Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No republican smart enough but hill says Trump pursues domestic political concerns.

How is election interference not a valid foreign policy objective - they are letting her - hill- parse it as a domestics poltical concern

Hill is smart enough to explain it to you. If you're dumb enough to ask her.

No, she’s not. Foreign election meddling is a valid foreign policy concern.

Dr. Hill has made clear to everyone that there was no Ukrainian interference in our election. An op-ed is not “interference.”

That’s her opinion.

I am saying as subject matter it is valid foreign policy concern. The president is not bound to shape his foreign policy in accordance with hill’s opinions.

The president doesn't care about your opinion either. He wants NOTHING, not valid foreign policy concerns, only personal favors.

I guess you slept through all of yesterday, when Sondland told all of us exactly what Trump was doing. It wasn't "valid foreign policy".

I don’t care what trump thinks- he’s an idiot.

These republicans allowed her to get away with a significant falsehood, namely, that foreign interference is not a valid objective for us foreign policy.

The "foreign interference" from Ukraine is Russian disinformation -- it didn't happen. It is not a valid objective or a valid foreign policy concern.

Everything on 4chan is a lie. Don't trust it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stewart is lying and distorting.

He is repugnant.

Someone before suggested these folks need to sworn in too

Including those who say they don't know who the whistleblower is?

It doesn't matter who the whistleblower is. This is not a whistleblower case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG these Republicans don’t have the balls to ask direct questions to Dr. Hill.

Three of them have made their 5 minute statements and then left the room.

Why did they leave?

Too uncomfortable? Same reason questions stopped. A desire not to be made to look foolish.

I missed it!

[Anonymous]

Trump has shitty people. His minions needed their own bullshit Steele dossier that would justify inquires into Biden and Burisma. Then they could point to their dossier to justify their requests.

Like democrats used Steele.

All the best people- idiots who needlessly exposed potus to shite.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG these Republicans don’t have the balls to ask direct questions to Dr. Hill.

Three of them have made their 5 minute statements and then left the room.

Why did they leave?

Too uncomfortable? Same reason questions stopped. A desire not to be made to look foolish.

They are after all the “corruptibles.”

[Anonymous]

My god these GOP people are tiresome. So tiresome. So much projection and so much stupid.

[Anonymous]

And now Stefanik is lying.

For starters, she skipped hearings she was invited to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And now Stefanik is lying.

For starters, she skipped hearings she was invited to.

She was lying as soon as she opened her mouth!! I guess sheystill stung to have been seen for exactly as lightweight and indecent as the rest of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No republican smart enough but hill says Trump pursues domestic political concerns.

How is election interference not a valid foreign policy objective - they are letting her - hill- parse it as a domestics poltical concern

Hill is smart enough to explain it to you. If you're dumb enough to ask her.

No, she’s not. Foreign election meddling is a valid foreign policy concern.

Dr. Hill has made clear to everyone that there was no Ukrainian interference in our election. An op-ed is not “interference.”

That’s her opinion.

I am saying as subject matter it is valid foreign policy concern. The president is not bound to shape his foreign policy in accordance with hill’s opinions.

The president doesn't care about your opinion either. He wants NOTHING, not valid foreign policy concerns, only personal favors.

I guess you slept through all of yesterday, when Sondland told all of us exactly what Trump was doing. It wasn't "valid foreign policy".

I don’t care what trump thinks- he’s an idiot.

These republicans allowed her to get away with a significant falsehood, namely, that foreign interference is not a valid objective for us foreign policy.

The "foreign interference" from Ukraine is Russian disinformation -- it didn't happen. It is not a valid objective or a valid foreign policy concern.

Everything on 4chan is a lie. Don't trust it.

Not 4chan.
1. Politico: “Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire” (Jan 17’)
2. Financial Times: “Ukraine leaders campaign against pro-Putin Trump” (Aug 16’)
3. Politico: “Manafort faced blackmail attempt, hacks suggest” (Feb 17’)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No republican smart enough but hill says Trump pursues domestic political concerns.

