Seriously with the book banning ?

[Anonymous]

Book banning always makes many many more people buy and read the book. I for one would not have seen this book without it.

Adorable little book.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1Ag3ZuMyIk&t=8s

Check out the banned "Everywhere Babies" book!!! Finding the objectionable part is like a "where's Waldo?" activity.

Ok. I just tried to find it. What is the issue?

There's a picture where it maybe looks like two guys are together romantically. Remember when we were told it "wasn't a don't say gay bill" and that it only banned "sexual content." Remember what people told you that, because they lied to you.

+1
Anyone who is supporting DeSantis over Disney (and I hate Disney culture with a fiery passion) is a fascist, a homophobic fascist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I’d really be interested in seeing what it is that Florida is calling “CRT” in a math book. Really. Maybe Kobe ended up with more apples than Kristie? /s

It does stand out that examples and titles aren’t listed — so their judgments can’t be assessed at all, let alone assessed accurately.
So “CRT” now means whatever these Republican politicians want it to mean, and they’re using their personal standards to impact the education of millions of students with no explicit standards or opportunities for assessment. This is America folks.


https://www.newsweek.com/florida-rejects-dozens-math-textbooks-over-alleged-references-crt-1698433

Yes, I’m shocked, SHOCKED that the Florida Department of Education did not provide examples.

They have now.

https://www.fldoe.org/academics/standards/instructional-materials/

I have less of an issue with the materials on any racial/political grounds than I do with the use of non-zero-based y-axis in the charts, that's terrible data viz 101 and makes the charts quite misleading. There are some cases where non-zero-based is fine and can be made quite clear, but this is basically a direct example of what not to do.

And clearly that was intentional, to exaggerate the differences in the groups beyond the reality. I don’t blame them for rejecting a textbook using that example.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1Ag3ZuMyIk&t=8s

Check out the banned "Everywhere Babies" book!!! Finding the objectionable part is like a "where's Waldo?" activity.

Ok. I just tried to find it. What is the issue?

There's a picture where it maybe looks like two guys are together romantically. Remember when we were told it "wasn't a don't say gay bill" and that it only banned "sexual content." Remember what people told you that, because they lied to you.

+1
Anyone who is supporting DeSantis over Disney (and I hate Disney culture with a fiery passion) is a fascist, a homophobic fascist.

I don’t support DeSantis over Disney. However I do think that there is a difference between telling a 6 year old about gay people vs. telling them that they can choose to be a boy or a girl or both or neither.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this is what my spouse shared with me, but please get the full story before you comment. I do know one of these books available to 13 year olds shows an explicit drawing of someone giving a blow job. I’m no prude and I think we should exercise extreme caution censoring books, but I don’t want my kid reading that. And no, my kid also doesn’t have unfettered access to the internet.

Oh just stop.

Liar and by the way you don't get to tell others what books they should read!
I am so tired of people like you. Screams "my freedoms" then bans books.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1Ag3ZuMyIk&t=8s

Check out the banned "Everywhere Babies" book!!! Finding the objectionable part is like a "where's Waldo?" activity.

Ok. I just tried to find it. What is the issue?

There's a picture where it maybe looks like two guys are together romantically. Remember when we were told it "wasn't a don't say gay bill" and that it only banned "sexual content." Remember what people told you that, because they lied to you.

+1
Anyone who is supporting DeSantis over Disney (and I hate Disney culture with a fiery passion) is a fascist, a homophobic fascist.

I don’t support DeSantis over Disney. However I do think that there is a difference between telling a 6 year old about gay people vs. telling them that they can choose to be a boy or a girl or both or neither.

Let me make this very clear. If you think DeSantis banned books bec they had anything in them at all you are an idiot and you don't get to ban books in the US full stop. Learn to read because DeSantis only bought books from the Carlyle group funneling monies to Youngkin's cronies. Next time you post do your homework. None of this has to do with actual caring about what kids are learning.

No one is "grooming" children from any banned books that is 100% false!

[Anonymous]

Seriously with the book banning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seriously with the book banning.

It’S jUsT sChOoL lIbRaRiEs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1Ag3ZuMyIk&t=8s

Check out the banned "Everywhere Babies" book!!! Finding the objectionable part is like a "where's Waldo?" activity.

Ok. I just tried to find it. What is the issue?

There's a picture where it maybe looks like two guys are together romantically. Remember when we were told it "wasn't a don't say gay bill" and that it only banned "sexual content." Remember what people told you that, because they lied to you.

+1
Anyone who is supporting DeSantis over Disney (and I hate Disney culture with a fiery passion) is a fascist, a homophobic fascist.

I don’t support DeSantis over Disney. However I do think that there is a difference between telling a 6 year old about gay people vs. telling them that they can choose to be a boy or a girl or both or neither.

I never told my kids the latter specifically (I do tell them there is no such thing as girl colors, boy colors, etc.) but seriously, what is so threatening about it when you really think about it?

We lock people into rigid notions -- boys wear this, girls wear that, boys have their hair like this, girls have their hair like that, girls paint their nails and wear jewelry, boys do not -- and when it comes down to it, they're just societal choices. Go to a different society and you'll find different notions of what is male and what is female.

I know this makes people feel uncomfortable. But there is nothing "natural" about women wearing dresses and men wearing pants. It's all societal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1Ag3ZuMyIk&t=8s

Check out the banned "Everywhere Babies" book!!! Finding the objectionable part is like a "where's Waldo?" activity.

Ok. I just tried to find it. What is the issue?

There's a picture where it maybe looks like two guys are together romantically. Remember when we were told it "wasn't a don't say gay bill" and that it only banned "sexual content." Remember what people told you that, because they lied to you.

+1
Anyone who is supporting DeSantis over Disney (and I hate Disney culture with a fiery passion) is a fascist, a homophobic fascist.

I don’t support DeSantis over Disney. However I do think that there is a difference between telling a 6 year old about gay people vs. telling them that they can choose to be a boy or a girl or both or neither.

No one teaches that. Trans people very much DON'T think they can choose to be a boy or a girl. If they could choose most of them would choose to be their birth gender because it sucks a lot less than being trans.

[Anonymous]

I’m opposed to the book bans. They are the analog version of online censorship.

[Anonymous]

It's crazy that we are so eager to surround kids with guns and instruments of murder and violence yet want to keep guns away from them. At least now we know who the REAL "child groomers" are.

[Anonymous]

^ want to keep books away from them

[Anonymous]

Seriously with the book banning.