Gun store opening next door to Franklin Sherman Elementary in Mclean

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sickening at the thought that the politicians are now vowing to make the business move. Given that there are no legal paths to make the business move, the only other incentive is financial. It would pain me greatly if tax payer money was spent to entice the business to move. That's wasteful spending and helps no one.

In fact, what's to prevent another gun shop to negotiate a lease in McLean and wait to be bought out?

The politicians are doing what they were elected to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I live in McLean and am a veteran.

I took an oath to defend the Constitution, as do law enforcement and (believe it or not) politicians. I believe in it deeply.

It's much harder to listen to the anti-gun loons than the responsible gun owners in this thread, but that's OK.

They can exercise that right, but they can't use it to harm other rights. Expect a lot of push-back if they try to deny others.

I would invite anyone who really wants to see the tenor of this debate to visit Fairfax Underground and read the hateful threads written towards those who oppose the location of this gun store near an elementary school in McLean.

They come across as bullying, hateful fascists. They have posted many personal details and pictures about those who have exercised their freedom of speech in favor of the store's relocation, and have engaged in the worst, misogynist rhetoric you can possibly imagine (bitch, cunt, whore, slut, etc.)

As a whole, this community does NOT want a gun store a few hundred feet from an elementary school, and we will exercise every political weapon at our disposal to see that it is shut down and relocated.

So, yes,

that is typical of the NRA and other pro-gun supporters.

They do not care about other people, only their incorrectly interpreted rights to arm a militia. A flame thrower, yes, it is our right. A machine gun, yes it is our right. The founders that had muskets had the foresight to legislate that all weapons should be legal and available to arm militias.

Their lunatic leader is against background checks, you see the felons and mentally ill deserve handguns too!!!



The halting testimony of former Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, gravely injured in a mass shooting two years ago, may have provided the most gripping moments of the Senate's first gun control hearing this session.

But the star witness on Capitol Hill on Wednesday was Wayne LaPierre, the National Rifle Association's top lobbyist.

LaPierre, who has spent 35 years with the NRA, sparred with congressional opponents pushing for new gun control measures, and warned darkly that enacting a universal background check on all weapons purchases would be
a "nightmare" come to life for law-abiding gun owners.

http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2013/01/30/170679024/lapierre-fights-to-stop-the-nightmare-of-background-checks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sickening at the thought that the politicians are now vowing to make the business move. Given that there are no legal paths to make the business move, the only other incentive is financial. It would pain me greatly if tax payer money was spent to entice the business to move. That's wasteful spending and helps no one.

In fact, what's to prevent another gun shop to negotiate a lease in McLean and wait to be bought out?

IF the gun shop owner decides to move (and I hope he doesn't), he should give up the space to someone who will turn it into a day laborer center. Certainly this would be endorsed by Foust, McAuliffe, Strauss, etc?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sickening at the thought that the politicians are now vowing to make the business move. Given that there are no legal paths to make the business move, the only other incentive is financial. It would pain me greatly if tax payer money was spent to entice the business to move. That's wasteful spending and helps no one.

In fact, what's to prevent another gun shop to negotiate a lease in McLean and wait to be bought out?

IF the gun shop owner decides to move (and I hope he doesn't), he should give up the space to someone who will turn it into a day laborer center. Certainly this would be endorsed by Foust, McAuliffe, Strauss, etc?

Such a center is the most brilliant idea yet, on this entire thread. Location is ideal. Moms of McLean can bake the cookies. Where do I sign up?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sickening at the thought that the politicians are now vowing to make the business move. Given that there are no legal paths to make the business move, the only other incentive is financial. It would pain me greatly if tax payer money was spent to entice the business to move. That's wasteful spending and helps no one.

In fact, what's to prevent another gun shop to negotiate a lease in McLean and wait to be bought out?

IF the gun shop owner decides to move (and I hope he doesn't), he should give up the space to someone who will turn it into a day laborer center. Certainly this would be endorsed by Foust, McAuliffe, Strauss, etc?

Always fun to watch people jump the shark and start babbling incoherently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sickening at the thought that the politicians are now vowing to make the business move. Given that there are no legal paths to make the business move, the only other incentive is financial. It would pain me greatly if tax payer money was spent to entice the business to move. That's wasteful spending and helps no one.