How is election interference not a valid foreign policy objective - they are letting her - hill- parse it as a domestics poltical concern

Hill is smart enough to explain it to you. If you're dumb enough to ask her.

No, she’s not. Foreign election meddling is a valid foreign policy concern.

Dr. Hill has made clear to everyone that there was no Ukrainian interference in our election. An op-ed is not “interference.”

That’s her opinion.

I am saying as subject matter it is valid foreign policy concern. The president is not bound to shape his foreign policy in accordance with hill’s opinions.

The president doesn't care about your opinion either. He wants NOTHING, not valid foreign policy concerns, only personal favors.

I guess you slept through all of yesterday, when Sondland told all of us exactly what Trump was doing. It wasn't "valid foreign policy".

I don’t care what trump thinks- he’s an idiot.

These republicans allowed her to get away with a significant falsehood, namely, that foreign interference is not a valid objective for us foreign policy.

The "foreign interference" from Ukraine is Russian disinformation -- it didn't happen. It is not a valid objective or a valid foreign policy concern.

Everything on 4chan is a lie. Don't trust it.

Not 4chan.
1. Politico: “Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire” (Jan 17’)
2. Financial Times: “Ukraine leaders campaign against pro-Putin Trump” (Aug 16’)
3. Politico: “Manafort faced blackmail attempt, hacks suggest” (Feb 17’)

The poster has to say 4chan, because Harris is Wrong!!!! Election Interfernce is valid foreign policy objective; and potus not bound by opinion of Harris.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No republican smart enough but hill says Trump pursues domestic political concerns.

How is election interference not a valid foreign policy objective - they are letting her - hill- parse it as a domestics poltical concern

Hill is smart enough to explain it to you. If you're dumb enough to ask her.

No, she’s not. Foreign election meddling is a valid foreign policy concern.

Dr. Hill has made clear to everyone that there was no Ukrainian interference in our election. An op-ed is not “interference.”

That’s her opinion.

I am saying as subject matter it is valid foreign policy concern. The president is not bound to shape his foreign policy in accordance with hill’s opinions.

The president doesn't care about your opinion either. He wants NOTHING, not valid foreign policy concerns, only personal favors.

I guess you slept through all of yesterday, when Sondland told all of us exactly what Trump was doing. It wasn't "valid foreign policy".

I don’t care what trump thinks- he’s an idiot.

These republicans allowed her to get away with a significant falsehood, namely, that foreign interference is not a valid objective for us foreign policy.

The "foreign interference" from Ukraine is Russian disinformation -- it didn't happen. It is not a valid objective or a valid foreign policy concern.

Everything on 4chan is a lie. Don't trust it.

Not 4chan.
1. Politico: “Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire” (Jan 17’)
2. Financial Times: “Ukraine leaders campaign against pro-Putin Trump” (Aug 16’)
3. Politico: “Manafort faced blackmail attempt, hacks suggest” (Feb 17’)

This was explained. You just didn't like it.

Sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No republican smart enough but hill says Trump pursues domestic political concerns.

How is election interference not a valid foreign policy objective - they are letting her - hill- parse it as a domestics poltical concern

Hill is smart enough to explain it to you. If you're dumb enough to ask her.

No, she’s not. Foreign election meddling is a valid foreign policy concern.

Dr. Hill has made clear to everyone that there was no Ukrainian interference in our election. An op-ed is not “interference.”

That’s her opinion.

I am saying as subject matter it is valid foreign policy concern. The president is not bound to shape his foreign policy in accordance with hill’s opinions.

The president doesn't care about your opinion either. He wants NOTHING, not valid foreign policy concerns, only personal favors.

I guess you slept through all of yesterday, when Sondland told all of us exactly what Trump was doing. It wasn't "valid foreign policy".

I don’t care what trump thinks- he’s an idiot.

These republicans allowed her to get away with a significant falsehood, namely, that foreign interference is not a valid objective for us foreign policy.

The "foreign interference" from Ukraine is Russian disinformation -- it didn't happen. It is not a valid objective or a valid foreign policy concern.

Everything on 4chan is a lie. Don't trust it.

