Drag Queen Story Hours

Anonymous
As long as it is all voluntary and appropriately advertised, then I don’t see the problem.

If people want to take their kids to this, that’s okay. If people don’t want to take their kids, that’s okay too. What is not okay is if people are not provided options to decide for themselves.

So I would not be a fan of the public library just advertising a “story hour” and you would not be able to know if it was or was not a “drag queen story hour”.

It is important to distinguish this from just a trans person reading stories, which is different because a “drag queen” is a specific persona and in effect a costume.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They’re fun. That’s it. There’s nothing sexual about them


If you say so. Do you ever ask yourself why these men want to be around young children. If they were not dressed up in these outfits would you still take your kids to see a random man read stories. For some reason the customers and make up somehow make it acceptable.


Ding ding ding

What percent of child abuse is committed by men who first try to blur kids’ boundaries around sex?

Not every drag queen is a danger, but many people who really are a danger would be interested in being in that kind of situation

Some decisions are pretty easy



How is reading books sexual?


Being deliberately obtuse isn’t going to get you anywhere


Seriously. How is a drag queen reading a book sexual? Or “blurring boundaries”?


If you don’t think a man dressing as an over the top woman is blurring boundaries, I don’t know what to tell you.


+1

Agree. But I would go a step further and argue that drag queens are not just males performing femininity, but they are males pantomiming female sexuality. That is what drag queens do, and that is what drag performance is all about. Their personas don't exist in a benign non-sexualized context like a Disney princess. Drag Queens have always blurred the lines between what is and is not acceptable. And DQSH is now blurring boundaries between adult entertainment and child entertainment, between traditionally adult sexual themes and "family-friendly". Teaching your kids that Drag Queens (adult males who perform female sexuality) are for children is very much desensitizing your kids to appropriate boundaries and behavior regarding sex. And your child can't consent.


YES. THIS. x1,000,000.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What is drag? Is it a man who feels excited by dressing as a woman (plenty of info out there indicating this is the case for many)? Is drag about performing (which seems to indicate a level of inauthenticity)….listening to some of you act like drag queer story time is the greatest thing ever, yet you supporters cantor even seem to agree on what exactly this thing is.


No, drag is not crossdressing.


What is it then?


Do you really not know?

You can google it.

Drag is a performance, like spiderman, or elsa, or clowning


...or exotic dancing, or striptease.


I’ve never seen Spider-Man on a pole but I believe you if you said it on the internet.

Did Elsa strip?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:As long as it is all voluntary and appropriately advertised, then I don’t see the problem.

If people want to take their kids to this, that’s okay. If people don’t want to take their kids, that’s okay too. What is not okay is if people are not provided options to decide for themselves.

So I would not be a fan of the public library just advertising a “story hour” and you would not be able to know if it was or was not a “drag queen story hour”.

It is important to distinguish this from just a trans person reading stories, which is different because a “drag queen” is a specific persona and in effect a costume.



That's an interesting point. But the library wouldn't need to disclose in advance that Elsa or Alice in Wonderland might show up at story time. Why is that, do you think? What is it about the persona of a Drag Queen that differentiates it from just any fictional female character? Could it be that they are males who are pantomiming female sexuality, and those personas exist to entertain adult patrons in adult spaces regarding sexual themes?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They’re fun. That’s it. There’s nothing sexual about them


If you say so. Do you ever ask yourself why these men want to be around young children. If they were not dressed up in these outfits would you still take your kids to see a random man read stories. For some reason the customers and make up somehow make it acceptable.


Ding ding ding

What percent of child abuse is committed by men who first try to blur kids’ boundaries around sex?

Not every drag queen is a danger, but many people who really are a danger would be interested in being in that kind of situation

Some decisions are pretty easy



How is reading books sexual?


Being deliberately obtuse isn’t going to get you anywhere


Seriously. How is a drag queen reading a book sexual? Or “blurring boundaries”?


If you don’t think a man dressing as an over the top woman is blurring boundaries, I don’t know what to tell you.


+1

Agree. But I would go a step further and argue that drag queens are not just males performing femininity, but they are males pantomiming female sexuality. That is what drag queens do, and that is what drag performance is all about. Their personas don't exist in a benign non-sexualized context like a Disney princess. Drag Queens have always blurred the lines between what is and is not acceptable. And DQSH is now blurring boundaries between adult entertainment and child entertainment, between traditionally adult sexual themes and "family-friendly". Teaching your kids that Drag Queens (adult males who perform female sexuality) are for children is very much desensitizing your kids to appropriate boundaries and behavior regarding sex. And your child can't consent.


