Youngkin or McAuliffe

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The whole country has heard what Terry McAuliffe said about parents. I think more than anything, this is what will cost him the election. Terry lives in a bubble surrounded by radical extremists.

Referring to the proposed legislation that he vetoed:
“The parents had the right to veto books... also take them off the shelves," McAuliffe said. "I'm not going to let parents come into schools and actually take books out and make their own decisions."

"I don't think parents should be telling schools what they should teach," McAuliffe added.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McAuliffe should start supporting parents who are concerned about the school safety problems.

Do you mean rollback some of DeVos’ protections for rapists? Those are federal.

Hyperbolic nonsense. She correctly restored basic rights of the accused consistent with judicial decisions. What do Democrats care about “me too” anyway….

DP. So would it be correct to assume you support what LCPS did with the boy who allegedly assaulted a girl in the bathroom, moving him to a different school while the investigation was ongoing? Basic rights of the accused and all.

That’s a moronic question. The rights DeVos restored applied to hearings and the presentation of evidence. I have not heard about any deprivation of rights of the individual to whom you refer. The court has ruled on one of the allegations. Whether the county properly handled the disciplinary matters has been the subject of debate and possibly a lawsuit.

Okay, so you only care about rights of the accused when it suits your agenda. Got it.

I’m not following you. Whose rights were violated? I care about rights consistently. Maybe try to recognize that constitutional rights transcend local politics?

In this instance, I am referring to the rights of the accused boy to continue to receive a proper public education while the investigation was ongoing. I assume you wouldn’t have supported him being removed from school after he first assault allegations before he’d even had a disciplinary hearing, right?

You assert that the accused had a “right” to that transfer. Did he? Does the NY Times Michelle Goldberg article say that? Is not that the very subject of the debate and complaints?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McAuliffe should start supporting parents who are concerned about the school safety problems.

Do you mean rollback some of DeVos’ protections for rapists? Those are federal.

Hyperbolic nonsense. She correctly restored basic rights of the accused consistent with judicial decisions. What do Democrats care about “me too” anyway….

DP. So would it be correct to assume you support what LCPS did with the boy who allegedly assaulted a girl in the bathroom, moving him to a different school while the investigation was ongoing? Basic rights of the accused and all.

That’s a moronic question. The rights DeVos restored applied to hearings and the presentation of evidence. I have not heard about any deprivation of rights of the individual to whom you refer. The court has ruled on one of the allegations. Whether the county properly handled the disciplinary matters has been the subject of debate and possibly a lawsuit.

Okay, so you only care about rights of the accused when it suits your agenda. Got it.

I’m not following you. Whose rights were violated? I care about rights consistently. Maybe try to recognize that constitutional rights transcend local politics?

In this instance, I am referring to the rights of the accused boy to continue to receive a proper public education while the investigation was ongoing. I assume you wouldn’t have supported him being removed from school after he first assault allegations before he’d even had a disciplinary hearing, right?

You assert that the accused had a “right” to that transfer. Did he? Does the NY Times Michelle Goldberg article say that? Is not that the very subject of the debate and complaints?

Are you talking about this piece that completely debunked Youngkin supporters’ anti-trans agenda?

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/28/opinion/loudoun-county-trans.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McAuliffe should start supporting parents who are concerned about the school safety problems.

Do you mean rollback some of DeVos’ protections for rapists? Those are federal.

Hyperbolic nonsense. She correctly restored basic rights of the accused consistent with judicial decisions. What do Democrats care about “me too” anyway….

DP. So would it be correct to assume you support what LCPS did with the boy who allegedly assaulted a girl in the bathroom, moving him to a different school while the investigation was ongoing? Basic rights of the accused and all.

That’s a moronic question. The rights DeVos restored applied to hearings and the presentation of evidence. I have not heard about any deprivation of rights of the individual to whom you refer. The court has ruled on one of the allegations. Whether the county properly handled the disciplinary matters has been the subject of debate and possibly a lawsuit.

Okay, so you only care about rights of the accused when it suits your agenda. Got it.

I’m not following you. Whose rights were violated? I care about rights consistently. Maybe try to recognize that constitutional rights transcend local politics?

In this instance, I am referring to the rights of the accused boy to continue to receive a proper public education while the investigation was ongoing. I assume you wouldn’t have supported him being removed from school after he first assault allegations before he’d even had a disciplinary hearing, right?

You assert that the accused had a “right” to that transfer. Did he? Does the NY Times Michelle Goldberg article say that? Is not that the very subject of the debate and complaints?

Are you talking about this piece that completely debunked Youngkin supporters’ anti-trans agenda?

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/28/opinion/loudoun-county-trans.html

I just reasonably assumed that that was the article you were basing your arguments on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McAuliffe should start supporting parents who are concerned about the school safety problems.

Do you mean rollback some of DeVos’ protections for rapists? Those are federal.

Hyperbolic nonsense. She correctly restored basic rights of the accused consistent with judicial decisions. What do Democrats care about “me too” anyway….

DP. So would it be correct to assume you support what LCPS did with the boy who allegedly assaulted a girl in the bathroom, moving him to a different school while the investigation was ongoing? Basic rights of the accused and all.

That’s a moronic question. The rights DeVos restored applied to hearings and the presentation of evidence. I have not heard about any deprivation of rights of the individual to whom you refer. The court has ruled on one of the allegations. Whether the county properly handled the disciplinary matters has been the subject of debate and possibly a lawsuit.

