Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s schooling Weinstrup. It’s amazing.

X1000

He knew it too. That look on his face!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG these Republicans don’t have the balls to ask direct questions to Dr. Hill.

Three of them have made their 5 minute statements and then left the room.

Why did they leave?

They are snowflakes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s schooling Weinstrup. It’s amazing.

X1000

that was quite something.

[Anonymous]

Here comes another one! At least he had the decency to announce he wasn't going to ask questions before starting his tantrum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No republican smart enough but hill says Trump pursues domestic political concerns.

How is election interference not a valid foreign policy objective - they are letting her - hill- parse it as a domestics poltical concern

Hill is smart enough to explain it to you. If you're dumb enough to ask her.

No, she’s not. Foreign election meddling is a valid foreign policy concern.

Dr. Hill has made clear to everyone that there was no Ukrainian interference in our election. An op-ed is not “interference.”

That’s her opinion.

I am saying as subject matter it is valid foreign policy concern. The president is not bound to shape his foreign policy in accordance with hill’s opinions.

[Anonymous]

Why are they allowed to waste time if they have no question...

[Anonymous]

Stewart is lying and distorting.

He is repugnant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No republican smart enough but hill says Trump pursues domestic political concerns.

How is election interference not a valid foreign policy objective - they are letting her - hill- parse it as a domestics poltical concern

Hill is smart enough to explain it to you. If you're dumb enough to ask her.

No, she’s not. Foreign election meddling is a valid foreign policy concern.

Dr. Hill has made clear to everyone that there was no Ukrainian interference in our election. An op-ed is not “interference.”

That’s her opinion.

I am saying as subject matter it is valid foreign policy concern. The president is not bound to shape his foreign policy in accordance with hill’s opinions.

The president doesn't care about your opinion either. He wants NOTHING, not valid foreign policy concerns, only personal favors.

I guess you slept through all of yesterday, when Sondland told all of us exactly what Trump was doing. It wasn't "valid foreign policy".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stewart is lying and distorting.

He is repugnant.

Someone before suggested these folks need to sworn in too

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG these Republicans don’t have the balls to ask direct questions to Dr. Hill.

And, reading prepared statements because they are unable to formulate questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No republican smart enough but hill says Trump pursues domestic political concerns.

How is election interference not a valid foreign policy objective - they are letting her - hill- parse it as a domestics poltical concern

Hill is smart enough to explain it to you. If you're dumb enough to ask her.

No, she’s not. Foreign election meddling is a valid foreign policy concern.

Dr. Hill has made clear to everyone that there was no Ukrainian interference in our election. An op-ed is not “interference.”

That’s her opinion.

I am saying as subject matter it is valid foreign policy concern. The president is not bound to shape his foreign policy in accordance with hill’s opinions.

You've got nothing but a conspiracy theory. Trump did not want an independent investigation, he just wanted tp bribe Zelensky to make a statement that Trump could use politically. Not legitimate foreign policy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stewart is lying and distorting.

He is repugnant.

Someone before suggested these folks need to sworn in too

Including those who say they don't know who the whistleblower is?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No republican smart enough but hill says Trump pursues domestic political concerns.

How is election interference not a valid foreign policy objective - they are letting her - hill- parse it as a domestics poltical concern

Hill is smart enough to explain it to you. If you're dumb enough to ask her.

No, she’s not. Foreign election meddling is a valid foreign policy concern.

Dr. Hill has made clear to everyone that there was no Ukrainian interference in our election. An op-ed is not “interference.”

That’s her opinion.

I am saying as subject matter it is valid foreign policy concern. The president is not bound to shape his foreign policy in accordance with hill’s opinions.

The president doesn't care about your opinion either. He wants NOTHING, not valid foreign policy concerns, only personal favors.

I guess you slept through all of yesterday, when Sondland told all of us exactly what Trump was doing. It wasn't "valid foreign policy".

I don’t care what trump thinks- he’s an idiot.

These republicans allowed her to get away with a significant falsehood, namely, that foreign interference is not a valid objective for us foreign policy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stewart is lying and distorting.

He is repugnant.

Someone before suggested these folks need to sworn in too

Including those who say they don't know who the whistleblower is?

Sure, I am fine with that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG these Republicans don’t have the balls to ask direct questions to Dr. Hill.

Three of them have made their 5 minute statements and then left the room.

Why did they leave?

Too uncomfortable? Same reason questions stopped. A desire not to be made to look foolish.