Not 4chan.
1. Politico: “Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire” (Jan 17’)
2. Financial Times: “Ukraine leaders campaign against pro-Putin Trump” (Aug 16’)
3. Politico: “Manafort faced blackmail attempt, hacks suggest” (Feb 17’)

The poster has to say 4chan, because Harris is Wrong!!!! Election Interfernce is valid foreign policy objective; and potus not bound by opinion of Harris.

Yeah, no.

[Anonymous]

Yet another R man who won't ask a question. So sick of the grandstanding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No republican smart enough but hill says Trump pursues domestic political concerns.

How is election interference not a valid foreign policy objective - they are letting her - hill- parse it as a domestics poltical concern

Hill is smart enough to explain it to you. If you're dumb enough to ask her.

No, she’s not. Foreign election meddling is a valid foreign policy concern.

Dr. Hill has made clear to everyone that there was no Ukrainian interference in our election. An op-ed is not “interference.”

That’s her opinion.

I am saying as subject matter it is valid foreign policy concern. The president is not bound to shape his foreign policy in accordance with hill’s opinions.

The president doesn't care about your opinion either. He wants NOTHING, not valid foreign policy concerns, only personal favors.

I guess you slept through all of yesterday, when Sondland told all of us exactly what Trump was doing. It wasn't "valid foreign policy".

I don’t care what trump thinks- he’s an idiot.

These republicans allowed her to get away with a significant falsehood, namely, that foreign interference is not a valid objective for us foreign policy.

The "foreign interference" from Ukraine is Russian disinformation -- it didn't happen. It is not a valid objective or a valid foreign policy concern.

Everything on 4chan is a lie. Don't trust it.

Not 4chan.
1. Politico: “Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire” (Jan 17’)
2. Financial Times: “Ukraine leaders campaign against pro-Putin Trump” (Aug 16’)
3. Politico: “Manafort faced blackmail attempt, hacks suggest” (Feb 17’)

Not interference in the election. But, if there were evidence of foreign interference, it has to be handled through proper channels, strictly by-the-book following protocol and agreements, and investigated by independent, non-political, agencies. Not as part of a political bribe demanding a phony public statement of an investigation for the personal political benefit of the President of the United States in exchange for official U.S. government acts and assistance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No republican smart enough but hill says Trump pursues domestic political concerns.

How is election interference not a valid foreign policy objective - they are letting her - hill- parse it as a domestics poltical concern

Hill is smart enough to explain it to you. If you're dumb enough to ask her.

No, she’s not. Foreign election meddling is a valid foreign policy concern.

Dr. Hill has made clear to everyone that there was no Ukrainian interference in our election. An op-ed is not “interference.”

That’s her opinion.

I am saying as subject matter it is valid foreign policy concern. The president is not bound to shape his foreign policy in accordance with hill’s opinions.

The president doesn't care about your opinion either. He wants NOTHING, not valid foreign policy concerns, only personal favors.

I guess you slept through all of yesterday, when Sondland told all of us exactly what Trump was doing. It wasn't "valid foreign policy".

I don’t care what trump thinks- he’s an idiot.

These republicans allowed her to get away with a significant falsehood, namely, that foreign interference is not a valid objective for us foreign policy.

The "foreign interference" from Ukraine is Russian disinformation -- it didn't happen. It is not a valid objective or a valid foreign policy concern.

Everything on 4chan is a lie. Don't trust it.

Not 4chan.
1. Politico: “Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire” (Jan 17’)
2. Financial Times: “Ukraine leaders campaign against pro-Putin Trump” (Aug 16’)
3. Politico: “Manafort faced blackmail attempt, hacks suggest” (Feb 17’)

Not interference in the election. But, if there were evidence of foreign interference, it has to be handled through proper channels, strictly by-the-book following protocol and agreements, and investigated by independent, non-political, agencies. Not as part of a political bribe demanding a phony public statement of an investigation for the personal political benefit of the President of the United States in exchange for official U.S. government acts and assistance.

You are talking around the point. Harris got away with a whopper.