Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
You think painting their faces and bodies black is ok? I have some bad news for you, bud. |
|
Believe your eyes. Look at page 1.
Nothing changed-except that a spoiled and nasty kid learned he could act badly and be babied for it after the fact. |
It's not OK. But we're dealing with a private institution that's not funded by tax money and obviously supported by wealthy "people of faith." So unless you go all 21 Jump Street on Covington, how will you fight against the school's claim that this was a non-racist tradition? This is no different from the anger at Pence's wife b/c she accepted a position teaching art at a Christian school that's anti-LGBT. If people are willing to find other "like-minded" individuals in an effort to create a group, you can't stop them unless they're out murdering people. You are all trying to fight against people who are comfortable in their niche. They have each other. They have money to support and insulate themselves. What you're trying to fight is a way of life that's been around since the beginning of "civilized" time. In this case, they have money and God on their side. |
The entire original narrative was a fabricated lie. Based on the facts that are co.ing out, along with Phillips behavior since, he created this moment to get to the Catholic church. Shame on him for ruining these kids lives. |
It was an excellent article. Far more balanced than I expected from the NYT. |
There's black face and there's black face. I fail to see the difference.
|
Do they still do that “tradition”? Times change. People are becoming more respectful of others. And fewer people are religious. These dinosaurs’ dats are numbered. |
What lie? The kids were acting like douches. |
There is so much underlying prejudice and bias in your post that I don't know where to begin. The black bigots are "crazy"? They're disgusting is what they are. Antisemties and anti-white lowlifes. But sure, let's complain about some white kids who took off their shirts. And the immature, jail-breaking Native American guy? His behavior was meant to antagonize and incite, also. But sure, let's complain about some white kid who smirked. And about poor judgment running deep in "there" (sic) roots? What is that? A slur against Southern whites? But you just inadvertently added anither element as to why libs have gone batshit crazy over this situation. It's not just that the boys are white....or affluent....or male....or Christian. They are also from the South, which libs also hate. You leftists are too deluded to see it, but this entire thread shows the problem with the new form of extreme liberalism. They make judgments based on skin color, and if yours is "wrong," (white), you'll be blamed regardless. Ironic for people who call others racist. |
This post is from page 1. We now know that it was the Native American who moved into the boy’s personal space, deliberately standing close to him. Is the viewpoint the same? Should we consider it intolerance and harassment? Should there be consequences? |
I don't know if this practice still exists. But neither I don't trust news "sources" to provide me with an accurate answer. They (right and left sources) are manipulating us - all in the name of the Almighty Dollar. |
OMG. The derangement keeps getting worse and worse with you libs. He learned he would be babied for being a spoiled and nasty kid? NO. He learned that lefties despise white boys, especially affluent ones who do not agree with their pro-choice stance, and thus if black racists start calling you cracker or a Native American starts drumming in your face, you better not dare smirk. Otherwise, libs will be calling to have you expelled from school, they'll phone in bomb threats to your school, and they'll talk about dropping your white a$$ into the wood chipper. |
The kids did not act like douches. Given the circumstances, they showed incredible reserve, particularly the main kid. If they had not been wearing MAGA hats, every liberal on DCUM and twitter would be applauding them for trying to drown out the racists shouting about sodomy and calling them f*ggots. |
|
Best and most fair article I've read yet describing what happened:
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/01/media-must-learn-covington-catholic-story/581035/ |
Fewer people are religious? Is that a good thing? Oh, I forgot.....libs also hate religious people. But how much religious observance is "too much" according to liberals? I don't eat pork or shellfish. Is that acceptable to you? I also fast on Yom Kippur. Is that OK? I don't eat grain products during Passover? Am I overdoing it? Please tell me. I know the "tolerant" liberals have a very defined notion of how one should beleive and act, and it's hard to keep up with the parameters they set. |