ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone is organizing all this to exploit people for political gain:

This is a RWNJ account in “moderate viewpoint” clothing. TF outta here, thanks for trying.

I am guessing the Associates Degree brain trust in comms at the WH is spending all of their time trying to create confusion about Renee Good’s murder. It won’t work. Tell your bosses, PP!

This.
She’s too made up and looks too warm to have been outside at a protest.

She's retweeting some really vile stuff about Goode's partner

https://x.com/amandatalks__

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And before you say dropping the cell phone proves he was hit by the car, let me ask you this because I don’t actually know. Do you need one hand to shoot a gun or two? I think he dropped the cell phone so he could put both hands on his gun. Was there a point where he had a cell phone in one hand and a gun in the other? Fearing for his life as he said? Because that really doesn’t sound like legitimate law enforcement to me.

It is absolutely not legitimate law enforcement to shoot into the driver side window (let alone twice). He also put his partner at risk in doing so. This video is terrible for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The white house also posted it. Terrible judgment. My guess is all the people here haven't actually watched it; they're just saying it's justified because Vance and Trump claim the video say it's justified. horrible horrible judgment on their part. Makes Ross look worse

Keep telling yourself that. Every single person that sees this sees the truth. She tried to kill him.

Anyway it doesn't matter. There is no world where a dyke beats a straight white male LEO. None. Deal with it.

Can you point out where she tried to kill him? Aside, that talking point died out 75 pages ago. I think we're onto "he feared for his life" for some reason.

We are there because that is the legal standard for when the use of lethal force is justified. When a reasonable person under the circumstances would be in fear for his life.

There is no reasonable person who would fear for their life with respect to a car pulling out to the right.

His family has come out in his defense claiming he is a “committed Christian”, which pretty much confirms he is an unstable nutjob with a criminal mindset.

True Christians don’t need to tell the world they are Christians, they show it by their actions. And Thou.Shall.Not.Kill.

You just exposed yourself as NOT a Christian.

The commandment is: “Though Shall Not Murder.” Very different.

You are wrong PP. if it were broadly “kill” (it’s not), then none of us could ever serve in the military, public safety, etc.

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Exodus-20-13/

"Thou shalt not kill."

No one believes your kooky Bible written by some carnival barker preacher-grifter in 1983.

“Thou shalt not kill” is even more straightforward. It doesn’t matter what the officer’s precious feelings were. He shouldn’t have killed her. End of story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The video proves that the ICE agent was struck by the victim’s vehicle. IMO, his actions were lawful. The disrespect the wife showed the agents and the victim’s refusal to follow orders may have led him to believe that the victim was trying to kill him when she stuck him with her vehicle. I don’t think she was trying to kill him, but she did hit him while driving away, and a reasonable officer could have feared for his life in the situation. This wasn’t some innocent mom, as posters are trying to portray her as. She and her wife were agitators who stalked, obstructed and then committed violence against federal agents.

+1. Also, wasn't this new video from his body cam, rather than a cell phone? So he wasn't holding the recording device in his hand.

[Anonymous]

The video proves that the ICE agent was struck by the victim’s vehicle.

Explain this to me like I’m five, please. How can you keep filming and shoot your gun while being hit by a car?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The video proves that the ICE agent was struck by the victim’s vehicle. IMO, his actions were lawful. The disrespect the wife showed the agents and the victim’s refusal to follow orders may have led him to believe that the victim was trying to kill him when she stuck him with her vehicle. I don’t think she was trying to kill him, but she did hit him while driving away, and a reasonable officer could have feared for his life in the situation. This wasn’t some innocent mom, as posters are trying to portray her as. She and her wife were agitators who stalked, obstructed and then committed violence against federal agents.

There’s no evidence she stalked or obstructed anyone. And refusal to follow orders does not justify deadly force.

She obstructed the agents by parking her car in the middle of the road, aiming to disrupt a federal law enforcement operation.

The wife admitted to the officers that they follow the agents around. That’s stalking.

They were very unpleasant individuals who believed they had the right to disrupt law enforcement operations.

And yet she was waving the cars by as she was attempting to pull out. One ICE vehicle managed to get by. Imagine that. Your narrative has failed, and you should be moving onto your next set of talking points defending this murder.

[Anonymous]

Correction, he didn’t drop his cell phone. It just stopped filming steadily. So he kept one cell phone in his hand and fired three shots with his other all well-being. “run over “by the car? In fear for his life? And then didn’t even fall to the ground, but sauntered away unscathed and drove away.

Incredible what some people will believe

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The video proves that the ICE agent was struck by the victim’s vehicle. IMO, his actions were lawful. The disrespect the wife showed the agents and the victim’s refusal to follow orders may have led him to believe that the victim was trying to kill him when she stuck him with her vehicle. I don’t think she was trying to kill him, but she did hit him while driving away, and a reasonable officer could have feared for his life in the situation. This wasn’t some innocent mom, as posters are trying to portray her as. She and her wife were agitators who stalked, obstructed and then committed violence against federal agents.

There’s no evidence she stalked or obstructed anyone. And refusal to follow orders does not justify deadly force.

