Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems like Russia my have divided us on gender lines too!

Not quite. I am a woman. And, I have no doubt in Kavanaugh’s innocence.

Really? There's no grey there??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Lol. You have no idea how much he did or didn’t drink. This whole thing is bullshit. He’s qualified and will be confirmed.

can't believe you're a real person

I am and a woman and a Democrat who voted for Hillary. Also a lawyer. This campaign is transparently political and the allegations are drafted to be vague guilt-by-association nonsense with timing that is ridiculously and transparently politically-motivated. It’s a campaign to discredit him based on him being at parties where bad things may have happened. You are a sheep and a part of the brainless mob for believing this stuff.

sorry, don't believe you

LMAO. Go ask Jeff to check my IP. I posted tons in favor of Hillary. Is it really so unbelievable that I can think for my damn self and see that this campaign is vague and baseless. I’m a woman who can think for herself, thank you very much. I read and think critically and can see this latest #metoo campaign for what it is.

This poster asked other posters to ask me to check the poster's IP address. Two posters asked. So I checked and this poster has claimed to be a Hillary supporter in the past. However, the poster also claims to have been impressed by the Jordan Peterson videos and to have "seen the light" as a result. The poster also support the "Walk Away" movement which doesn't really exist.

Jeff, has she only claimed to be a Hillary supporter in the past or her behaviors (original posting supporting Hillary, defending Hillary/praising Hillary on other post) in the past proves she is a Hillary supporter. I can say I am Trump supporter multiple time on posts while questioning all kind of crap policies by his administration here. That would not make me a Trump supporter, rather would make me a fake to buy in Trump supporters trust. Please respond. And thanks for what you do!

I super love that you are so thoroughly floored that I did indeed support Hillary. What is seriously wrong with you that you cannot fathom disagreement in your own party? I don’t know how far back Jeff can look at posts but I posted a LOT on here in favor of Hillary during the campaign.

On another note, I find it incredible that posters turn to Mr. Steele for background on people who post here and he happily obliges. I think it is HIS way of trying to discredit some of the people who post here.

You told them to ask him, and now you're incredulous that they actually did what you suggested? I think it's his way of maintaining the integrity of this forum, so it doesn't become awash in dishonest conspiracies that originated online. Like the walkaway movement.

I’m a DP. I didn’t ask him to do any revealing of anything. As for maintaining the “integrity” of this forum, he does have a “delete” feature available to him. Disclosing information about posters is a bit more manipulative.
And, I understand why you don’t want to believe anything about #WalkAway. Hard to admit that people who used to be Dems are fed up.

I think it's important to reveal the existence of someone posing to be something they're not in order to influence public opinion. That behavior is even more manipulative than calling them out as liars.

I totally accept that people who used to be Dems are fed up, just like people who used to be Republicans are fed up. But lets not pretend that the walkaway movement didn't originate with and get propogated by Russian bots trying create chaos.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
WaPo front page - Jeff Flake to speak soon.

Very balanced speech, although I feel he believes the accusers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:America 2018 where you are guilty based on words and not evidence.

If a women up for confirmation have her career derailed because at Mardi Gras she flashed her boobs in my face?

Let me know if you think her career would be derailed if multiple witnesses came forward to testify that she:
1)Flashed her boobs in your face
2)Wrestled you to the bed and kept you from screaming aloud while grinding you and trying to strip off your clothes
3)Targeted you as a sexual victim by spiking your drink so that you would pass out and a train of people could molest your unconscious body. And did this to others, too.
4)Publicly lied about it and claimed her high school years and those following were pure as the driven snow.

As said, words have convicted him not evidence.

Testimony is evidence.

What i don’t get with people who think this way (“words”, I.e. testimony is not “real evidence”). Soooo - then have an investigation to get your real evidence. Only having a hearing means only having testimony. Not that hard to understand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems like Russia my have divided us on gender lines too!

Not quite. I am a woman. And, I have no doubt in Kavanaugh’s innocence.

That is fine. But the rest of the US does have doubts. There should be a FBI investigation. No supreme court justice should have these accusations out there and still go to vote. He is not owed a vote. He is not owed the position.

[Anonymous]

Imagine if social media existed back then... wow. We'd have a lot more evidence now. I'm afraid for our next generation who have documented every single action and behavior at parties and elsewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So, looking ahead here to the future of Republican Senators who have expressed their opinion today that the latest accusation is another Democrat scam.