In fact, what's to prevent another gun shop to negotiate a lease in McLean and wait to be bought out?

IF the gun shop owner decides to move (and I hope he doesn't), he should give up the space to someone who will turn it into a day laborer center. Certainly this would be endorsed by Foust, McAuliffe, Strauss, etc?

Always fun to watch people jump the shark and start babbling incoherently.

Where's your suggestion?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sickening at the thought that the politicians are now vowing to make the business move. Given that there are no legal paths to make the business move, the only other incentive is financial. It would pain me greatly if tax payer money was spent to entice the business to move. That's wasteful spending and helps no one.

In fact, what's to prevent another gun shop to negotiate a lease in McLean and wait to be bought out?

IF the gun shop owner decides to move (and I hope he doesn't), he should give up the space to someone who will turn it into a day laborer center. Certainly this would be endorsed by Foust, McAuliffe, Strauss, etc?

Always fun to watch people jump the shark and start babbling incoherently.

Sorry you don't like my idea, Vicky, but your nine bathrooms aren't going to build themselves, you know!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sickening at the thought that the politicians are now vowing to make the business move. Given that there are no legal paths to make the business move, the only other incentive is financial. It would pain me greatly if tax payer money was spent to entice the business to move. That's wasteful spending and helps no one.

In fact, what's to prevent another gun shop to negotiate a lease in McLean and wait to be bought out?

IF the gun shop owner decides to move (and I hope he doesn't), he should give up the space to someone who will turn it into a day laborer center. Certainly this would be endorsed by Foust, McAuliffe, Strauss, etc?

Always fun to watch people jump the shark and start babbling incoherently.

Sorry you don't like my idea, Vicky, but your nine bathrooms aren't going to build themselves, you know!

Lol! This is getting fun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sickening at the thought that the politicians are now vowing to make the business move. Given that there are no legal paths to make the business move, the only other incentive is financial. It would pain me greatly if tax payer money was spent to entice the business to move. That's wasteful spending and helps no one.

In fact, what's to prevent another gun shop to negotiate a lease in McLean and wait to be bought out?

IF the gun shop owner decides to move (and I hope he doesn't), he should give up the space to someone who will turn it into a day laborer center. Certainly this would be endorsed by Foust, McAuliffe, Strauss, etc?

Always fun to watch people jump the shark and start babbling incoherently.

Sorry you don't like my idea, Vicky, but your nine bathrooms aren't going to build themselves, you know!

Lol! This is getting fun.

it is. the percentage of paranoid losers is rapidly decreasing.

The share of American households with guns has declined over the past four decades, a national survey shows, with some of the most surprising drops in the South and the Western mountain states, where guns are deeply embedded in the culture.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/10/us/rate-of-gun-ownership-is-down-survey-shows.html?_r=0

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sickening at the thought that the politicians are now vowing to make the business move. Given that there are no legal paths to make the business move, the only other incentive is financial. It would pain me greatly if tax payer money was spent to entice the business to move. That's wasteful spending and helps no one.

In fact, what's to prevent another gun shop to negotiate a lease in McLean and wait to be bought out?

IF the gun shop owner decides to move (and I hope he doesn't), he should give up the space to someone who will turn it into a day laborer center. Certainly this would be endorsed by Foust, McAuliffe, Strauss, etc?

Always fun to watch people jump the shark and start babbling incoherently.

Sorry you don't like my idea, Vicky, but your nine bathrooms aren't going to build themselves, you know!

The petition has about 1400 signatures now.

Should we call everyone supporting the gun merchant "Rachel" just because the store's bookkeeper started her own petition?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sickening at the thought that the politicians are now vowing to make the business move. Given that there are no legal paths to make the business move, the only other incentive is financial. It would pain me greatly if tax payer money was spent to entice the business to move. That's wasteful spending and helps no one.

In fact, what's to prevent another gun shop to negotiate a lease in McLean and wait to be bought out?

IF the gun shop owner decides to move (and I hope he doesn't), he should give up the space to someone who will turn it into a day laborer center. Certainly this would be endorsed by Foust, McAuliffe, Strauss, etc?

