Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg shut up old man

Do you want the old lady to shut up now? You sound foolish. They are giving opening statements. Is this your first time following the news?

She can read. Grassley is an embarrassment.

And, Feinstein isn’t?
She couldn’t even own up to the responsibility of leaking the letter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Teach your kids to speak up when they are the target of assault, or witnesses anything that's not right.

Are you people doing this?

Want me to start naming names?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is he going to let her ever talk or what? I find his tone very dismissive.

It's called an opening statement. Hold your horses. Dianne will do the same.

She is...
She also just mispronounced ‘Blasey’

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Teach your kids to speak up when they are the target of assault, or witnesses anything that's not right.

Are you people doing this?

Guess what is the BEST way to teach them?

Believe victims who come forward. If we changed our reactions to victims coming forward it would DRAMATICALLY change the reporting stats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg shut up old man

Do you want the old lady to shut up now? You sound foolish. They are giving opening statements. Is this your first time following the news?

She can read. Grassley is an embarrassment.

Yeah. Grassley reads word for word and it's pathetic. Chuck Schumer does the same thing and I hate it from him, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg shut up old man

Do you want the old lady to shut up now? You sound foolish. They are giving opening statements. Is this your first time following the news?

She can read. Grassley is an embarrassment.

And, Feinstein isn’t?
She couldn’t even own up to the responsibility of leaking the letter.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG then he interrupts Feinstein!

he's poison for Republicans. The angry shopkeeper. What a crusty, shriveled old dick he is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad optics - old codger mansplaining to a woman about to talk about her terrifying assault.

What else is new! Pilots have to retire at age 65 ... so should these old white guy Senators.

Say that to Ginsburg.

[Anonymous]

It was supposed to be an introduction but Grassley tried to undermine the proceedings with his biased remarks.

[Anonymous]

It sounds as if Diane Feinstein has already made up her mind. She's not delivering an unbiased message.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:disgusting Feinstein

She's a hack. The FBI investigates sex crimes only if it's only federal property. Surely Feinstein knows that fact?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many women are on the SJC?
Why have they brought in a prosecutor to ask her questions?

Why are people commenting on Dr. Ford’s appearance? I’m sure the worry and death threats have caused her lots of lost sleep. Right now she looks like she’s super anxious, almost panting.

Did Grassley forget to take his medication?

Republicans - 0 of 11; Democrats - 4 of 11

Prosecutor is because they didn't like the way it would look and sound if a bunch of men were questioning her. Her lawyers did like the way that would look and sound and fought hard to make them question her.

Sorry, but any good trial lawyer could do the questioning. The fact that they chose a *prosecutor* tells us everything we need to know.

The Dems and her lawyers didn't want ANY lawyer at all. Well before this prosecutor was chosen, this was a sticking point that almost caused Ford to back out. They wanted the 11 men to do it, and they wanted it badly.

Initially, she claims she was reluctant to come because of being questioned by 11 male Republicans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad optics - old codger mansplaining to a woman about to talk about her terrifying assault.

What else is new! Pilots have to retire at age 65 ... so should these old white guy Senators.

Say that to Ginsburg.

and Feinstein

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:disgusting Feinstein

She's a hack. The FBI investigates sex crimes only if it's only federal property. Surely Feinstein knows that fact?

*on

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Feinstein just went through Ford's academic qualifications/CV and to me it just screams, why would someone so accomplished and comfortable in their career come forward with these allegations if they were false? I know it's been said. But it's just hard to believe people think she's somehow seeking fame when she could stick to what she obviously loves, doing research psychology in academia.

What struck me is Ford is a "mother of two sons". Not someone who wants to see boys lives ruined by unsubstantiated accusations.