DMV Preseason Rankings

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fcv Youtube dad - Post some rankings we can argue about.

Not Fcv Youtube dad but as far as club rankings go in this area:

FCV NUMBER 1

.......

Every other club a distant 2nd or worse.

There are a few teams in individual age groups that could hold their own but no club that would win the majority of games against FCV U13-U19.

This isn’t exactly high praise of FCV by the way. Once FCV gets out of the region they fall flat on their face.

What do describe as flat on their face?

Because FCV 05 won one and tied one against strong California teams.

04 won one and lost two.

U16/17 went 1-1-1

U18/19 went 1-1-1

04 looks a little disappointing but they also earlier this year beat a team that qualified for semifinals next week.

U16/17 likely better than expected given they were lowest seed in group and have a few missing playing up.

U18/19 lost last game to get eliminated after only needing a tie - game was close one and only ended up 3-0 late as FCV pushed everyone up to try to score and got burned doing it.

This seems far from falling on their face especially given the very high level opponents being faced and the advantage west coast teams have in terms of travel.

Which in that environment projected out a ten game season would make FCV very average.

Not in this area. Put any ECNL team in those groups and no one other than McLean 00/01 even has a chance to be competitive.

No 05 team. No 04 team. And no 03/02 team even Mikey’s vaunted BRYC 03s. They have relied on athleticism. His lack of coaching/training experience has led to those players getting caught and passed. Truth hurts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fcv Youtube dad - Post some rankings we can argue about.

Not Fcv Youtube dad but as far as club rankings go in this area:

FCV NUMBER 1

.......

Every other club a distant 2nd or worse.

There are a few teams in individual age groups that could hold their own but no club that would win the majority of games against FCV U13-U19.

This isn’t exactly high praise of FCV by the way. Once FCV gets out of the region they fall flat on their face.

What do describe as flat on their face?

Because FCV 05 won one and tied one against strong California teams.

04 won one and lost two.

U16/17 went 1-1-1

U18/19 went 1-1-1

04 looks a little disappointing but they also earlier this year beat a team that qualified for semifinals next week.

U16/17 likely better than expected given they were lowest seed in group and have a few missing playing up.

U18/19 lost last game to get eliminated after only needing a tie - game was close one and only ended up 3-0 late as FCV pushed everyone up to try to score and got burned doing it.

This seems far from falling on their face especially given the very high level opponents being faced and the advantage west coast teams have in terms of travel.

Now the metric is performance against California teams?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fcv Youtube dad - Post some rankings we can argue about.

Not Fcv Youtube dad but as far as club rankings go in this area:

FCV NUMBER 1

.......

Every other club a distant 2nd or worse.

There are a few teams in individual age groups that could hold their own but no club that would win the majority of games against FCV U13-U19.

This isn’t exactly high praise of FCV by the way. Once FCV gets out of the region they fall flat on their face.

What do describe as flat on their face?

Because FCV 05 won one and tied one against strong California teams.

04 won one and lost two.

U16/17 went 1-1-1

U18/19 went 1-1-1

04 looks a little disappointing but they also earlier this year beat a team that qualified for semifinals next week.

U16/17 likely better than expected given they were lowest seed in group and have a few missing playing up.

U18/19 lost last game to get eliminated after only needing a tie - game was close one and only ended up 3-0 late as FCV pushed everyone up to try to score and got burned doing it.

This seems far from falling on their face especially given the very high level opponents being faced and the advantage west coast teams have in terms of travel.

Now the metric is performance against California teams?

To be a top club the metric is always compared to the best. Big fish, small pond.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fcv Youtube dad - Post some rankings we can argue about.

Not Fcv Youtube dad but as far as club rankings go in this area:

FCV NUMBER 1

.......

Every other club a distant 2nd or worse.

There are a few teams in individual age groups that could hold their own but no club that would win the majority of games against FCV U13-U19.

This isn’t exactly high praise of FCV by the way. Once FCV gets out of the region they fall flat on their face.

What do describe as flat on their face?

Because FCV 05 won one and tied one against strong California teams.

04 won one and lost two.

U16/17 went 1-1-1

U18/19 went 1-1-1

04 looks a little disappointing but they also earlier this year beat a team that qualified for semifinals next week.

