ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It takes less time to jump backwards than it does to unholster a weapon, aim, and shoot -- plus it means you are no longer in the path of what may now be an uncontrolled vehicle.

Shooting doesn't make sense as a defense.

He was panicked and acted within a split second.

If that situation caused him to panic he has no business doing that job. It is painfully obvious ICE agents are utterly incompetent and now another person is dead because of it.

[Anonymous]

Did her wife even get in the car? It looks like her wife couldn’t open the door then noticed the officer trying to open driver door and yelled at Good to “drive, drive” the moment the other officer was going around the car, presumably to assist the other officer

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It takes less time to jump backwards than it does to unholster a weapon, aim, and shoot -- plus it means you are no longer in the path of what may now be an uncontrolled vehicle.

Shooting doesn't make sense as a defense.

He was panicked and acted within a split second.

He demonstrated nothing that looked like panic. Nothing. He kept filming with his cellphone the entire time. Hardly the behavior of a panicked person or a person in fear for their life.

Give up already. It's obvious by now that what happened was a mistake and not murder.

[Anonymous]

ICE = LEOs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It takes less time to jump backwards than it does to unholster a weapon, aim, and shoot -- plus it means you are no longer in the path of what may now be an uncontrolled vehicle.

Shooting doesn't make sense as a defense.

He was panicked and acted within a split second.

If that situation caused him to panic he has no business doing that job. It is painfully obvious ICE agents are utterly incompetent and now another person is dead because of it.

That’s not why this person is dead. If she had been anywhere else other than putting herself at risk willfully she would be home with her family tonight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
It takes less time to jump backwards than it does to unholster a weapon, aim, and shoot -- plus it means you are no longer in the path of what may now be an uncontrolled vehicle.

Shooting doesn't make sense as a defense.

The car was turning right, away from him. Shooting actually made the vehicle veered off towards him and others if there were any behind him. It makes zero sense to shoot for safety reasons.

Let the jury decide.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are you allowed to control the movement and actions of LEOs using your vehicle?

OMG lol…. The posts are getting just preposterous now!

There you go folks, you can execute someone in the middle of the street for controlling the movement of a law-enforcement officer using your vehicle.

This person is clearly watched several episodes of Law and order!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It takes less time to jump backwards than it does to unholster a weapon, aim, and shoot -- plus it means you are no longer in the path of what may now be an uncontrolled vehicle.

Shooting doesn't make sense as a defense.

He was panicked and acted within a split second.

And proceeded to murder her through the driver side window.

Not all killing is murder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the new video shows that the wife was trying to push all his buttons. She pissed him off enough that he reacted by shooting the victim. I see ZERO evidence that his life was in danger nor evidence that she was "weaponizing her vehicle", in fact it is now clearer that she was leaving the scene.

Just because the wife was mouthing off was NOT a reason to use deadly force.

It isn’t a justification but it shows how stupid and unhinged the people trying to obstruct ICE are.

I don’t think the shooting was justified, but WTF were they trying to accomplish exactly?

Who goes out and tries to antagonize and pick a fight with law enforcement trying to do their job? If I don’t like speeding enforcement should I follow state troopers around screaming at them, holding a cell phone in their face, and blowing whistles next to them all day?

The officers are doing what they are told. They can’t just decide not to do their job because you disagree with it. Of course they should try to stay cool… but they are also human and if you put them under enough pressure long someone will lose their cool.

There is no evidence the she was doing any of that, but generally, that would be an act of civil disobedience. The people assuming some risk to help right a wrong.

It doesn’t mean that you’ll get to murder someone, no matter how broken and pathetic you are.

It's stupid like running into a busy highway and illegal

Wait, are you talking about the cops illegally standing in the roadway now?

Amazing.

Yes, charge them with that too.

What's going to happen is the national guard will be deployed to protect ice from the lunatics it's clear miniapolis police aren't doing their job. I look forward to it.

Wait - National Guard thugs will be deployed by Walz ?!?!

[Anonymous]

She literally said ‘I am not mad at you’ seconds before he blew her head off. How does that show she is ‘unhinged’

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It takes less time to jump backwards than it does to unholster a weapon, aim, and shoot -- plus it means you are no longer in the path of what may now be an uncontrolled vehicle.

Shooting doesn't make sense as a defense.

He was panicked and acted within a split second.

He demonstrated nothing that looked like panic. Nothing. He kept filming with his cellphone the entire time. Hardly the behavior of a panicked person or a person in fear for their life.

Give up already. It's obvious by now that what happened was a mistake and not murder.

Then let a jury acquit him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It takes less time to jump backwards than it does to unholster a weapon, aim, and shoot -- plus it means you are no longer in the path of what may now be an uncontrolled vehicle.

Shooting doesn't make sense as a defense.

He was panicked and acted within a split second.

He demonstrated nothing that looked like panic. Nothing. He kept filming with his cellphone the entire time. Hardly the behavior of a panicked person or a person in fear for their life.

Give up already. It's obvious by now that what happened was a mistake and not murder.

You do you. Firing into a driver side window twice can certainly be argued as murder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think this would be going better for the admin if ICE wasn’t regularly doing terrible stuff. Nationally they aren’t respected anymore.

Half the country supports what they are doing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It takes less time to jump backwards than it does to unholster a weapon, aim, and shoot -- plus it means you are no longer in the path of what may now be an uncontrolled vehicle.

Shooting doesn't make sense as a defense.

He was panicked and acted within a split second.

Manslaughter then?

Perhaps.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It takes less time to jump backwards than it does to unholster a weapon, aim, and shoot -- plus it means you are no longer in the path of what may now be an uncontrolled vehicle.

Shooting doesn't make sense as a defense.

He was panicked and acted within a split second.

And proceeded to murder her through the driver side window.

Not all killing is murder.

That’s up to the jury to decide.