Sound of Freedom - What are they up to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
CHILD RAPE aka human trafficking

“It’s the fastest growing international crime network the world has ever seen.”

Yeah, and you perpetrate it by sending money to the people who profit from this movie.

What about the thousands of men who do this who don't have ties to the movie?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
CHILD RAPE aka human trafficking

“It’s the fastest growing international crime network the world has ever seen.”

Yeah, and you perpetrate it by sending money to the people who profit from this movie.

What about the thousands of men who do this who don't have ties to the movie?

Crickets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
CHILD RAPE aka human trafficking

“It’s the fastest growing international crime network the world has ever seen.”

Yeah, and you perpetrate it by sending money to the people who profit from this movie.

What about the thousands of men who do this who don't have ties to the movie?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
CHILD RAPE aka human trafficking

“It’s the fastest growing international crime network the world has ever seen.”

Yeah, and you perpetrate it by sending money to the people who profit from this movie.

What about the thousands of men who do this who don't have ties to the movie?

You can also not funnel money to them to fund those choices? I don't understand why this is a question, or why you were so excited about "crickets" yesterday.

If you want to avoid funding people who engage in these behaviors, then don't send money their way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
CHILD RAPE aka human trafficking

“It’s the fastest growing international crime network the world has ever seen.”

Yeah, and you perpetrate it by sending money to the people who profit from this movie.

What about the thousands of men who do this who don't have ties to the movie?

You can also not funnel money to them to fund those choices? I don't understand why this is a question, or why you were so excited about "crickets" yesterday.

If you want to avoid funding people who engage in these behaviors, then don't send money their way.

+1 And don’t vote for people who talk about defunding the FBI.

[Anonymous]

You people should get your news from reputable news sources, rather than tweeter or other social media.

By coincidence I clicked on a link about this guy Marta and while it is true he has been charged with kidnapping, it is not as the tweet posted above made it seem, with innuendos of sexual molestation, etc.

This is a custody case and one of the parents (mother I think) fled with the child and this Marta guy, apparently, let them hide in one of his apartments (it seems he has or manage a rental property).

It seems he also made it difficult for the police to go inside to investigate it - probably requested a warrant?

I’m not going into the merit of issue, if what he did was wrong or not.

I just wanted to impart what I read yesterday from a story in my news app.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You people should get your news from reputable news sources, rather than tweeter or other social media.

By coincidence I clicked on a link about this guy Marta and while it is true he has been charged with kidnapping, it is not as the tweet posted above made it seem, with innuendos of sexual molestation, etc.

This is a custody case and one of the parents (mother I think) fled with the child and this Marta guy, apparently, let them hide in one of his apartments (it seems he has or manage a rental property).

It seems he also made it difficult for the police to go inside to investigate it - probably requested a warrant?

I’m not going into the merit of issue, if what he did was wrong or not.

I just wanted to impart what I read yesterday from a story in my news app.

He also hosts sugar baby parties and trains young girls on being a sugar baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
CHILD RAPE aka human trafficking

“It’s the fastest growing international crime network the world has ever seen.”

Yeah, and you perpetrate it by sending money to the people who profit from this movie.

What about the thousands of men who do this who don't have ties to the movie?

You can also not funnel money to them to fund those choices? I don't understand why this is a question, or why you were so excited about "crickets" yesterday.

If you want to avoid funding people who engage in these behaviors, then don't send money their way.

+1 And don’t vote for people who talk about defunding the FBI.

When will jailing child traffickers be their priority?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people should get your news from reputable news sources, rather than tweeter or other social media.

By coincidence I clicked on a link about this guy Marta and while it is true he has been charged with kidnapping, it is not as the tweet posted above made it seem, with innuendos of sexual molestation, etc.

This is a custody case and one of the parents (mother I think) fled with the child and this Marta guy, apparently, let them hide in one of his apartments (it seems he has or manage a rental property).

It seems he also made it difficult for the police to go inside to investigate it - probably requested a warrant?

I’m not going into the merit of issue, if what he did was wrong or not.

I just wanted to impart what I read yesterday from a story in my news app.

He also hosts sugar baby parties and trains young girls on being a sugar baby.

Good lord, so gross.

Lie down with dogs, wake up with fleas. Don't lie down with this dog, please. And don't send more money his way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
CHILD RAPE aka human trafficking

“It’s the fastest growing international crime network the world has ever seen.”

Yeah, and you perpetrate it by sending money to the people who profit from this movie.

What about the thousands of men who do this who don't have ties to the movie?

You can also not funnel money to them to fund those choices? I don't understand why this is a question, or why you were so excited about "crickets" yesterday.

If you want to avoid funding people who engage in these behaviors, then don't send money their way.

+1 And don’t vote for people who talk about defunding the FBI.

When will jailing child traffickers be their priority?

DP. Maybe you could try scrolling up?

[Anonymous]

(The time stamp is there.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
CHILD RAPE aka human trafficking

“It’s the fastest growing international crime network the world has ever seen.”

Yeah, and you perpetrate it by sending money to the people who profit from this movie.

What about the thousands of men who do this who don't have ties to the movie?

You can also not funnel money to them to fund those choices? I don't understand why this is a question, or why you were so excited about "crickets" yesterday.

If you want to avoid funding people who engage in these behaviors, then don't send money their way.

+1 And don’t vote for people who talk about defunding the FBI.

This.

[Anonymous]

Okay, I weighed in on this thread early bc I couldn't understand why anyone would be against a movie that was against human trafficking. As usual, I just got called QAnon and deleted, so I stopped paying attention to this thread and I apologize if this has been brought up-- I haven't read the whole thread.

If you're like me, someone who is like "why the hell would you have a problem with people fighting human trafficking?!", listen to the podcast Believable: The Coco Berthmann Story. They talk about truth and lies in human trafficking and how there are some self-glorifying people who raise money and buy ridiculous things like helicopters for rescue missions that never happen, while other organizations raise money for rent for recently escaped survivors. Very helpful in understanding the issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Okay, I weighed in on this thread early bc I couldn't understand why anyone would be against a movie that was against human trafficking. As usual, I just got called QAnon and deleted, so I stopped paying attention to this thread and I apologize if this has been brought up-- I haven't read the whole thread.

If you're like me, someone who is like "why the hell would you have a problem with people fighting human trafficking?!", listen to the podcast Believable: The Coco Berthmann Story. They talk about truth and lies in human trafficking and how there are some self-glorifying people who raise money and buy ridiculous things like helicopters for rescue missions that never happen, while other organizations raise money for rent for recently escaped survivors. Very helpful in understanding the issue.

If this is a common experience for you... maybe you really are a conspiracy theory nutbag?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay, I weighed in on this thread early bc I couldn't understand why anyone would be against a movie that was against human trafficking. As usual, I just got called QAnon and deleted, so I stopped paying attention to this thread and I apologize if this has been brought up-- I haven't read the whole thread.

If you're like me, someone who is like "why the hell would you have a problem with people fighting human trafficking?!", listen to the podcast Believable: The Coco Berthmann Story. They talk about truth and lies in human trafficking and how there are some self-glorifying people who raise money and buy ridiculous things like helicopters for rescue missions that never happen, while other organizations raise money for rent for recently escaped survivors. Very helpful in understanding the issue.

If this is a common experience for you... maybe you really are a conspiracy theory nutbag?

I meant as usual for this thread. Settle down.