U16/17 likely better than expected given they were lowest seed in group and have a few missing playing up.

U18/19 lost last game to get eliminated after only needing a tie - game was close one and only ended up 3-0 late as FCV pushed everyone up to try to score and got burned doing it.

This seems far from falling on their face especially given the very high level opponents being faced and the advantage west coast teams have in terms of travel.

Now the metric is performance against California teams?

The question is whether any of the local ECNL teams could do more than be bottom dwellers in the GDA even the supposedly weak MA GDA division. Other than McLean 00/01 the answer is NO. So if you take pleasure in FCV struggling how do you feel when that struggling FCV would dominate every other team in the area? How bad are these other teams when they get dominated by that struggling FCV team? You sound like a resentful little whiner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fcv Youtube dad - Post some rankings we can argue about.

Not Fcv Youtube dad but as far as club rankings go in this area:

FCV NUMBER 1

.......

Every other club a distant 2nd or worse.

There are a few teams in individual age groups that could hold their own but no club that would win the majority of games against FCV U13-U19.

This isn’t exactly high praise of FCV by the way. Once FCV gets out of the region they fall flat on their face.

What do describe as flat on their face?

Because FCV 05 won one and tied one against strong California teams.

04 won one and lost two.

U16/17 went 1-1-1

U18/19 went 1-1-1

04 looks a little disappointing but they also earlier this year beat a team that qualified for semifinals next week.

U16/17 likely better than expected given they were lowest seed in group and have a few missing playing up.

U18/19 lost last game to get eliminated after only needing a tie - game was close one and only ended up 3-0 late as FCV pushed everyone up to try to score and got burned doing it.

This seems far from falling on their face especially given the very high level opponents being faced and the advantage west coast teams have in terms of travel.

Now the metric is performance against California teams?

The question is whether any of the local ECNL teams could do more than be bottom dwellers in the GDA even the supposedly weak MA GDA division. Other than McLean 00/01 the answer is NO. So if you take pleasure in FCV struggling how do you feel when that struggling FCV would dominate every other team in the area? How bad are these other teams when they get dominated by that struggling FCV team? You sound like a resentful little whiner.

Congrats FCV, you’re the best of the worst

[Anonymous]

Who gives AF.

Bunch of wankers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fcv Youtube dad - Post some rankings we can argue about.

Not Fcv Youtube dad but as far as club rankings go in this area:

FCV NUMBER 1

.......

Every other club a distant 2nd or worse.

There are a few teams in individual age groups that could hold their own but no club that would win the majority of games against FCV U13-U19.

This isn’t exactly high praise of FCV by the way. Once FCV gets out of the region they fall flat on their face.

What do describe as flat on their face?

Because FCV 05 won one and tied one against strong California teams.

04 won one and lost two.

U16/17 went 1-1-1

U18/19 went 1-1-1

04 looks a little disappointing but they also earlier this year beat a team that qualified for semifinals next week.

U16/17 likely better than expected given they were lowest seed in group and have a few missing playing up.

U18/19 lost last game to get eliminated after only needing a tie - game was close one and only ended up 3-0 late as FCV pushed everyone up to try to score and got burned doing it.

This seems far from falling on their face especially given the very high level opponents being faced and the advantage west coast teams have in terms of travel.

Now the metric is performance against California teams?

The question is whether any of the local ECNL teams could do more than be bottom dwellers in the GDA even the supposedly weak MA GDA division. Other than McLean 00/01 the answer is NO. So if you take pleasure in FCV struggling how do you feel when that struggling FCV would dominate every other team in the area? How bad are these other teams when they get dominated by that struggling FCV team? You sound like a resentful little whiner.

How bad are these other teams when they get dominated by that struggling FCV team?

We'll likely never know, but its fun to hear you get worked up like you're some kind of know-it-all about DMV youth soccer...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fcv Youtube dad - Post some rankings we can argue about.

Not Fcv Youtube dad but as far as club rankings go in this area:

FCV NUMBER 1

.......

Every other club a distant 2nd or worse.

There are a few teams in individual age groups that could hold their own but no club that would win the majority of games against FCV U13-U19.

This isn’t exactly high praise of FCV by the way. Once FCV gets out of the region they fall flat on their face.