Always fun to watch people jump the shark and start babbling incoherently.

Sorry you don't like my idea, Vicky, but your nine bathrooms aren't going to build themselves, you know!

The petition has about 1400 signatures now.

Should we call everyone supporting the gun merchant "Rachel" just because the store's bookkeeper started her own petition?

Different poster here, but I think admin will probably allow you to call people (almost) anything you like. Just my observation that Vicky sticks out like a sore thumb. Her hate is vile. No one else comes close.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sickening at the thought that the politicians are now vowing to make the business move. Given that there are no legal paths to make the business move, the only other incentive is financial. It would pain me greatly if tax payer money was spent to entice the business to move. That's wasteful spending and helps no one.

In fact, what's to prevent another gun shop to negotiate a lease in McLean and wait to be bought out?

IF the gun shop owner decides to move (and I hope he doesn't), he should give up the space to someone who will turn it into a day laborer center. Certainly this would be endorsed by Foust, McAuliffe, Strauss, etc?

This would concern me a lot more than some dude buying .22 ammunition for his range pistol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sickening at the thought that the politicians are now vowing to make the business move. Given that there are no legal paths to make the business move, the only other incentive is financial. It would pain me greatly if tax payer money was spent to entice the business to move. That's wasteful spending and helps no one.

In fact, what's to prevent another gun shop to negotiate a lease in McLean and wait to be bought out?

IF the gun shop owner decides to move (and I hope he doesn't), he should give up the space to someone who will turn it into a day laborer center. Certainly this would be endorsed by Foust, McAuliffe, Strauss, etc?

Always fun to watch people jump the shark and start babbling incoherently.

Sorry you don't like my idea, Vicky, but your nine bathrooms aren't going to build themselves, you know!

Lol! This is getting fun.

it is. the percentage of paranoid losers is rapidly decreasing.

The share of American households with guns has declined over the past four decades, a national survey shows, with some of the most surprising drops in the South and the Western mountain states, where guns are deeply embedded in the culture.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/10/us/rate-of-gun-ownership-is-down-survey-shows.html?_r=0

Those statistics undermine your "paranoid loser" hypothesis, you know. Gun ownership is declining because hunting as a sport is declining. Gun owners aren't the paranoid losers that you portray. They are hunters and hobbyists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sickening at the thought that the politicians are now vowing to make the business move. Given that there are no legal paths to make the business move, the only other incentive is financial. It would pain me greatly if tax payer money was spent to entice the business to move. That's wasteful spending and helps no one.

In fact, what's to prevent another gun shop to negotiate a lease in McLean and wait to be bought out?

IF the gun shop owner decides to move (and I hope he doesn't), he should give up the space to someone who will turn it into a day laborer center. Certainly this would be endorsed by Foust, McAuliffe, Strauss, etc?

This would concern me a lot more than some dude buying .22 ammunition for his range pistol.

We could offer ESOL instruction at FS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sickening at the thought that the politicians are now vowing to make the business move. Given that there are no legal paths to make the business move, the only other incentive is financial. It would pain me greatly if tax payer money was spent to entice the business to move. That's wasteful spending and helps no one.

In fact, what's to prevent another gun shop to negotiate a lease in McLean and wait to be bought out?

IF the gun shop owner decides to move (and I hope he doesn't), he should give up the space to someone who will turn it into a day laborer center. Certainly this would be endorsed by Foust, McAuliffe, Strauss, etc?

Always fun to watch people jump the shark and start babbling incoherently.

Sorry you don't like my idea, Vicky, but your nine bathrooms aren't going to build themselves, you know!

The petition has about 1400 signatures now.

Should we call everyone supporting the gun merchant "Rachel" just because the store's bookkeeper started her own petition?

Different poster here, but I think admin will probably allow you to call people (almost) anything you like. Just my observation that Vicky sticks out like a sore thumb. Her hate is vile. No one else comes close.

I have no idea what you are talking about or which posts you are referring to, but you're living up to the "paranoid loser" label with lines like "her hate is vile." She's literally like one of hundreds of parents in the area who don't want a gun store near a school. Why do you find her so threatening?