was ridiculed and rebuked by the MSM as spreading lies.


However, 3 years later, the current theory accepted by the government, public, media, Fauci that is was from the lab indeed.

So yo I have to be careful what you censor as false info as it actually may be correct.

Except what they wanted to censor was more directly attributable to actual foreign psyops.

But PP wants the freedom to promote foreign psyops.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's the difference between disinformation and verifiable lies? Have they defined the scope of disinformation?

And who determines what’s disinformation?

That is a good question. This is only a good idea if it’s still good to have when another party is in charge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s too bad that slightly less far right wing sites haven’t covered this yet, because this is an absolute necessity, especially with the GOP spreading as much dis- and misinformation as they can.

Is it still a good idea of the likes of trump is in office?