She obstructed the agents by parking her car in the middle of the road, aiming to disrupt a federal law enforcement operation.

The wife admitted to the officers that they follow the agents around. That’s stalking.

They were very unpleasant individuals who believed they had the right to disrupt law enforcement operations.

False.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The video proves that the ICE agent was struck by the victim’s vehicle. IMO, his actions were lawful. The disrespect the wife showed the agents and the victim’s refusal to follow orders may have led him to believe that the victim was trying to kill him when she stuck him with her vehicle. I don’t think she was trying to kill him, but she did hit him while driving away, and a reasonable officer could have feared for his life in the situation. This wasn’t some innocent mom, as posters are trying to portray her as. She and her wife were agitators who stalked, obstructed and then committed violence against federal agents.

+1. Also, wasn't this new video from his body cam, rather than a cell phone? So he wasn't holding the recording device in his hand.

This is not bodycam video, this is cellphone video. Bodycam video is labeled as such (usually Axon) on the screen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NEWS: The Hennepin County Attorney investigating the ICE agent who shot Renee Nicole Good confirms he does not have "complete immunity."

Ruh roh!! Oh dear. What will Jonathan E Ross, murderer, do to cope this weekend? Research extradition laws in the Philippines?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The video proves that the ICE agent was struck by the victim’s vehicle.

Explain this to me like I’m five, please. How can you keep filming and shoot your gun while being hit by a car?

You cannot. It's an absurd take. He walked toward her vehicle to get off the shot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The video proves that the ICE agent was struck by the victim’s vehicle. IMO, his actions were lawful. The disrespect the wife showed the agents and the victim’s refusal to follow orders may have led him to believe that the victim was trying to kill him when she stuck him with her vehicle. I don’t think she was trying to kill him, but she did hit him while driving away, and a reasonable officer could have feared for his life in the situation. This wasn’t some innocent mom, as posters are trying to portray her as. She and her wife were agitators who stalked, obstructed and then committed violence against federal agents.

+1. Also, wasn't this new video from his body cam, rather than a cell phone? So he wasn't holding the recording device in his hand.

It was his cell phone video. Trump even posted it on X.

People on Reddit are suggesting that it was uploaded to the cloud and people have found it that way, not that Ross has deliberately released it, but who really knows?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The video proves that the ICE agent was struck by the victim’s vehicle. IMO, his actions were lawful. The disrespect the wife showed the agents and the victim’s refusal to follow orders may have led him to believe that the victim was trying to kill him when she stuck him with her vehicle. I don’t think she was trying to kill him, but she did hit him while driving away, and a reasonable officer could have feared for his life in the situation. This wasn’t some innocent mom, as posters are trying to portray her as. She and her wife were agitators who stalked, obstructed and then committed violence against federal agents.

There’s no evidence she stalked or obstructed anyone. And refusal to follow orders does not justify deadly force.

She obstructed the agents by parking her car in the middle of the road, aiming to disrupt a federal law enforcement operation.

The wife admitted to the officers that they follow the agents around. That’s stalking.

They were very unpleasant individuals who believed they had the right to disrupt law enforcement operations.

Ok, so they can knock a year off his sentence for hurt feelings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The video proves that the ICE agent was struck by the victim’s vehicle. IMO, his actions were lawful. The disrespect the wife showed the agents and the victim’s refusal to follow orders may have led him to believe that the victim was trying to kill him when she stuck him with her vehicle. I don’t think she was trying to kill him, but she did hit him while driving away, and a reasonable officer could have feared for his life in the situation. This wasn’t some innocent mom, as posters are trying to portray her as. She and her wife were agitators who stalked, obstructed and then committed violence against federal agents.

There’s no evidence she stalked or obstructed anyone. And refusal to follow orders does not justify deadly force.

She obstructed the agents by parking her car in the middle of the road, aiming to disrupt a federal law enforcement operation.

The wife admitted to the officers that they follow the agents around. That’s stalking.

They were very unpleasant individuals who believed they had the right to disrupt law enforcement operations.

You don’t know what her intent was for being there and you never will because she’s dead. The road was wide open though, and cars were going around her, which is the opposite of “obstructing” anything. But even if everything you claim is true, the penalty for none of it is death.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The video proves that the ICE agent was struck by the victim’s vehicle. IMO, his actions were lawful. The disrespect the wife showed the agents and the victim’s refusal to follow orders may have led him to believe that the victim was trying to kill him when she stuck him with her vehicle. I don’t think she was trying to kill him, but she did hit him while driving away, and a reasonable officer could have feared for his life in the situation. This wasn’t some innocent mom, as posters are trying to portray her as. She and her wife were agitators who stalked, obstructed and then committed violence against federal agents.

Everything you wrote leads to the opposite conclusion from a legal standpoint. If she hit him, then he shot, he was no longer in danger and the shooting was retaliatory in nature..

What is clear from the video is that at no timein the video did he state anything or exhibit any behavior that indicated he was afraid. To the contrary, he continued to film. And didn't get out of the way, but stood firmly in place putting himself further in danger. Again, from a legal perspective, militating against the conclusion that this was a justifiable use of force.