Tell me you don't understand drag without telling me you don't understand drag.

And when someone has their kids watch The Little Mermaid, and Ursula comes onscreen with her gigantic boobs and gyrates around singing about "body language," is that also desensitizing your kids to appropriate boundaries and behavior regarding sex?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:As long as it is all voluntary and appropriately advertised, then I don’t see the problem.

If people want to take their kids to this, that’s okay. If people don’t want to take their kids, that’s okay too. What is not okay is if people are not provided options to decide for themselves.

So I would not be a fan of the public library just advertising a “story hour” and you would not be able to know if it was or was not a “drag queen story hour”.

It is important to distinguish this from just a trans person reading stories, which is different because a “drag queen” is a specific persona and in effect a costume.



That's an interesting point. But the library wouldn't need to disclose in advance that Elsa or Alice in Wonderland might show up at story time. Why is that, do you think? What is it about the persona of a Drag Queen that differentiates it from just any fictional female character? Could it be that they are males who are pantomiming female sexuality, and those personas exist to entertain adult patrons in adult spaces regarding sexual themes?


What? I would hope a library would give a head's up if they were having paid entertainers come to story time, regardless of their gender and/or the gender of the character they're portraying. Some (albeit fewer) parents are equally weird about Disney, let's be real. And I have never heard of a drag queen story time that wasn't advertised as such so the audience could self select. The performers probably don't want to deal with surprise hate either.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They’re fun. That’s it. There’s nothing sexual about them


If you say so. Do you ever ask yourself why these men want to be around young children. If they were not dressed up in these outfits would you still take your kids to see a random man read stories. For some reason the customers and make up somehow make it acceptable.


Ding ding ding

What percent of child abuse is committed by men who first try to blur kids’ boundaries around sex?

Not every drag queen is a danger, but many people who really are a danger would be interested in being in that kind of situation

Some decisions are pretty easy



How is reading books sexual?


Being deliberately obtuse isn’t going to get you anywhere


Seriously. How is a drag queen reading a book sexual? Or “blurring boundaries”?


If you don’t think a man dressing as an over the top woman is blurring boundaries, I don’t know what to tell you.


+1

Agree. But I would go a step further and argue that drag queens are not just males performing femininity, but they are males pantomiming female sexuality. That is what drag queens do, and that is what drag performance is all about. Their personas don't exist in a benign non-sexualized context like a Disney princess. Drag Queens have always blurred the lines between what is and is not acceptable. And DQSH is now blurring boundaries between adult entertainment and child entertainment, between traditionally adult sexual themes and "family-friendly". Teaching your kids that Drag Queens (adult males who perform female sexuality) are for children is very much desensitizing your kids to appropriate boundaries and behavior regarding sex. And your child can't consent.


Tell me you don't understand drag without telling me you don't understand drag.

And when someone has their kids watch The Little Mermaid, and Ursula comes onscreen with her gigantic boobs and gyrates around singing about "body language," is that also desensitizing your kids to appropriate boundaries and behavior regarding sex?


FWIW, I didnt let my daughter watch that either. The message of "I can get him to love me as long as I shut up and be pretty" wasn't the best. We kept Beautiy & the Beast out of our house too, bc the message "If I just love him hard enough, he'll stop abusing me" wasn't ok either.

I also wouldnt take my daughter to a drag story hour.

It feels performative and more for the benefit of the parents than the actual kid. I'm not going to let people use my kid as a pawn in their social media competitions
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are women allowed to cancel drag queens for cultural appropriation?


No. Most ‘progressive’ liberals have a very high tolerance for misogyny.


No one has explained how drag shows where performers dance to Cher, Beyonce, and Dolly is misogyny. Saying it is isn't evidence or an argument.

Keep in mine drag queens love these performers because they are naturally over the top feminine. Does that mean Dolly, Cher, and Bey are also misogynists and unworthy of feminist consideration?
Or--is it maybe juat people using feminism in the most venal way possible as a cloak for their bigotry?


People have explained multiple times, but you just don’t want to learn or listen. Of course, that is consistent behavior for a misogynist.

