Virginia referendum - if you hate MAGA, vote YES (even if your mailing says to vote 'No')

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every one of you (presumably Democrats?) that rabidly call anyone voting no a MAGA or Trumper or conscienceless...you are turning Independents that vote on issues against Dem candidates in local and state elections. I have never voted for a Republican president btw but think both parties are deeply flawed and started thinking that in 1970.

If you've been polarized by anonymous posts on an internet forum, congratulations, you are admitting your own profound irrationality.

If you don't remember that accurately referring to people as deplorable had consequences then congratulations you have selective amnesia. Contempt has consequences. Trump told them they were his best supporters and they still are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Venn diagram of people who strutted around and bleated "elections have consequences" after Trump won and the people who are whining about Democratic overreach in redistricting is a perfect circle. GMAFB.

That was Obama's line!

That’s why MAGA loves it so much.

That makes absolutely no sense. But remember, without Obama's divisiveness (that line is the perfect example), Trump never gets elected and there is no MAGA. Thanks, Obama!

No, it makes perfect sense. A decade after leaving office and you're still hysterical about having had a black president. I wonder what you have to say about Trump's divisiveness! Wait, never mind, I already know that you love it because "he's telling it like it is," or something.

Funny how the PP never responded to this.

There's nothing to respond to. Read your own words. You actually said "Wait, never mind". Remember you somehow already know what I think. You're convinced I'm a racist, MAGA, Trump supporter, so what's the point?

Again, remember that saying about "assume". And you you really should work on your reading comprehension, along with your Shakespeare quotes.

You are making some ASSumptions and confusing posters. I didn’t write any of those comments.

If you thought Obama was “divisive”, please share your thoughts on Trump.

My apologies. I assumed and the old saying proved true.

Trump is obviously very divisive as well. I won't even put that in quotations.

You consider Obama “very divisive” when compared to Trump? GMAFB.

That's not what I said, but whatever. So no thanks, I won't give you a f'ing break

“ Trump is obviously very divisive as well “

That's not comparing them. You're desperately trying to find a "gotcha" moment that just isn't there. Give it a rest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:22 point swing to the GOP in the special election, Rice over Smith.

Can’t have that, can we Dems…

Republican district votes for Republican. Shocker.

If anything, it shows how Republicans no longer show up for Trump.

The growth is the point. And it shows how much the current legislature is despised.

[Anonymous]

My favorite part of this scheme by the GOP is ASSUMING that redrawing districts to favor Republicans will actually equal republican votes. It may work in some spots, but their strongholds are crumbling and the policies and Trump are killing them. Unless you can convince peeople in 5 months that their lives and pocketbooks are better, then it'll be a bloodbath (blue one) in November and it won't matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I didn't realize the WaPo editorial board was allowed to write about anything except how rich people are overtaxed. I guess Bezos granted them an exemption to write about a different topic.

But they are out of the 'endorsement business' GMFB

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Venn diagram of people who strutted around and bleated "elections have consequences" after Trump won and the people who are whining about Democratic overreach in redistricting is a perfect circle. GMAFB.

That was Obama's line!

That’s why MAGA loves it so much.

That makes absolutely no sense. But remember, without Obama's divisiveness (that line is the perfect example), Trump never gets elected and there is no MAGA. Thanks, Obama!

No, it makes perfect sense. A decade after leaving office and you're still hysterical about having had a black president. I wonder what you have to say about Trump's divisiveness! Wait, never mind, I already know that you love it because "he's telling it like it is," or something.

Funny how the PP never responded to this.

There's nothing to respond to. Read your own words. You actually said "Wait, never mind". Remember you somehow already know what I think. You're convinced I'm a racist, MAGA, Trump supporter, so what's the point?

Again, remember that saying about "assume". And you you really should work on your reading comprehension, along with your Shakespeare quotes.

You are making some ASSumptions and confusing posters. I didn’t write any of those comments.

If you thought Obama was “divisive”, please share your thoughts on Trump.