What do describe as flat on their face?

Because FCV 05 won one and tied one against strong California teams.

04 won one and lost two.

U16/17 went 1-1-1

U18/19 went 1-1-1

04 looks a little disappointing but they also earlier this year beat a team that qualified for semifinals next week.

U16/17 likely better than expected given they were lowest seed in group and have a few missing playing up.

U18/19 lost last game to get eliminated after only needing a tie - game was close one and only ended up 3-0 late as FCV pushed everyone up to try to score and got burned doing it.

This seems far from falling on their face especially given the very high level opponents being faced and the advantage west coast teams have in terms of travel.

Which in that environment projected out a ten game season would make FCV very average.

Not in this area. Put any ECNL team in those groups and no one other than McLean 00/01 even has a chance to be competitive.

No 05 team. No 04 team. And no 03/02 team even Mikey’s vaunted BRYC 03s. They have relied on athleticism. His lack of coaching/training experience has led to those players getting caught and passed. Truth hurts.

Not to worry, Mikey has jettisoned the girls who were holding the team back and replaced them with new, better girls that have been developed at other clubs.
If next isn't different there are always more girls from other clubs to replace the problems girls from this year who will be summarily dismissed but they don't meet his standards. Whatever they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fcv Youtube dad - Post some rankings we can argue about.

Not Fcv Youtube dad but as far as club rankings go in this area:

FCV NUMBER 1

.......

Every other club a distant 2nd or worse.

There are a few teams in individual age groups that could hold their own but no club that would win the majority of games against FCV U13-U19.

This isn’t exactly high praise of FCV by the way. Once FCV gets out of the region they fall flat on their face.

What do describe as flat on their face?

Because FCV 05 won one and tied one against strong California teams.

04 won one and lost two.

U16/17 went 1-1-1

U18/19 went 1-1-1

04 looks a little disappointing but they also earlier this year beat a team that qualified for semifinals next week.

U16/17 likely better than expected given they were lowest seed in group and have a few missing playing up.

U18/19 lost last game to get eliminated after only needing a tie - game was close one and only ended up 3-0 late as FCV pushed everyone up to try to score and got burned doing it.

This seems far from falling on their face especially given the very high level opponents being faced and the advantage west coast teams have in terms of travel.

Which in that environment projected out a ten game season would make FCV very average.

Not in this area. Put any ECNL team in those groups and no one other than McLean 00/01 even has a chance to be competitive.

No 05 team. No 04 team. And no 03/02 team even Mikey’s vaunted BRYC 03s. They have relied on athleticism. His lack of coaching/training experience has led to those players getting caught and passed. Truth hurts.

Not to worry, Mikey has jettisoned the girls who were holding the team back and replaced them with new, better girls that have been developed at other clubs.
If next isn't different there are always more girls from other clubs to replace the problems girls from this year who will be summarily dismissed but they don't meet his standards. Whatever they are.

The FCV way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fcv Youtube dad - Post some rankings we can argue about.

Not Fcv Youtube dad but as far as club rankings go in this area:

FCV NUMBER 1

.......

Every other club a distant 2nd or worse.

There are a few teams in individual age groups that could hold their own but no club that would win the majority of games against FCV U13-U19.

This isn’t exactly high praise of FCV by the way. Once FCV gets out of the region they fall flat on their face.

What do describe as flat on their face?

Because FCV 05 won one and tied one against strong California teams.

04 won one and lost two.

U16/17 went 1-1-1

U18/19 went 1-1-1

04 looks a little disappointing but they also earlier this year beat a team that qualified for semifinals next week.

U16/17 likely better than expected given they were lowest seed in group and have a few missing playing up.

U18/19 lost last game to get eliminated after only needing a tie - game was close one and only ended up 3-0 late as FCV pushed everyone up to try to score and got burned doing it.

This seems far from falling on their face especially given the very high level opponents being faced and the advantage west coast teams have in terms of travel.

Now the metric is performance against California teams?

The question is whether any of the local ECNL teams could do more than be bottom dwellers in the GDA even the supposedly weak MA GDA division. Other than McLean 00/01 the answer is NO. So if you take pleasure in FCV struggling how do you feel when that struggling FCV would dominate every other team in the area? How bad are these other teams when they get dominated by that struggling FCV team? You sound like a resentful little whiner.