In any case, there has been years and years of feminist discussion about the misogyny and sexism of drag, which a minimal amount of time on Google and feminist publications could have found for you, if you were actually interested in learning what feminists thought, and not just in shutting down conversation. Here are two links, for instance (and there are deeper discussions in feminist journals):

https://www.feministcurrent.com/2014/04/25/why-has-drag-escaped-critique-from-feminists-and-the-lgbtq-community/
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/gay-men-lgbt-50th-anniversary-misogyny-rupaul-drag-race-fishy-queen-lesbians-a7862516.html

These articles came up in the first page of searching. I spent 30 seconds on it. If you really wanted to understand why some feminists consider drag deeply misogynist, you could have taken the time to learn before whining about how nobody has explained it to you (which is objectively false).

But you just want to shut women’s opinions down.




Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are women allowed to cancel drag queens for cultural appropriation?


No, they're lower in the hierarchy without a little intersectionality thrown in.

It's a clever move by some of these men.

+1. Women aren't allowed to say jack. Especially when trans women come into our spaces and behave as though their experiences have been the same as ours. I think anyone should be able to live as they wish, but labeling bio women as hateful terfs if they refuse to deny science is misogyny at its finest.


You know, you could extend empathy and sympathy for what it must be like for trans women to have lived their lives feeling "wrong." They have a different, yet also difficult, set of experiences. Your statement also assumes all women are the same and have shared the same experiences...and we haven't. Not even close.

For some reason that I still have yet to understand, trans women can't be let into your feminism club because they haven't lived exactly like you. But strippers, sex workers, athletes, celibates, celebrity women, butch women, disabled women, disfigured women, lesbians, academics, conservatives, liberals, religious ladies, nuns, have all lived way different lives from me. Way different. All I share with them is a double X, yet I can recognize that their struggles, while different than mine, are still women's struggles.


A trans woman, who has not had the same lifetime experience as me, has had her own struggles living in the wrong body and now adjusting to a new life. I accept her as willingly into that club, as all these other women so vastly different from me, even if she doesn't have the right chromosomes, because she has still experienced similar struggles---what does it mean to be an authentic you and an authentic women while people see what they want to see--not who you are.

Why is this so hard for some people? Why do you feel threatened?



My sister suffers from an eating disorder. I don’t stick my fingers down her throat to let her know I empathize with the fact that she doesn’t feel right in her body.

You can be kind to people without catering to their internal struggle.

Given the over the top nature of drag performances, we aren’t talking about people quietly struggling with themselves. We are talking about people actively seeking attention however they can get it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are women allowed to cancel drag queens for cultural appropriation?


No, they're lower in the hierarchy without a little intersectionality thrown in.

It's a clever move by some of these men.

+1. Women aren't allowed to say jack. Especially when trans women come into our spaces and behave as though their experiences have been the same as ours. I think anyone should be able to live as they wish, but labeling bio women as hateful terfs if they refuse to deny science is misogyny at its finest.


You know, you could extend empathy and sympathy for what it must be like for trans women to have lived their lives feeling "wrong." They have a different, yet also difficult, set of experiences. Your statement also assumes all women are the same and have shared the same experiences...and we haven't. Not even close.

For some reason that I still have yet to understand, trans women can't be let into your feminism club because they haven't lived exactly like you. But strippers, sex workers, athletes, celibates, celebrity women, butch women, disabled women, disfigured women, lesbians, academics, conservatives, liberals, religious ladies, nuns, have all lived way different lives from me. Way different. All I share with them is a double X, yet I can recognize that their struggles, while different than mine, are still women's struggles.


A trans woman, who has not had the same lifetime experience as me, has had her own struggles living in the wrong body and now adjusting to a new life. I accept her as willingly into that club, as all these other women so vastly different from me, even if she doesn't have the right chromosomes, because she has still experienced similar struggles---what does it mean to be an authentic you and an authentic women while people see what they want to see--not who you are.

Why is this so hard for some people? Why do you feel threatened?



My sister suffers from an eating disorder. I don’t stick my fingers down her throat to let her know I empathize with the fact that she doesn’t feel right in her body.

You can be kind to people without catering to their internal struggle.

Given the over the top nature of drag performances, we aren’t talking about people quietly struggling with themselves. We are talking about people actively seeking attention however they can get it.


Was this particular chain of responses deleted? I’m having trouble finding the original response.
If not, what exactly is an “authentic woman” (as the PPP called it)?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:As long as it is all voluntary and appropriately advertised, then I don’t see the problem.

If people want to take their kids to this, that’s okay. If people don’t want to take their kids, that’s okay too. What is not okay is if people are not provided options to decide for themselves.

So I would not be a fan of the public library just advertising a “story hour” and you would not be able to know if it was or was not a “drag queen story hour”.