Do you think they will face political backlash?

They fear their own base more than anything else. He may still be confirmed.

I think the base has shrunk considerably in the past 24 hours!

Remember that Roy Moore was not elected...

Their base may have shrunk a little bit. But many, many more people who sat home in Nov 16 will be voting.

With an allegation of enabling gang rape? I believe a lot of Republican women will stay home. We'll see.

[Anonymous]

Some are saying that Swetnick graduated from HS in 1980. What was she doing at these HS parties 2 or 3 years later? If that is true, something is fishy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is almost too outrageous to even be believable. It’s like someone said “let’s come up with a shady sexual allegation to make him go away.” And that didn’t work so then they said “let’s try again just to bolster the first one.” Then when that didn’t work they said “screw it, let’s go for broke. Let’s say he’s actually a serial gang rapist.” I mean, this is like every liberal dystopian fantasy come to life

She graduated in a public high school in Gaithersburg in 1980, three years before the judge did. No way she was even in the social circle of the prep boys.

Wow, you have personal knowledge of these people?

It's in her statement. Explain to us how did she join those younger boys' social circle already graduated from a remote public school?

Gaithersburg is totally within the prep world. Moco schools, moco culture.

I knew college kids that showed up to HS parties. ESPECIALLY during the summer/beach week

+1. This is not at al hard for me to believe. When I was a freshman I was at a party where my elementary school babysitter showed up. She sure was surprised to see me. There was not bright line between publics and privates. It's not like it was the greasers and the socs a la The Outsiders.

[Anonymous]

Guy Benson’s tweet. I totally agree:

Guy Benson
?
Verified account

@guypbenson
Following Following @guypbenson
More
Lots of bipartisan, warranted skepticism & caution about the ‘gang rape ring’ accusation.

If it’s true, there should be tons of corroborating accounts, numerous victims & assailants, & ppl should go to prison.

If it’s not, it’s the most despicable political smear I can recall.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Lol. You have no idea how much he did or didn’t drink. This whole thing is bullshit. He’s qualified and will be confirmed.

can't believe you're a real person

I am and a woman and a Democrat who voted for Hillary. Also a lawyer. This campaign is transparently political and the allegations are drafted to be vague guilt-by-association nonsense with timing that is ridiculously and transparently politically-motivated. It’s a campaign to discredit him based on him being at parties where bad things may have happened. You are a sheep and a part of the brainless mob for believing this stuff.

Thank you. I'm a conservative woman who WAS sexually molested, so I know bad things can happen.

Vague guilt-by-associationnonsense is a great way to put this into perspective. If this was going on, I don't understand why this girl would continue to go back into the horror again and again. And not tell anyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So, looking ahead here to the future of Republican Senators who have expressed their opinion today that the latest accusation is another Democrat scam.

Do you think they will face political backlash?

No. I think Democrats will, though, esp. among men. This is mob justice identity politics laid bare. People have had enough.

Do you realize that men are also victims of sexual assault?

Were the altar boys at house parties drinking and partying with drunk priests? Different scenario, friend!


Funny how no one doubted the men who claimed the catholic priests raped them.

So it’s ok to rape people who go to a party and get drunk?

No, moron, it’s not “OK.” It’s a different scenario that raises different and more messy issues of consent and complicity. And it’s particularly a silly issue when the allegations are basically that there were guys at these parties and Kavanaugh, you know, was around somewhere and may have like given some girl a drink and his friend Mark Judge is an alcoholic and an idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems like Russia my have divided us on gender lines too!

Not quite. I am a woman. And, I have no doubt in Kavanaugh’s innocence.

Really? There's no grey there??

Right because women would totally make up these horrific stories and put their families through death threats and jeopardize their careers for a chance to sully some low-T Chevy Chase judge?!?!?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Imagine if social media existed back then... wow. We'd have a lot more evidence now. I'm afraid for our next generation who have documented every single action and behavior at parties and elsewhere.

It is going to be soooooo hard to be a predator and get away with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Imagine if social media existed back then... wow. We'd have a lot more evidence now. I'm afraid for our next generation who have documented every single action and behavior at parties and elsewhere.

You're afraid for them? Oh boo hoo, the bad boys who are spiking the punch might have to answer for their behavior?