That’s immunity against reinfection, not immunity that protects against severe illness, which is much more durable. But the main point is that this immunity is widespread. It’s not like it’s going to get significantly better. This is what the post-covid world looks like with widespread immunity. |
The likehoid of severe infection with the new variant is small anyway. I care about infection we do not have immunity. |
You are confusing opinions, slurs, and expressing feelings with factual and logical errors, so I'm not sure what your point is. What I will say is that the quantity, frequency, and overall outrageous factual and logical errors made by the non-masking crowd are really over the top. The question you should be asking is why MCPS changed their reporting methods twice (in January / February). Anyone hiding their data is hiding information from the parents and public-at-large. This is how I know I should not be taking you seriously. Where is the data that MCPS was the primary source of the January Covid numbers? MCPS withheld reporting daily infections, choosing to only report a multi-day window and only a daily infection count on the following day only, making the analysis difficult. However, by tracking the January daily numbers it was clear that by subtracting the counts from the Montgomery County reported numbers that the county rise appears to have coincided with a prior increase at MCPS (MCPS was the leading edge, followed by an increase in overall county numbers to by subtracting out the MCPS numbers you get the approximate adult infection rates). The trend was that (a) families spread at Thanksgiving and December (adults seemed to surge prior than MCPS), (b) in Jan the trend seemed to reverse as kids brought it to school and other infected kids brought it home to infect other adult family members (MCPS numbers appeared to lead county increases mid-to-late Jan). Another way to look at it is if children are unmasked sitting in a school cafeteria in the middle of Winter with infected children, for example, why would you think that environment is safe and it is not possible to spread infections? That doesn't even hold water and was already disproven by the panic call to the national guard, so the only question is - what will happen this year? |
??? Your post is a mess. You are literally making analysis up. That’s not how it works. Did you even look at MoCo’s data during this time period? It’s still available on Google. |
Ok, but the implication of that is Covid measures/policies forever. Covid is unlikely to evolve to become less contagious, and you juar admitted the likelihood of severe illness is already low. It's not going to get better than this. People might stop testing, but Covid isn't going to go away. |
Might? They already have. |
There’s still a lot of testing going on. It will certainly drop much lower. |
It looks like the CDC’s latest guidance says you don’t even have to test if you are boosted and exposed as long as you aren’t symptomatic. I look forward to September when my students and colleagues all have “allergies”. |
But listen to yourself. If it presents as allergies, who gives a f*%k? |
Why would you test if you don't have any symptoms? |
Might present as allergies in Bob, but give Brian a week of asthmatic misery. |
If you knew you were exposed, why not test? |
Cause it's contagious even without symptoms. You knew here? |
Because I’m not sick. Sure, if you’re sick test but testing when there are absolutely no symptoms is ridiculous. |
Why, though? By the time I’d test positive I’d already be halfway through the most contagious period of the virus. So given that it is completely ridiculous to suggest that people quarantine until they get past the incubation period and test, what’s the point in testing? |