Okay, so you only care about rights of the accused when it suits your agenda. Got it.

I’m not following you. Whose rights were violated? I care about rights consistently. Maybe try to recognize that constitutional rights transcend local politics?

In this instance, I am referring to the rights of the accused boy to continue to receive a proper public education while the investigation was ongoing. I assume you wouldn’t have supported him being removed from school after he first assault allegations before he’d even had a disciplinary hearing, right?

You assert that the accused had a “right” to that transfer. Did he? Does the NY Times Michelle Goldberg article say that? Is not that the very subject of the debate and complaints?

Are you talking about this piece that completely debunked Youngkin supporters’ anti-trans agenda?

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/28/opinion/loudoun-county-trans.html

I just reasonably assumed that that was the article you were basing your arguments on.

No, I’d never read it before. It’s a good piece, though, thanks for highlighting it for me!

[Anonymous]

I am voting Republican across the board except for Gov. I just can’t vote for Youngkin. I guess I’ll take a crook over a guy that stands for nothing and is backed by Trump. Crappy choice, but the choice I’ll make.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McAuliffe should start supporting parents who are concerned about the school safety problems.

Do you mean rollback some of DeVos’ protections for rapists? Those are federal.

Hyperbolic nonsense. She correctly restored basic rights of the accused consistent with judicial decisions. What do Democrats care about “me too” anyway….

DP. So would it be correct to assume you support what LCPS did with the boy who allegedly assaulted a girl in the bathroom, moving him to a different school while the investigation was ongoing? Basic rights of the accused and all.

That’s a moronic question. The rights DeVos restored applied to hearings and the presentation of evidence. I have not heard about any deprivation of rights of the individual to whom you refer. The court has ruled on one of the allegations. Whether the county properly handled the disciplinary matters has been the subject of debate and possibly a lawsuit.

Okay, so you only care about rights of the accused when it suits your agenda. Got it.

I’m not following you. Whose rights were violated? I care about rights consistently. Maybe try to recognize that constitutional rights transcend local politics?

In this instance, I am referring to the rights of the accused boy to continue to receive a proper public education while the investigation was ongoing. I assume you wouldn’t have supported him being removed from school after he first assault allegations before he’d even had a disciplinary hearing, right?

You assert that the accused had a “right” to that transfer. Did he? Does the NY Times Michelle Goldberg article say that? Is not that the very subject of the debate and complaints?

Are you talking about this piece that completely debunked Youngkin supporters’ anti-trans agenda?

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/28/opinion/loudoun-county-trans.html

I just reasonably assumed that that was the article you were basing your arguments on.

No, I’d never read it before. It’s a good piece, though, thanks for highlighting it for me!

OK. I try to read widely to get all sides.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am voting Republican across the board except for Gov. I just can’t vote for Youngkin. I guess I’ll take a crook over a guy that stands for nothing and is backed by Trump. Crappy choice, but the choice I’ll make.

Yeah, ok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am voting Republican across the board except for Gov. I just can’t vote for Youngkin. I guess I’ll take a crook over a guy that stands for nothing and is backed by Trump. Crappy choice, but the choice I’ll make.

Don't be a bigot. Why vote for someone who wants to silence parents? This election is about our children, not the last president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am voting Republican across the board except for Gov. I just can’t vote for Youngkin. I guess I’ll take a crook over a guy that stands for nothing and is backed by Trump. Crappy choice, but the choice I’ll make.

Don't be a bigot. Why vote for someone who wants to silence parents? This election is about our children, not the last president.

DP. I’m voting for McAuliffe specifically for my kids. I don’t need ignorant parents trying to force schools to teach my kids about dinosaur Jesus. 🦕🦖🦕

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just received a solicitation from McAuliffe’s campaign where the lead is “Democrats are blowing it in Virginia.”

I don’t necessarily disagree with that sentiment, given how our local Democrats have been such a disaster in every respect for the public schools, but it seems like an odd admission to broadcast within a few days of the election.

Terry has lost his mind. What's going on with him?

Latest polls favor Younkin by as much as 10 points, that's what's wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just received a solicitation from McAuliffe’s campaign where the lead is “Democrats are blowing it in Virginia.”

I don’t necessarily disagree with that sentiment, given how our local Democrats have been such a disaster in every respect for the public schools, but it seems like an odd admission to broadcast within a few days of the election.

Terry has lost his mind. What's going on with him?

Latest polls favor Younkin by as much as 10 points, that's what's wrong.

That speaks very poorly of Virginians. We’ll be the new laughing stock after this election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just received a solicitation from McAuliffe’s campaign where the lead is “Democrats are blowing it in Virginia.”

I don’t necessarily disagree with that sentiment, given how our local Democrats have been such a disaster in every respect for the public schools, but it seems like an odd admission to broadcast within a few days of the election.

Terry has lost his mind. What's going on with him?

Latest polls favor Younkin by as much as 10 points, that's what's wrong.

That speaks very poorly of Virginians. We’ll be the new laughing stock after this election.

Because a former executive of the Carlyle Group is the governor? How funny is that exactly?

[Anonymous]

Most of America will be celebrating when Virginia elects a governor who supports parents having a voice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Most of America will be celebrating when Virginia elects a governor who supports parents having a voice.

A voice in banning books? That’s not something to be proud of.