Good point on how the terminology influences the student composition. Used to be G&T programs and I suspect most people still view it as a G&T program for all practical purposes. |
Those are just a play of words. If that makes sense. GT program is what is being watered down for past few years. |
What an irony |
|
The thing is they aren't watering down anything. It turns out the 85% do just fine. |
Oy.
|
I don't agree with the watering down comment but I don't think we know yet. |
Makes sense mathematically. 2>1, 95>85. |
NBA rosters show an average height of 6-foot-6 But the very tallest of them last year (7-foot-6) was the lowest paid of them all. Use your math to explain that |
Yes but when 95 just means some kid attended Doc LI's it really means 85 = 95. |
|
Whether or not you did a prep class does not matter
You speak as though these tests were pipettes and as though MCPS was creating designer DNA babies. It is just middle school folks. |
| MCPS is simply incapable of addressing the problem with limited seats in "magnet" programs when there are so many capable kids. The very fact that there are so few parents that turn down an invitation to TPMS or Eastern is all that one needs to see for evidence. MCPS lies through their teeth about enrichment at local MS when we can all see that they dont even offer computer science education at any local MS other than the magnets. If "magnets" cannot accommodate the highly capable kids, MCPS should just offer parents the option to drive their kids to the "W" feeder middle schools (where the affluence helps raise the bar) or time to start charters. |
That isn't true. There are middle school computer science classes available as electives. |
Excuses
|
You just proved the point. All NBAers are in the 99 percentile height category. |