|
Of course I do as do most people with means/choices/money. Life shits on poor people and minorities so why would I want to be anywhere near them and get collateral damage. I am a 40 year old white guy and drive a S550 and when I get pulled over it is "sorry Mr XXXXX here is a warning and please be careful as there are other cops looking for ABC out today". When I got pulled over a couple of weeks ago in PG county driving out to Chesapeake beach to go fishing with a black coworker it was "do you have any drugs in the car would you mind if I search?"
Until African American and all under severed minority people find a way to pull their demographic away from being a perpetual punching bag, people like me who don't want to get hit with a stray punch or more importantly don't want their kids getting disproportionally policed and hanging with kids who gave up college dreams in middle school due to SES considerations will create little villages. I get it, the whole it takes people like me to break down the systemic systems that keeps people being perpetual punching bags but I am not convinced that bucking the status quo which is designed to keep me and my family comfortable and in power would actually do anything but make room for another white or token minority family to hop aboard. Statistically my job is to put my family in the best position to accomplish their dreams and in upper class mostly white areas, schools and networks which are where tomorrows leaders come from. I am not quite enlightened enough to vote with my feet against my own self interests. I do remain open to people on an individual basis without prejudging and don't discriminate which allows me to consider myself (not raciest) but I actually have no problem taking advantage of the White boys club that has provided me a pretty comfortable life and a high SES with only avg talents and work ethic at my disposal. I guess that is the part for Libs (like me) to reconcile that you can like all people AND the benefits of raciest systems....as long as it was others who had to do the dirty work. |
|
I was wearing a red polo shirt to Target and an AA woman asked me if I knew where stuff was.
I lol'd. |
You sound stupid as h** |
At least you're honest but what bothers me is the way you're blaming the victim. Instead of the police behaving professionally and learning to treat people as individuals, you say it's black people's fault that the police abuse them as a group. Nice. |
Pp again -- and this is why I'm so glad I didn't raise my kid in your neighborhood. Wouldn't want her to pick up your twisted attitudes. |
| ^^^ holier-than-thou lib |
I see that logical reasoning is not one of your strengths. Rational people typically examine the evidence and come to a rational conclusion. For a rational person to conclude that race was the cause of something, they would either have direct evidence, or exclusionary evidence. In this case, if other AA people were not treated as the wait staff, then it would pretty clearly eliminate her race as a cause. I know that thinking in a logical and rational manner takes some effort, it may even be tiresome, but you really should try it some time. |
Oh, you are right because of course the person must have time to to discriminate against every dang POC in the room in order to prove discrimination. And a sexist must do something sexist against every woman he meets, etc. I truly detest deliberate stupidity |
|
Strawman. That's not my position at all. I'll make it simple: the one making the claim has the burden of proof. So it's not up to me to assert that she was not mistaken as the wait staff due to her race, it's up to you to prove that she was. Stating two facts does not mean they have a causal relationship, no matter how much you want them to be. |
No one has to prove anything to you. Your strawman can take a seat. |
| That's the frustrating thing about 21st-century discrimination. Educated people will not call you the "n" word or display other overt signs of racism. Instead, it's the very ambiguity and the subtlety of these interactions that can be frustrating. At least with overt displays, you know where you stand. With less overt displays, in isolation they are harder to prove, and perhaps easy to dismiss as a one-off. You may tell yourself you're being paranoid. But it's the accumulation of these sorts of interactions--being mistaken for staff, etc.--that happen on a regular basis that may convince the recipient that race/ethnicity was the determining factor in their unfair or differential treatment. |
How about you stop fixating on race and stop worrying what other people think about you? I think that white folks get annoyed with AAs because 90% of what they talk about is race. At some point you need to just buckle down, study, and work hard. The milking of "discrimination!" for all it's worth needs to stop. |
How about you not entering a thread clearly marked "race" if you don't want to hear what posters have to say? |
Yes, and you probably have to drive there from your bougie home. Do you want a keeping it real medal? You don't get one. |