It is important to distinguish this from just a trans person reading stories, which is different because a “drag queen” is a specific persona and in effect a costume.



That's an interesting point. But the library wouldn't need to disclose in advance that Elsa or Alice in Wonderland might show up at story time. Why is that, do you think? What is it about the persona of a Drag Queen that differentiates it from just any fictional female character? Could it be that they are males who are pantomiming female sexuality, and those personas exist to entertain adult patrons in adult spaces regarding sexual themes?


A drag performer is traditionally a cisgender gay man. Some trans people as well as cisgender women do drag now as well. The thing that some people that aren't familiar with drag don't seem to understand is that a drag queen is a character putting on a performance.

A trans woman normally takes hormones which changes the shape of her body/face and make her grow breasts as well as a host of other things that happen on estrogen. There are a lot of possible surgeries that trans women can get. Some get all, some get none. Trans women live their entire lives as women. Sometimes you'll see a really cringy looking trans woman but that's usually early in transition. After a few years, most have the goal of just blending in as best as they can because they just want to live a normal life like they did before. But now as a woman because that matches how they felt inside.

When a drag queen takes off the costume, he's a man under it. A trans woman looks like (or does her best to look like) and lives as a woman all the time.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are women allowed to cancel drag queens for cultural appropriation?


No, they're lower in the hierarchy without a little intersectionality thrown in.

It's a clever move by some of these men.

+1. Women aren't allowed to say jack. Especially when trans women come into our spaces and behave as though their experiences have been the same as ours. I think anyone should be able to live as they wish, but labeling bio women as hateful terfs if they refuse to deny science is misogyny at its finest.


You know, you could extend empathy and sympathy for what it must be like for trans women to have lived their lives feeling "wrong." They have a different, yet also difficult, set of experiences. Your statement also assumes all women are the same and have shared the same experiences...and we haven't. Not even close.

For some reason that I still have yet to understand, trans women can't be let into your feminism club because they haven't lived exactly like you. But strippers, sex workers, athletes, celibates, celebrity women, butch women, disabled women, disfigured women, lesbians, academics, conservatives, liberals, religious ladies, nuns, have all lived way different lives from me. Way different. All I share with them is a double X, yet I can recognize that their struggles, while different than mine, are still women's struggles.


A trans woman, who has not had the same lifetime experience as me, has had her own struggles living in the wrong body and now adjusting to a new life. I accept her as willingly into that club, as all these other women so vastly different from me, even if she doesn't have the right chromosomes, because she has still experienced similar struggles---what does it mean to be an authentic you and an authentic women while people see what they want to see--not who you are.

Why is this so hard for some people? Why do you feel threatened?



My sister suffers from an eating disorder. I don’t stick my fingers down her throat to let her know I empathize with the fact that she doesn’t feel right in her body.

You can be kind to people without catering to their internal struggle.

Given the over the top nature of drag performances, we aren’t talking about people quietly struggling with themselves. We are talking about people actively seeking attention however they can get it.


And we are talking about performances that aren’t benign, that rely on and feed truly harmful stereotypes of women for the sake of entertainment.

Being kind doesn’t mean being a doormat. It does not mean accepting grotesque minstrel performances of women as “funny.” It does not mean letting men mock the physical body of women for entertainment while that same body that has been the target of a millennia of violence from men.

We can stand up and say no. We can point out that while you (top PP) are lecturing us on being kind, you’re only really extending kindness to men. We can observe the hypocrisy, the performative mentality, the astonishing privilege on display. You can’t shut women’s language down and women’s thoughts down by telling us to “be kind.” That is, in the end, so very typically male: just shut up and let the men speak.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Thanks for starting the discussion OP. I’ve looked into it more reading this discussion and we’re definitely going to check it out at our local library.


Enjoy! For a sexier version, I'd also suggest seeing one at a bar.


What do you mean? I’ve been to a lot of drag shows at bars. They’re not usually particularly sexy, just raunchy like any other adult show.


np Doesn't raunchy=sexy?
Anonymous
How are these performers being compensated when they perform at public libraries and how much?
Anonymous
From the MOcO Library website:

Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH) is just what it sounds like—drag queens reading stories to children in libraries, schools, and bookstores. DQSH captures the imagination and play of the gender fluidity of childhood and gives kids glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models.


In spaces like this, kids are able to see people who defy rigid gender restrictions and imagine a world where people can present as they wish and where dress-up is real.
Forum Index » Off-Topic
Go to: