I'm from Northern California. Plenty of people take babies for hikes in August here. The never-hike-with-babies people are outright crazy.
Now, this particular hike, probably not. But hiking in general? Of course. |
So did the family actually hike the 8 mile loop, or did they retract that? |
No one in their right mind would take a baby and dog for that long hike in that weather. Both baby and dog were at risk from minute one. The father is no youngster either. |
Hiking like 2 miles, sure. 8 miles over terrain that isn't mostly flat, though? Especially in 90 plus degree heat? I guess if you are really hard core ... probably depends on the kids too. My first hated any kind of carrier even as an infant and that pretty much nixed hiking until he was about 2, and anything more serious than a stroll around a wooded lake until he was 4 or 5. |
I have to agree. We are 4 mile easy/moderate hikers, but even our elementary kids know that even the cleanest looking water can be dangerous to drink. I’m with the heat stroke group. |
Africa? https://www.infoplease.com/world/health-statistics/infant-mortality-rates-countries |
2 miles is a family stroll not a hike. The article specifically mentions 2+ hours of exposure. I mean sure, you can load up the carrier and Instagram it and call it a hike. |
California has so many microclimates. I would take a baby for a hike in Marin any time, but inland in August mid-day? Nope. |
Sure, there are literally micro pockets in NorCal which don’t get above 80 in August; but for almost the entire rest of the country, the rule would apply. |
LOL. Guess you don’t get out much. |
You are nuts. |
I’m talking about infants in summertime heat. We hike as a family with preschoolers all the time, both coasts. I just know that if you are at all concerned about an adults hydration on a hike (make sure you bring water), it’s already too strenuous for an infant. |
Baby was a toddler, not an infant… |
My understanding is the toxicity is not filtered out with standard hiking water filters that hikers use. If that's true, this is a reasonable hypothesis. By itself its unlikely toxic algae would kill a healthy adult, but if it sickened them, that could have made them susceptible to other factors. |
They initially thought that based on footprints. They haven't retracted the statement but also don't seem to be promoting it. |