My apologies. I assumed and the old saying proved true.

Trump is obviously very divisive as well. I won't even put that in quotations.

You consider Obama “very divisive” when compared to Trump? GMAFB.

That's not what I said, but whatever. So no thanks, I won't give you a f'ing break

“ Trump is obviously very divisive as well “

That's not comparing them. You're desperately trying to find a "gotcha" moment that just isn't there. Give it a rest.

“ very divisive as well “ is comparing them. Equating them, in fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:22 point swing to the GOP in the special election, Rice over Smith.

Can’t have that, can we Dems…

Republican district votes for Republican. Shocker.

If anything, it shows how Republicans no longer show up for Trump.

The growth is the point. And it shows how much the current legislature is despised.

It shows that Trump is despised more than rando Republican.

[Anonymous]

It looks like this amendment is likely to fail at this point. The early voter turnout from red areas is much higher than blue areas. Eg. The early voter turnout from Republican Fauquier county is 5.4%. The turnout from Fairfax county is only 2.6%. There is a very strong gradient between the percentage share of the county that voted republican in 2024 and the early voter turnout. This data also suggests that even within counties republicans are more likely to vote on this amendment than Dems. Unless turnout improves in democratic leaning areas, this amendment is likely to fail or it will be approved by a very slim margin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It looks like this amendment is likely to fail at this point. The early voter turnout from red areas is much higher than blue areas. Eg. The early voter turnout from Republican Fauquier county is 5.4%. The turnout from Fairfax county is only 2.6%. There is a very strong gradient between the percentage share of the county that voted republican in 2024 and the early voter turnout. This data also suggests that even within counties republicans are more likely to vote on this amendment than Dems. Unless turnout improves in democratic leaning areas, this amendment is likely to fail or it will be approved by a very slim margin.

And…how many people live in Fauquier vs Fairfax?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It looks like this amendment is likely to fail at this point. The early voter turnout from red areas is much higher than blue areas. We Eg. The early voter turnout from Republican Fauquier county is 5.4%. The turnout from Fairfax county is only 2.6%. There is a very strong gradient between the percentage share of the county that voted republican in 2024 and the early voter turnout. This data also suggests that even within counties republicans are more likely to vote on this amendment than Dems. Unless turnout improves in democratic leaning areas, this amendment is likely to fail or it will be approved by a very slim margin.

There’s still a month to go

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It looks like this amendment is likely to fail at this point. The early voter turnout from red areas is much higher than blue areas. Eg. The early voter turnout from Republican Fauquier county is 5.4%. The turnout from Fairfax county is only 2.6%. There is a very strong gradient between the percentage share of the county that voted republican in 2024 and the early voter turnout. This data also suggests that even within counties republicans are more likely to vote on this amendment than Dems. Unless turnout improves in democratic leaning areas, this amendment is likely to fail or it will be approved by a very slim margin.

Fauquier County has 75,000 people...Fairfax County has 1.15MM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I loathe MAGA, but I also loathed Biden-Harris and dem sanctimony.
And I believe in protecting the vote of my fellow Virginians, even those who are “different” from me. Voting no.

Sounds like you shouldn't vote at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It looks like this amendment is likely to fail at this point. The early voter turnout from red areas is much higher than blue areas. Eg. The early voter turnout from Republican Fauquier county is 5.4%. The turnout from Fairfax county is only 2.6%. There is a very strong gradient between the percentage share of the county that voted republican in 2024 and the early voter turnout. This data also suggests that even within counties republicans are more likely to vote on this amendment than Dems. Unless turnout improves in democratic leaning areas, this amendment is likely to fail or it will be approved by a very slim margin.

I'm in Richmond, and I've been bombarded with "vote NO" flyers and social media. Democrats have done a terrible job of framing the issue and getting the vote out. Republicans are clearly energized by this. FWIW I'm voting YES because Republicans are treasonous cretins.

[Anonymous]

The assault weapon ban will sink this legislation.

[Anonymous]

I'm voting yes for my kid's futures!