Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone be interested in watching the hearing this morning should read Christine Blasey Ford’s opening statement.

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4945864/Ford-Testimony-2018-09-26.pdf

So after a few days of people picking the story apart, now she says, it was 4 boys, oh and I remember a girl, oh and I remember....

Please

This is not the case - her story is unchanged. She listed someone else at the ‘gathering ’ But didn’t say that they either assaulted her or witnessed it. What are you talking about? Can you not read?

Her letter to Feinstein said “me and 4 others.”

"Me and four others"? Is that how an educated woman with a fancy-schmancy education speaks?

Yes, when that phrase is a direct or indirect object rather than the subject.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many women are on the SJC?
Why have they brought in a prosecutor to ask her questions?

Why are people commenting on Dr. Ford’s appearance? I’m sure the worry and death threats have caused her lots of lost sleep. Right now she looks like she’s super anxious, almost panting.

Did Grassley forget to take his medication?

Republicans - 0 of 11; Democrats - 4 of 11

Prosecutor is because they didn't like the way it would look and sound if a bunch of men were questioning her. Her lawyers did like the way that would look and sound and fought hard to make them question her.

Sorry, but any good trial lawyer could do the questioning. The fact that they chose a *prosecutor* tells us everything we need to know.

[Anonymous]

OMG then he interrupts Feinstein!

[Anonymous]

disgusting Feinstein

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is he going to let her ever talk or what? I find his tone very dismissive.

It's called an opening statement. Hold your horses. Dianne will do the same.

I know what an opening statement is but his tone is ridiculously patronizing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg shut up old man

Do you want the old lady to shut up now? You sound foolish. They are giving opening statements. Is this your first time following the news?

She can read. Grassley is an embarrassment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict k as vanaugh will be confirmed and when Dems take House and Senate, he will be impeached!

For what? Unproven claims by liberals who don't want him in the Court because.....wait for it......abortion?

Perjury.

[Anonymous]

Feinstein just went through Ford's academic qualifications/CV and to me it just screams, why would someone so accomplished and comfortable in their career come forward with these allegations if they were false? I know it's been said. But it's just hard to believe people think she's somehow seeking fame when she could stick to what she obviously loves, doing research psychology in academia.

[Anonymous]

Teach your kids to speak up when they are the target of assault, or witnesses anything that's not right.

Are you people doing this?

[Anonymous]

Grassley did not introduce her and now he would interrupt Feinstein. Ridiculous. Why did he introduce the GOP side prosecutor in so much detail now and say he would introduce Dr. Ford later. He did not even bother to welcome Dr. Ford, smile or anything. He is such a scum!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many women are on the SJC?
Why have they brought in a prosecutor to ask her questions?

Why are people commenting on Dr. Ford’s appearance? I’m sure the worry and death threats have caused her lots of lost sleep. Right now she looks like she’s super anxious, almost panting.

Did Grassley forget to take his medication?

Republicans - 0 of 11; Democrats - 4 of 11

Prosecutor is because they didn't like the way it would look and sound if a bunch of men were questioning her. Her lawyers did like the way that would look and sound and fought hard to make them question her.

Sorry, but any good trial lawyer could do the questioning. The fact that they chose a *prosecutor* tells us everything we need to know.

The Dems and her lawyers didn't want ANY lawyer at all. Well before this prosecutor was chosen, this was a sticking point that almost caused Ford to back out. They wanted the 11 men to do it, and they wanted it badly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bad optics - old codger mansplaining to a woman about to talk about her terrifying assault.

What else is new! Pilots have to retire at age 65 ... so should these old white guy Senators.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg shut up old man

Do you want the old lady to shut up now? You sound foolish. They are giving opening statements. Is this your first time following the news?

She can read. Grassley is an embarrassment.

+1

Grassley's voice is intolerable, but the difficulty reading is especially annoying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Grassley did not introduce her and now he would interrupt Feinstein. Ridiculous. Why did he introduce the GOP side prosecutor in so much detail now and say he would introduce Dr. Ford later. He did not even bother to welcome Dr. Ford, smile or anything. He is such a scum!

He apologized to her. Miss that?

[Anonymous]

Grassley - ugh. He is exactly what needs to go. Vote them out. He tried to discredit Ford in his remarks, then called for "fair and respectful"proceedings. Disgusting. Typical hypocritical whiny old rich white man.

Can't pronounce "Ramirez", that's one of them weird foreign names.

VOTE THEM OUT!