Why don’t Bobby play any scrimmages against the lowly ecnl teams then?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fcv Youtube dad - Post some rankings we can argue about.

Not Fcv Youtube dad but as far as club rankings go in this area:

FCV NUMBER 1

.......

Every other club a distant 2nd or worse.

There are a few teams in individual age groups that could hold their own but no club that would win the majority of games against FCV U13-U19.

This isn’t exactly high praise of FCV by the way. Once FCV gets out of the region they fall flat on their face.

What do describe as flat on their face?

Because FCV 05 won one and tied one against strong California teams.

04 won one and lost two.

U16/17 went 1-1-1

U18/19 went 1-1-1

04 looks a little disappointing but they also earlier this year beat a team that qualified for semifinals next week.

U16/17 likely better than expected given they were lowest seed in group and have a few missing playing up.

U18/19 lost last game to get eliminated after only needing a tie - game was close one and only ended up 3-0 late as FCV pushed everyone up to try to score and got burned doing it.

This seems far from falling on their face especially given the very high level opponents being faced and the advantage west coast teams have in terms of travel.

Now the metric is performance against California teams?

The question is whether any of the local ECNL teams could do more than be bottom dwellers in the GDA even the supposedly weak MA GDA division. Other than McLean 00/01 the answer is NO. So if you take pleasure in FCV struggling how do you feel when that struggling FCV would dominate every other team in the area? How bad are these other teams when they get dominated by that struggling FCV team? You sound like a resentful little whiner.

Why don’t Bobby play any scrimmages against the lowly ecnl teams then?

Just stop asking him. And stop complaining that he doesn’t accept, it makes him feel more relevant than he is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fcv Youtube dad - Post some rankings we can argue about.

Not Fcv Youtube dad but as far as club rankings go in this area:

FCV NUMBER 1

.......

Every other club a distant 2nd or worse.

There are a few teams in individual age groups that could hold their own but no club that would win the majority of games against FCV U13-U19.

This isn’t exactly high praise of FCV by the way. Once FCV gets out of the region they fall flat on their face.

What do describe as flat on their face?

Losing 0:5 against PDA for example.

In a national championship game. What about losing 0:7 and then having a parent brawl? #thefutureisfcv #betterthanyesterday #worldclass

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fcv Youtube dad - Post some rankings we can argue about.

Not Fcv Youtube dad but as far as club rankings go in this area:

FCV NUMBER 1

.......

Every other club a distant 2nd or worse.

There are a few teams in individual age groups that could hold their own but no club that would win the majority of games against FCV U13-U19.

This isn’t exactly high praise of FCV by the way. Once FCV gets out of the region they fall flat on their face.

What do describe as flat on their face?

Because FCV 05 won one and tied one against strong California teams.

04 won one and lost two.

U16/17 went 1-1-1

U18/19 went 1-1-1

04 looks a little disappointing but they also earlier this year beat a team that qualified for semifinals next week.

U16/17 likely better than expected given they were lowest seed in group and have a few missing playing up.

U18/19 lost last game to get eliminated after only needing a tie - game was close one and only ended up 3-0 late as FCV pushed everyone up to try to score and got burned doing it.

This seems far from falling on their face especially given the very high level opponents being faced and the advantage west coast teams have in terms of travel.

Now the metric is performance against California teams?

The question is whether any of the local ECNL teams could do more than be bottom dwellers in the GDA even the supposedly weak MA GDA division. Other than McLean 00/01 the answer is NO. So if you take pleasure in FCV struggling how do you feel when that struggling FCV would dominate every other team in the area? How bad are these other teams when they get dominated by that struggling FCV team? You sound like a resentful little whiner.

Why don’t Bobby play any scrimmages against the lowly ecnl teams then?

They have. They just don’t advertise it.

[Anonymous]

2004

1. Fcv
2. Metro United
3. Arlington
4. Bethesda
5. Bryc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:2004

1. Fcv
2. Metro United
3. Arlington
4. Bethesda
5. Bryc

2004:

FCV
Arlington/Bethesda
BRYC
Metro